Illinois Farmers as Nutrient Stewards: Opportunities via the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy IFB Commodities Conference July 30, 2014 Lauren.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
(your state) Master Farmer Program
Advertisements

FARM BILL UPDATE. LAST FARM BILL: A LOT ACCOMPLISHED ON WORKING LANDS.
IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico Spring 2013.
Gulf Restoration Network Decision. Nutrients Nitrogen (N) Phosphorus (P) Sources include: NPS: fertilizer/manure runoff, septic tank overflow Point sources:
Cost-Share Funding Opportunities – How the Lower Souris Watershed Committee Can Help You? Karmen Kyle Group Plan Advisor, Lower Souris Watershed Committee.
2 A large area of low oxygen that cannot sustain marine life. Hypoxia is a worldwide problem but is found in the Gulf of Mexico and is a result of nutrients,
Minnesota Watershed Nitrogen Reduction Planning Tool William Lazarus Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota David Mulla Department of.
Current Planning for 2017 Mid-Point Assessment Gary Shenk COG 10/4/2012 presentation credit to Katherine Antos and the WQGIT ad hoc planning team.
Montana’s 2007 Nonpoint Source Management Plan Robert Ray MT Dept Environmental Quality.
Brief Overview of MDA’s Non- Point Program and Midwest Fertilizer Fees Bruce Montgomery MN Department of Agriculture.
Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY November, 2013.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.
2014 Federal Farm Bill Overview 3/14/14. Conservation Compliance 2 “Recoupling” federal crop insurance premium support benefits to HEL and wetland conservation.
Rick Koelsch University of Nebraska – Lincoln Bob Broz University of Missouri - Columbia.
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Nonpoint Source Pollution Reductions – Estimating a Tradable Commodity Allen R. Dedrick Associate Deputy Administrator Natural Resources & Sustainable.
Illinois Department of Natural Resources. Illinois Coastal Management Program Illinois was officially approved as a Coastal Management Program on Jan.
A gricultural E nvironmental M anagement NYS Soil & Water Conservation Committee Department of Agriculture & Markets A E MA E M.
Agroforestry Assistance §History §Technical §Financial.
Eric G. Hurley, Nutrient Management Specialist USDA-Natural Resources Conservation Service.
Lake Springfield Watershed Nutrient Management Project February 11, 2015.
New England is one of 10 regions making up the 406 National Water Program, “A partnership of USDA CSREES and the Land Grant System”
Update on Chesapeake Bay Issues Presentation to the Chesapeake Bay and Water Resources Policy Committee July 17, 2009 Ted Graham & Steve Bieber COG Department.
Update on Forest Goals and Progress in the Chesapeake Bay Partnership Citizens Advisory Committee Meeting, 8/23/13 Sally Claggett & Julie Mawhorter, US.
Region III Activities to Implement National Vision to Improve Water Quality Monitoring National Water Quality Monitoring Council August 20, 2003.
Developing Final Phase II WIPs and Milestones Katherine Antos Chesapeake Bay Program Office Jenny Molloy Water Protection Division DC Draft Phase II WIP.
LAKE OHRID MACEDONIA AND ALBANIA Experiences with Nutrient Management and Agricultural Non-point Source Pollution Control.
Watershed Planning: Current Status and Next Steps
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell March 11,
World Resources Institute. Hypoxia: What is it? What causes It? The Dead Zone > Seasonally oxygen depleted zone in the Gulf of Mexico > Mobile aquatic.
Taking the Next Step: Implementing the TMDL. What IDEM Provides to Help With Implementation  Compiling all the data in one place  Data-driven recommendations.
Natural Resources Conservation Service Tom Krapf Assistant State Conservationist NRCS - Wisconsin The Regional Conservation Partnership Program.
Laila Racevskis 1, Tatiana Borisova 1, and Jennison Kipp 2 1 Assistant Professor, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida 2 Resource.
Cover crop economics: estimating a return on investment Liz Juchems and Jamie Benning.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Mississippi River Basin Nutrient Losses Herb Buxton, USGSRob Magnien, NOAA Co-Chairs, Monitoring, Modeling, and Research Workgroup,
Source Water Collaborative Online Partnership Tool 1 Collaboration Toolkit: Protecting Drinking Water Sources through Agricultural Conservation Practices.
Desired Outcomes / Impacts ActionsKnowledge Occurs when there is a behavior change based upon what participants have learned (medium term): Development.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, Greg McIsaac, George Czapar, Gary Schnitkey, Corey Mitchell University.
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
Wisconsin’s Nutrient Reduction Strategy for Water Quality Wisconsin Crop Management Conference January 16, 2014 Ken Genskow, PhD Associate Professor, Department.
Gulf of Mexico Hypoxia and Nutrient Management in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, U.S. Geological Survey.
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Opportunities for Collaboration on Water- Quality Issues in the Mississippi River Basin Herb Buxton, Office of Water Quality.
1 GEORGIAN EXPERIENCE – and Strategy for Future DAVID NAKANI Environmental Pollution Control Program DAREJAN KAPANADZE World Bank Office Tbilisi Georgia.
Kg P per county (1000) > < 45 Figure 4 Estimated P production from confined livestock. kg N per county (1000) > 908 Figure.
Science Assessment to Support an Illinois Nutrient Reduction Strategy Mark David, George Czapar, Greg McIsaac, Corey Mitchell August 8,
Protecting and saving water. Partnership Overview Who we are Our accomplishments Our challenges Our priorities.
European Commission Directorate General Environment Page 1 Regulation (EC) No 2152/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning monitoring.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
High Rock Lake Nutrient Modeling Update Pam Behm - NC Division of Water Resources Environmental Management Commission Water Quality Committee Information.
69 th Annual Iowa Soil and Water Conservation District Commissioners Conference Iowa’s Water Quality -Civil Conversations - -Deanne Bryce The Wallace Centers.
EPA and Agriculture: A New Era of Partnership NACD Summer Board Meeting July 21, Ellen Gilinsky Senior Policy Advisor Office of Water, US EPA.
Nutrients and the Next Generation of Conservation Presented by: Tom Porta, P.E. Deputy Administrator Nevada Division of Environmental Protection President,
Growing Smarter Pennsylvania’s Land Use Agenda. Percent of Land Developed in Pennsylvania Source: Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department.
IOWA NUTRIENT REDUCTION STRATEGY A science and technology-based framework to assess and reduce nutrients to Iowa waters and the Gulf of Mexico James Gillespie.
1 Chesapeake Bay TMDL Watershed Implementation Plan – Phase II James Davis-Martin, Chesapeake Bay TMDL Coordinator Citizens Advisory Committee to the Chesapeake.
Taking on the Challenge Addressing Sustainability and Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy Goals Caroline Wade, Nutrient Watershed Manager Illinois Corn Growers.
What The Agricultural Industry Is Doing Now A Focus On “Nutrient Service Providers” Douglas Busdeker The Andersons, Inc. & Ohio AgriBusiness Association.
Introduction to the Regional Conservation Partnership Program (RCPP) June 10, 2016 Carol Rivera– Program Manager An Equal Opportunity Provider and Employer.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
Watershed Management for Urban Water Supply. Why use NYC as a case study? Comprehensive, long-range watershed protection program Illustrates a multifaceted.
Amy Walkenbach, Illinois EPA- Watershed Management Section
Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy - NLRS
WIP Regional Meetings Jason Keppler
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
National 303(d)/TMDL Webinar Series Tuesday, May 2nd, 1:00-3:00 pm EST
Iowa Agriculture Water Alliance
Environmental Management Commission Information Item January 8, 2015
Chesapeake Bay TMDL Milestones, Progress, Mid-point Assessment
Manure Management Implementation by US Farmers
Presentation transcript:

Illinois Farmers as Nutrient Stewards: Opportunities via the Illinois Nutrient Loss Reduction Strategy IFB Commodities Conference July 30, 2014 Lauren Lurkins Director of Natural and Environmental Resources

Why is the Strategy Needed? Gulf Hypoxia Task Force – 5 federal agencies, 12 states and tribes in the Mississippi River Basin – Established in 1997 to reduce/control hypoxia in the Gulf – 2008 Action Plan Goals: Reduce Hypoxic Zone to 1,930 square miles Reduce Nutrient Loading to the Gulf – 45% Total P and Total N

Why is the Strategy Needed? USEPA Guidance Memo in March 2011 – Purpose: Encourage states to develop nutrient reduction strategies while continuing to develop numeric nutrient standards. – Lays out 8 elements of a framework

Stakeholder Involvement Stakeholders met August 2013 – May 2014: – Illinois Department of Agriculture, Illinois EPA – University of Illinois Science Team – Illinois Farm Bureau, Illinois Pork Producers Association, Illinois Fertilizer and Chemical Association, Illinois Corn Growers Association, Illinois CBMP – Association of Illinois Soil and Water Conservation Districts – University of Illinois Extension – NRCS – Sanitary Districts/Wastewater Treatment Plants – Prairie Rivers Network, Environmental Law and Policy Center, Sierra Club – Illinois Environmental Regulatory Group

Status of the Strategy Illinois EPA plans to release draft for public comment at the end of August Final strategy will go to USEPA by end of 2014

Science Assessment February 2013 – Illinois EPA partnered with University of Illinois to develop the Science Assessment: – Current conditions in Illinois of nutrient sources and export by rivers in the state from point and non- point sources – Methods that could be used to reduce these losses and estimates of their effectiveness throughout Illinois – Estimates of the costs of statewide and watershed level application of these methods to reduce nutrient losses to meet TMDL and Gulf of Mexico goals

Science Assessment Illinois contributes 20% of nitrate (410 M lbs) and 11% of phosphorus (37.5 M lbs) that makes it to the Gulf

Strategy Targets and Costs Baseline – Average annual loading of nitrate-N and P from the levels Targets – (5 year running average) – N: 15% by 2025, 45% ultimate – P: 25% by 2025, 45% ultimate Estimated costs - $800 million annually from point source and nonpoint source, with no new funding sources

Agricultural Nonpoint Sources Includes recommended BMPs shown through peer reviewed research to reduce nutrient losses – In-field (split application of N, cover crops, reduced tillage) – Edge of field (bioreactors, wetlands) – Land use changes (perennial crops) Information on costs and estimated reductions/acre for N and P Combination scenarios of BMPs to see large scale reductions

Agricultural Nonpoint Sources Livestock operations - BMPs included for: – Land application of manure – Runoff management from production areas

Key Nutrient Reduction Programs for Nonpoint Sources Focus on building upon existing programs and resources Reinvigoration of voluntary conservation adoption and nutrient management No new legislation or regulation

Key Nutrient Reduction Programs for Nonpoint Sources State Programs – IEPA Section 319 grant program Illinois Green Infrastructure Grant – IDNR Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program – IDOA Partners for Conservation Cost-Share (allocated annually to SWCDs)

Key Nutrient Reduction Programs for Nonpoint Sources Federal Programs – NRCS Environmental Quality Incentives Program Conservation Stewardship Program Easement Programs (Agricultural Conservation Easement Program and Healthy Forests Reserve Program)

Key Nutrient Reduction Programs for Nonpoint Sources Illinois Agriculture Initiatives – Nutrient Research and Education Council – Council on Best Management Practices Keep it for the Crop Education and Outreach Program Cover Crop Training Initiative Lake Springfield Watershed Project

NREC Established by Illinois agriculture in 2012 – sustainable funding mechanism for nutrient research and education Assessment of 75 cents per ton of bulk fertilizer sold in the state. Primarily paid by farmers. Support projects and programs that address the role of nutrients in enhancing Illinois crop production while minimizing environmental impact

NREC Annual funding to NREC between $2-2.5 million 2014 is second year of funding Breakout session today to hear more about specific projects currently funded

Illinois Council on Best Management Practices Coalition of agricultural organizations and agribusinesses: – Illinois Farm Bureau, Illinois Corn Growers Association, Illinois Soybean Association, Illinois Pork Producers Association, Illinois Fertilizer and Chemical Association, Syngenta, GROWMARK and Monsanto Mission is to assist and encourage adoption of BMPs to protect and enhance natural resources and the sustainability of agriculture in Illinois

CBMP Goals Information: Gather current and accurate information on effective/economically viable BMPs and programs Awareness: Increase awareness of water quality issues and BMPs that address Participation: Increase farmer participation in programs and adoption of BMPs Demonstration: Demonstrate loss reductions and progress on strategy goals

KIC Education and Outreach Program Overarching program to promote BMPs so farmers aware of variety of tools available One component – 4R Program – Nutrient stewardship program to reduce nutrient losses from agriculture, focusing on the 4Rs of Nutrient Use: Right Source, Right Rate, Right Time, Right Place – Seeks to educate farmers and suppliers to manage nutrients in a systematic approach throughout the growing season, rather than as a single application

KIC Education and Outreach Program KIC uses the following programs and tools to better educate farmers on the nitrogen cycle, nutrient uptake and optimum nitrogen rates for individual fields: – On-farm nitrogen rate trials – N-WATCH soil inventory and tracking program

Cover Crop Training Initiative Utilize 3 regional cover crop specialists to provide training, education and outreach to promote use of cover crops for nutrient management in production agriculture Cover crop specialists will: – Establish demonstration sites – Work with ag retailers, local SWCDs and IDOA to identify farmers statewide – Partner with Ag Departments at Community Colleges and establish network for education and outreach throughout the state

Lake Springfield Project Purpose: To reduce agriculture’s contribution of nitrate-N loading to Lake Springfield Objective: To help CWLP deliver finished drinking water no less than 5 ppm below the drinking water standard (of 10 ppm) Length of Program: 3 years

Lake Springfield Project Partners CBMP Springfield CWLP Sangamon County SWCD Lincoln Land Community College Farmers Ag retailers

Lake Springfield Project Components N-Rate trials Cover crop sites N-WATCH locations

Ongoing Strategy Work The work will continue even after the Strategy is finalized: – Education and Outreach Committee – Nutrient Science Advisory Committee (NNCs) – Water Monitoring Council Progress will be reviewed and reported to the public every 2 years Strategy is a living document, will be reviewed every 5 years by the stakeholder group to evaluate necessary revisions

Conclusion Everyone (urban, suburban, point source, nonpoint source) has contributed to the problem, and now everyone has an opportunity to be part of the solution Reinvigoration of voluntary conservation adoption and nutrient management on the farm New focus on tracking implementation of BMPs and resulting water quality impacts No “one size fits all” approach for all of Illinois agriculture Our opportunity to demonstrate that voluntary conservation does work!