Testing, Tablets, and Transitions: A View From Maryland June 22, 2013 Dale Cornelius, Project Manager, Online Testing and Science Maryland State Department.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding Student Learning Objectives (S.L.O.s)
Advertisements

Blending Learning Online and Across the School: Practical Strategies for Success Darlene Haught, Director of Extended Programs & Emerging Technologies.
K-5 Instructional Technology Overview Darien Public Schools
Smarter Balanced Assessments SBAC Field Test this spring Field Test will determine cut points for proficiency levels, validity of items Will not be used.
Why has data become so important in education? n Accountability requires school districts to measure effectiveness. n Standards that identify what all.
1:1 and BYO What Works, What Doesn’t ? Instructional Models and Issues Presented by Roger W. Minier, Ph.D
PARCC Tests: An Investment in Learning Test quality and rigor increase; Costs for states generally hold steady July 2013.
Tablet Computers and Standards of Learning Testing: Insights from the Virginia Department of Education Monday, August 12, 2013.
2015 SpEd Assessment Updates TETN Event # Presented June 5, 2013 TEA’s Student Assessment Division.
Canfield Local School District Ohio’s Next Generation Assessments.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
Volume 5, Issue 5 December 20, 2013 NEWSLETTER: January 2014 Graymont Grade School Newsletter Common Core State Standards (The following was taken from.
Ready to Grow… Ready to Learn… Ready to Succeed Kentucky’s Plan for Kindergarten Readiness October 2012.
Envisioning 21 st Century Learning: Results of Speak Up 2007 for School Leaders 13 th Annual CoSN K-12 School Networking Conference March 10, 2008 Julie.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Smarter.
San Mateo County Results from the 2014 SBAC Field Test Survey Deann Walsh Manager, Learning Analytics & Program Evaluation.
SBAC: UPDATE, RESOURCES, BEST PRACTICES OCTOBER 6, 2014.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports Going to Scale in Maryland’s Local School Systems
+ Curriculum & Instruction Technology Terry Duggan, Dir. of Program Development Deb Gammerman, Dir. of Technology & Innovation FY’15 Budget 8/21/
Campus Technology 08 Shootout! Bracing for the Next-Gen Student Wave: Myth or Mandate? Next-Gen Students “Speak Up” – Are we listening? Julie Evans Project.
K-5 Instructional Technology Royle PTO Meeting – 1/15/14 Christina L. Hefele K-12 Technology/Data Coordinator
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
Planning for Secondary Growth DIPBLE nvironments CCRCTEL earning 2014RISDF lexible September 22, 2014.
1:1, BYO Ohio’s New Learning Standards What Works, What Does Not Instructional Models and Issues Presented by Roger W. Minier, Ph.D.
Wethersfield Board of Education December 10, 2013.
Mobile technologies in the Classroom 21 st Century Learning What are mobile technologies? Mobile technologies are portable, wireless, and Wi-Fi enabled.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
“Tech” side of Integration. Device Selection Laptops Pros Compatible with existing Apps We can manage them Keyboard Repair Deployment speed is manageable.
The Race to Future-Ready Dr. Rebecca Garland Accountability Conference February 19, 2009.
1:1, BYO and Mobile Devices Ohio’s New Learning Standards What works, what does not Instructional Models and Issues Presented by Roger W. Minier, Ph.D.
Lenoir STEM Learning Community. Just the facts, ma’am… 0 What? Half million dollar MSP grant with additional financial support from industry partners.
Arlington Independent School District More Than A Remarkable Education Technology Overview Summer Leadership August 5, 2010.
Natick Public Schools Technology Update April 28, 2008 Dennis Roche, CISA Director of Technology.
Using NowComment to Meet the Demands of the CCSS updated from: HCESC Tech Conference 2013  English Language Arts  Content Area Literacy Standards.
OSPI CHANGES AND PRIORITIES January OSPI agency priorities and organization chart.
Transitioning and Implementing the Common Core State Standards… One District’s Approach Kay B. Sammons Elementary Mathematics Howard.
What is a Title I? Title I is Part A of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) of This program provides financial assistance to states.
+ Voorheesville CSD Strategic Plan Community Forum September 30, 2015.
Recommendations College Success Task Force. Ensure that by 2011 all districts have PreK-12 curricula and graduation requirements aligned to the Common.
Technology Use Faulk Middle School soars to success.
Sandringham Parents BYOD working group 28 th April 2014.
Technology and the Wilshire Way: an analysis of the Texas STaR Chart survey results Julia Wilson EDLD 5306 June, 2010.
LEITCH ELEMENTARY SCHOOL PARENT TECHNOLOGY TRAINING.
The 21 st Century Classroom: Technology at Flower Valley.
Study of Device Comparability within the PARCC Field Test.
Technology readiness Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 DevicesPeopleInfrastructure DevicesSupportTest AdministrationExternalInternal.
An Innovation-Development Plan for Thomas G. Pullen K-8 Academy of Creative and Performing Arts Howard Brent June 2013.
INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT DIGITAL TEXTBOOKS MELISSA COLEMAN.
Chapter 15 Schooling in the United States Jessica Barron Doug Strahler.
BYOD- Bring Your Own Device Nickajack Elementary School Target Grades 4-5.
Technology Impacting Student Learning Harvey Bagshaw Union County - Stallings Elementary
SUCCESSFULLY PREPARING ALL STUDENTS FOR THEIR FUTURES SE 256 TH STREET, KENT, WA | ELEMENTARY KEYBOARDING IMC PRESENTATION.
Woodlawn Academy History in the Making. Woodlawn Academy is the next SAISD school to adopt an academy model to serve pre-K through 8th grade. WHO WE ARE.
Walnut Valley Unified School District California Assessment and Accountability System Performance and Progress (CAASPP) Walnut Valley Unified School District.
Raising the Bar for Oregon. Why Now?  New Mathematics Content Standards were adopted for grades K-8 in 2007 and high school in Oregon Statewide.
SBCUSD Common Core Technology Initiative Assessment, Accountability and Instructional Technology and Information Technology.
21 st Century Classroom Learning Environment Installation Process.
KCS Middle School 1:1 Technology Initiative ▶ The focus of the Chromebook Program for Keyport Central School is to prepare students for college and career.
CERES UNIFIED TECHNOLOGY SERVICES UPDATE
Virtual School Strand Edith K. Pickens Stewart Thorson May, 2012.
Building on our tradition of excellence – planning for the future.
Sustainable Innovation for UPSD
MCAS vs. PARCC Dedham School Committee December 16, 2015
Usability Research: Lessons Learned For Digital Assessment Delivery Cathy Wendler Educational Testing Service June 21, 2013.
Collegewood Elementary School
Rising 6th Grade Scheduling Information
NGSS Interim Assessments Webinar
Patterson Mill High School
Mobile Learning for Everyone
Presentation transcript:

Testing, Tablets, and Transitions: A View From Maryland June 22, 2013 Dale Cornelius, Project Manager, Online Testing and Science Maryland State Department of Education

History of Testing in Maryland: From Tablets to Tablets In the 1800s and 1900s students used tablets for learning and testing. In the 21 st Century students continue using tablets for learning and testing. Schools want to assess students on tablets, but it needs to be done right.

Maryland Today: At a Glance State School Demographics – 25 districts (county level) – Approx 1500 schools – Approx 852,000 students High Stakes Online Assessments in Maryland – MSA Science online since 2007 – High School Assessments (4) online since 2009 – MSA Reading online (grades 5 & 7) since spring 2013 – (1980s and 1990s: CAT “diploma” assessment)

High Stakes Online Testing Volumes

High Stakes Online Testing in Maryland High School: 58% online Middle School: 51% online Elementary Schools: 48% online Challenges: 1.Not all schools test 100% online. Not all tests offered online. 2.Some districts 100% online and others are 5-10% online. 3.Many schools prioritize benchmark and diagnostic online testing because they provide immediate, actionable data.

Tablet Study-Three Focus Areas Touch User Interface: Does the touch user interface present challenges? – Keyboard for tablets required for PARCC and recommended for SBAC – Students testing on tablets should be using tablets for instruction – Students testing on tablets should be taking practice tests on tablets Ergonomics: Do the ergonomics of tablet usage create fatigue or strain? – Students testing on tablets should be familiar with tablets used in instruction Screen Size: Do smaller screens and device features impact the user experience? – We have standardized on screen resolution, 1024x768, but not screen. – Is the experience of taking an assessment on a 9.5” screen different from a 15” screen?

Testing on Tablets: Financial Challenges TCO for PARCC-ready Tablets Outweighs Laptops for many districts whose management and support infrastructures already exist. Additional Expenses: Keyboards: PARCC Mandated New management services for WIFI environments PD for teachers Additional tech support

Testing on Tablets: Logistical Challenges Keyboards: PARCC Mandated Bluetooth keyboards need to be configured to speak to only one device. WIFI environments need to be configured, PD for teachers, and additional tech support will likely be required. Are WIFI environments robust enough to support high stakes testing? If not, WIFI is an additional possible point of failure.

Testing on Tablets: Opportunities Increase Learning: Tablets offer opportunities for teachers to provide more robust learning opportunities for students. Greater Equity: Tablets provide equal access to digital learning for students unable to access computer labs occupied for instructional purposes. Flexibility: Tablets allow for assessments to be given in a variety of settings. In many schools the only way to test large populations online is with mobile devices because access to labs is limited.

Testing on Tablets: Conclusions INSTRUCTION IS KEY: Students will have more and often better instructional opportunities with tablet s and should be assessed on them. NOT IF BUT WHEN: Four counties in MD have already confirmed that they will be administering PARCC assessments via tablets. The early adopter model works! THE TRANSITION IS CRITICAL: Moving to tablets for high stakes testing has to be done right. Schools must follow best practices. Practice tests need to be available months in advance of the operational test.

THANK YOU For more information, please contact Dale Cornelius at MSDE: Dale Cornelius Project Manager, Online Testing and Science Department of Accountability, Assessment, and Data Systems Maryland State Department of Education 200 West Baltimore Street Baltimore, MD P: F: