NOAA’s Protected Resources Recovery Program Donna Wieting Director Office of Protected Resources MAFAC September 24, 2014 Silver Spring, MD.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Fish and Wildlife Losses and Hydroelectric System Responsibility January 2004.
Advertisements

THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT Draft Year: 1973 Amendment Years: 1982, 1985, 1988 National (in conjunction with International Treaties) Regulated by the ESA.
Need for Revision to the New York State Endangered Species Regulations
Upper Willamette River Recovery Planning WITHIN OUR REACH New Partnerships for a Healthier Willamette December
THE YAZOO DARTER : DISCUSSIONS AND STRATEGIES FOR HEALTHY POPULATIONS STREAM ECOLOGY LAB, OXFORD, MS., SEPTEMBER , 2012 Daniel J. Drennen Mississippi.
Use of the Endangered Species Act in Alaska Doug Vincent-Lang, Special Assistant Alaska Department of Fish & Game 1.
Management Plans Wildlife Conservation Wildlife Conservation.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America How does the surrogate species effort relate to other ongoing efforts? Birds of Management.
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services Utah Field Office.
Endangered Species Act
Endangered Species Act Overview
Endangered Species Preservation Act Passed by Congress in 1966 Provided a means for listing native species as endangered – Gave them limited protection.
1 Update on the Ongoing ESA Section 7 Consultation and DEIS Development for the Southeast Shrimp Fishery Louisiana Shrimp Task Force November 29, 2011.
Endangered Species Act GOALS: Prevent species extinctions Increase numbers to the point where a species has recovered and can be delisted.
4 th grade class Miss Pollinger 1386 Cooper Road, Hamilton, Ontario Canada The African Lion Safari tries to imitate the actual safari.
OBLIGATIONS TO PROTECT MARINE ECOSYSTEMS UNDER INTERNATIONAL CONVENTIONS AND OTHER LEGAL INSTRUMENTS Transform Aqorau Scientific Symposium of the Reykjavik.
Provisions of the Spotted Owl CHU Rule: How Are We Interpreting What It Says? And How Does it Integrate with the NWFP? Bruce Hollen (BLM) and Brendan White.
1 Proposed Revisions to the National Standard 1 Guidelines: Adding Guidance on Annual Catch Limits and Other Requirements Presentation to the Regional.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Slide 1 Our Mission: “Working with others to conserve, protect, and enhance fish, wildlife, plants, and their habitats for.
404 Species Mega-petitioned from Center of Biological Diversity: Where are we now? Presented by: Channing St. Aubin US Fish and Wildlife Service Panama.
NOAA Fisheries Update Pacific States Marine Fisheries Commission – Coeur d’Alene, ID Paul Doremus DAA for Operations September 23, 2013.
Proposed Approach for Developing Columbia Basin Salmon and Steelhead Goals June 3, 2015.
Fish and Wildlife Service Mission Conserve, protect and enhance fish, wildlife, and plants and their habitats for the continuing benefit of the American.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Overview Endangered Species Program, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service 2001.
Endangered Species Act Section 7 Consultations. The Endangered Species Act Sec. 2:Purpose Sec. 3:Definitions Sec. 4:Listing, Recovery, Monitoring Sec.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 (ESA) Larsen Schlachter Per. 3.
Trista Dillon THE ENDANGERED SPECIES ACT (1973, 1982, 1985, 1988)
Pacific Coast Groundfish Bycatch Management for Protected Species Implementing NOAA Fisheries’ Biological Opinion West Coast Region Alison Agness 1, Steve.
The Endangered Species Act: Species Listings and Implications for Development in Alaska Presented by: Cherise Oram Stoel Rives LLP.
How Are Marine Protected Areas Created? A Guide for the Lay Person.
1 A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board Usha Varanasi, Ph.D. Science Director Philip Roni, Ph.D. Research Fishery Biologist Northwest Fisheries.
Canada’s Ocean Strategy. The Oceans Act In 1997, Canada entrenched its commitment to our oceans by adopting the Oceans Act. In 1997, Canada entrenched.
Endangered Species Act Counterpart Regulations for National Fire Plan Projects Bureau of Land Management Forest Service June 9, 2004.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
By: Helena Brantz Period 2 APES-Rall.  Draft Years: 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988  National Scope: First signed by Nixon in As of November 2011, there.
NOAA Science Advisory Board …advises the Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on long- and short- range strategies for research, education,
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 By Tristan Armstrong.
FCRPS Adaptive Management Implementation Plan (AMIP) 1 September 15, 2009.
The Section 6 Program of the Federal Endangered Species Act: Overview and Update New York Marine Endangered Species Workshop Port Jefferson, NY October.
Endangered Species Act By: Kelly Hansard, Kelli Bagwell, and Celeste Ligon.
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE ENDANGERED SPECIES. HISTORY Lacey Act Forbids interstate transport/commerce of illegally killed wildlife Oldest wildlife protection.
Endangered Species Act of 1973, 1982, 1985, and 1988 By: Nicole Wypychowski Period 6 President Nixon signed the bill December 28, 1973 ESA is administered.
THE SPECIES AT RISK ACT (SARA) CBA/Justice National Section Meeting National Environmental Energy Resources Law Group Ottawa – October 24, 2004.
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988
The Endangered Species Act 1973, 1982, 1985, 1988 (ESA) By Anais Teyton Function: Promotes the conservation of the listed endangered and threatened worldwide.
4th Annual University Federal Dialogue on Environmental and Energy Research and Education Scott Rayder Chief of Staff National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
Managing Through Partnerships Ralph Cantral NOAA’s Ocean Service September 5, 2003.
American Fisheries Society Incoming Governing Board Breakfast Scott Rayder Chief of Staff National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration September 15,
Marlene Kaplan Office of Education and Sustainable Development.
Estuary Actions for Salmon and Steelhead Columbia River Estuary Science Policy Exchange September 10-11, 2009 NOAA 2008 FCRPS Biological Opinion Estuary.
Implementation of the Lower Columbia River Recovery Plan Northwest Region August 19, 2013.
MSRA Implementation Status Update. 2 Implementation Strategy Divide tasks Priority 1 – Due date specified in the Act Priority 2 – Required, but no due.
NOAA Fisheries Update MAFAC Meeting Paul Doremus DAA for Operations September 23, 2014.
ARE 309Ted Feitshans021-1 Unit 21 Endangered Species Endangered Species Act of 1973.
U.S. Department of Commerce National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration NOAA Fisheries A Priority in motion at NOAA Recreational Fisheries.
North Pacific Climate Regimes and Ecosystem Productivity (NPCREP) NOAA Fisheries Ned Cyr NOAA Fisheries Service Office of Science and Technology Silver.
CONTEXT FOR THE REVIEW Gary Matlock, Ph.D. Deputy Assistant Administrator for Programs and Administration (A) Office of Oceanic & Atmospheric Research.
Finding the Law: Primary & Secondary Sources in Print
One Perspective on an effort to improve the implementation of the Endangered Species Act David Bernhardt.
Endangered Species Act(ESA)
The Endangered Species Act
The Endangered Species Act (ESA)
The Endangered Species Act of 1973
The Endangered Species Act 1973 ,1982,1985,1988
PROVISIONS OF H.R
Endangered Species Act of 1973
Ecosystem-Based Fisheries Management
OBJECTIVES: Define recovery and explain how it fits within the other provisions of the Act. Describe the historical development of recovery. Compare and.
North Shore Streamkeepers February 23, 2019
Presentation transcript:

NOAA’s Protected Resources Recovery Program Donna Wieting Director Office of Protected Resources MAFAC September 24, 2014 Silver Spring, MD

NOAA’s Protected Resources Recovery Program Presentation Outline  ESA Overview/What We do to Support Recovery  ESA Recovery Requirements  How We Measure Success/Challenges  Ideas to Work Together to Improve Recovery Success

Endangered Species Act of 1973 (ESA) Why protect species? Congress found and declared, when enacting the ESA…  Various species have been rendered extinct as a consequence of economic growth and development untempered by adequate concern and conservation  Such species are of esthetic, ecological, educational, historical, recreational, and scientific value to the nation and its people

ESA Recovery How many listed species under NMFS jurisdiction have recovery plans?  NMFS has jurisdiction over 122 marine “species” of which 32 are foreign species  Recovery Plan Status  43 species--final recovery plans  4 species--draft recovery plans (out for public comment)  15 species– recovery plans underdevelopment  23 species--recovery plans not started  39 species--found that recovery plans would not promote conservation (e.g., foreign species),

What factors are considered in recovery planning?  Species biological constraints & habitat needs;  Present or threatened destruction, modification, or curtailment of its habitat or range;  Overutilization for commercial, recreational, scientific, or educational purposes;  Disease or predation;  Inadequacy of existing regulatory mechanisms;  Other natural or manmade factors affecting its continued existence  Conservation efforts, ESA Recovery

What is recovery?  Improvement in the status of listed species to the point at which listing is no longer appropriate under the criteria set out in section 4(a)(1) of the Act (50 CFR § )  Process by which listed species & their ecosystems are restored & their future is safeguarded to the point that protections under ESA are no longer needed (NMFS & FWS Interim Recovery Planning Guidance 2007)

ESA Recovery What is required for recovery? ESA Section 4(f) requires:  Develop & implement recovery plans for conservation & survival of listed species unless such plan will not promote the conservation of the species  Priority given to species that are most likely to benefit from such plan  Procure services of appropriate entities to develop & implement plan—FACA exempt  Provide public notice & comment and consider all information prior to plan approval  Biennial Report to Congress on progress,

ESA Recovery What policies guide us in recovery?  Interim Endangered & Threatened Species Recovery Planning Guidance (2004 & updated in 2010)  Endangered & Threatened Species Listing & Recovery Priority Guidelines (1990),

ESA Recovery What is a recovery plan?  Guidance (not regulatory), a road map for recovery – lays out where we need to go & how best to get there  Outreach tool  Guide for monitoring species status, threats, recovery actions, post-listing,

ESA Recovery What is required in a recovery plan? Each plan must include:  Site-specific management actions as may be necessary to achieve the plan’s goal  Objective, measurable criteria, which when met would result in removing the species from the ESA  Cost and time to carry out those measures needed to achieve the plan’s goal,

ESA Recovery How do we measure success?  Government Performance Results Act (GPRA)  Number of protected species with stable or increasing population levels (30/79)  Number and percent of ongoing or completed recovery actions (44.6%)  Percent of Protected Species with Adequate Population Assessments and Forecasts (19%)  NMFS must make measurable progress on recovering protected species—(NOAA Annual Guidance Memorandum FY2015)  NMFS must improve recovery of listed species through innovative partnerships—(DOC Strategic Plan FY ; Objective 3.4)

12 We Are Making Progress!  Delisting of Eastern Population of Steller sea lion due to recovery  820,000 fall Chinook pass Bonneville Dam – double the 10 year average  Humpback population annual growth 3 – 7%  Monk seal recovery program success North Atlantic right whale – 2.6% growth Bowhead whale population growth estimated over 3% annually since 2001

Recovery Challenges Workload, budget, staffing Increased number and scope of listings Increased recovery planning Decreased funding Meeting expectations with fewer resources Outreach and Partnerships MAFAC assistance to develop/ facilitate partnerships in recovery implementation & examine recovery actions U.S. Department of Commerce | National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration | NOAA Fisheries | Page 13

ESA Recovery How can we work together to improve recovery success?  We will work with the Protected Species Subcommittee in FY2015 to determine how best to proceed & develop a plan of action  Possible outputs would be a report with recommendations to advise on improving recovery actions and fostering partnerships that achieve timely recovery of listed species

ESA Recovery How can we work together to improve recovery success? Retrospective analysis of recovery actions—what has worked and what can we do better:  Are the recovery actions clearly described & appropriate responsible parties engaged  Are the recovery actions technically & scientifically practicable/feasible  What degree does NMFS have authority/influence over the recovery action & how does that affect the outcome

ESA Recovery How can we work together to improve recovery success?  Build partnerships to facilitate completing recovery actions  Examples of actions that have not been started:  Smalltooth sawfish: Recovery Task Develop and implement programs, in cooperation with other interested parties to assess, minimize and mitigate the effects of lost fishing gear.  Atlantic Salmon Gulf of Maine DPS: Recovery Task 1.4.1E. Enhance riparian protection through modifications to Acts & land use zoning

ESA Recovery A recovery plan is one of the most important tools to ensure sound scientific and logistical decision-making throughout the recovery process and to ensure recovery success. But… Even the best of plans may achieve little for species recovery if they are not implemented because they are not practical, they are misunderstood, or they are opposed by those with the authority or means to implement them.

18 QUESTIONS ?