CMU Faculty Self-Perception Presented by: Group #3 Zeljka Bradaric Meng-Yang Chiang Belinda Kazlman John Rinderle.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Core Standards for All Teachers Core Content Standards for All Teachers Content Standards for Selected Teaching Specialties e.g., Mathematics, Science,
Advertisements

She is the Liaison Librarian for: Canadian Studies Celtic Studies History Music Special Collections.
Filipe Fortes Ankur Kothari Jenn Matvya Amanda Pyles Legality of Undergraduate MP3 usage.
Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
Sarah Karlson Edward Cho Richard Gasperini Heather Frantz The Rankings of CMU by Students April 26,
Brian A. Harris-Kojetin, Ph.D. Statistical and Science Policy
CMU Campus Life Group 1 Ellen L Beldner Darya Leyzarovich Choon Hong Peck.
CMU has been said to be the “most wired campus in the US” for two years in a row. What kind of impact does such a infrastructure has on the daily academic.
Alumni Surveys Larry Caretto Mechanical Engineering Advisory Board Meeting October 18, 2006.
Open Educational Recourses - SOCIOLOGY Department.
NSF ADVANCE: Institutional Transformation for Faculty Diversity ADVANCE Faculty Work Life Survey: Comparison of Statistically Significant Gender Differences.
The Future Ain’t What It Used To Be UKSG Conference 2004 and Exhibition Manchester, UK 29 March 2004.
The Collaborative on Academic Careers in Higher Education 2010 Survey of Pre-tenure Faculty.
Teachers for A New Era Neag School of Education Teacher Preparation Program’s Fall 2008 Common Entry Survey Results Teachers for A New Era (TNE) Teacher.
Chapter 13 Survey Designs
STEPPING STONE PROJECT STEPPING STONE PROJECT designing a new engineering discipline presented by team 1.
Faculty Instructional Support Moving beyond putting courses online to curriculum redesign Leila Lyons, University of Delaware.
NRC Results University of Kentucky Revised 10/03/2010.
Chapter 13 Survey Designs
Increasing Online Survey Response Rates April 7, 2015 Institute for Faculty Development.
Student views about homework Toby Leonard Eleanor Scott Jessica Hollis Nima Habibzadeh Lauren Danbury Alice Ward.
A gender analysis of the population of students and academic staff at the University of Cyprus Athanasios Gagatsis Department of Education University of.
Mathematics The Universal Language. The globally competent student Has a diverse and knowledgeable world view Understands the international dimensions.
UNIVERSITY OF NIŠ IMPLEMENTATION OF ECTS AT FACULTIES Prof. Dr. Nadežda Novaković
Do CMU Undergrads Lead a Healthy Lifestyle? John Lee John Lee Meredith Powers Shamil Patel Shamil Patel Dan Bruner Dan Bruner Sampling, Surveys,
Report of the Results of the Faculty Survey of Student Engagement William E. Knight and Jie Wu Office of Institutional Research Presentation to the Faculty.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
Power Point Slides by Ronald J. Shope in collaboration with John W. Creswell Chapter 13 Survey Designs.
Exploring the Gendered Space of Attributes that Predict Expectations of Success in STEM Gender in STEM Research Symposium: Pathways to Parity in STEM September.
Orvill Adams, Orvill Adams & Associates B.V. Orvill Adams Orvill Adams & Associates B.V. Measuring the Products of Medical Education.
Early Childhood Education: Creativity Dr. K. A. Korb University of Jos.
Bruce Heterick, Director of Library Relationswww.jstor.org CONCERT 2004 Taipei, Taiwan November 11, 2004.
Burnaby North Excel Program AP & Honours Pathways.
The use of Technology in Flemish Mathematics Education – Sandy Van Wonterghem 21/07/2006 Faculty of Engineering – Department of Mathematical Analysis The.
English Grammar Pedagogical Analysis
Implementing Active Learning Strategies in a Large Class Setting Travis White, Pharm.D., Assistant Professor Kristy Lucas, Pharm.D., Professor Pharmacy.
English 6901 Survey Diagnosing Written Communication: Cross-Campus Composition Compendium Methods of Composition Research.
Electronic Thesis & Dissertation Program Searching Techniques for Access to the ETD Collection.
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Student Engagement: A Phenomenological Study and Follow-up Survey Dan Riordan, PhD Professor of English, UW-Stout Wendy Marson Institutional Planner, UW-Stout.
The Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE) measures faculty expectations for student engagement in educational practices that are known to be empirically.
BECTa ICT Research Conference – June 2002 Intro  Survey Details  Secondary Surveys conducted July 2000 and June/July 2001  Sponsored by Fischer Family.
Before & After: What Undergraduates and Alumni Say About Their College Experience and Outcomes Angie L. Miller, NSSE & SNAAP Research Analyst Amber D.
Artificial Intelligence Introductory Lecture Jennifer J. Burg Department of Mathematics and Computer Science.
The student learning experience 2013 Survey Bahram Bekhradnia Director, HEPI 10 May 2013.
OLYMPIC VIEW END OF YEAR SURVEY 2011 Family Engagement Presented at: OVPTA General Meeting October 5, 2011 Olympic View Elementary.
IT Education in Serbia Prof. Dr. Ivan Milentiejvic
Live your life. Create your destiny. Does classroom management Play a role in student progress? Ina Louw
What is the Dewey Decimal System It is a general knowledge organization tool to organize information into ten subject areas that is broken down into smaller.
Teacher Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
The Impact of Non-Traditional Students on Student Needs.
Design Process for a Non- Majors Computing Course Mark Guzdial & Andrea Forte College of Computing/GVU Georgia Institute of Technology With thanks for.
Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Application, 9 th edition. Gay, Mills, & Airasian © 2009 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved.
Future Ready Schools National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) in North Carolina Wednesday, February 13, 2008 Auditorium III 8:30 – 9:30 a.m.
Survey Research.
1 East Lyme Public Schools 2013 Standardized Test Report CMT ~ CAPT ~ ACT ~ AP Presentation to EL BOE September Dr. James D. Lombardo, Superintendent.
The Language of Sampling Lecture 6 Sections 2.1 – 2.4 Fri, Jan 26, 2007.
Why Study Economics?. Economists Matter Economics at MTSU James M. Buchanan, MTSU Alumnus Nobel Prize in Economics (1986)
The Language of Sampling Lecture 6 Sections 2.1 – 2.4 Fri, Aug 31, 2007.
Welcome Back, Students & Faculty! university photos courtesy of Carnegie Mellon Photo Archive.
Perceptions of Creativity in Art, Music and Technology Education Perceptions of Creativity in Art, Music and Technology Education David StrickerDavid Stricker.
Continuing Education Provincial Survey Winter 2012 Connie Phelps Manager, Institutional Research & Planning.
Poly Politics Cal Poly, San Luis Obispo This is your campus. This is how it is split. Poly Politics currently reports current political affiliation data.
Education System in Kenya Location The Republic of Kenya lies along the equator on the east coast of Africa. The capital of Kenya is Nairobi. It.
Spring 2017 Graduate Survey
A nationwide US student survey
Created by Academic Advising Services
The Language of Sampling
Educational Research Mini-Grant Report
Presentation transcript:

CMU Faculty Self-Perception Presented by: Group #3 Zeljka Bradaric Meng-Yang Chiang Belinda Kazlman John Rinderle

Agenda Background and Design Background and Design Expectations Expectations Questionnaire Questionnaire Survey Administration Survey Administration Data Analysis Data Analysis Conclusions Conclusions

Why we chose this topic? Social Psychology Phenomenon Social Psychology Phenomenon People tend to perceive themselves above average even though they may be below average People tend to perceive themselves above average even though they may be below average Curious to see if CMU Faculty follow this pattern of self-serving bias Curious to see if CMU Faculty follow this pattern of self-serving bias

Background and Design Target Population Target Population Carnegie Mellon Faculty Carnegie Mellon Faculty Sample Population Sample Population Difference between target and sample Difference between target and sample Frame Frame list provided by Ethan, weeded out to eliminate non-eligible s list provided by Ethan, weeded out to eliminate non-eligible s Stratified Random Sample Stratified Random Sample Proportional Allocation across departments Proportional Allocation across departments

Background and Design(cont.) Sample size Sample size Assume 50% response rate, MOE of 9% Assume 50% response rate, MOE of 9% 863 Faculty in original list (without Philosophy) 863 Faculty in original list (without Philosophy) Original sample of 200, then added 12 with philosophy department Original sample of 200, then added 12 with philosophy department Survey was online Survey was online Participants received with link to take our survey Participants received with link to take our survey

Expectations Faculty would be more willing to take survey to help out students Faculty would be more willing to take survey to help out students Would have higher response rate in H&SS and CFA than in CIT or SCS Would have higher response rate in H&SS and CFA than in CIT or SCS CIT and SCS to rate themselves higher than H&SS and CFA CIT and SCS to rate themselves higher than H&SS and CFA

Questionnaire First piloted on friends for understanding First piloted on friends for understanding Got feedback from Profs for formatting issues Got feedback from Profs for formatting issues

Survey Administration Survey was administered electronically between 4/19/2001. and 4/30/2001. Survey was administered electronically between 4/19/2001. and 4/30/2001. Three attempts at follow-up were made on 4/23/01, 4/26/01, and 4/29/01. Three attempts at follow-up were made on 4/23/01, 4/26/01, and 4/29/01. Problems Problems Left out two departments in list Left out two departments in list No technical issues No technical issues

Response Rates by Department HCII Modern Languages SDS Physics Architecture Mathematics MSE Chemistry Computer Science Psychology Drama Mechanical Engineering Biology EPP History ECE CEE Chemical Engineering Philosophy Statistics Art Design Robotics Institute Music English900.00

Departments where >2 responded HCII HCII Modern Languages Modern Languages SDS SDS Physics Physics Architecture Architecture Mathematics Mathematics MSE MSE Chemistry Chemistry Computer Science Computer Science Psychology Psychology Drama Drama ECE ECE

Teaching Ability Chemistry91.67% Drama86.25% Psychology78.33% Mathematics75.00% Computer Science73.44% Physics69.00% MSE68.75% Modern Languages63.00% Architecture57.50% SDS45.00% ECE43.33% HCII36.67%

Research Ability Physics68.00% Mathematics66.67% Chemistry65.00% ECE63.33% Drama57.66% Architecture57.50% HCII51.25% Computer Science48.75% MSE46.25% Psychology40.00% SDS31.67% Modern Languages26.66%

Creativity Drama85.00% Chemistry83.33% Mathematics79.25% ECE76.67% HCII71.25% Physics68.00% Computer Science67.22% Psychology65.00% Modern Languages62.00% MSE61.25% Architecture56.25% SDS40.00%

Rapport with students Drama88.75% Chemistry80.00% Psychology75.00% Physics70.00% Computer Science66.44% Modern Languages64.00% Mathematics62.50% SDS56.67% Architecture56.25% MSE56.25% ECE38.33% HCII36.67%

Prestige Chemistry80.00% Drama71.25% Physics68.00% ECE53.33% Mathematics53.00% Psychology46.56% Computer Science37.22% Modern Languages36.00% HCII36.00% Architecture33.75% MSE33.75% SDS28.33%

Quality of the department within CMU Computer Science87.11% ECE83.33% Psychology83.33% Drama72.50% SDS68.33% Chemistry63.33% Modern Languages63.00% Physics62.00% HCII60.00% MSE60.00% Mathematics55.00% Architecture52.50%

CMU faculty vs. other faculty Psychology91.00% SDS91.00% Drama90.00% Computer Science83.33% Modern Languages82.00% ECE80.00% Mathematics78.75% Chemistry75.00% Physics75.00% HCII72.50% Architecture68.75% MSE61.67%

Field of study among those present at CMU ECE83.33% Chemistry80.00% Psychology76.67% Computer Science74.89% Physics70.00% Mathematics67.50% MSE66.25% Architecture62.50% Drama55.00% SDS45.00% HCII37.50% Modern Languages32.00%

Field of study within the department Drama83.75% Chemistry83.33% Computer Science78.89% ECE73.33% Psychology73.33% Architecture66.67% HCII62.50% SDS53.33% Physics52.50% Modern Languages52.00% Mathematics51.25% MSE50.00%

Comments “I do not have time for surveys.” “In the School of Drama the uniqueness of one's teaching style is valued highly. Also we respect each other's privacy in the classroom. I couldn't judge, unfortunately for your survey's goal, my colleagues teaching quality and even I'd find it unthinkable to play with some percents there. There's no such kind of a measurement in the arts in my view.” “As I am no longer officially a faculty, having resigned in the Spring, you may take that as an indication that I did not feel that my worth was fully appreciated.” We also received one automatically generated response indicating that the recipient of our was deceased.

Conclusions CMU Faculty DO exhibit self-serving bias CMU Faculty DO exhibit self-serving bias Non-response problems and questions Non-response problems and questions Faculty very worried about confidentiality Faculty very worried about confidentiality Topic more sensitive than originally thought Topic more sensitive than originally thought Expectations were wrong Expectations were wrong

Questions ?