Grant Writing Workshop for Development & Innovation Projects

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Guide to Implementation
Advertisements

Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Accelerating the Academic Achievement of Students with Learning Disabilities Research Initiative Kristen.
Preparing a Grant Proposal: Some Basics
Roger D. Goddard, Ph.D. March 21, Purposes Overview of Major Research Grants Programs Administered by IES; Particular Focus on the Education Research.
Writing an Effective Proposal for Innovations in Teaching Grant
Research Training Program in Special Education:
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner, National Center for Education Research.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences: Information for the Grants Administrator Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Acting Commissioner National.
Exploration Projects within the Education Research Grants Program (84.305A) and Special Education Research Grants Program (84.324A) Allen Ruby National.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
COLLEGE SPARK WASHINGTON 2012 Community Grants Program Application Webinar 12/22/201110:00 AM 1/4/20122:00 PM.
IES Grant Writing Workshop for Efficacy and Replication Projects
National Science Foundation: Transforming Undergraduate Education in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics (TUES)
WRITING PROPOSALS WITH STRONG METHODOLOGY AND IMPLEMENTATION Kusum Singh, Virginia Tech Gavin W. Fulmer, National Science Foundation 1.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Teaching and Learning Division National Center for Education Research.
How to Develop a Project Evaluation Plan Pat Gonzalez Office of Special Education Programs
Developing an Effective Evaluation to Check for Understanding Susan E. Schultz, Ph.D. Evaluation Consultant PARK Teachers.
Emily Lynn Grant Administrator Office of Sponsored Projects and Research Administration.
Grant Writing Workshop for Historically Black Colleges and Universities Allen Ruby, Ph.D. Katina R. Stapleton, Ph.D. Policy and Systems Division National.
Social and Behavioral Context for Academic Learning Program Meeting Emily Doolittle Program Officer Sunday, June 7, 2009.
TITLEIIA(3) IMPROVING TEACHER QUALITY COMPETITIVE GRANTS PROGRAM 1.
Striving for Quality Using continuous improvement strategies to increase program quality, implementation fidelity and durability Steve Goodman Director.
Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Researcher-Practitioner Partnerships in Education Research (84.305H) Allen Ruby, Ph.D. National Center.
Moving from Development to Efficacy & Intervention Fidelity Topics National Center for Special Education Research Grantee Meeting: June 28, 2010.
Literature Review and Parts of Proposal
Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center.
Grant Writing Workshop for Research on Adult Education Elizabeth R. Albro National Center for Education Research.
Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Basic Overview of Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Rebecca McGill-Wilkinson,
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Preparing Grant Proposals: A Session for INASP Country Coordinators Barbara Gastel, MD, MPH AuthorAID Knowledge Community Editor Bangladesh May 2009.
INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR TECHNOLOGY IN EDUCATION working together to improve education with technology Using Evidence for Educational Technology Success.
Comp 20 - Training & Instructional Design Unit 6 - Assessment This material was developed by Columbia University, funded by the Department of Health and.
Evaluating a Research Report
Fiscal Year (FY) 2015 National Training and Technical Assistance Cooperative Agreements (NCA) Funding Opportunity Announcement (FOA) HRSA Objective.
KATEWINTEREVALUATION.com Education Research 101 A Beginner’s Guide for S STEM Principal Investigators.
Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Basic Overview of Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro,
Developing a Teaching Portfolio for the Job Search Graduate Student Center University of Pennsylvania April 19, 2007 Kathryn K. McMahon Department of Romance.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation Lecture 2c – Process Evaluation.
Eloise Forster, Ed.D. Foundation for Educational Administration (FEA)
 Read through problems  Identify problems you think your team has the capacity and interest to solve  Prioritize the problems and indicate the.
LANSING, MI APRIL 11, 2011 Title IIA(3) Technical Assistance #2.
Suggested Components of a Schoolwide Reading Plan Part 1: Introduction Provides an overview of key components of reading plan. Part 2: Component details.
Designing a Training Program RATIONALE OF THE TRAINING Background or introduction of what the training is all about –Developments in the field/discipline/area.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
ECOS Information Session Draft EPA Quality Documents February 13, 2013 Presented by EPA Quality Staff, Office of Environmental Information For meeting.
The Proposal AEE 804 Spring 2002 Revised Spring 2003 Reese & Woods.
Securing External Federal Funding Janice F. Almasi, Ph.D. Carol Lee Robertson Endowed Professor of Literacy University of Kentucky
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Preparing a Written Report Prepared by: R Bortolussi MD FRCPC and Noni MacDonald MD FRCPC.
Project Evaluation for MSP Targeted Partnerships Eric R. Banilower Horizon Research, Inc.
Qualifications Update: Higher Media Qualifications Update: Higher Media.
Open Forum: Scaling Up and Sustaining Interventions Moderator: Carol O'Donnell, NCER
Grant Writing Workshop for Young Investigators Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Associate Commissioner Teaching and Learning Division National Center for Education.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
Setting Your Goals For TTESS Memorial HS Training September 11, 2015.
How to Write a Project Proposal Specialization Introductory Module Thursday, May 9, 2013 Barbados.
Observing and Assessing Young Children
Funding Opportunities at the Institute of Education Sciences Elizabeth R. Albro, Ph.D. Teaching and Learning Division National Center for Education Research.
1 IEP Case Study: PLEPs, PLOPs, PLAFPs, and IEPs Week 7 and 8 (Combined)
Dr. Kathleen Haynie Haynie Research and Evaluation November 12, 2010.
Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice Katie Taylor, Ph.D. Program Officer National Center for Special Education Research Research Training.
Ies.ed.gov Connecting Research, Policy and Practice 1 Erin Higgins, Ph.D. Program Officer National Center for Education Research Katie Taylor, Ph.D. Program.
Stages of Research and Development
An overview of course assessment
Presentation transcript:

Grant Writing Workshop for Development & Innovation Projects

Grant Research Goals All applications to the Education Research Grants Program (84.305A) and the Special Education Research Grants Program (84.324A) must be directed to a specific research goal The goal describes the type of research to be done

The 5 Research Goals Exploration Development and Innovation Explore the association between malleable factors and education outcomes Development and Innovation Develop a new or modify an existing intervention Efficacy and Replication Evaluate an intervention under ideal conditions Scale-up Evaluation Independently evaluate an intervention under routine conditions Measurement Develop and/or validate a measure

Breaking Out of the Old Shell

Development and Innovation Projects Development of and innovation in education interventions Curricula Instructional approaches Supplemental (add-on) programs Professional development School-wide interventions District-level interventions

Development and Innovation Projects About 50% of NCER funded research projects About 57% of NCSER funded research projects

Development and Innovation Projects: Challenges No widely accepted, systematic process for developing interventions Education interventions cover a wide range in scope Disciplinary differences in approaches

Development Projects: Key Question Why is the proposed intervention likely to produce better student outcomes relative to current education practices?

Before Development Work Begins... Ask: Do I understand the problem? Can I explain the underlying processes? Do I know what malleable factors might be targets for intervention? Do I know what distinguishes effective and less effective practices?

In a Nut Shell... Development work depends upon prior research that explores and identifies underlying processes and potentially malleable factors. This knowledge is then used to inform the development of new interventions.

FY 2012 IES Development and Innovation Projects Include: Well-specified theory of change for the intervention Fully developed intervention Pilot data on the feasibility of implementing the intervention Pilot data on the promise of the intervention for generating desired outcomes

All IES Research Applications include 4 Sections Significance Research Plan (Methodological Requirements) Personnel Resources

Specific Requirements For Development and Innovation Applications

Significance Answers the question, “Why develop this intervention?” Context for the proposed intervention Intervention, theory of change, and theoretical and empirical rationale Practical importance Rationale justifying the importance of the proposed research

Significance 1. Context for the proposed intervention Describe attributes of existing practice Specify shortcomings of existing practice Clarify the problem Describe how much of a change the proposed intervention is intended to achieve

Significance 2a. Intervention, What are the components or features of the proposed intervention? How do the features or components relate to each other? Who will implement or use it? How will it be used?

Example: Teacher PD for PreK ELL Vocabulary Instruction Content Which words will be taught? What is the rationale for that decision? Strategies for vocabulary instruction What techniques? Rationale? Delivery of information to teachers What materials? What mode of instruction for teachers? Rationale? Objective What should teachers be able to do? What should their students be able to do?

Significance 2b. theory of change, What is the causal chain of events that leads from the implementation of the intervention to the desired outcome?

Professional Development Intervention Vocabulary Instruction Simple Model of Change Professional Development Intervention Vocabulary Instruction Outcomes

Simple Model of Change: Teacher PD for PreK ELL Vocabulary Instruction Vocabulary Professional Development Intervention Vocabulary Instruction Outcomes Resources: how many sessions and when, content, mode, materials Outcomes and Measures: mastery vocabulary measures, standardized language measures Activities: continuous assessment, using data, using strategies for teaching vocabulary Outcomes and Measures: attendance, use of online resources, teacher logs, interviews, surveys, knowledge acquisition Outcomes and Measures: observations, fidelity of implementation, changes in pedagogy

Significance 2c. theoretical & empirical rationale What are the theoretical and empirical justifications for the design and sequencing of the intervention components? Literature review Describe any prior published or unpublished work completed by your team that supports your development effort

Significance 3. Practical importance Describe why the fully developed intervention will have the potential to improve student outcomes in educationally meaningful increments Describe why the proposed intervention is affordable for and easily implemented by authentic education delivery settings

Significance 4. Rationale justifying the importance of the proposed research Why is this project a good idea, and important to fund?

Methodological requirements (Research Plan) Clear description of development activities, so that reviewers will understand What will be developed How it will be developed When the development will take place

Methodological requirements (Research Plan) Sample Iterative development process Feasibility of implementation Pilot study Measures

Methodological requirements 1. Sample Describe samples and settings that will be used to iteratively develop the intervention, assess the feasibility of implementation, and assess the promise of the intervention in the pilot data

Methodological requirements 2. Iterative Development Process How “operating as intended” for the proposed intervention is defined; What data will be collected to determine how the intervention (or component) is operating; How will the data collected be used to revise the intervention; What criteria will be used to determine if the intervention or component operates as intended.

What Will be Developed Content/ Feature Exists Partially Developed To be Developed A X B C

Operating as Intended Define “operating as intended” Describe data to be collected to determine how the intervention (component) is operating Describe criteria to determine if intervention operates as intended Correspondence with theory of change

Operating as Intended What data will be collected to determine how the intervention is operating? Often involves collection of process data (e.g., observation of teacher implementing a lesson) Feedback from users Specify how data will be coded (i.e., what are you looking for?) How will the data be used to revise the intervention, if needed?

Operating as Intended Note on using experiments to determine if intervention/components operate as intended Often used in Cognition and Technology projects (but not required) Acceptable for use in other topics for the purpose of development

Example: Teacher PD Video Clips Select possible examples from videotapes of master teachers implementing strategies Write accompanying text for clips Teachers (similar to target audience) review prototype clips and text Semi-structured interview for teacher reactions in key areas (e.g., clarity of main message; length of clip/text; organization of text and its relation to clip) Content analysis of interview data to identify what needs refining Continue to refine and assess until consistent responses for identifying main message and perception of user-friendly clips/text

Example: Use of Hypermedia Objective: gather data on factors that facilitate teacher use of hypermedia resources in context of teacher PD coaching

Example: Teacher PD Video Clips Gather data on factors that facilitate teacher use of hypermedia resources in context of PD program Small field test of PD program with hypermedia Track teachers’ use of hypermedia with software (e.g., what do they look at, how long, how often) Periodic interviews to identify what facilitates or impedes clicking on a hypermedia resource recommended by coach Observations of teachers using hypermedia (amount of time spent on each clip/text, number of related clip/texts viewed) Think-aloud sessions of teachers using hypermedia Continue to refine and assess until consistent responses for teachers viewing suggested clip/text and usability of resources (e.g., ease of navigation)

Iterations???? Number of iterations depends on the complexity of the intervention and its implementation

Methodological requirements 3. Feasibility of Intervention Demonstrate that the intervention can be implemented with fidelity In settings that represent the type of settings for which the intervention is intended By users who are like those for whom the product is intended

Methodological requirements 4. Pilot Study: Promise of the Intervention Does performance on outcome measures progress in the appropriate direction? Pilot study is stronger is a comparison group is used Is implementation of intervention associated with changes in activities and behaviors that are consistent with the theory of change?

Methodological requirements 5. Measures Procedures for collecting data Often includes collection of process data using observational, survey, or qualitative methodologies Measures to be used, including reliability and validity information, where appropriate A useful by-product of development is a set of fidelity of implementation measures

Personnel Relevant content expertise Methodological expertise required for conducting the study Experience working with schools or other education agencies

Personnel Include in the research narrative a brief description of the qualifications, roles, responsibilities, and percent of time to be devoted to the project for key personnel.

Resources Support at the research institution Technological support Letters of agreement from participating schools and/or teachers

Appendix A Page limit: 15 pages single-spaced Include at end of the Project Narrative and submit as part of same PDF file attachment Adhere to margin, format, and font size requirements

Appendix A Include: Figures, charts, or tables that supplement research text Examples of measures to be used in the project Resubmissions: use up to 3 pages to describe how revised proposal is responsive to prior reviewer feedback – indicate prior application number

Appendix B Page limit: 10 pages single-spaced Include at end of Appendix A and submit as part of same PDF file attachment Adhere to margin, format, and font size requirements

Appendix B Include: Curriculum materials Computer screen shots Test items you will develop Other materials used in the intervention or assessment

New This Year - Appendix C Page limit: none Include at end of Appendix B and submit as part of same PDF file attachment Adhere to margin, format, and font size requirements

Appendix C Include: letters of agreement from research partners (e.g., schools, districts, consultants) Do not reduce the size of the letters Letters should clearly indicate understanding of time, space, and resources that will be required if the application is funded

Additional Considerations—If Seeking A Second Development Award If seeking to further develop or extend an intervention from a previous Development award, applicants should: Justify the need for a second Development award Describe the results and outcomes from other Development efforts Describe efficacy evaluations and data (if available)

Additional Considerations-If Seeking A Second Development Award If a previous Development grantee wants to develop a new intervention, applicant should: Indicate whether the first intervention has been evaluated for efficacy and describe results (if available) Show that previous intervention improves or shows promise for improving education outcomes

Notes for FY 2012 No applications to develop reading interventions will be accepted under the Reading and Writing topic

Award amounts Typical award: $150,000 to $400,000 per year Maximum of 3 years and $1,500,000

Review of Applications No more than 30 percent of funds may be used to support the collection of pilot data Review of methodological requirements will focus on methods for developing the intervention Pilot data are not intended to be a test of the efficacy of the intervention

Finding Requests for Applications FY 2012 Requests for Applications are available on: http://ies.ed.gov/funding Sign up for the IES Newsflash: http://ies.ed.gov/newsflash/

Application Package Available Key Dates Application Deadline Letter of Intent Due iesreview.ed.gov Application Package Available www.grants.gov Start Dates 6/23/11 4/21/11 3/1/12 to 9/1/12 9/22/11 7/21/11 7/1/12 to 9/1/12

Application Due Dates Education and Special Education Research June 23, 2011 and September 22, 2011 4:30:00 pm Washington, DC time

Elizabeth Albro elizabeth.albro@ed.gov