Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences Presented By Mr. Guy Gribble General Manager, International Flight Resources, LLC Current as of APR 2013

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops They Are The Same, Only Different Departures Holding Arrival Maneuvering Approaches Missed Approaches PANS-Ops Volume II, Part 1, Section 1, Chapter 3, “Units of Measurement” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 210, “Units of Measurement”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops They Are The Same, Only Different Physics, Aerodynamics, Mathematics Units of Measure US Customary Units vs. Meters Conversions ? Rounding of Numbers Fix Tolerances and Accuracy Flight Technical Errors PANS-Ops Volume II, Part 1, Section 1, Chapter 3, “Units of Measurement” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 210, “Units of Measurement”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Who is In Charge Here ? State (Country) Aeronautical Information Publication, AIP Flight Check, Maintain Publish, Revise Design Criteria Standard design development Role of the Procedure Designer Pilot operational procedures ICAO, International Civil Aviation Organization SARPS vs. Documents

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Where Does This Data Come From ? State (Country) Commercial Provider WGS-84 Compliant ? Airport Country Somewhere ? ICAO Annex 11, Paragraph 2.28, “Common Reference System” ICAO Annex 14, Paragraph 1.3, Common Reference System” NOAA FAQ’s on WGS-84, http://www.ngs.noaa.gov/faq.shtml

NAD 83 datum system is acceptable for GPS positioning Russia China India NAD 83 datum system is acceptable for GPS positioning Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure “Normal” Operations Maintain the Ground Track Maintain the Required Climb Gradient X X TERPS, Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 2e  PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 2, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.1.2 PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.7 “Abnormal and Emergency Operations” 14 CFR 25.121, FAA Airworthiness Standards, Transport Category Airplanes CS 25.121, EASA Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplanes

TERPS vs. Pans-Ops vs. FAR 25 Standard Instrument Departure Vertically Speaking 5 M MSA 35 Ft ? MSA 15? 1,500 Feet AFL Departure End Of Runway DER Country survey of obstructions, BGBW, Narsarsuaq, Greenland 14 CFR 25.121, FAA Airworthiness Standards, Transport Category Airplanes CS 25.121, EASA Certification Specifications for Large Aeroplanes

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure If straight out will not work… Climb faster over obstacle Turn away from obstacle Keep in sight, “See and avoid” Climb in a safe sector away from obstacle Speed limiting Combinations of any of the above X X PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 2, Para. 2.7, “Procedure Design Gradient” TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.4.4 “Multiple Climb Gradient Application” PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3, “Turning Departures” TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 3, “Departure Routes”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure Climb Faster Over Obstacle MSA 35 Ft ? .8% MOC 3.3% 2.5% OIS MSA 5 M 152 Feet per NM OCS 48 Feet per NM ROC 200 FEET PER NM Requires 350'/NM Until Reaching MSA PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 2, Para. 2.7, “Procedure Design Gradient” TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.4.4 “Multiple Climb Gradient Application” PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3, “Turning Departures” TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 3, “Departure Routes” Maintain 4.3% Until Reaching 1700MSL DER

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure Turn Away From Obstacle ≈ 2 NM Initial Climb Area ≈ 3.5 KM Area 1 500' 500' 15˚ Splay Take-Off Run Available= Runway available for ground run (No clearway) Rule of Thumb: 10%increase in TOGW= 20%increase in TO Distance PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 3, “Departure Routes” TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.6, “Initial Climb Area” 14 CFR 121.189, 135.379, EU-Ops 1.495 ICAO Annex 6, Part 1, Attachment C, Para. 5, “Take-off Obstacle Clearance Limitations”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure Turn Away From Obstacle ≈ 2 NM Initial Climb Area ≈ 3.5 KM Area 1 500' 500' 15˚ Splay Take-Off Run Available= Runway available for ground run (No clearway) Rule of Thumb: 10%increase in TOGW= 20%increase in TO Distance PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 3, “Departure Routes” TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.6, “Initial Climb Area” 14 CFR 121.189, 135.379, EU-Ops 1.495 ICAO Annex 6, Part 1, Attachment C, Para. 5, “Take-off Obstacle Clearance Limitations”

X TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure, TERPS Keep in Sight and Tell Pilot to "See and Avoid" X Visual Climb Over Airport PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 5, “Published Information for Departures” TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 4, “Visual Climb Over Airport” PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 4, “Omnidirectional Departures” TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 2, “Diverse Departures” 15˚ MAX Hazard Beacons on top of hill to the east clearly visible or Take Off Minimums 600/1 Take Off Minimums 800/2

No Departure Turns East TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure, TERPS Climb in a Safe Sector 25 or 46 NM X Diverse Departure Evaluation Take-Off Run Available= Runway available for ground run (No clearway) Rule of Thumb: 10%increase in TOGW= 20%increase in TO Distance 15˚ MAX No Departure Turns East

X TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure, PANS-Ops Climb in a Safe Sector PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 5, “Published Information for Departures” TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 4, “Visual Climb Over Airport”   PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 4, “Omnidirectional Departures” TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 2, “Diverse Departures" X

X TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure, PANS-Ops Climb in a Safe Sector No Turns Eastbound X PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 5, “Published Information for Departures” TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 4, “Visual Climb Over Airport”   PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 3, Chapter 4, “Omnidirectional Departures” TERPS Volume 4, Chapter 2, “Diverse Departures”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure “Minimum Safe Altitude”, MSA TERPS 25NM terrain only, no guarantee of navaid reception TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 221, “Minimum Safe/Sector Altitudes” Aeronautical Information Manual, Paragraph 5-4-5c “Minimum Safe/Sector Altitude” Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure “Minimum Sector Altitude”, MSA PANS-Ops TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 221, “Minimum Safe/Sector Altitudes” Aeronautical Information Manual, Paragraph 5-4-5c “Minimum Safe/Sector Altitude” PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 1, Chapter 1, “Definitions: Minimum Sector Altitudes” PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 8, “Minimum Sector Altitudes (MSA)” ICAO Annex 4, "Definitions" and Appendix 2 Item #171, 172 Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Standard Instrument Departure “Minimum Safe Altitude”, MSA PANS-Ops TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph 221, “Minimum Safe/Sector Altitudes” Aeronautical Information Manual, Paragraph 5-4-5c “Minimum Safe/Sector Altitude” PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 1, Chapter 1, “Definitions: Minimum Sector Altitudes” PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 8, “Minimum Sector Altitudes (MSA)” ICAO Annex 4, "Definitions" and Appendix 2 Item #171, 172 Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Holding Timing PANS-Ops >14,000 = 1.5 Minute ≤ 14,000 = 1 Minute PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3 “Flight Procedures for Racetrack and Reversal Procedures” FAA’s Instrument Procedures Handbook, FAA-H-8261-1A Chapter 3, Page 3-25, “High Performance Holding” PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 6, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.4.9 “Time/Distance Outbound” FAA’s Aeronautical Information Manual, Chapter 5, Section 3, Para. 5-3-7 “Holding”   TERPS

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Holding Speeds PANS-Ops >34,000 = IMN.83 >20,000 ≤ 34,000 = 265 KIAS >14,000 ≤ 20,000 = 240 KIAS ≤ 14,000 = 230 KIAS >14,000 = 240 >6,000≤ 14,000 = 220 KIAS ≤ 6,000 = 210 265 230/210KIAS 200 KIAS PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 2, Section 4, Chapter 1, “Conventional Holding Criteria” FAA Order 7130.3A, “Holding Pattern Criteria”, Chapter 1, Chapter 3 PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 3, Para. 3.3.8, “Shuttle” Transport Canada, AIM RAC 10.0, Paragraph 10.9 “Shuttle Procedure” NATS UK, AIP Enroute 1.5 “Holding, Approach and Departure Procedures” Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.6 “Shuttle Procedure” TERPS

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Holding Evaluated Airspace PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 2, Section 4, Chapter 1, “Conventional Holding Criteria” PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 3, Section 3, Chapter 7, “RNAV Holding Criteria” FAA Order 7130.3A, “Holding Pattern Criteria”, Chapter 1

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops X X XX XX Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures Definitions and Use of Entry Procedures Evaluated Airspace Obstacle Clearance Speeds Selection of Turn X XX PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Table I-4-1-2, “Speeds for Procedure Calculation in Knots”, Category C/D Speeds for Initial Approach PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Table I-4-1-3, “Rate of Descent in the Final Approach Segment, w/o FAF” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph #234, “Initial Approach Segment Based on a PT” FAA’s AIM Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-4-9, “Procedure Turn and Hold-in-lieu of Procedure Turn”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops 45/180 45/180 80/260 80/260 Base Turn Teardrop Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures Racetrack Base Turn Turn point Entry Sector 80/260 45/180 Holding In lieu of Teardrop 10 NM Limit 80/260 45/180 PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 3, “Initial Approach Segment” FAA’s AIM Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-4-9, “Procedure Turn and Hold-in-lieu of Procedure Turn” FAA’s Instrument Procedures Handbook, FAA-H-8261-1A Chapter 5, Page 5-39, “Course Reversals” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph #235, “Initial Approach Segment Based on a PT”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures, TERPS Entry Procedure PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 3, Para. 3.3 “Flight Procedures for Racetrack and Reversal Procedures” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph #234, “Initial Approach Segment Based on a PT”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures, PANS-Ops Entry Sector Defined PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 3, Para. 3.3 “Flight Procedures for Racetrack and Reversal Procedures”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures, PANS-Ops "Omni-Directional" Defined PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 3, Para. 3.3.1 “Entry”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Evaluated Airspace Intermediate Segment, TERPS 31 different templates PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 2, Section 4, Chapter 1, “Conventional Holding Criteria” PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 3, Section 3, Chapter 7, “RNAV Holding Criteria”  FAA Order 7130.3A, “Holding Pattern Criteria”, Chapter 1 FAA Order 7130.3A, “Holding Pattern Criteria”, Chapter 1, Chapter 3

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Evaluated Airspace Intermediate Segment, PANS-Ops 4.6 km (2.5 NM) 1 min./45-180 Procedure turn area Secondary area 4.6 km (2.5 NM) PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4 Chapter 5 Paragraph 5.4.3, “OCA/H for Non-precision Approach (Straight In)” and Figure I-4-5-3b PANS-Ops Volume 2, Section 2, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.4.3 “Area” PANS-Ops Volume 2, Section 2, Chapter 4, Paragraph 4.4.4 “Area”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Evaluated Airspace Final Segment, Non-Precision All = 14.29˚ SPLAY VOR = 7.8˚ SPLAY NDB = 10.3˚ SPLAY PANS-Ops Volume 2, Section 2, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.4.3 “Area” PANS-Ops Volume 2, Section 2, Chapter 4, Paragraph 4.4.4 “Area”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Approach Procedures 350 No Final Approach Fix 300 200 Precision Approach 200 TERPS Volume 1, Chapters 4, 5, 6, 7, VOR's= additional 50' lower. PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 2, Section 1, Chapter 1, Paragraph 1.4.7 “Obstacle Clearance on the precision Segment Application of Basic ILS Surfaces” PANS-ATM, Chapter 6, Paragraph 6.5.3

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures Speeds PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Table I-4-1-2, “Speeds for Procedure Calculation in Knots”, Category C/D Speeds for Initial Approach PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Table I-4-1-3, “Rate of Descent in the Final Approach Segment, w/o FAF” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph #234, “Initial Approach Segment Based on a PT” FAA’s AIM Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-4-9, “Procedure Turn and Hold-in-lieu of Procedure Turn”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Arrivals and Maneuvering Procedures Speeds PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Table I-4-1-2, “Speeds for Procedure Calculation in Knots”, Category C/D Speeds for Initial Approach PANS-Ops Volume 1, Part 1, Section 4, Table I-4-1-3, “Rate of Descent in the Final Approach Segment, w/o FAF" TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Paragraph #234, “Initial Approach Segment Based on a PT” FAA’s AIM Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-4-9, “Procedure Turn and Hold-in-lieu of Procedure Turn”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops X X XX XX Visual Approaches and Visual Maneuvering Definition of Use for Evaluated Airspace OCA/ROC Speeds Visual Aids and Cues X XX X XX ICAO Document #9157, “Aerodrome Standards” Chapter 5, Paragraph 5.3.6, “Circling Guidance Lights” FAA Order JO 6850.2B, 08/20/10 Visual Guidance Lighting Systems” Definitions#18, “Lead-in Lighting System” FAA Information for Operators #11003 01/25/11 “Pilots Roles and Responsibilities During Visual Approaches”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops X X "Visual" vs. Circle-to-Land Definition of Use for Evaluated Airspace OCA/ROC Speeds Visual Aids and Cues MDA vs. Descent Point X X PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 7, Appendix “Visual Manoeuvering Using Prescribed Track” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach” AIM Chapter 5, Paragraph 5-4-24 “Charted Visual Flight Procedures”

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering 300‘AFL 1.7 NM “C” 2.68 NM “D” 3.49 NM 1.7 NM 2.3 NM 14 CFR 91.175, 135.225, 121.651, 125.381 TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6, “Circling Approach” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3.3 and Table 3-9 PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 5, Paragraph 5.4.6, “Protection of Visual Segment of the Approach Procedure” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 5, Paragraph #253, “Visual Descent Point” “C” 4.2 NM “D” 5.28 NM

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering Pans-Ops TERPS Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR* C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum) TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3.3 and Table 3-9 PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 7 PANS-Ops Volume I, Part I, Chapter 1, Definitions

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering Pans-Ops TERPS Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR* C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum) TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3.3 and Table 3-9  PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 7 PANS-Ops Volume I, Part I, Chapter 1, Definitions

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering Pans-Ops TERPS Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR* C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum) TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3.3 and Table 3-9  

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering Pans-Ops TERPS Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR* C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum) TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3.3 and Table 3-9  

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering Pans-Ops TERPS Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR* C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum) TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach” TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3.3 and Table 3-9  

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Circling Approaches and Maneuvering Pans-Ops TERPS Acft Cat Min Vis MOC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB 2 x Radius + Straight C 2.0 NM 394/ 591 ft 180 KIAS/20º 3.70+.5 = 4.20 NM D 2.5 NM 394/ 689 ft 205 KIAS/20º 4.68+.6 = 5.28 NM TERPS OEA Radius + Acft Cat Min Vis ROC/HAA Max Speed/ºAOB Straight=CAR* C 1 ½ SM 300/ 450 ft 145 KIAS/20º 2.18+.5 = 2.68 NM D 2.0 SM 300/ 550 ft 165 KIAS/20º 2.89+.6 = 3.49 NM With Change #21 and later, At 1000’MSL, ISA Standard and 25KTS of added wind. Visibility in Statue Miles OEA= Obstacle Evaluated Area, CAR= Circling Area Radius (1.3NM Minimum) TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 2, Section 6 “Circling Approach” 1.5SM =1.3NM, 2.0SM=1.74NM TERPS Volume 1, Chapter 3, Paragraph 3.3.3 and Table 3-9  

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation.

Greece South Korea Japan Canada Mexico Venezuela Azores Germany Reproduced with permission of Jeppesen Sanderson, Inc. Not to be used for navigation. Azores Germany Saudi Arabia

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Missed Approach Procedures Missed Approach Requires 3.7% Climb TERPS Volume 3, Chapter 2, Paragraph 2.4 and Appendix 2, Paragraph 4 PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 6, “Missed Approach” Intermediate Missed Approach

TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Missed Approach Procedures TERPS Volume 3, Chapter 2, Paragraph 2.4 and Appendix 2, Paragraph 4 PANS-Ops Volume 2, Part 1, Section 4, Chapter 6, “Missed Approach” Intermediate Missed Approach

Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences TERPS vs. PANS-Ops Instrument Procedure Design and Operational Differences Presented By Mr. Guy Gribble General Manager, International Flight Resources, LLC www.InternationalFlightResources.com