SCHOOLING POLICIES FOR QUALITY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Eric A. Hanushek Stanford University May 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Eric A. Hanushek Stanford University
Advertisements

Workshop 2 Day 2 Classroom Observation Certification Assessor Training Program.
ENDANGERING PROSPERITY: EDUCATION, ECONOMIC GROWTH, AND THE FAILINGS OF MODERN AMERICAN SCHOOLING An interview with Eric Hanushek, Stanford University.
A “Best Fit” Approach to Improving Teacher Resources Jennifer King Rice University of Maryland.
Nick Bloom, Economics of Human Resources, 2011 Economics of Human Resources Nick Bloom (Stanford Economics) Lecture 1: Management and firm Performance.
How to prepare students for a world we cannot possibly imagine Salzburg Global Seminar, December 2011 Dylan Wiliam
Teacher Credentials and Student Achievement in High School: A Cross Subject Analysis with Student Fixed Effects Charles T. Clotfelter Helen F. Ladd Jacob.
Improving Australia’s systems of school education* 29 October 2010 CEET 14 th Annual National Conference Ascot House, 50 Fenton st, Ascot Vale, Melbourne.
Challenges in Developing a University Admissions Test & a National Assessment A Presentation at the Conference On University & Test Development in Central.
Ifo Institute for Economic Research at the University of Munich “Education and Training: The European Economy’s Best Hope” Munich Economic Summit 2012.
Special Education Teacher Quality and Student Achievement Li Feng Tim R. Sass Dept. of Finance & Econ.Dept. of Economics Texas State UniversityFlorida.
Learning from the International Experience Program on Education Policy and Governance Harvard University August 2011 Globally Challenged: Are U. S. Students.
What policy makers should know about Pre-K effectiveness Steve Barnett, PhD
“Value added” measures of teacher quality: use and policy validity Sean P. Corcoran New York University NYU Abu Dhabi Conference January 22, 2009.
Chapter 12: Gross Domestic Product and Growth Section 3
Ludger Wößmann Demand, Autonomy and Accountability: Lessons from International Analysis International Seminar “Demand, Autonomy and Accountability in Schooling”
SREE Inaugural Conference Low Performing Schools and The Market for Teachers Eric A. Hanushek Stanford University December 2006.
Findings from forthcoming regional flagship report Skills, not just diplomas Presentation of findings from forthcoming regional flagship report Mamta Murthi.
MISSOURI: ECONOMIC FUTURE WITH EDUCATIONAL REFORM This file contains detailed projections and information from the article: Eric A. Hanushek, Jens Ruhose,
Maine: Economic future with educational Reform
New Hampshire: Economic future with educational Reform
alabama: Economic future with Educational Reform
Schooling, Gender Equity, and Economic Outcomes
Seminar on the importance of Education Research and Innovation
Minnesota: Economic future with educational Reform
alaska: Economic future with educational Reform
Kansas: Economic future with educational Reform
Wyoming: Economic future with educational Reform
North carolina: Economic future with educational Reform
nevada: Economic future with educational Reform
Rhode island: Economic future with educational Reform
Arizona: Economic future with educational Reform
Michigan: Economic future with educational Reform
arkansas: Economic future with educational Reform
Washington: Economic future with educational Reform
Wisconsin: Economic future with educational Reform
New York: Economic future with educational Reform
New Jersey: Economic future with educational Reform
Florida: Economic future with educational Reform
Tennessee: Economic future with educational Reform
Nebraska: Economic future with educational Reform
Texas: Economic future with educational Reform
New Mexico: Economic future with educational Reform
Utah: Economic future with educational Reform
Hawaii: Economic future with educational Reform
oregon: Economic future with educational Reform
virginia: Economic future with educational Reform
montana: Economic future with educational Reform
South dakota: Economic future with educational Reform
california: Economic future with educational Reform
Georgia: Economic future with educational Reform
Louisiana: Economic future with educational Reform
Kentucky: Economic future with educational Reform
connecticut: Economic future with educational Reform
illinois: Economic future with educational Reform
South Carolina: Economic future with educational Reform
Iowa: Economic future with educational Reform
West Virginia: Economic future with educational Reform
Pennsylvania: Economic future with educational Reform
Ohio: Economic future with educational Reform
Delaware: Economic future with educational Reform
Massachusetts: Economic future with educational Reform
North Dakota: Economic future with educational Reform
idaho: Economic future with educational Reform
indiana: Economic future with educational Reform
vermont: Economic future with educational Reform
Colorado: Economic future with educational Reform
Mississippi: Economic future with educational Reform
oklahoma: Economic future with educational Reform
Schooling policies for quality and economic growth
Presentation transcript:

SCHOOLING POLICIES FOR QUALITY AND ECONOMIC GROWTH Eric A. Hanushek Stanford University May 2013

Key Questions 1. Does achievement matter? YES 2. Is Spain competitive? NO 3. How is Spain doing? NOT WELL 4. Are there things to be done? YES

Does achievement matter? and Is Spain competitive?

Cognitive Skills and Long Run Economic Growth

Years of Schooling and Economic Growth Without quality control With quality control

PISA Mathematics Achievement, 2009

Present Value of Gains to GDP for Spain

How is Spain doing?

Achievement Growth,

Are there things to be done?

Resource Policies Little evidence of success Cross country evidence Within country – developed Within country – developing

Resources and Performance across Countries R 2 = 0.01 R 2 = 0.15

Resource Policies Little evidence of successle evidence of success Cross country evidence Within country – developed Within country – developing Consistent with detailed analysis class size school characteristics

Resource Policies Does not say “resources never have effect” Does not say “resources cannot have effect” No expectation within current incentive structure

Teacher Quality Teachers most important input No identifiable characteristics Master’s degrees Experience* Certification Preparation Professional development Observable through both student performance and supervisor ratings Cannot regulate and pay on characteristics

Institutional Reforms Supported by Evidence Centralized exams Accountability Autonomy/decentralization

Institutional Reforms Supported by Evidence Centralized exams Accountability Autonomy/decentralization Choice Direct performance incentives

Alternative Estimates of Least Effective Teachers (United States distribution)

Key Questions 1. Does achievement matter? YES 2. Is Spain competitive? NO 3. How is Spain doing? NOT WELL 4. Are there things to be done? YES

Trends in Test Scores

Changes in Growth Rates vs. Changes in Test Scores