JEFF VANSTEENBURG IOWA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Arsenic Removal/Reduction at the Point of Use in Small Water Systems.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEM Drinking Water Program Water Resources Study Committee.
Advertisements

General Water Treatment By Kelly R. Thompson CWS VI In Association with Free Trial Membership Call In # Conference.
Western RCAP Rural Community Assistance Corporation (916) Midwest RCAP Midwest Assistance Program (952)
Gregory Korshin and Steve Reiber Gregory Korshin and Steve Reiber (partly based on materials prepared for the American.
Nathan Saunders, P.E. Maine Drinking Water Program Public Water System Owner & Operator Responsibility.
CO ‑ STAR: Colorado Strategy for Arsenic Reduction A Five Phase Compliance Assistance Program 1. Evaluate 2. Sample 3.Engineer4. Finance 5. Implement.
Safe Drinking Water Act John N. Gillis, Ph.D. U.S. EPA, Region VIII Denver, Colorado Office of Enforcement, Compliance, and Environmental Justice Technical.
Point-of-Use (POU) Treatment: A Viable Inorganics Compliance Strategy for Small Systems Warren J. Swanson, P.E RMSAWWA/RMWEA Annual Conference Grand.
Sustained Compliance for Public Water Systems, Chapter 2 Workshop The Significant Non-Complier List.
Requirement to Report Changes in Contact Information; Emergency Preparedness Requirements Leslie Shurtleff PWS Security Specialist Drinking Water Program.
Evaluation of DWTUs Which Consist of Multiple Technologies Testing of systems which fall under multiple DWTU Standards.
SDWA1 The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
S afe D rinking W ater A ct Marty Swickard drinking water program EPA Region 8 25 years old in 1999.
POINT OF ENTRY POINT OF USE BOTTLED WATER
Cindy Christian Compliance & Monitoring Manager DEC Drinking Water Program Sustained Compliance Workshop September 23-24, 2010.
Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Presents Drinking Water Program Heather Newman South-central Area Program Coordinator.
Treatment Options Part 1 Tom Sorg Darren Lytle Water Supply and Water Resources Division Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection.
Leah A. Guzman Environmental Program Specialist Drinking Water Program Alaska Department of Environmental Conservation Sustained Compliance—What It Means.
USEPA Regulations By Douglas Rittmann, Ph.D., P.E. Water/Wastewater Consultant Presented to Entrepreneurs Association of Bari.
Transitions to Surveys with New ESRD Regulations
After the Sanitary Survey
Mississippi State Department of Health
SPWSTAC 2006 From POU to Centralized Arsenic Treatment: A Small Water System Case Study 2006 NGWA Naturally Occurring Contaminants Conference J. Mitchell.
© 2009 Michigan State University licensed under CC-BY-SA, original at Water Quality.
Technologies for Radon & Radionuclide Removal Tom Sorg U. S. Environmental Protection Agency.
STAGE 2 DISINFECTION BY- PRODUCTS (DBP’S) A GUIDE TO COMPLIANCE 1.
Primacy Revision Application The Arsenic Rule. Major Points Components of Primacy Revision Application Attorney General’s Statement Special Primacy Requirements.
NSF International Drinking Water Product Standards.
Copyright © United Utilities Water Limited 2015 Water Filters Customer experiences with.
$200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 MCLsMonitoring RulesReporting.
MRWS GROUND WATER RULE (GWR) PREPARED BY JOHN CAMDEN MRWS GROUND WATER TECH
Arsenic Treatment Technologies Christopher A. Impellitteri USEPA/ORD/WSWRD/WQMB Water Technologies for Rural Texas Tuesday, December 2, 2003.
The Safe Drinking Water Act and the Arsenic Rule Rajiv Khera, P.E. Arsenic in Drinking Water Discussion Panel - ITRC Fall Meeting October 27, 2004.
Meeting Current & Future Drinking Water Regulations By: Tyler Richter and Wyatt Smith.
VI. Purpose of Water Treatment
Proposed Rule: 21 CFR 507 Proposed Rule for Preventive Controls for Animal Food 1.
COLIFORM SITE SAMPLING PLAN Gary Carlson Drinking Water Program U.S. EPA Region 8.
All About Sanitary Surveys David Edmunds Environmental Program Specialist ADEC Drinking Water Program Sustained Compliance: What It Means to Public Water.
TOTAL COLIFORM MONITORING 40 CFR TRANSIENT NON-COMMUNITY PUBLIC WATER SYSTEMS.
Drinking Water Tiffany Floyd Assistant Regional Administrator/ Regional Drinking Water Manager.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
An Overview of the Safe Drinking Water Act. Objectives Explain threats to drinking water Describe the hydrologic cycle and pathways of contamination Understand.
EPA Groundwater Rule 40 CFR Parts and 142. Reasons for the Groundwater Rule  To protect public health due to viruses and other bacterial exposure.
Purpose of Water Treatment c. Safe Drinking Water Act and SDWA amendments.
Using GIS to Map Chromium Occurrence in Drinking Water Nate Rogers CEE 6440.
Not all changes will be discussed please view all regulations at
Radionuclide Regulations, Treatment and Affordability Anthony E. Bennett, R.S. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Water Supply Division.
Water to drink Coulter. Water quality 0 Water quality- is a measurement of the substances in water besides water molecules. 0 Certain substances, such.
Total Coliform Rule (Old)vs. Revised Total Coliform Rule (New)
Level 1 Assessment. Abbreviations To Know RTCR – Revised Total Coliform Rule TCR – Total Coliform Rule TC – Total Coliform EC – E. Coli PN – Public Notice.
HOUSEHOLD WATER TREATMENT. Water Quality Problems Recommendations New source Pollution control Maintenance + inspection Treatment Explore all of them.
The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) Drafted in 1974 Amended in 1986 and 1996 Sets national health-based standards for drinking water to protect against.
Housing Choice Voucher Program
Total Coliform Rule (TCR)
Hub 4 Water Media Filters
Water Treatment Basics
CTC 450 Review Open Channel Flow (Manning’s Equation)
REVERSE OSMOSIS PLANTS 5-35kl/day
Hub 4 Water Hub 4 Water Softener
CHAP. 2.2 – WATER TO DRINK.
REVERSE OSMOSIS PLANTS kl/day
Hub 4 Water Carbon Filters
NSF International Drinking Water Product Standards
Private Homeowner Drinking Water Issues
Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)
Private/Domestic Wells
POINT OF ENTRY POINT OF USE BOTTLED WATER
CTC 450 Review Open Channel Flow (Manning’s Equation)
Flint Water.
Arsenic Lisa Miller Water Quality Engineer Golden State Water Company
Presentation transcript:

JEFF VANSTEENBURG IOWA DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES Arsenic Removal/Reduction at the Point of Use in Small Water Systems

Definitions Point of Entry treatment (POE) is a treatment device applied to the drinking water entering a house or building for the purpose of reducing contaminants in the water distributed throughout the house or building.

Definitions Point of use treatment (POU) is a treatment device applied to a single tap or multiple taps, used for the purpose of reducing contaminants in drinking water at those taps, but is not intended to treat all of the water in the facility.

Safe Drinking Water Act Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) identifies POE and POU treatment units as potentially affordable technologies, but stipulates that the systems “shall be owned, controlled, and maintained by the public water system or by a person under contract with the Public Water Supply (PWS) to ensure proper operation and compliance…”

Small Public Water Supply Treatment Technologies (BAT) Activated alumina Coagulation/filtration Coagulation-assisted microfiltration Electrodialysis reversal Enhanced coagulation/filtration Enhanced lime softening Ion exchange

Small Public Water Supply Treatment Technologies (BAT) cont’d. Lime softening Oxidation/filtration Reverse osmosis All of these treatment technologies are effective, but are applied at a central treatment facility.

Three Most Common/Effective POU Treatment Technologies Activated alumina Ion exchange Reverse osmosis

Activated Alumina Aluminum hydroxide – dehydroxylated Used as a desiccant Highly porous Can be regenerated with sodium hydroxide, sulfuric acid, and/or alum Treat with sodium hydroxide then sulfuric acid; proper pretreatment of the beds is essential

Ion Exchange Anion resin is most common Resin needs to be regenerated Some resins are one-time use Water may need pretreatment

Reverse Osmosis Is effective in removing Arsenic V Arsenic III not as effective High volumes of reject water Need to send wastewater for appropriate treatment No chemical regeneration required

Iowa Department of Public Health Treatment Equipment Registration Iowa Department of Public Health (IDPH) rules require registration of water treatment equipment for sale to private well owners to meet the requirements of Iowa Code

Iowa Code Prohibits a person selling, leasing or renting, or advertising the sale, lease or rental of a water treatment system in Iowa, from making false or deceptive representations that the water treatment system will reduce the concentration of one or more contaminants in drinking water.

Registered Treatment Systems for Arsenic Removal 32 systems are registered to remove Arsenic V 7 are registered to remove Total Arsenic Registration ensures that the units have been tested in accordance with National Sanitation Foundation (NSF) Standards 53 and 58 Almost all of the units were reverse osmosis or reverse osmosis in combination with filtration or ion exchange

Treatment for the Private Well Owner There are a number of companies to choose from but, for the most part, the approved treatment of choice would be reverse osmosis. Consumers should be sure that the unit is registered and hold the seller responsible. Test pre and post-treatment. See for yourself that the unit is performing as promised.

What About Small Public Water Supplies? A public water supply is any system that serves an average of 25 people per day, 60 days out of the year (transient non-community). A system that would have an arsenic monitoring requirement would be a system that serves the same population for a minimum of 4 hours per day, 4 or more days per week, for 26 or more weeks per year (non-transient non-community PWS)

Community Water Supply A public supply that has at least 15 service connections used by year-round residents or regularly serves at least 25 year-round residents.

Use of Non-Centralized Treatment Devices Non-community PWS may be allowed to use POU devices to achieve compliance, provided there is no eminent health threat or that the use will not put a sensitive population at risk.

Non-centralized Treatment for Community PWS Community public water systems shall NOT use a POU or POE device to achieve permanent compliance with a maximum contaminant level (MCL) violation (IAC (3)).

Why POU/POE is Not Allowed for Community PWS Must protect the most vulnerable population All users must receive water that meets standards Units are within private residences and are hard to access for monitoring and maintenance Sampling for compliance purposes would be extremely difficult

Summary A variety of treatment technologies for small water systems to remove arsenic are available POU and POE treatment devices that remove arsenic are available Rules are in place to try and protect the consumer and to ensure that the treatment devices perform as advertised

Summary cont’d. POU and POE have a limited application for some public water supplies POU and POE are not allowed in Iowa community public water supplies to meet SDWA maximum contaminant levels requirements.