Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Portfolio Management, according to Office of Management and Budget (OMB) Circular A-16 Supplemental Guidance, is the coordination of Federal geospatial.
Advertisements

Delivering SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Through the National Science and Technology Consortium.
TN Regional Water-Supply Planning Technical Working Group Tennessee Regional Water-Supply Planning: General Observations and Conclusions TACIR February.
Lesson 3 ODOT Analysis & Assessment. Analysis & Assessment Learning Outcomes As part of a small group, apply the two- part analysis by generating exposure-
PNW Strategic Plan: Developing a Blueprint for Future Direction Research for Resources.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
Climate Change Adaptation A Framework for the City of Philadelphia Chastain C., Ferguson J., Gudernatch S., Kondracki E, Levy J., Tran L.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Roles for Commodity Production in Sustaining Forests & Rangelands J. Keith Gilless Professor of Forest Economics UC Berkeley.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Ruth McWilliams National Sustainable Development Coordinator USDA Forest Service May 31, 2001 May 31, 2001 Science Day 2001 Sustainability Framework …
Watershed Management Framework Mission of watershed management –Coordinate and integrate the programs, tools, and resources of multiple stakeholder groups.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
The National Academies’ Board on Life Sciences Dr. Frances Sharples Director National Research Council National Research Council.
Competency Assessment Public Health Professional (2012)-
System of Environmental-Economic Accounting SEEA Implementation Guide and Diagnostic Tool Alessandra Alfieri UNSD.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Okanagan Basin Conservation Programs (SOSCP and OCCP) 80+ organizations (government and non-government) working together to achieve shared conservation.
Community-based Education K-12 students serving as a resource for meeting community needs.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
SPECA Regional Workshop on Disability Statistics: Dec 13-15, 2006 Purposes of Disability Statistics Jennifer Madans and Barbara Altman National Center.
EPA Office of Water Source Water Protection Initiative Elizabeth Corr, Associate Director Drinking Water Protection Div. Office of Ground Water and Drinking.
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
1/6/2003ESA Ecological Vision Committee Building the scientific foundation for sound environmental decisions U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office.
New England is one of 10 regions making up the 406 National Water Program, “A partnership of USDA CSREES and the Land Grant System”
Wetland Monitoring and Assessment National Water Quality Monitoring Council Meeting August 20, 2003.
Planning for a Vibrant Community. Introduction Planning is a process that involves: –Assessing current conditions; envisioning a desired future; charting.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
US FOREST SERVICE REGIONAL ROUNDTABLE Planning Rule Revision Photographer: Bill Lea.
Marin County Watershed Stewardship Plan
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
«Проект по экономической реабилитации и построению мер доверия» Integrating interests and institutions in water resource management 25 th June, 2013 Eng.
Oregon Jobs and Transportation Act Section 18 External Stakeholder Meetings.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Laila Racevskis 1, Tatiana Borisova 1, and Jennison Kipp 2 1 Assistant Professor, Food and Resource Economics Department, University of Florida 2 Resource.
AWARE: Stakeholder Analysis Udaya Sekhar Nagothu, Per Stålnacke, Bioforsk, Norway. AWARE kick-off meeting Rome, 3-5 June, 09.
Industrial Generation Performance Targets/Goals: » A set of starter methods that are characterized » A grid showing applicability, cost, uncertainty »
Support of the Framework for Monitoring Office of Management and Budget March 26, 2003.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Water Quality Program Financial Assistance Progress and Plans for Meeting RCW Requirements (Joint Legislative Audit and Review Committee)
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
REGIONAL COORDINATION High Level Indicators Draft “white paper” to recommend a core set indicators that can be shared among all types of monitoring Protocol.
1 EPA Regulatory Authority and PPCPs Octavia Conerly Health and Ecological Criteria Division Office of Water Office of Water October 26, 2005 October 26,
NOAA Science Advisory Board …advises the Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere on long- and short- range strategies for research, education,
Objectives: 1.Enhance the data archive for these estuaries with remotely sensed and time-series information 2.Exploit detailed knowledge of ecosystem structure.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey History of the Southwest Biological Science Center A Short Overview.
Needs Assessment Presented By Ernest D. Pérez Capacity Building Assistance Trainer BORDER HEALTH FOUNDATION Tucson, Arizona CAPACITY BUILDING ASSISTANCE.
Assessing Linkages between Nearshore Habitat and Estuarine Fish Communities in the Chesapeake Bay Donna Marie Bilkovic*, Carl H. Hershner, Kirk J. Havens,
Mid-Atlantic Regional Council on the Ocean (MARCO) Presented to the 62 nd Annual Interstate Seafood Seminar Bob Connell New Jersey Department of Environmental.
Critical Loads and Target Loads: Tools for Assessing, Evaluating and Protecting Natural Resources Ellen Porter Deborah Potter, Ph.D. National Park Service.
PP 4.1: IWRM Planning Framework. 2 Module Objective and Scope Participants acquire knowledge of the Principles of Good Basin Planning and can apply the.
Developing Proposals for a System of Indicators on the Nation’s Environment (the SINE) H. Theodore Heintz, Jr. Indicator Coordinator White House Council.
Rapid Bioassessment Protocols for low gradient streams) for species richness, composition and pollution tolerance, as well as a composite benthic macroinvertebrate.
The Science Requirements for Coastal and Marine Spatial Planning Dr. Robert B. Gagosian President and CEO September 24, 2009.
Public Choices for a Healthy Harbor US EPA Collaborative Science & Technology Network for Innovation Rosslyn, VA - October 18 th, 2005 Marta A. Panero.
MEKONG RIVER COMMISSION PROGRAMMES FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT.
 Four Main Sections:  (a) Plan (Unit Level) Monitoring Program  (b) Broader Scale Monitoring Strategies  (c) Timing & Process  (d) Biennial Evaluation.
Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental.
Lecturer: Lina Vladimirovna Zhornyak, associated professor.
Lake Management in Alberta. Lake Issues ~2500 lakes in total with 800 fish-bearing lakes in Alberta Many lakes have changed due to Watershed alteration.
CONTEXT FOR THE REVIEW Gary Matlock, Ph.D. Deputy Assistant Administrator for Programs and Administration (A) Office of Oceanic & Atmospheric Research.
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Preparation of Drought Vulnerability Assessment Study to Develop Iraq National Framework for Integrated Drought Risk Management (DRM) PAVING THE WAY FOR.
Unit Webex Meetings Step 1: Targets, Threats, and Stresses.
K. Bruce Jones EPA Office of Research and Development U.S. EPA Science Advisory Board Regional Vulnerability Assessment Advisory Panel Meeting October,
Using Analysis and Tools to Inform Adaptation and Resilience Decisions -- the U.S. national experiences Jia Li Climate Change Division U.S. Environmental.
Mission: To protect human health and safeguard the environment
Presentation transcript:

Notice: The views expressed here are those of the individual authors and may not necessarily reflect the views and policies of the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). Scientists in EPA have prepared the EPA sections, and those sections have been reviewed in accordance with EPA’s peer and administrative review policies and approved for presentation and publication. The EPA contributed funding to the construction of this website but is not responsible for it's contents. Mention of trade names or commercial products does not constitute endorsement or recommendation for use.

Water Quality Indicators: Lessons from State and Federal Officials Penn State University Atlantic Slope Consortium Human Dimensions Group May 13, 2003

Survey Goals  Identify: What water quality indicators are being used What water quality indicators are being used How they are being used How they are being used How they are useful and/or problematic How they are useful and/or problematic How development, refinement and use of indicators can be improved How development, refinement and use of indicators can be improved Key Water Quality Indicator Issues and Challenges Key Water Quality Indicator Issues and Challenges  Provide foundation for development of community surveys in selected ASC watersheds

Respondent Recruitment  “Reputational Method”  State agencies (28 Interviews) NJDEP, Delaware DNREC, PADEP, MDDNR, VAMRC, VADCR, VADEQ, NCDENR and NYDEC NJDEP, Delaware DNREC, PADEP, MDDNR, VAMRC, VADCR, VADEQ, NCDENR and NYDEC  Federal agencies (12 Interviews) EPA, NOAA, ACE, Fish & Wildlife Service, Forest Service, and USGS EPA, NOAA, ACE, Fish & Wildlife Service, Forest Service, and USGS  Interstate Watershed Commissions (6 Interviews) DRBC, SRBC, ICPRB, and CBLAD DRBC, SRBC, ICPRB, and CBLAD

Respondents’ Roles  Managers Water Resources Management Water Resources Management Development of Policies and Regulations Development of Policies and Regulations Issuing Permits and Overseeing Permitting Processes Issuing Permits and Overseeing Permitting Processes Managing planning for watersheds Managing planning for watersheds Supervising monitoring and assessment of aquatic resources Supervising monitoring and assessment of aquatic resources  Scientists Developing and Collecting Indicator Data Conducting Water Resource Assessments Designing Monitoring Programs Evaluating and Improving Indicator Metrics

What is an “Indicator”?  “Data that vary with time and tell us something about the overall health of an aquatic ecosystem or water resource” Identifies stressor, condition and/or response Identifies stressor, condition and/or response  Water Quality Standards or Criteria  Biological, Physical or Chemical Commonly Integrated as a Suite Commonly Integrated as a Suite  Land Use or Watershed Measures  Socioeconomic Indicators

How are indicators used?  Important for: Assessing Status and Monitoring Trends Assessing Status and Monitoring Trends Cause-Condition-Response ModelsCause-Condition-Response Models Regulatory Enforcement Regulatory Enforcement Defining and Evaluating StandardsDefining and Evaluating Standards Identifying “Vulnerability” StatusIdentifying “Vulnerability” Status Setting Agency Priorities Setting Agency Priorities Indirect Measure of Agency PerformanceIndirect Measure of Agency Performance

Water Quality Indicators: Strengths and Weaknesses +  Identifying impairment or degradation of water resources  Developing water quality standards and criteria  Responding to and guiding program goals  Foundation of data for future needs _  Limited by resource constraints Financial Technical Organizational  Most useful when developed as suites / multi-metrics  Challenge of maintaining scientific integrity and issue- relevance

Improving Indicator Metrics  Accuracy and Scientific Integrity Evaluation and application of new technologies Evaluation and application of new technologies  Availability and Abundance Utilizing current resources (e.g. citizens’ monitoring data) Utilizing current resources (e.g. citizens’ monitoring data) Securing support for continued indicator development Securing support for continued indicator development

Improving Indicator Use  Consistency… from development of metrics to provision for management purposes Data needed vs. data that can be obtained Data needed vs. data that can be obtained Forms in which data are collected Forms in which data are collected  Application to Water Quality Issues Gather localized or issue-specific data when possible (quality vs. quantity tradeoffs) Gather localized or issue-specific data when possible (quality vs. quantity tradeoffs) Diverse and creative formatting of data for stakeholder use Diverse and creative formatting of data for stakeholder use

Stakeholders - and - Their Concerns  State & Federal Agencies  Others NGO’s NGO’s Private Industry Private Industry Academia Academia Plus many more… Plus many more…  Similarities and Differences 1. Aquatic resources’ status and conditions 2. Standards, requirements and permitting rules 3. Resource Management 4. Development and Accuracy of Indicators

Responding to Stakeholder Concerns: Important Dimensions of Indicators  No Silver Bullet (Suites with issue-dependent components)  Iterative Process of Indicator Development  Flexibility of Formatting is Important (Audience- specific Indicator Data)

Key Findings  State and Federal agencies have a continuing need for indicator development and enhancement of current indicators  Stakeholders need data to be in multiple formats and communicated creatively  Availability and efficient allocation of funding and technical resources are fundamental challenges

Challenges  Abundance, Quality, and Efficiency of Resources Financial Financial Technical Technical Human Human  Future Needs: Indicators and Programs that are… Innovative Innovative Adaptive Adaptive Collaborative Collaborative  Where to go from here Input at the watershed level Input at the watershed level What do indicators mean to the general public? What do indicators mean to the general public?

Next Step: Community Surveys in Selected ASC Watersheds  Develop a taxonomy of watershed indicators based on ecological science  Develop a taxonomy of watershed indicators based on ecological science  Assess the relevance of these indicators to the general public  Assess the linkage between environmental indicators and indicators of social well being  Determine the qualities of indicators that increase:  Determine the qualities of indicators that increase: perceived relevanceperceived relevance the probability of their use in environmental policythe probability of their use in environmental policy the strength of the relationship between environmental and social well beingthe strength of the relationship between environmental and social well being

Thank You!  EPA STAR  Respondents  Collaborators

QUESTIONS?