IN THE NAME OF GOD. SELECTION OF APPROPRIATE IOL IN CATARACT SURGERY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Toric and Modern IOL Technology
Advertisements

VisTor The new Toric IOL by Hanita Lenses
DR. FAİK ORUCOV İSTANBUL SURGERY HOSPİTAL DEPARTMANT OF CATARACT AND REFRACTİVE SURGERY Accomodative and Multifocal IOL implantations i s t a n b u l c.
“New Options in Anterior Surgery ” Steven B. Siepser, MD January 12, 2009.
Lens Implants – Comparison, Options and Benefits
Dr H. Razmjoo Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Multifocal IOLs
Monovision for Presbyopia Insert name/ Practice name/ Logo here if desired.
PROBLEMS OF APHAKIA & IOL
Goals of Cataract Surgery Provide a Full Range of Vision Minimize Dependence on Glasses Including Reading Glasses and Bifocals Improve Lifestyle Activities.
Diffractive Multifocal IOL Prof. Dr. Daniel H. Scorsetti
Refractive Surgery September 22, 2012 Matthew Carnahan, MD.
Intraocular lens (IOL) Dislocation M.R. Akhlaghi MD.
State-of-the-art Vision Correction
Accommodative IOL’s Dr. H. Razmjoo
The new Akreos MI 60 lens Joel Pynson, MD - Director Design Engineering Bausch & Lomb, Toulouse - France London, September 9th 2006.
Sulcus-Placed Single-Piece Acrylic IOL After Posterior Capsule Tear A.K. Junk, S. R. Wellik Bascom Palmer Eye Institute, Miller School of Medicine, University.
Visual outcome & subjective visual symptoms of the Tecnis ZM900 multifocal intraocular lens in Asian eyes Dr Colin S.H. Tan MBBS, MMed (Ophth), FRCSEd.
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses & Contrast Sensitivity
NEW TRULIGN™ TORIC IOL Surgeon Training
A Prospective, Randomized, Comparative Evaluation of Patients with Contralateral Implantation of Two Aspheric Acrylic Intraocular Lenses R. Cionni, MD.
Ruth Lapid-Gortzak MD PhD 1,2, Jan Willem van der Linden BOpt 2, and Ivanka J. van der Meulen MD 1,2 1 Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Medical Center,
Progressive Multifocal Intraocular Lens G. Rubiolini M.D. Italy Disclosure of finanacial interest Author's research is partially funded.
Phakic IOL. 2 How the eye works Light rays enter the eye through the clear cornea, pupil and lens. These light rays are focused directly onto the retina,
DEPARTMENT OF COUNSELLING
Retrospective Comparison of 3177 Eyes Implanted with Presbyopic IOLs Carlos Buznego MD Elizabeth A. Davis MD, FACS Guy M. Kezirian MD, FACS William B.
Refractive Lens Exchange. 2 How the eye works Light rays enter the eye through the clear cornea, pupil and lens. These light rays are focused directly.
REFRACTIVE ASPECTS OF CATARACT SURGERY. OPTICAL CORRECTIONS AFTER CATARACT EXTRACTION.
Placement of Toric Intraocular Lens and the Long-term Change in the Axis of Corneal Astigmatism after Sutureless Cataract Extraction by Phacoemulsification.
Recent Advances in Intraocular Lenses Jim Schwiegerling, PhD Ophthalmology & Vision Sciences Optical Sciences.
ASCRS/ESCRS Survey on Foldable IOLs Requiring Explantation or Secondary Intervention 2005 Update.
Phacoemulsification in eyes with previous anterior chamber phakic IOL surgery Walton Nosé, MD, PhD 1,2 Adriana dos Santos Forseto, MD 1 Mariana Ávila,
Neeti Parikh, MD Fuxiang Zhang, MD Department of Ophthalmology Henry Ford Hospital A Comparison Of Patient Satisfaction With Modified Monovision Versus.
Outcomes after WIOL – CF accommodative intraocular lens implantation Institute of Vision and Optics University of Crete School of Medicine Heraklion, Crete.
Phacoemulsification some Basic Ideas…
Cataract Surgery. What is a Cataract? A cataract is a clouding of the lens in the eye that affects vision. Most cataracts are related to aging. Cataracts.
EVALUATION OF ANTERIOR CHAMBER SULCUS SUPPORTED INTRAOCULAR LENS BY PROF. HAMED NASER EL- DIN TAHA HAED OF OPHTHALMOLOGY DEPT. SAUDI GERMAN HOSPITAL JEDDAH.
New Concept of Truly ACCOMMODATING IOL
Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.
Outcomes of Transscleral Sulcus Fixation of Intraocular Lenses through a 2.4-mm Incision with an Injector System: 1-Year Follow-Up Akiko Masai, MD, Tomoichiro.
Multifocal Intraocular Lenses Abdullah Al-assiri Mansour Farooqui Abdulrahman Al-Muammar Saudi Ophthalmology Meeting 2009.
AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL. Aspheric IOL AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® 2 AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Aspheric IOL SN6AD3 Add Power: +4 D Spectacle Plane: 3.2 D Range:
بسم اللة الرحمن الرحيم. Limbal relaxing incisions versus penetrating limbal relaxing incisions for the management of astigmatism in cataract surgery Sara.
Johns Hopkins Hospital
Early capsular bag contraction with haptic dislocation following implantation of a flexible hydrophilic acrylic “psuedoaccomodating” IOL Nigel Morlet FRACS.
AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® Apodized Diffractive IOL. What is the AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® IOL? The AcrySof ® ReSTOR ® IOL incorporates an apodized diffractive optic.
Uveitis-Glaucoma-Hyphema Syndrome Constanze Kortuem, Daniela Suesskind, Manfred Zierhut Centre for Ophthalmology University of Tuebingen, Germany.
Comparative Study of the Aspheric Akreos Adapt AO IOL Versus the Spherical Akreos Adapt IOL Maghizh Anandan Martin Leyland.
Comparison of visual function following piggyback implantation of Acrysof ReSTOR intraocular lenses with Tecnis multifocal ZM900 intraocular lenses. Rodrigo.
I have no financial interest in any devices or techniques discussed in this presentation.
Comparison of 2 Models of Aspheric Diffractive Multifocal IOL
Investigation of Multifocal Toric IOLs to Compensate for Corneal Astigmatism and to Provide Near, Intermediate, and Distance Vision José L. Rincón, MD.
Preliminary Results after Cataract Surgery with the Aspheric Acrysof ReSTOR IOL to Correct Presbyopia Meeting of the ASCRS Chicago 8-10 February 2007 R.M.M.A.
Inadvertent Insertion of an Opposite- Side Tecnis ZM900 Multifocal IOL Wilson Takashi Hida, M.D. Celso Takashi Nakano; Jonathan Lake;
9-Month Results after Implantation of a new accommodative IOL that works with one focus Mark Tomalla M.D.* Clinic for Refractive and Ophthalmic Surgery,
Dr. Jason E. Compton O.D. The Right Contact, Inc..
Cataract Lens rEPLACEMENT
OUR EXPERIENCE WITH PRELOADED IOL CT LUCIA 601P(Y)
Intraocular Lenses Doğan Gidon.
Intraocular Lens.
Pablo Artal, Encarna Alcón, Eloy Villegas, Carmen Cánovas, Elena Rubio
Hong A, Boehlke CS, Afshari NA, Kim T Duke University Medical Center
IN THE NAME OF GOD.
Barry A Schechter, MD Florida Eye Microsurgical Institute
Comparison of vision with an accommodating IOL versus a multifocal IOL
INTRAOCULAR LENS IMPLANT System Description and Diagram (task 2)
Intraocular lens (IOL) Dislocation
성모병원 안센터 CHANGES IN ASTIGMATISM RELATIVE TO IOL HAPTIC INSERTION AXIS IN WITH-THE-RULE AND AGAINST-THE-RULE ASTIGMATISM PATIENTS Hyun Seung Kim, M.D.
Visual Outcomes and Satisfaction with Toric IOL Versus Monofocal IOL
Z deformity of an acommodative IOL
Michael Goodman, Alexandra Paul and Andrew Hsu
Presentation transcript:

IN THE NAME OF GOD

SELECTION OF APPROPRIATE IOL IN CATARACT SURGERY

HISTORY The history of the modern intraocular lens (lOL) began in 1949 when Harold Ridley implanted a polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA) I0L following an extracapsular cataract extraction. Although early IOLs were associated with a high rate of complications, including uveitis, glaucoma, and dislocation, more recent improvements in lens design and surgical techniques have greatly reduced the incidence of postoperative problems. I0Ls are now used in 98% of cataract extractions in the United States.

Types of IOLs In the 1990s, most I0Ls were made with PMMA optics and polypropylene or PMMA supporting haptics. Removal of a cataractous lens through incisions as small as 3 mm, have led to the development of foldable I0Ls manufactured from newer materials such as silicone, acrylic,and hydrogels. Although the role of ultraviolet light in contributing to retinal damage is still unclear, ultraviolet filters may be included in I0Ls. Although the role of ultraviolet light in contributing to retinal damage is still unclear, ultraviolet filters may be included in I0Ls.

Larger optics (6mm+) are:  Less centeration dependent  Have fewer dysphotopic symptoms in patients with large pupils or under mydriatic conditions  Lower rates of posterior capsule opacification (PCO)

Haptic size  Haptic size needs to be appropriate for bag fixation without causing posterior capsular folds as these can cause symptoms from scattering of light or PCO.  An appropriate IOL with a larger haptic is required for sulcus fixation.

IOL materials & designs  Hydrophilic IOL have a better uveal biocompatibility (lower inflammatory cell attachment).  Hydrophobic IOL have a better performance in preventing PCO.  Square edge optic has been shown to be an important factor in preventing PCO but increases dysphotopic symptoms.

Two basic lens designs are currently in use,differentiated by the plane in which the lens is placed and the tissue supporting the lens. Anterior Chamber Lenses Anterior Chamber Lenses Posterior Chamber Lenses Iris plane lenses Iris plane lenses attached or sutured to the iris. attached or sutured to the iris.

Techniques of "piggyback" lenses, in which two IOLs are inserted in an eye either at the same time or sequentially. These may be useful in two situations: when the actual postoperative refraction These may be useful in two situations: when the actual postoperative refraction is very different from what was desired and expected and when the required IOL power is higher than what is commercially available.

Minus-power IOLs are available for extreme myopes. Toric IOLs may be useful to partially correct high degrees of astigmatism. Toric IOLs may be useful to partially correct high degrees of astigmatism.

Anterior Chamber Lenses AC IOL may be inserted following intracapsular or extracapsular cataract extraction. A particular problem associated A particular problem associated with the use of rigid anterior chamber lenses is inaccurate estimation of the size of the lens required to traverse the anterior chamber. The lens support elements must rest lightly in the chamber angle without trauma to the angle Such unstable fixation can lead to persistent uveitis, hyphema, iris atrophy, corneal decompensation, and glaucoma (UGH syndrome).

Artisan iris-fixation IOL  Since it is fixated to the mid-peripheral iris, not the angle or sulcus, it has the advantage of being a one-size-fits-all length.  It is 8.5 mm in length with a 5.0 or 6.0 mm PMMA optic.  A 12 o'clock incision will require side port incisions at 10 and 2 o'clock.

Artisan iris-fixation IOL  The "claw“ haptics are fixated to the iris by a process called enclavation.  The long axis is ultimately oriented perpendicular to the axis of the incision.

Artisan iris-fixation IOL

Posterior Chamber Lenses The lens is supported by loops placed either in the capsular bag or in the ciliary sulcus. PC IOL may be used with a torn posterior capsule in front of an intact anterior capsule. It may be used with no remaining capsule by suturing the haptics into the ciliary sulcus with nonabsorbable suture material.

Toric IOL (STAAR)  In Corneal astigmatism of > 1.5 D that is present in 15% to 29% of patients.  FDA-approved, single-piece, plate-haptic, foldable silicone.  The 2.0 D I0L corrects 1.4 D of corneal astigmatism and the 3.5 D I0L corrects 2.3 D.

Patient Selection  1.5 to 3.5 D of regular corneal astigmatism.  Not be appropriate for diabetic patients who require an acrylic IOL optic, such as patients with a history of iritis,or patients who may require silicone oil for retinal detachment repair.

Outcomes  Uncorrected visual acuity of >20/40 in 48% to 84% of patients.  Postoperative astigmatism was <0.50 D in 48% of patients and < 1.00 D in 75% to 81% of patients.

Complications  10° off-axis rotation reduces the correction by approximately 1/3  20° off-axis rotation reduces the correction by 2/3  Off-axis correction of> 30° can actually increase the cylindrical refractive error

Multifocal lOLs Conventional IOLs focus on distance only. Patient want to see with acceptable clarity over a range of distances. This ability may be further augmented if the patient is left with a residual refractive cylinder such as a myopic astigmatism. An alternative approach to this problem is to correct one eye for distance and the other for near vision, so-called monovision.

Depending on the type of multifocal IOL and the viewing situation, both near and far foci may be presented to the eye at one time.

Factors that need particular consideration with multifocal IOLs are: Lens centeration ( intact posterior capsule) Pupil size Accuracy of IOL power calculation Low preoperative and postoperative astigmatism

Array (AMO) multifocal silicone IOL  The optical design is distance-dominant with a functional add power +2.5 D at the corneal plane.  The focusing of the incoming light is divided 50% for distance, 30% for near, and 20% for intermediate.

Array (AMO) multifocal lOL. Note circular zones of correction shown in lens optic.

Patient Selection  Adaptable,relatively easy-going people  Good potential vision  Less than 1.0 D of residual astigmatism.  Pupil should be at least 4.0 mm diameter

Outcomes  4 times more likely to never wear glasses(32% vs 8%).  At 3 months binocular uncorrected distance acuity of 20/40 or better and near acuity of at least J3 in 96% vs 65%.

Side Effects and Complications  More glare (11 % vs 1%)  More haloes (15% vs 6%) (over several months subside)  Some reduction in contrast sensitivity  1% of patients have insisted on exchange for a monofocal lOL.

Accommodating IOLs  Investigations found that during ciliary muscle contraction there was a forward displacement of the IOL.  Two IOLs that use this accommodative approach are the CrystaLens and the Akkommodative ICU.  Regression does not seem to be a problem after more than 2 years of follow- up.

CrystaLens (Eyeonics)  Approved by the FDA for improvement of near, intermediate, and distance vision  Posterior chamber pressure on the back surface of the IOL  Pressure of the ciliary body on the IOL haptics  Forward movement of the entire ciliary body

Flexible hinge in the haptic at the proximal end and a polyamide foot plate at the distal end

CrystaLens (Eyeonics)  1 D of power generated at near  Not indicated for secondary IOL placement  Only 57% of patients could read a newspaper without spectacles  Contrast sensitivity was better than standard posterior chamber IOLs

Akkommodative ICU IOL (HumanOptics AG)  Undergoing clinical trials  Foldable acrylic IOL with four haptics with flexible transition zones  Anterior shift of approximately 0.60 mm  Myopic shift of 1.3 to 1.7 D

Akkommodative ICU

Light-Adjustable IOL LAL (Calhoun Vision)  Three-piece silicone-optic IOL  Silicone matrix has been embedded with silicone subunits called macromers  When the IOL is irradiated with ultraviolet light, the macromers polymerize and are depleted.  Macromers from the nonirradiated part of the IOL optic are in higher concentration and, diffuse toward the area of irradiation, causing the IOL to swell in this region.

Light-Adjustable IOL

 For myopia,irradiation of the I0L periphery  For hyperopia,irradiation of the I0L center  Correction of astigmatism through a toric exposure pattern  Over a 5.0 D range  Once the desired power has been achieved, the I0L optic is diffusely irradiated in a subsequent session within 1 to 2 weeks postoperatively (locking in)

Light-Adjustable IOL  Can be used to induce a reversible monovision state that could be adjusted if the patient failed to adapt to it.  Multifocal patterns can be placed in the IOL optic for specific pupil diameters.  Can Induce a wavefront correction on the IOL that could correct higher-order aberrations.

Aspheric Intraocular Lens Selection Based on Corneal Wavefront Journal of Refractive Surgery Vol. 25 No. 1 January 2009  Corneal topographic spherical aberration Z4,0 was measured at the 6-mm optical zone.  One of three aspheric IOLs was chosen so the arithmetic sum of the corneal spherical aberration and pseudophakic spherical aberration came closest to zero.

RESULTS  Thirty eyes of 18 patients were available for analysis.  The SofPort Advanced Optics (Bausch & Lomb) lens was implanted in 1 eye  The AcrySof IQ (Alcon Laboratories Inc) in 11 eyes  The Tecnis Z9000 or Z9002 (Advanced Medical Optics [AMO]) in 18 eyes

 Total postoperative ocular spherical aberration for the entire population measured –0.013±0.072 µm  SofPort: µm  AcrySof IQ: ±0.053 µm  Tecnis: –0.015±0.052 µm

CONCLUSIONS  They reduced whole eye spherical aberration from a mean preoperative corneal spherical aberration of to a mean postoperative spherical aberration of

Horizon  Thermoplastic acrylic gel that can be customized to any size, shape, or power specified by the physician  Restore accommodation by increasing its surface curvature in response to zonule- induced changes in the lens capsule  Flexible polymers for injection into a nearly intact capsular bag, after extraction of the crystalline lens through a tiny laterally capsulorrhexis

THE END