A 1:1 TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE Google Chromebook Roger Bevels ITEC 7445 Kennesaw State University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Teacher Foundation A Look at the Evaluation Process by The Teacher Foundation (TTF)
Advertisements

Technology Use Plan Methacton School District Patty McGinnis ED TECH 501.
Teachers, administrators and staff continuously seek and share learning and then act on what they learn. The goal of their actions is to enhance their.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Goals of Workshop District Education Technology Plan Goals 8 goals aligned to State/National Education Technology Plans Strategies to meet challenges.
A Guide to Implementation
STRATEGIC PLAN Community Unit School District 300 7/29/
Action Plan Mr. Ahmed Zaki Uddin Mathematics O-Level.
Calvary Christian School Technology Roadmap. Technology at Calvary School (Vision) Using information technology, CCS endeavors to enhance the educational.
Technology Plan EDLD 5362 Casey Smith.
1 Program Improvement Update Foundations for writing the LEA Addendum.
STaR Chart Summary for Bryan ISD By Jenna Springfield.
Handheld Educators Leadership Program: Handhelds in the Hands of Learners Lynn A. Elder Marsha Gladhart WSU College of Education.
Ricki Sabia, JD edCount, LLC Senior Associate and NCSC Technical Assistance and Parent Training Specialist Universal Design for Learning: Working to Create.
Part II: Strategic Planning for a Successful 1:1 Program
Educational Technology Plan Del Mar Union School District.
Technology Use Plan Mary Anderson 7/29/08 EDTECH 571 click to go to each slide.
LanSchool v7.8 Software Evaluating Emerging Technologies Assessment By Lydia Hordges ITEC 7445.
ITEC 7445: EMERGING TECHNOLOGY EMILY TOMS NOVEMBER 12, 2012
MOBILE TECHNOLOGY Christy Haskins ITEC7445 Evaluating EETA Kennesaw State University.
Katherine Kingston EDLD May 15, 2011 This presentation will see just how well Galena Park ISD’s technology plan compares with the National.
Milwaukee Digital Inclusion Program Draft: January 26, 2007, Milwaukee Department of Administration.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
EETT Enhancing Education Through Technology McKeesport Area School District Founders’ Hall.
Jeni Corn, Ph.D., Trip Stallings, Ph.D., Friday Institute, NC State University.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Technology Leadership
Technology Update Barrington School Committee December 15, 2011.
Masconomet Regional School District Tablets vs. Netbooks Seth Goodman & Ryan King masconomet.org/tablets-netbooks Art Business & Computer Ed. EnglishForeign.
Teachers Discovering Computers Integrating Technology and Digital Media in the Classroom 7 th Edition Evaluating Educational Technology and Integration.
Using Technology in the Classroom. State of Education Low test scores Funding issues Poverty Lack of support Standardized testing.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
Comparing pedagogical innovations at the classroom level: teacher roles and role of technology Dimensions 2, 4, 5.
Strategic Technology Plan Lincoln High School Sarah Simmons ETEC 6223 University of Arkansas.
CCISD TECHNOLOGY PLAN by Patti Shields Cohort 10 EDLD 5362 Information Systems Management.
Interview with Justin Castile Henry County Schools Instructional Technology Specialist Anissa Andrews MEDT 8461 Diffusions of Innovations.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Technology Use Plan Presented by: Bob Santi. Rationale A technology plan is a current guideline for the appropriate and effective use of technology a.
Lubbock Independent School District Technology Plan By Stacey Price.
Common Core State Standards: Supporting Implementation and Moving to Sustainability Based on ASCD’s Fulfilling the Promise of the Common Core State Standards:
PERSONAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS (PLES) LACEY GOOCH EVALUATING EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES ITEC 7445 SUMMER 2015.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
Jackson County Public Schools Technology Plan Kimberly Body and Elizabeth Perin Liberty University Education 639.
Region 6 Fall Meeting Concord, North Carolina November 24, 2014.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
Bethune Middle School Technology Plan Presented by: William Carter E7801-Instructional Technology Planning and Management Dr. Regina Merriwether.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Becoming Mentors & Building Capacity in our Schools Year 3 of 3 & 2 of 3 February 2011.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
By Billye Darlene Jones EDLD 5362 Section ET8004-1B February, 2010.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
UNC Deans Council The North Carolina K-12 Digital Learning Transition Glenn Kleiman Friday Institute for Educational Innovation NC State University College.
Implementing Writing Technology in our Instruction By Judson Smith.
Tablet Computer Adoption Programs in High School Dean McGee and Jeff VanderNoor
SACS/CASI District Accreditation  January 2007  April 2007  May 2007  January – April 2008  Board Approval for Pursuit of District Accreditation.
Created By: Erin McAlister Christiana Elder Sherene Mayner Freddie Martinez.
Monika O. Gonzalez ET Information Systems.
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
Friday Institute Leadership Team Glenn Kleiman, Executive Director Jeni Corn, Director of Evaluation Programs Phil Emer, Director of Technology Planning.
February 28, 2012 Presented By: Eileen Rohan, Superintendent Sean Maher, Network Manager Katie Frank, White Hill Michael Bessonette, Brookside Upper Ron.
AYP Aigner Allen Shoemaker Elementary  Shoemaker did not make AYP because of the following subjects:  Math  Writing.
It’s all about the learning Igniting Economic Development Though Students’ 21 st Century Skills.
For the Students Students in elementary school right now have always used technology, classes seem outdated and boring to most because of the lack of.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
SMART Table 442i collaborative learning center By: Lisa Dowd – ITEC 7445 Emerging Technology.
Edmodo: Instant Connection with Students, Parents, and the Community
Edmodo: Instant Connection with Students, Parents, and the Community
Chrissi Denman ITEC Emerging Technology Dr. Cain
Presentation transcript:

A 1:1 TECHNOLOGY INITIATIVE Google Chromebook Roger Bevels ITEC 7445 Kennesaw State University

What is Google Chromebook? Internet-dependent laptop with a fast startup (7-8 seconds) that gives students and teachers access to thousands of educational apps and videos Google Chromebook

Fast start-up of 7-8 seconds Battery lasts the entire school day 24/7 Support from Google Students and teachers have access to thousands of educator- approved apps, books, and videos Ease of district management through web-based management console Cost effective for 1:1 implementation Easy set-up for secure online assessments as states implement online standardized testing Students can immediately share work with teachers, peers, and parents Benefits of Google Chromebook

Oglethorpe County Schools -Vision for Technology Use- The mission of the Oglethorpe County School System is to provide research based learning opportunities in a safe environment thus developing the skills and knowledge to prepare all students for graduation. The primary purpose, primary duties, core beliefs, values and accessibility of system technology are as follows: Students will develop a solid foundation for building a lifetime of learning through use of basic technology skills. Technology is a vital resource in the classroom to motivate, stimulate, and engage students in learning.

Oglethorpe County Schools -Vision for Technology Use- (cont’d.) QCC technology standards guide the process of technology integration. Technology skills are an integral part of all aspects of building knowledge. Technology is an essential component of today’s jobs and will be essential to additional jobs in the future. Training, planning, hardware and software for technology instruction equips students and teachers with the skills to be successful and competitive.

Professional learning opportunities in technology are essential for all faculty and staff members in which to expand student knowledge and implement instructional technology. Resources are available for students to work on areas of need or interest with immediate feedback Classroom technology standards are set and a purchasing plan is implemented to keep technology current. Community has access to school technology resources. Oglethorpe County Schools -Vision for Technology Use- (cont’d.)

Parents have access to student information and progress in a real time environment. All staff members have access to technology and training to allow better communication and more efficient functionality of the school system A variety of technology resources such as Georgia Virtual High School, web based instruction and video streaming deliver rigorous academic courses. Oglethorpe County Schools -Vision for Technology Use- (cont’d)

Supports a 1:1 technology initiative by placing a laptop in the hands of each student Gives equitable access to students during the school day Provides opportunities for students to incorporate technology into their day-to-day learning Provides teachers opportunities for incorporating technology in their lessons without the need to reserve computer lab time Keeps students up to date on emerging technologies including writing tools, presentation tools, and software apps that support learning new information Equips students with the technology essentials that they will face when entering college and the workforce How does the Google Chromebook support the Oglethorpe County School System Vision for Technology Use?

Pilot program implemented during the 2014 – 2015 school year Grade levels in the pilot program: 3 rd, 6 th, and 9 th grades Primary grade level (K – 2 nd ) teachers and administrators will assist in determining if the Google Chromebooks are appropriate for that age level Demographic information on the pilot grade levels are available on the next slide. Target Population -Pilot Program 2014/2015-

Total of 155 Students 70% White 21% African American 4% Hispanic 1% Asian 4% Other 16 Students with IEPs 41% Economically Disadvantaged 3 rd Grade Total of 183 students 67% White 22% African American 4% Hispanic 2% Asian 3% Other 20 Students with IEPs 34% Economically Disadvantaged 6 th Grade Total of 184 students 72% White 20% African American 5% Hispanic 1% Asian 2% Other 18 Students with IEPs 40% Economically Disadvantaged 9 th Grade Target Population -Pilot Program 2014/2015-

Technical support provided through the technology department and the use of Big Web Desk to report issues Basic troubleshooting and curriculum assistance provided by 2 technology coaches who will serve the 4 schools, one splitting their time between the primary and elementary schools and one splitting their time between the middle and high schools As funding for technology improves technology coaches will be placed full time in each school Technical Support

As with any technology use there are limitations and obstacles that must be addressed. Some considerations for using Google Chromebooks: The cost of implementing 1:1 technology will have to be considered. Chromebooks are internet-based. The system’s infrastructure must be improved to support the increased use of the network. Students with no internet access at home will have limited use of the apps on the Chromebook. Limitations

Maintenance and Repair: As with any equipment provided for student and teacher use, there must be procedures in place for the repair/replacement of damaged equipment. The following procedure is a proposal based on the procedures in other schools systems: First repair need : system will be responsible for the cost of repair or replacement Second repair need : system will divide the cost of repair of replacement with the student’s parent or guardian Third repair need : the student’s parent or guardian will be responsible for the entire cost of repair or replacement Limitations (cont’d.)

Chromebook Starts at $ Management & Console Support $30.00 each device Headphones $7.00 each Training/Support Very little cost since these are laptops. System technology staff will do any training. Wireless Access and Peripherals Printers and wireless access points are already in place. Costs

E-rate: Since the computers are web-based e-rate funding may be available. Local: Money has been budgeted for technology in the local school system. Grants: There are many grants available for technology in schools. Funding Sources

Through Google Play for Education teachers and students have access to books, apps, and videos that support content-area standards. Google Play for Education The many different apps and presentation tools support technology standards for students. Students have access to inquiry apps, such as virtual labs that provide authentic learning experiences. Use of Chromebooks to Meet Content and Student Technology Standards

Through virtual labs, communication with experts in the field, and online learning projects, students experience engaging lessons that promote inquiry and higher-order thinking skills. Students are able to collaborate with other students as they upload projects. Students have the opportunity to enhance their writing and presentation skills through the use of presentation tools and online software. Use of Chromebooks to Promote Specific Learning Goals

Assistive and Instructional tools are available to students in Google Play and other app sources. Teachers can individualize learning opportunities based on students’ needs. Online assessment tools allow teachers to assess a student with immediate feedback so they know what weaknesses to address with a student. With some apps, students are able to learn at their own pace. Provides extended learning opportunities for gifted students. Use of Chromebooks to Differentiate Instruction

Students are able to communicate and share work with other students during project-based learning experiences. Students can upload work at school or from home for the teacher to review/grade. Students can share final products to interested parties in the school, community, and worldwide. Promotes digital citizenship as students communicate at the local and global levels. Use of Chromebooks to Promote Communication

1:1 Technology “Of the core content areas, some of the most substantial academic achievement results of one-to-one programs have been seen with writing skills” (Sauers & McLeod, 2012, p. 2). “Bebell and Kay report on evidence from teacher and student surveys, teacher and principal interviews, and classroom observations that ‘student engagement increased dramatically in response to the enhanced educational access and opportunities afforded by 1:1 computing through the pilot program’” (Bebell & O’Dwyer, 2010, p. 11) Evaluation of Research

1:1 Technology “Our findings demonstrate that schools employing a 1:1 student- computer ratio and key implementation factors outperform other schools, and reveal significant opportunities for improving education return on investment (ROI) by transforming teaching and learning (Gielniak, M. et. al., 2010, n.p.) “1:1 technology makes it possible to quickly assess students’ strengths and weaknesses and then differentiate or even individualize instruction based on each student’s specific needs. Subjects like math, in particular, can benefit from this form of individualized instruction” (Dunn, J. 2012, n.p.) Evaluation of Research

Google Chromebook Case Studies Richland School District Two, Columbia, South Carolina Richland School District Two Reported more collaboration among students Reported and increase in student engagement Teachers moved away from the traditional “desks-in-a-row” environment to arrangements that support team work Students are able to collaborate at school and outside of school Minimal device management gives schools the ability to focus on the students, not the devices Evaluation of Research

Google Chromebook Case Studies (cont’d.) Leyden High School, Franklin Park, Illinois Leyden High School Web-based operating system allows for more student collaboration Due to collaboration with peers and teachers, assignments become a “living piece of learning” Supports the “anytime, anywhere” idea of learning Has seen an increase in student participation in activities With the devices developed a student achievement system to encourage students to take more rigorous classes Evaluation of Research

Google Chromebook Case Studies (cont’d) Evaluation of Research

Implementation Plan Gather and finalize data on number of Chromebooks needed, additional materials needed, professional development, support, etc., and the cost of all these components. Present findings to the Oglethorpe County School Board of Education for questions and approval Communicate to the schools and community how the process will work, policies and procedures, and timeline Provide a question-and-answer session for teachers, students, parents Order Chromebooks and supporting materials Plan for initial and ongoing professional development for teachers Plan for how the Chromebooks will be distributed to students in the pilot grade levels

Implementation Plan (cont’d.) John Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model (cont’d.) 1. Create urgency: communicate to all stakeholders the many benefits of technology and making it readily available to students so that they see the immediate need 2. Form a powerful coalition: find out which stakeholders already see the importance and need of 1:1 and invite them to plan with you 3. Create a vision for change: define goals and desired outcomes to share with stakeholders 4. Communicate the vision: share the vision with interested stakeholders, especially those involved in the decision process such as the local board and superintendent

Implementation Plan (cont’d.) I would recommend using John Kotter’s 8-Step Change Model, as outlined below, to implement the 1:1 Google Chromebook plan. 5. Remove obstacles: if there are people who do not agree with the plan work with them to see why they are opposed and try to convince them to get on board 6. Create short-term wins: start with a smaller group if necessary and measure and record outcomes to share with stakeholders 7. Build on the change: do more than implement the plan. Extend it in any way possible so the benefits outweigh the challenges of implementation 8. Anchor the changes in corporate (school) culture: make sure that administrators share the same vision not only for implementation but for continuous extensions and improvements

Bebell, D. & O’Dwyer, L. (2010). Educational outcomes and research from 1:1 computing settings. The Journal of Technology, Learning, and Assessment (9, 1). Retrieved from: Chromebooks for Education. Retrieved from Dunn, J. (2012). How 1:1 technology is making school more real. Edudemic. Retrieved from Kotter's 8-Step Change Model: Implementing Change Powerfully and Successfully. (n.d.) Retrieved from: newPPM_82.htm References

Moon, M. (2012). What’s a Chrome Book, anyway? Retrieved from Oglethorpe County Technology Vision. Retrieved from &mid=25408 Project RED: The Research. (2010) Retrieved from overview.html Sauers, J., & McLeod, S. (2012). What does the research say about school one-to-one computing initiatives? Castle. Retrieved from