SIR ABSTRACT #1 Safety, Response and Survival Outcomes of Y90 Microsphere Radioembolization for Liver Metastases: Results from a 151 Patient Investigational.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (bev) vs FOLFIRI plus bev
Advertisements

1 N9841: A Randomized Phase III Equivalence Trial of Irinotecan (CPT-11) versus FOLFOX4 in Patients with Advanced Colorectal Carcinoma Previously Treated.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Introduction  Soft Tissue Sarcoma (STS) are a group of highly chemotherapy resistant tumors  Doxorubicin is the only APPROVED 1 st line chemotherapy.
Targeting Tumors Using Endogenous Albumin
Efficacy of Denileukin Diftitox Retreatment in Patients with Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed After Initial Response 1 Identification of an Active,
A Meta Analysis of Risk of Cardiovascular Events in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer (MBC) Treated with Anti Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)
Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Following Bortezomib: Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics from the.
Phase III Study Comparing Gemcitabine plus Cetuximab versus Gemcitabine in Patients with Locally Advanced or Metastatic Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Southwest.
Phase III study of first-line XELOX plus bevacizumab (BEV) for 6 cycles followed by XELOX plus BEV or single agent (s/a) BEV as maintenance therapy in.
1 Phase II trial of sequential gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by paclitaxel as first-line treatment of advanced urothelial carcinoma Presented by.
Efficacy and Safety of Single Agent Sunitinib in Treating Advanced Hepatocelluar Carcinoma Patients After Sorafenib Failure: A Prospective, Open-Label,
Effect of Age on Efficacy and Safety Outcomes in Patients (Pts) with Newly Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma (NDMM) Receiving Lenalidomide and Low-Dose Dexamethasone.
SARC015: Phase II study of R1507 in wild-type GIST Margaret von Mehren, Fox Chase Cancer Center Katie Janeway, Dana Farber Cancer Institute.
Phase II Trial of Continuous Course Re- irradiation Concurrent with Weekly Cisplatinum and Cetuximab for Recurrent Squamous Cell Carcinoma of The Head.
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
The Use of Trastuzumab in the Elderly in the Adjuvant Setting and After Disease Progression in Patients with HER2-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer Dall.
Phase III Trial of Pazopanib in Locally Advanced and/or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Sternberg CN et al. ASCO 2009; Abstract (Oral Presentation)
Palumbo A et al. Proc ASH 2014;Abstract 175.
1Bachelot T et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract S1-6.
CheckMate 025: A randomized, open-label, phase III study of nivolumab versus everolimus in advanced renal cell carcinoma Padmanee Sharma, Bernard Escudier,
Phase III trial of chemotherapy with or without irinotecan in the front-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer in elderly patients. FFCD
CE-1 IRESSA ® Clinical Efficacy Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive Cancer Center Ronald B. Natale, MD Director Cedars Sinai Comprehensive.
The treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the anal canal: A single institution experience P. Pathak, B. King, A. Ohinata, P. Das, C.H.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
E2100 A Randomized Phase III Trial of Paclitaxel versus Paclitaxel plus Bevacizumab as First- Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic Breast Cancer.
Bevacizumab continuation versus no continuation after first-line chemo-bevacizumab therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: a randomized.
MAX: International multi-centre randomised phase II/III study of capecitabine (Cap), bevacizumab (Bev) and mitomycin C (MMC) as first-line treatment for.
Final Analysis of Overall Survival for the Phase III CONFIRM Trial: Fulvestrant 500 mg versus 250 mg Di Leo A et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract S1-4.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
KRAS status and efficacy in the first- line treatment of patients with mCRC treated with FOLFOX with or without cetuximab: The OPUS experience Carsten.
Stereotactic Ablative Body Radiotherapy for Non small cell lung cancer
AVADO TRIAL David Miles Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Middlesex, United Kingdom A randomized, double-blind study of bevacizumab in combination with docetaxel.
Cmab might have therapeutic benefit in Japanese patients with KRAS p.G13D mutant colorectal cancer. Limitations of this study are its retrospective design.
The Combination of Bevacizumab (Bev) with capecitabine/irinotecan (CapIri/Bev) or capecitabine/oxaliplatin (CapOx/Bev) is highly active in advanced colorectal.
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
A Phase 3 Prospective, Randomized, International Study (MMY-3021) Comparing Subcutaneous and Intravenous Administration of Bortezomib in Patients with.
Niall C. Tebbutt International randomised phase III study of capecitabine, bevacizumab, and mitomycin C in first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal.
Gemcitabine With or Without Cisplatin in Patients with Advanced or Metastatic Biliary Tract Cancer (ABC): Results of a Multicentre, Randomized Phase III.
1 CONFIDENTIAL – DO NOT DISTRIBUTE ARIES mCRC: Effectiveness and Safety of 1st- and 2nd-line Bevacizumab Treatment in Elderly Patients Mark Kozloff, MD.
A Phase 2 Study with a Daily Regimen of the Oral mTOR Inhibitor RAD001 (Everolimus) in Patients with Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Cancer Amato RJ et.
P.A. Tang 1, S. J. Cohen 1, G. Bjarnason 1, C. Kollmannsberger 1, K. Virik 1, M. J. MacKenzie 1, J. Brown 1, L. Wang 1, A. Chen 2, M. J. Moore 1 1 Princess.
1 A Randomized, Multi-Center Phase III Trial of Irinotecan in Combination with Three Different Methods of Administration of Fluoropyrimidine with Celecoxib.
Agency Review of sNDA SE-006 DOXIL for Ovarian Cancer Division of Oncology Drug Products Office of Drug Evaluation 1 Center for Drug Evaluation.
Journal Club Dr. Eyad Al-Saeed Radiation Oncology 12 January, 2008.
Phase II Multicenter Study of Single-Agent Lenalidomide in Subjects with Mantle Cell Lymphoma Who Relapsed or Progressed After or Were Refractory to Bortezomib:
Erlotinib plus Gemcitabine Compared with Gemcitabine Alone in Patients with Advanced Pancreatic Cancer: A Phase III Trial of the National Cancer Institute.
Results of a Phase 2, Multicenter, Single-Arm Study of Eribulin Mesylate as First-Line Therapy for Locally Recurrent or Metastatic HER2-Negative Breast.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
Clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with sorafenib as first-line therapy : A Korean multicenter.
Adjuvant autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal- cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III,
Everolimus for Advanced Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors N Engl J Med 2011;364: R4. 박선희 / Prof. 동석호.
CCO Independent Conference Coverage* of the 2016 ASCO Annual Meeting, June 3-7, 2016 Phase II MONARCH 1: CDK4/6 Inhibitor Abemaciclib in HR+/HER2- MBC.
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
A cura di Filippo de Marinis
Alessandra Gennari, MD PhD
Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori
Gajria D et al. Proc SABCS 2010;Abstract P
Phase III Trial (MPACT) of Weekly nab-Paclitaxel Plus Gemcitabine in Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer: Influence of Prognostic Factors of Survival J Tabernero,
Vahdat L et al. Proc SABCS 2012;Abstract P
SIRveNIB: Randomized Phase III Trial of Selective Internal Radiation Therapy vs Sorafenib in Locally Advanced HCC CCO Independent Conference Highlights*
NESIR Case Presentation 5/8/17
KEYNOTE-012: Durable Efficacy With Pembrolizumab in PD-L1–Positive Gastric Cancer CCO Independent Conference Highlights of the 2015 ASCO Annual Meeting*
BRAF mutant mCRC patients – What would you recommend? FOLFIRINOX/Bev
Krop I et al. SABCS 2009;Abstract 5090.
First efficacy and safety results from XELOX-1/NO16966, a randomised 2x2 factorial phase III trial of XELOX vs FOLFOX4 + bevacizumab or placebo in first-line.
- Phase 1 Signalling Study
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
Presentation transcript:

SIR ABSTRACT #1 Safety, Response and Survival Outcomes of Y90 Microsphere Radioembolization for Liver Metastases: Results from a 151 Patient Investigational Device Exemption Multi- Institutional Study Study Chair – Dr. Al Benson III, Northwestern Memorial Hospital Principle Investigators – Dr. Gary Siskin, Albany Medical Center – Dr. Jeff Geschwind, Johns Hopkins University Hospital – Dr. Gregory Wiseman, Mayo Clinic Rochester – Dr. William Rilling, Medical College of Wisconsin – Dr. Mary Mulcahy, Dr. Riad Salem, Northwestern Memorial Hospital

TheraSphere Y-90 integral constituent of the insoluble, biocompatible glass microspheres Mean sphere diameter :  m 22,000 to 73,000 spheres / mg 6 dose sizes (3, 5, 7, 10, 15, 20 GBq) Dose by selected target volume Activity = [Desired Dose (Gy)] [Mass of Liver Target (kg)] 50 Arterial administration preferentially delivers microspheres to tumor; spares normal parenchyma Comparison of a Human Hair with TheraSphere  (500x) TheraSphere Y-90 Glass microspheres Radiation

Study Overview Design Single-arm prospective, open-label Investigational Device Exemption (Nordion) Independent contract research organization Patients with Liver Metastases: – Primary Colorectal Cancer (CRC) – Neuroendocrine (NE) – Non-Colorectal/Non-Neuroendocrine (Non-CRC/Non-NE) Objectives Evaluate safety of TheraSphere at doses of 120 ± 10% Gy Evaluate Imaging Outcomes (RECIST v1.0) – Response Rate (RR) – Progression Free Survival (PFS) – Independent central review Evaluate Overall Survival (OS)

Main Inclusion Criteria ≥ 18 years of age Metastatic disease refractory to, or inappropriate for other systemic or liver-directed therapies Unresectable tumors Measurable disease Tumor replacement  50% by liver volume ECOG PS 0-2 ≥ 30 day from prior cancer therapy Signed informed consent

Main Exclusion Criteria Risk of hepatic or renal failure – Serum creatinine >2.0 mg/dL, unless on dialysis – Serum bilirubin  2.0 mg/dL – Albumin < 2.0 g/dL – History of hepatic encephalopathy Pulmonary insufficiency, clinically evident COPD Contraindication to TheraSphere or radiology procedures Cirrhosis or portal hypertension Prior Y90 microspheres or EBRT to the liver Intervention for, or compromise of the Ampulla of Vater Clinically evident ascites Co-morbidities or unresolved adverse events Positive serum pregnancy test

Trial Treatment Schedule Pre-Treatment Procedures (< 28 days prior to Day 0) – Screening for eligibility, informed consent; medical history; labs; CT/MRI; 99 TcMAA scan and hepatic angiography (coil embolization) – Develop treatment plan: determine target volume; activity to treat target volume; account for decay; schedule treatment, order dose vial Day 0 - Treatment first lobe: position catheter, infuse microspheres Week 2 – Telephone follow-up (safety) Week 5 – Assess safety & response, treat 2 nd lobe Months 3, 6, 9, 12 then every 6 months – Assess safety & progression

Study Enrollment First patient enrolled: January 2007 Last patient enrolled: October 2009 Last patient visit: by March 1, 2011 Study Center CRC N=61 NE N = 44 Non CRC / Non NE N = 46 All Patients N = 151 N (%) Albany Medical Center 17 ( 27.9)5 ( 11.4)10 ( 21.7)32 ( 21.2) Johns Hopkins12 ( 19.7)11 ( 25.0)4 ( 8.7)27 ( 17.9) Mayo Clinic4 ( 6.6)10 ( 22.7)8 ( 17.4)22 ( 14.6) Medical College Wisconsin 8 ( 13.1)8 ( 18.2)6 ( 13.0)22 ( 14.6) Northwestern University 20 ( 32.8)10 ( 22.7)18 ( 39.1)48 ( 31.8)

Results – Patient Population Mean age 63.7 years 55.6 % male 91.4 % Caucasian 95.4 % ECOG % bilobar disease Mean 2.5 years from initial diagnosis Medical history consistent with age/disease: – > 50% patients with histories in GI, Musculoskeletal, General Cardiac, Dermatology, Allergy/immunology & Endocrine body systems Non CRC/Non NE included: cholangiocarcinoma, breast, ovarian, renal cell/bladder, esophageal/gastric, lung, pancreas

Results – Prior Treatments Prior Therapy CRC N = 61 NE N = 44 Non CRC/ Non-NE N = 46 All Patients N = or fewer therapies43%93%59%62% 3 or more therapies57 %7%41%38% Systemic Chemotherapy100%30%70% Hormone Therapy0%50%20% Other30%10%20%

Results – Dosing 243 lobar treatments per protocol Average 1.6 treatments per patient All patients received 120 Gy +/ – 20% – No USNRC reportable medical events Median cumulative lung exposure <10 Gy 2% of patients received > 30 Gy to lung without clinical sequelae

Results – Total Liver Dosing (Gy) CRC N = 61 NE N = 44 Non CRC/ Non- NE N = 46 All Patients N = 151 Mean (SD)115.3 ( 7.62)116.4 ( 7.79)116.3 ( 7.11)116.0 ( 7.48) Median (IQR)114.3 ( 11.4)115.0 ( 9.3)116.1 ( 9.0)115.0 ( 10.3) Min, Max100, , 13897, 13397, 138 Site 1Site 2Site 3Site 4Site 5 Mean (SD) ( 5.93)116.3 ( 5.39)117.3 ( 5.48)120.2 ( 8.39)111.7 ( 5.92) Median (IQR) ( 7.1)117.4 ( 6.7)116.7 ( 8.3)119.6 ( 11.1)110.7 ( 7.9) Min, Max 102, , , 12697, , 130

Study Analysis Populations Safety and OS populations all patients receiving TheraSphere (N = 151) RR (CR+PR+SD) patients with completed independent image review (N = 130) PFS populations CRC patients (N = 56), NE patients (N = 31) with complete independent image review

Response by RECIST v1.0 Response by RECIST CRC N = 56 NE N = 31 Non CRC/Non-NE N = 43 All Patients N = 130 n (%) CR 0 ( 0.0) PR 5 ( 8.9)4 ( 12.9)3 ( 7.0)12 ( 9.2) SD 30 ( 53.6)24 ( 77.4)24 ( 55.8)78 ( 60.0) PD 21 ( 37.5)3 ( 9.7)16 ( 37.2)40 ( 30.8) CR + PR + SD 35 (62.5)28 (90.3)27 (62.8)90 (69.2)

Survival Estimates CRC – Median PFS 2.8 months [95% CI: ] – Median OS 9.4 months [95% CI: ] Neuroendocrine – Median PFS 14.6 months [95% CI: ] – Median OS 24.0 months [95% CI: ]

Kaplan-Meier Progression-Free Survival MONTHS K-M Estimate of Hepatic or Extra-Hepatic PFS Probability

Kaplan-Meier Overall Survival K-M Estimate of Survival Probability MONTHS

Conclusions TheraSphere demonstrated excellent tolerability and safety profile in patients with advanced metastatic liver disease Highly reliable delivery of planned radiation dose Prospective, multicenter confirmation of anti-tumor effect in patients without alternative therapeutic options Results were reproducible among all centers; set the stage for international, multicenter phase 3 RCTs