GEO Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories (GSNL): Building data infrastructures for science Massimo Cocco EPOS PP Coordinator INGV, Rome GEO-X.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DS-01 Disaster Risk Reduction and Early Warning Definition
Advertisements

Remote Sensing at the service of Natural Disasters Warning: the Contribution of the Supersites Concept Professor Stuart Marsh Co-Chair GEO Institutions.
Massimo Cocco EPOS PP Coordinator TABOO Meeting Aprile 2013 Integrazione delle infrastrutture di ricerca in EPOS: data services per la ricerca e la società
Supersites infrastructure: data access services and tools Chuck Meertens, Jeff McWhirter, Fran Boler, Stuart Wier, Susanna Gross, Scott Baker, UNAVCO Supersites.
Contribution of Space Earth Observation to the GeoHazard Scientific Community Salvatore Stramondo Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia Workshop.
GEO SB-01 Oceans and Society: Blue Planet An Integrating Oceans Task of GEO GEO-IX Plenary November 2012 Foz do Iguaçu, Brazil on behalf of the Blue.
© GEO Secretariat The Group on Earth Observations – Status and Post 2015 Osamu Ochiai GEO Secretariat 41 st CGMS Tsukuba, Japan 8-12 July 2013.
Summary of Supersites discussion at FRINGE 2011 meeting Frascati 21 Sept splinter meeting Chair: Falk Amelung (GEO task leader) Craig Dobson, represented.
MARSITE - ISTANBUL. MARSITE started on November 1 st, It is a three-year project. MARsite has been funded for about 6M€. The first months are dedicated,
Earthquake Seismology waveform data – research resource – data challenge Torild van Eck (ORFEUS, FDSN, NERIES, NERA) ORFEUS NGO (since 1987)
Massimo Cocco & Joern Lauterjung EPOS PP Council Rome September 19 th 2013 The Technical architecture Material prepared by WG7.
Big data and Open data for solid Earth science Massimo Cocco & EPOS Team Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia EPOS PP Coordinator Big Data &
The European Plate Observing System (EPOS): Integrated Services for solid Earth Science Massimo Cocco and the EPOS Consortium EPOS PP Coordinator
The GEO Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories Initiative Objective, Status, Value Chart 1> Geohazard Supersites > Jörn Hoffmann
WP5 Strategy Domenico Giardini SED ETHZ. WP5 Objectives Harmonize national implementation Integrate the European scientific community Establish Centres.
The role of the GEO Geohazards Community of Practice for the Supersites Initiative The role of the GEO Geohazards Community of Practice for the Supersites.
© GEO Secretariat GEO WP & 2013 GEO priorities for CEOS Support GEO Secretariat CEOS SIT-28 NASA - Langley March 2013.
The Preparatory Phase Proposal a first draft to be discussed.
, Implementing GIS for Expanded Data Accessibility and Discoverability ASDC Introduction The Atmospheric Science Data Center (ASDC) at NASA Langley Research.
Leveraging research and future funding opportunities Hajo Eicken Geophysical Institute & International Arctic Research Center University of Alaska Fairbanks.
IGOS Geohazards: Status and perspectives 3rd International Geohazards Workshop Frascati, ESRIN, 6th November 2007 Hormoz Modaressi Director IGOS Geohazards.
EPOS Preparatory phase Torild van Eck (ORFEUS) Call INFRA Deadline: December 3, 2009 Funding: between 3 and 6 MEuro Duration: max 4 year.
Planning for Arctic GIS and Geographic Information Infrastructure Sponsored by the Arctic Research Support and Logistics Program 30 October 2003 Seattle,
NERA/REAKT Workshop Zürich March 19-20, 2013 ______________________________________________________________________________ Workshop WISHES ①Learn how.
GEO Geohazard Supersites Current Status and key challenges EGU 2013 Vienna Supersites Splinter Meeting.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
EPOS a long term integration plan of research infrastructures for solid Earth Science in Europe Preparatory Phase Project
© GEO Secretariat GEO Work Plan 2nd GEOSS Science and Technology Stakeholder Workshop "GEOSS: Supporting Science for the Millennium Development.
From GEANT to Grid empowered Research Infrastructures ANTONELLA KARLSON DG INFSO Research Infrastructures Grids Information Day 25 March 2003 From GEANT.
Seismic Hazard Map EPOS European Plate Observing System RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURE AND E-SCIENCE FOR DATA AND OBSERVATORIES ON EARTHQUAKES, VOLCANOES, SURFACE.
© GEO Secretariat Global Datasets (GEOSS task DA-09-03) 3rd GEO European Project Workshop 8-9 October 2009 Istanbul Douglas Cripe, GEO Secretariat.
Data discovery and data processing for environmental research infrastructures Roberto Cossu ENVRI WP4 leader ESA.
ENV proposal meeting, Geneva, Sep. 24, Proposal Objectives Joost van Bemmelen, ESA
International Perspectives on Data and Information for Science 1.What is ICSU 2.ICSU and data and information 3.ICSU policy 4.World Summit on the Information.
EPOS European Plate Observing System Research Infrastructure and e-science for Data and Observatories on Earthquakes, Volcanoes, Surface Dynamics and Tectonics.
What is GEO? launched in response to calls for action by the 2002 World Summit on Sustainable Development, Earth Observation Summits, and by the G8 (Group.
EPA Geospatial Segment United States Environmental Protection Agency Office of Environmental Information Enterprise Architecture Program Segment Architecture.
GEON2 and OpenEarth Framework (OEF) Bradley Wallet School of Geology and Geophysics, University of Oklahoma
EPOS where we are, where we go ! Massimo Cocco INGV Rome September EPOS Meeting.
Towards an European Network of Earth Observation Networks (ENEON): Addressing Challenges and Facilitating Collaboration for non-space based Earth Observations.
TCS-ICS interactions Kuvvet Atakan 1 and the WP6 and WP7 Teams 1 University of Bergen / Department of Earth Science.
Update on GPS/SCIGN REASoN CAN GPS Data Products for Solid Earth Science (GDPSES) Sponsored by NASA F Webb, Y Bock, D Dong, B Newport, P Jamason, M Scharber,
WP3 Harmonization & Integration J. Lauterjung & WP 3 Group.
Why are we here? projectsnational coordinationWorking groupsTCS.
Capacity Building & the European Community Research Framework Programme: (FP7) Alan Edwards European Commission.
EPOS IP Roadmap Massimo Cocco & PDB. EPOS IP project Timeline Implementation Validation Pre-operation.
Fire Emissions Network Sept. 4, 2002 A white paper for the development of a NSF Digital Government Program proposal Stefan Falke Washington University.
Task XX-0X Task ID-01 GEO Work Plan Symposium April 2014 Task ID-01 “ Advancing GEOSS Data Sharing Principles” Experiences related to data sharing.
A. Review current infrastructure status within Europe Review and overview (national and European scale) of existing and planned Observational infrastructures.
WP10 – GNSS Data & Products Rui Fernandes on behalf of WP10 members.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems Malta, 27 January 2004 Alan Edwards EUROPEAN COMMISSION GMES – Implications.
Cloud-based e-science drivers for ESAs Sentinel Collaborative Ground Segment Kostas Koumandaros Greek Research & Technology Network Open Science retreat.
Page 1 CSISS Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems 09/12/2006 Center for Spatial Information Science and Systems (CSISS) George Mason University.
EGI-Engage is co-funded by the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union under grant number EGI vision for the EOSC Tiziana.
EUDAT receives funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 programme - DG CONNECT e-Infrastructures. Contract No EPOS and EUDAT.
GEO Disaster Resilience Breakout Group Summary GEO Work Programme Symposium 2016 Kerry Ann Sawyer CEOS/NOAA 4 May 2016 Geneva, Switzerland.
CEOS Working Group on Information System and Services (WGISS) Data Access Infrastructure and Interoperability Standards Andrew Mitchell - NASA Goddard.
1      Structural Funds DG REGIO + RESEARCH INFRASTRUCTURES for EU COMPETITIVENESS: research and innovation assets Giorgio Rossi, Unimi, ESFRI EB.
Geo-energy Test Beds: part of the European Plate Observing System Michael H. Stephenson, David Schofield, Chris Luton, Florian Haslinger, Jan Henninges.
NextGEOSS data hub incl. alpha release
EPOS European Plate Observing System
INTAROS – Integrated Arctic Observation System
Alessandro Spinuso, Andreas Rietbrock, Andrè Gemuend,
GEO WP 1. INFRASTRUCTURE (Architecture and Data Management)
Summit 2017 Breakout Group 2: Data Management (DM)
Capacity Building Enhance the coordination of efforts to strengthen individual, institutional and infrastructure capacities, particularly in developing.
Robida, F. 1, Wächter, J. 2, Tulstrup, J. 3, Lorenz, H. 4, Carter, M
FDA Objectives and Implementation Planning
Work Programme 2012 COOPERATION Theme 6 Environment (including climate change) Challenge 6.4 Protecting citizens from environmental hazards European.
Maria Teresa Capria December 15, 2009 Paris – VOPlaneto 2009
Presentation transcript:

GEO Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories (GSNL): Building data infrastructures for science Massimo Cocco EPOS PP Coordinator INGV, Rome GEO-X Plenary and Geneva Ministerial Summit Speaker-Corner, 15 January 2014

EPOS PP Mission The European Plate Observing System (EPOS) is a long-term integrated research infrastructure plan to promote innovative approaches for a better understanding of the physical processes controlling earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, unrest episodes and tsunamis as well as those driving tectonics and Earth surface dynamics EPOS will integrate the existing advanced European facilities into one, distributed multidisciplinary Research Infrastructure (RI) taking full advantage of new e-science opportunities The EPOS RI will allow geoscientists to study the causative processes acting from s to 10 6 years and from  m to 10 3 km EPOS PP Timeline mid-way through the PP

EPOS COMMUNITIES

The EPOS Integrated Core Services will provide access to multidisciplinary data, data products, synthetic data from simulations, processing and visualization tools,.... The EPOS Integrated Core Services will serve scientists and other stakeholders, young researchers (training), professionals and industry EPOS is more than a mere data portal: it will provide not just data but means to integrate, analyze, compare, interpret and present data and information about Solid Earth Thematic Core Services are infrastructures to provide data services to specific communities (they can be international organizations, such as ORFEUS for seismology) National Research Infrastructures and facilities provide services at national level and send data to the European thematic data infrastructures. Topological Architecture

EPOS Board of Service Providers EPOS Remote Sensing Products & Services (EGPS) … Other EPOS Communities Data Archiving Data repository from other projects Structure: Distributed ~3-5 nodes, including EPOS Data Gateway. Products (indicative list) -PSI data from TERRAFIRMA ESA project all over Europe -Wide Area Product data over Greece and Turkey Services Repository of existing: -PSI velocity maps -time series, -added value products Satellite Acquisition Strategy Satellite Acquisition Strategy Priorities are the areas identified in the Santorini white paper Structure: Distributed ~ 3 nodes (ESA, DLR, CNES) Products (indicative list) Definition of an acquisition plan over geohazard areas in Europe: -sensor type/Satellite mission -potential coverage (acquisition geometry, resolution and mode) -type of product (interferogram, velocity map, land use map,...) Services -Defining Satellite Data provider -Site information (metadata, site characterization…) -data quality information EPOS Volcanology e-Remote Sensing & common services Services for visualisation, discovery and access to portal expert groups, standards EPOS Geology IT Tools Support to Satellite data processing Structure: Distributed ~ 3 nodes (ESA, DLR, CNES) Products (indicative list) - Fast generation and delivery - Diffusion of best practices. Services Web-services for online processing of satellite data (SAR in particular) and estimation of velocities (interseismic and post- seismic signals). -provide guaranteed, reliable, easy, effective access to a variety of data, facilities, and applications to an ever increasing number of users. -enable multidisciplinary collaboration among communities and the creation of user-configured virtual research facilities EPOS Integrated Services Visualisation tool / discovery & access portal high performance and high end computing expert groups, standards Governance and coordination by Board of Service representatives, 4-6 members Geohazard Supersites SAR displacement maps Structure: Distributed multiple nodes, potentially one for each Supersite Products (indicative list) For volcanic Supersites: -sineruptive displacement map -volcanic source model For seismic Supersites: -coseismic displacement map -cross comparison with GPS -seismic source model Services Preservation of historical data (also from commercial networks). Data quality information. Thematic Services: Satellite Data Information

Functional Architecture

Discovery (DC) and (CKAN, eGMS) Contextual (CERIF metadata model) Detailed (community specific) Generate Point to Web portal, Spatio- Temporal Search Search for instruments, software, models... domain-specific data with detailed metadata Anticipates data.gov domains domain specific - geographically distributed data 3 layer metadata model

EPOS is a GEO participating institution. TASK-DI-01 C2: Geohazard Supersites and Natural Laboratories (GSNL) EPOS as a regional federation to provide multidisciplinary services in solid Earth EPOS is coordinating efforts with the three EC supersites: – MARSITE (Istanbul) – FUTUREVOLC (Icelandic Volcan.) – MED-SUV (Italian Volcanoes) The European Supersites

10 KEYWORDS Integration of the existing in-situ Ris through data infrastructures and web services in each supersite. Integration of terrestrial and satellite observations Interoperability of in-situ data infrastructures & web services Access to past and present data through shared data policies Acknowledgment of the data source and Metrics to check the use of data Progress in Science through availability of high quality data and the means to process and interpret them (e.g., explore and mine large data volumes, results easily reproducible/replicable) information, dissemination, education and training Implementation plans, which require strategic investment in research infrastructures at national and international levels (sustainability issue) Societal contributions, e.g., hazard assessment and risk mitigation

Discussion Points Data policies and IPR Implementation of e-RIs in each site (ICT Innovation) Interoperability with other services (EPOS ICS, GSNL, etc...) Stakeholders interaction strategies Long-term sustainability of these RIs

EPOS Open Access Policies Data and facilities will be owned by national RIs EPOS products will be owned by EPOS Pricing: at this point no requirements for a pricing policy has been identified Open Access to: Freely available data in real time or with some time delay Data available without charge to specific users or for specified purposes Access to metadata allowing discovery of other relevant data Access to facilities under equitable rules (details under discussion) Data Licensing: Creative Commons (CC-BY-NC) wherever possible Services and software available under CC licensing Access rules: authentication will be required including statements on purpose of using data

Conclusive Remarks Supporting the European Supersites to demonstrate the maturity & credibility of solid Earth community as well as the capacity to provide novel and effective data services to users Contributing to the GEO Permanent Supersites as well as to Candidate Supersites and Natural Laboratories Joining community efforts for the long- term sustainability of supersites initiative (involving governments and funding agencies) Proving better services to stakeholders

Thank you for attention

I.Data and service providers from the solid Earth sciences  RIs declared in RIDE ( & EPOS WGswww.epos-eu.org/ride/ II.Scientific User Community  Researchers from solid Earth Science  Solid Earth science community projects (NERA, SHARE, REAKT,....)  Training and educational institutions, projects and initiatives  Researchers and organizations from outside the solid Earth sciences III.Governmental Organizations  National governments  Funding agencies  Civil protections authorities  European Commission IV.Other data and service providers and users  IT projects and experts, Industry, Private data and service providers V.General Public EPOS Stakeholders INVOLVEMENTINVOLVEMENT INVOLVEMENTINVOLVEMENT

Data Taxonomy  Level 0: raw data, or basic data (example: seismograms, accelerograms, time series...)  Level 1: data products coming from nearly automated procedures (earthquake locations, magnitudes, focal mechanism, shakemaps,....)  Level 2: data products resulting by scientists’ investigations (crustal models, strain maps, earthquake source models, etc...)  Level 3: integrated data products coming from complex analyses or community shared products (hazards maps, catalogue of active faults, etc....)