Www.ccac.ca.  This training module is relevant to all animal users working with genetically-engineered (GE) farm animals in research, teaching or testing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biological Agents.
Advertisements

 This training module applies to all farm animals derived through deliberate human technological intervention, including: dairy and beef cattle dairy.
Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC)
Monitoring transgenic mice Which lines need monitoring? 1.New lines produced by: Gene targeting or insertional transgenesis Mutagenesis, natural or induced.
Safety and Extrapolation Steven Hirschfeld, MD PhD Office of Cellular, Tissue and Gene Therapy Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research FDA.
 This training module is relevant to all farm animal users, including those working with: dairy and beef cattle dairy and beef cattle sheep.
Phenotypic Characterization Harlan Howard, PhD. Describes the animal, construct, and proposed claim Are there sequences that are likely to contain potential.
Innovative applications in animal production Paschalis Fortomaris and Georgios Arsenos Laboratory of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,
Use of Children as Research Subjects What information should be provided for an FP7 ethical review?
The International Regulation of Biotechnology Lecture No. 19 Further Inf. For further information and video link please click on the right buttons in the.
Application of Technology Platforms to Horse Breeding
Post Approval Monitoring Program Presented by Carolyn Malinowski Manager, Quality Assurance and Training.
What Do Toxicologists Do?
Safety and Regulation in Agricultural Biotechnology MUPGRET Workshop.
1 NOTES This presentation is an outline of some of the most important aspects of DOE O 440.1B For completeness, copies of the Order should accompany this.
Overview of the Howard University Animal Care and Use Program (IACUC) Regulatory/Oversight Agencies OLAW (Office of Laboratory Animal Welfare) USDA (United.
Food Safety Assessment Kevin Greenlees, PhD, DABT Kathleen Jones, PhD.
Environmental Safety Assessment Eric Silberhorn, PhD, DABT.
 This training module applies to all farm animals used in biomedical research including: dairy and beef cattle dairy and beef cattle sheep.
Genetically Modified Foods
Chapter 4 Animal Rights and Animal Welfare
Approaches to Assessing Unintended Health Effects of Genetically Engineered Foods.
Early Childhood Information Sharing Toolkit for Community Providers.
The Role of Biotechnology in a Sustainable Food Supply Section 3 : Risk Assessment Peggy G. Lemaux, University of California, Berkeley, California, U.S.A.
Wildlife Management and Vector Control During Livestock or Poultry Disease Outbreaks.
Ashland Specialty Ingredients IFAC’s cGMP Audit Guide How the Food Ingredient Industry has Responded to FSMA and Food Safety Audits Priscilla Zawislak.
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics October 9, 2012
1 OPHS FOUNDATIONAL STANDARD BOH Section Meeting February 11, 2011.
Key elements of an ECP: 1.Statement of Purpose 2.Responsibilities 3.Risk Identification and Risk Assessment 4.Risk Control Measures 5.Education and Training.
Risk Assessment. Risk As defined by Kaplan and Garrick, risk analysis consists of answering three specific questions: what can happen? what is the chance.
WELANIMAL Meeting, 9th October, 2008 Significance of Training of Organic Animal Husbandry in MSc Education Konrád Sz. – Kovácsné Gaál K.
Risk Management, Assessment and Planning Committee III-4.
World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) and Animal Welfare Presentation to the National Farm Animal Care Council May 13, 2010.
Title Support for the Modernisation of the Mongolian Standardisation systemEuropeAid/134305/C/SER/MN TRACEABILITY Food safety - a step forward FOOD CHAIN-MEAT.
Pathogen Reduction Dialogue Panel 4 May 7, 2002 On Farm Food Safety A Process of Intervention Martin Firth Manager, Policy and Strategies Canadian Food.
Animals in Research Donald B. Casebolt, DVM, MPVM, DACLAM.
Potential trade implications of CBD and the Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety MEA – UNEP meeting on Enhancing MEA and WTO Information Exchange 11 November,
Animal Care Committee responsibilities CCAC ACC CCAC National Workshop, May 13, 2010.
Overview of the USDA Biotechnology Risk Assessment Grants Program Deb Hamernik, PhD National Program Leader, Animal Physiology US Department of Agriculture.
The New Science of Food: Facing Up to Our Biotechnology Choices Prepared by Mark Edelman, Iowa State University David Patton, Ohio State University A Farm.
Some Special Markets for Meats John E. Rushing, Ph. D. Department of Food Science NCSU.
Hazards Identification and Risk Assessment
ENVR 401 December 1, 2003 Supervisor: George McCourt Ashleigh Akalehiywot Andrea Hicks Mara Dacso Ted Walker Lillian Harris Kate Washington Regulation.
Psychology 291 – Lab 4 Ethics September 29 - October 2, 2013.
DEPARTMENT: AGRICULTURE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAWS AND THE LIVESTOCK SECTOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION LAWS AND THE LIVESTOCK SECTOR.
Animals in Research Donald B. Casebolt Director, Department of Animal Resources.
Regulations and Ethics. There are two sides to every issue… Do I look like a Frankenfood?
Good Production Practice #6 Assuring Quality Care for Animals
Public Health and Risk Assessment (2nd of 10 Lectures on Toxicologic Epidemiology) Michael H. Dong MPH, DrPA, PhD  readings.
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION go.osu.edu/AQCA Youth Food Animal Quality Assurance Curriculum Guide Food Safety and Government Relations.
OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY EXTENSION Follow Proper Feed Processing Protocols Good Production Practice #5 Assuring Quality Care for Animals Food Animal Quality.
ISO/IEC 27001:2013 Annex A.8 Asset management
Genetically Modified Foods Beth Roberson November 19, 2004 FST 490.
By Isaac and Christy.  GMOs are regulated by the FDA (Food and Drug Administration), the APHIS (Animal Plant Health Inspection Service), and the EPA.
FAS Training 2016 SMR 4 Food and Feed Hygiene Carrick on Shannon, Charleville, Kilkenny Integrated Controls Division 1.
Some common genetic engineering applications A brief overview.
OHSAS Occupational health and safety management system.
Session 7: Planning for Evaluation. Session Overview Key definitions:  monitoring  evaluation Process monitoring and process evaluation Outcome monitoring.
Training and competence of people Bryan Howard. Today I will use the word competence to signify: The possession of suitable and sufficient skill, knowledge,
Storage, Labeling, Controlled Medications Guidance Training CFR § (b)(2)(3)(d)(e) F431.
Federal Biological Research Centre for Agriculture and Forestry President Dr. Georg F. Backhaus Structure, tasks and scientific activities of the Federal.

Biosafety at Swinburne
Food Safety and Government Relations
Follow Proper Feed Processing Protocols
Assuring Quality Care for Animals Youth Food Animal Quality Assurance
Good Production Practice #6 Assuring Quality Care for Animals
ROLE OF KEPHIS IN SAFE HANDLING, TRANSFER AND USE OF GMOS.
Care of Research Animals
@journal_animal animal AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANIMAL BIOSCIENCE.
Presentation transcript:

 This training module is relevant to all animal users working with genetically-engineered (GE) farm animals in research, teaching or testing.  This module covers the following GE farm animals: dairy and beef cattle dairy and beef cattle sheep sheep goats goats swine swine poultry poultry horses horses farmed wildlife farmed wildlife 2 Photo courtesy of Animal Resources Centre, University of Saskatchewan

 Introduce the issues related to the impacts of genetic engineering on farm animals  Provide an appreciation for the special care requirements of GE farm animals  Provide investigators with references and resources for the ethical care and use of GE farm animals in science 3 Basic principles of farm animal welfare, fundamental needs, acquisition, routine handling and specialized procedures and termination of scientific use are covered in the CCAC training module on: the ethical use and care of farm animals in science (2010)

 Overview of GE farm animals  Welfare issues  Regulations  Special considerations for potential alterations in care and nutrition 4

 GE animals have a random or targeted genetic change due to deliberate human technological intervention  Special considerations: unexpected welfare impacts unexpected welfare impacts ethical concerns ethical concerns risk to humans, environment, etc. risk to humans, environment, etc. See the CCAC guidelines on: genetically-engineered animals used in science (in prep.) for further information Pronuclear microinjection of embryos Photo courtesy of Dr. C. Forsberg 5

 Many potential issues may arise from genetic engineering; a few examples: high stillborn rates high stillborn rates low short-term survival rates low short-term survival rates chronic long-term health issues chronic long-term health issues developmental issues developmental issues physiological abnormalities physiological abnormalities 6 Investigators should be aware that in addition to the intended effects of genetic engineering (e.g., deliberate production of diseases or gene function abnormalities), unintended effects are also likely Ultrasound scanning

 Additional regulations for GE animals, as well as their progeny and products (e.g., “new substances”, “novel feeds”)  Environmental release and indirect human health impacts of “new substances” regulated by Environment Canada and Health Canada under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999 (CEPA)  Animal Feed Division of Canadian Food Inspection Agency requires safety assessment of “novel feeds”: livestock livestock humans (worker/bystander exposure and consumption of products) humans (worker/bystander exposure and consumption of products) environment environment 7

 Records outlining the specifics of any genetic modification are necessary and: facilitate accurate follow-up care for health and welfare facilitate accurate follow-up care for health and welfare should be in accordance with regulatory agency and institutional requirements should be in accordance with regulatory agency and institutional requirements 8  Two separate forms of identification should be used for GE farm animals: permanent (e.g., microchip or tattoo) permanent (e.g., microchip or tattoo) easy to identify and read (e.g., ear tag) easy to identify and read (e.g., ear tag)

 In addition to following species-specific guidelines, special consideration should be given to: biosecurity measures to prevent accidental release of genetically-engineered farm animals biosecurity measures to prevent accidental release of genetically-engineered farm animals ○ (e.g., transporting such animals separately from conventional farm animals) 9 physiological impact of any genetic modifications physiological impact of any genetic modifications ○ (e.g., immunosuppression) Photo courtesy of Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada

 At least two physical barriers should be used when confining GE farm animals  Maintain secure confinement limit access to authorized personnel only limit access to authorized personnel only screen and log all visitors and vehicles screen and log all visitors and vehicles adhere to any additional regulations adhere to any additional regulations 10

 Providing care tailored to the special needs of GE farm animals is important for both good animal welfare and for achieving scientific goals higher levels of monitoring required to identify unanticipated welfare concerns higher levels of monitoring required to identify unanticipated welfare concerns  Care and nutrition of GE farm animals will be heavily dependent on the: impact of specific genetic engineering methods impact of specific genetic engineering methods ○ (e.g., a transgene introduced may alter physiology) intended end use of animals or their products intended end use of animals or their products 11

12 Physiological pathways altered by genetic modification Changes in digestion and absorption and utilization of nutrients Potential deficiencies and toxicities e.g., animals kept indoors may require Vitamin D supplementation Potential deficiencies and toxicities e.g., animals kept indoors may require Vitamin D supplementation

13 Photo courtesy of UBC Animal Welfare Program  Considering the intended end use of GE farm animals will help dictate any necessary changes to feeding regime  Alteration to conventional feeding practices (e.g., pesticide- free feed to animals producing pharmaceuticals in their milk)  Offspring of animals used for producing products within their milk will need adapted feeding programs

 Systematic welfare assessment helps to identify potential effects of genetic engineering on physiological and behavioural states  Potential indicators of issues: changes in behaviour changes in behaviour abnormal physical changes abnormal physical changes Three grower hemizygous Enviropigs Photo courtesy of Dr. C. Forsberg

 Careful observation helps mitigate adverse welfare consequences by: revealing special needs and/or problems stemming from specific genetic engineering methods revealing special needs and/or problems stemming from specific genetic engineering methods developing special care methods for animals in the same applications developing special care methods for animals in the same applications determining relevant endpoints determining relevant endpoints See the CCAC guidelines on: choosing an appropriate endpoint in experiments using animals for research, teaching and testing (1998) and the CCAC training module on: pain, distress and endpoints (2010) for further information regarding endpoints

 Genetic engineering may have adverse effects on farm animals  Special consideration should be given to: regulations, identification and transportation regulations, identification and transportation meeting special care and nutrition needs of the GE farm animals based on the specific modifications made, as well as the intended end use of the animals meeting special care and nutrition needs of the GE farm animals based on the specific modifications made, as well as the intended end use of the animals  Paying attention to the special needs of GE farm animals will result in improved scientific outcomes 16 Investigators should strive to achieve their scientific goals in line with the best possible animal welfare standards