Stanford Employee Survey. Topics Background, Purpose of Employee Satisfaction Surveys –Survey Specifics –Survey Participants, Spring and Fall 2010 Fall.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
INITIAL ON BOARDING COACHING
Advertisements

The University of Dayton Business Plan Competition.
Employee Engagement Readiness Name Department. Purpose / Objectives To help us prepare for the Employee Engagement (EE) Survey by ensuring a common understanding:
Office of the State Chief Information Officer Customer Satisfaction Survey Enterprise Project Management Office Gaye Mays Kathy Bromead October.
Texas City Municipal Police Association 2012 Satisfaction Survey.
Updates from HR Learning & Org. Effectiveness Stanford Employee Survey Results from 2010 Staff Resource Fair in March 2011.
Shelter Diagnostic Survey Shelter Name Results and Planning.
TalentMap 1 York Community Services: November 1-12, TalentMap Athabasca University – Spring TalentMap Employee Survey Results Presentation.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
2014 Employee Engagement Survey Judith Wong September 17, 2014
Human Resources Office of Summary of Results 1 University of Minnesota Morris.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Improving Business Satisfaction Moving from Measurement to Action.
Federal Consulting Group August 2004 Department of Labor Civil Rights Center 2004 Satisfaction Study - Recipients.
Facilitator Training Program. Day One Agenda – Day One Welcome Getting Started Activity Course Objectives Overview of Facilitation Skills Facilitation.
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
Who is Sinking Your Boat?
New PBIS Coaches Meeting September 2,  Gain knowledge about coaching  Acquire tips for effective coaching  Learn strategies to enhance coaching.
Lenovo Listens Manager Training Step 2: Interpret and Communicate Results 1.
McLean & Company1 Improving Business Satisfaction Moving from Measurement to Action.
The 9 th Annual Engagement and Retention Research Study Christopher Mulligan Chief Executive Officer Commit. Engage. Excel. Chief Executive Officer.
Updated Performance Management for Exempt Staff Fall 2009.
Assessment Cycle California Lutheran University Deans’ Council February 6, 2006.
Presented by: Karen Gauthier
2010 Results. Today’s Agenda Results Summary 2010 CQS Strengths and Opportunities CQS Benchmarks Demographics Next Steps.
Guide to Patient & Family Engagement Insert hospital logo here Become a Patient and Family Advisor: Information Session [Hospital Name | Presenter name.
Agenda Background 2015 Survey Overview 2014 Recap Timeline Questions, Next Steps.
Lenovo Listens Manager Training Executive Summary
Provider Member Surveys for Resident and Staff Satisfaction Presented By: Jocelyn Martin & Connie Wolfe May 10th, 2010.
Military Family Services Program Participant Survey Training Presentation.
Staff Survey Executive Team Presentation (Annex B) Prepared by: GfK NOP September, Agenda item: 17 Paper no: CM/03/12/14B.
Session 4 Engagement, Continuous Improvement, and Accountability CLAS Training [ADD DATE] [ADD PRESENTER NAME] [ADD ORGANIZATION NAME]
Employee engagement Guide Global Human Resources June 2014.
Human Resources Office of FACULTY Summary of Results _College of Design_FACULTY.
1 © 2004 Cisco Systems, Inc. All rights reserved. Case Study Cisco Unity Voice Messaging Deployment: Communications Strategy November.
Emory University Climate Survey Results Presented to HR Leadership Group April 21, 2005 Del King Senior Director, Human Resources.
December 3, 2014 Lauren Benishek, PhD & Sallie Weaver, PhD
Program Committee Chair Training. Training Agenda Conference Program Housekeeping items and deadlines Action and Information Items Accomplishment Report.
National Commission for Academic Accreditation & Assessment Developmental Reviews at King Saud University and King Faisal University.
Staff Council 27 January 2011 Joeann Humbert Organizational Development, HR Sarah Pillittere Center For Professional Development, HR 1 Leadership Academy.
2007 Faculty & Staff Denison Organizational Culture Survey.
Distance Learning at CCC A Proactive Vision & Team Approach A distance learning proposal submitted by Patrick Keough.
2005 All-Staff Survey: Survey Results Summary Presentation
A. P. Moller - Maersk Employee Engagement Survey 2011 MDSI Corporate IT-Admin; RVA018 - Roberto - Valenciano Report.
Faculty Satisfaction Survey Results October 2009.
Hawaiian Airlines Na Leo Survey 2010 Your Results.
OneVoice W Group Results 16 June 2014 Human Resources Employee Engagement.
Students as Change Agents Exploring issues of Student Engagement among On- Campus MSc Students Denise Ryder, Jonathan Doney, Nii Tackie-Yaoboi With Nadine.
Measuring Outcomes of Doctoral Programs: Alumni and Exit Surveys at Western University CAGS October 2015.
THE STATE OF ENGAGEMENT TOWN HALL
Making It Better Planning Employee & Patient Satisfaction November 2010.
Copyright, © 2006, eePulse, Inc. the measure of your success 1 Implementation for Data and Dialogue Driven Leadership™ Initial Discussion Document.
Human Resources Office of 1 Summary of Results College of Design Dean’s Reports.
Overall NSW Health 2011 YourSay Survey Results YourSay - NSW Health Workplace Survey Results Presentation NSW Health Overall Presented by: Robyn Burley.
Helping Hands in an International Workforce – Maximizing Client Benefits through use of Global Teams Cathy Michalsky and Manori Turmel.
Forward Together: UW Madison’s Framework for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence Ad Hoc Diversity Planning Committee Shared Governance (Faculty, staff,
Sharing Your School Climate Data with STAFF Directions for PowerPoint users: The following is a sample template for sharing your DSCS results.
Local Points of Contact Webinar
Items in red require your input
Employee Engagement Survey Education Session #3
Derek Herrmann & Ryan Smith University Assessment Services
Items in red require your input
Items in red require your input
Engagement Follow-up Resources
Before you begin… If you are prepared to share your team’s survey results prior to receiving the overall Business Unit results, simply modify this presentation.
Before you begin… If you are prepared to share your team’s survey results prior to receiving the overall Business Unit results, simply modify this presentation.
Engagement Follow-up Resources
Team Check-Up Orientation Briefing
2007 Faculty & Staff Denison Organizational Culture Survey
Employee Engagement Defined
WORKSHOP Establish a Communication and Training Plan
Presentation transcript:

Stanford Employee Survey

Topics Background, Purpose of Employee Satisfaction Surveys –Survey Specifics –Survey Participants, Spring and Fall 2010 Fall Survey Process –Timeline –Identifying Reports –Preparing for Action Planning Phase –Strategic Communication Reference Information Slide 2

Background, Purpose of Surveys

Background ● Uniform use of employee survey tool increases the understanding of key areas of employee concern across all schools and units ● Some areas had been conducting surveys that provided great information to them but not useful to identify university-wide themes, trends ● Selection committee recommended a vendor (3D Group) in 11/2009 ● First survey process held in spring, 2010: Highest rated category: – Teamwork Lowest rated category: – Feedback and Coaching

Why Conduct Employee Satisfaction Surveys Employees Morale booster—“We care about you” Indicates that management is listening and will follow up with results Managers ● Gain staff feedback about both their own leadership and about work conditions ● Use the results to engage staff in proactively addressing issues in the workgroup Stanford ● Communicates to employees they are a partner in Stanford’s success ● Sets a benchmark for employee satisfaction for participating schools/units (SU norms) ● Provides metrics for managerial accountability

Employee Engagement/Retention Tool ● Typically, satisfied and engaged employees: Higher productivity Better customer service Likely to speak well of employer, refer others to work here Tend to be high performing, continuing to learn and develop skills Appreciate being asked their opinions ● Surveys give you a confidential way to “take a pulse”

Survey Specifics ● Survey contains:  53 rated items  5-point scale  “Strongly Disagree” to “Strongly Agree” + ‘N/A’  Rated survey items are grouped into 11 categories, called dimensions; results are reported by dimension and item  1 open-ended question:  “Your opinion is important to us in the continual improvement of our organization. What one action can we take to make this a better place to work?” Slide 7

Spring 2010 Survey Participants Six Organizations: Office of Development Office of Public Affairs School of Earth Sciences School of Education Stanford Alumni Assn. VP Undergraduate Education (VPUE) Slide total staff members surveyed Overall participation rate: 85%

Fall 2010 Survey Participants Business Affairs Human Resources School of Humanities & Sciences School of Law School of Medicine Residential & Dining Enterprises 4,975 staff members set to be surveyed October 4-15, 2010

The Survey Success Foundation: Leadership Commitment ● Sponsorship, clear setting of expectations up front is important Ensure managers know you expect them to have discussions with their staff when results are known ● Communicate before, during, and after the survey Communicates seriousness of process and shows that senior leaders are engaged To all: state why the survey is helpful; encourage participation To Managers: emphasize the importance of action planning Follow up with all staff to ensure successful action planning process Communicate at all levels of the organization

Fall Survey Process

The survey is the start of the process Next survey process targeted for Spring, 2012

● Fall survey open October 4 through October 15, 2010 Reports delivered in November, prior to Thanksgiving holiday Senior Leadership presentations can take place in early December, prior to winter closure Manager Action Planning training sessions and staff discussions can take place starting in January, 2011, after winter closure Key Dates & Deliverables Due to the winter closure, it is recommended the action planning phase occur in early Areas can accelerate this as feasible, taking into account the winter closure break. Slide 13

Identifying Reports ● Three types of reports with survey data: Rollup Report: Aggregate data for entire school, VP area, or organizational unit – With or without comments from 1 open-ended question Manager Report: Data for specific manager; must have 5 responses to get a report – With or without comments Demographic Report: Data based on specific variable; variable must be identified for each employee. Examples are: work location (building name or address); if the employee reports to a staff or faculty member; years of service; etc. No comments.

Reports Available with Survey Results Dean or VP Assoc. Dean or Assoc. VP Asst. Dean or Director AssistantManager 1Employee 1Employee 2Employee 3Employee 4Employee 5Employee 6Manager 2Employee 1Employee 2Employee 3Emp AEmp BEmp CEmp D 1. Rollup report of school/unit (one rollup report required) With or without comments May also want rollup of each large organizational unit; e.g., departments (optional)/ May also want his/her own manager report, if more than 5 direct reports (optional) 2. Demographic report (optional) Reports data by up to five variables; e.g., length of service. Does not include comments. 3. Comments Coded report (optional) Analysis done to group comments by theme. To ensure confidentiality, a report is not generated if there are fewer than five responses This manager eligible for Manager report of work group/department (optional), assuming at least 5 staff respond. With or without comments. This manager not eligible for Manager report (fewer than 5 direct reports), but might want a Rollup report of aggregate data for group

Sample Report Pages Results are shown both by category (dimension) and by each survey item (question) within each category

Action Planning Process ● Purpose of action planning is: For all in the organization to understand results – Leadership is briefed first and determines how to communicate organization-wide results to employees (leadership briefing required) For managers to engage employees in collaborative brainstorming to maintain and/or improve organization and create action steps on viable ideas – Managers are trained to lead employees through a discussion (optional) – Managers are coached individually to plan their discussion (optional)

Timing for Action Planning Phase ● Action Planning begins when survey results are delivered to each school/VP area in mid November: Senior Leader(s): attend a briefing of the results  Recommend scheduling this to occur prior to winter closure Managers:  Attend a training session to learn how to best proceed with staff discussions (will receive rollup or manager report in training, if applicable)  After training, managers talk with staff to review high level results and brainstorm action steps  Recommend manager training and discussions occur after winter closure

Communicate Strategically ● All employees need to hear about the survey process more than once,* and possibly using different media: announcements Newsletter article(s) All Hands meeting(s) Manager announcements in group staff meetings *At minimum: once before, once during, and once after the online survey is open, October 4-15

Reference Information Each school/area’s human resources staff are leading the project and have access to communication templates and detailed project and costing information. In central Human Resources, Learning & Organizational Effectiveness: Valerie Beeman, Project Lead: Survey web site: Slide 20