Criteria for Cross-Jurisdictional Sharing in Public Health Perspectives from a literature review, health officers interviews and policymakers discussion.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

TCE Board Presentation February, 2006 Evaluating the Initiative Oakland, CA - Seattle, WA.
A Health and Wellbeing Board for Leicestershire Cheryl Davenport Programme Director.
Update to Board of Health May 22, Recommended by Northern Michigan CJS Team Approved by Center for Sharing Public Health Services Approved by BOH,
March 29, 2012 Improving Health Outcomes for Children in Foster Care: the Role of Electronic Information Exchange.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Calhoun County School System Jacksonville, Alabama April 27-30, 2014.
1 HIE Project Business Case HIMSS/NACCHO HIE Toolkit for Public Health Business Case Tool [INSERT ORGANIZATION NAME, DATE]
Building Epidemiologic Capacity in Wisconsin February 2005 Lorna Will RN, MA Surveillance Epidemiologist Wisconsin Division of Public Health.
Northwoods Shared Services Project: Discussions with Policymakers Ashland County Health & Human Services Committee September 18, 2013.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Catalyst High School May 11,12,13, 2014.
Public Health Essential Service #8
Committee on Health Equity and Policy (CHEP) AMHPAC Committee September 11, 2014 Presented by Greta Coe, AMH On behalf of CHEP.
A Healthy Place to Live, Learn, Work and Play:
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
The Wisconsin Maps PowerPoint Created by Rozalynn M. Klaas, UW-Madison Applied Population LabRozalynn M. Klaas In cooperation with Bethany Laursen, UW-Extension’s.
WASC Accreditation Standards and Process August 31, 2006.
Cross-Jurisdictional Sharing: Can it work in small jurisdictions? Gianfranco Pezzino, Co-Director, Center for Sharing Public Health Services Sandy Tubbs,
Essential Service # 7:. Why learn about the 10 Essential Services?  Improve quality and performance.  Achieve better outcomes – improved health, less.
Sharing Public Health Resources and Services Gianfranco Pezzino Patrick Libbey Co-Directors, Center for Sharing Public Health Services.
New Procurement & Delivery Arrangements for the Schools’ Estate Presentation to Strategic Advisory Group 18 April 2005.
Report to Los Angeles County Executive Office And Los Angeles County Health Services Agencies Summary of Key Questions for Stakeholders February 25, 2015.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Sharing Resources Across Jurisdictions: A Roadmap to Success Gianfranco Pezzino Co-Director August 19,
Workforce for London – A Strategic Framework Implications for NHS/HE Partnership.
Health IT Policy Committee Federal Health IT Strategic Plan September 9, 2015.
Wisconsin STD Program Overview of Gonorrhea Epidemiology and Program Prevention Efforts Meeting February 2, 2010 Wisconsin Department of Health Services:
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Northern Michigan Cross Jurisdictional Sharing Team National Association of Local Boards of Health Salt Lake City, Utah August 14, 2013 Shelley Pinkleman,
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Delivery System Reform Incentive Payment Program (DSRIP), Transforming the Medicaid Health Care System.
Cross-jurisdictional sharing in public health: what we do (and do not) know Gianfranco Pezzino, Co-Director Center for Sharing Public Health Services phsharing.org.
Crosswalk of Public Health Accreditation and the Public Health Code of Ethics Highlighted items relate to the Water Supply case studied discussed in the.
Bill Hogan, Commissioner Alaska Department of Health and Social Services.
Strategic Plan Strategic Goals (Thrusts) 1. Achieve Performance Excellence CRJ uses metrics of performance to evaluate, manage and plan its.
The Pennsylvania Community of Practice in Support of Secondary Transition National Association of State Directors of Special Education March 10, 2004.
1 Developing a Framework for an Early Intervention System of Care NECTAC/ ITCA Finance Seminar May 22, 2006.
Youth Empowerment Services Transition Network Marilyn Stewart, MSW Casey Family Programs Bob Stewart, MSW, MPH ACCESS, Inc.
Savings, Service and Sensitivities: The Rural New York Cross Jurisdictional Sharing Experience  Donald W. Rowe, PhD  Director Office of Public Health.
1 Partnerships and Collaboration: Building Interagency Teams Strategic Service Delivery Component Disability Employment Initiative.
Alexandra B. McGoldrick Director, Central Grants Office City of Bridgeport Bill Finch Mayor.
Strengthening Communities Awarded to support the development and implementation of collaborate and innovative community projects that address economic.
Enter System Name AdvancED TM External Review Exit Report Maxey Elementary December 9 and 10, 2013.
AB 86: Adult Education Consortia Planning Using Your Planning $$$ Wisely Webinar Series
Integrating Your Environmental Management System With Community Stakeholders Mr. Jimmy Parrish Defense Supply Center Richmond April 7, 2004 Presented To.
Solano County Behavioral Health MHSA Innovation Plan A Joint Project Between Solano County and the UC Davis Center for Reducing Health Disparities.
Community-Academic Aging Research Network CAARN Jill Ballard, MPH, CHES September 2011.
Processes and Practices Supporting the implementation of the Occupational Therapy and Personal Care Growth Funding Julie Cairns Project Officer for the.
Writing Grants: How we do it together Laura Chenven Director, H-CAP September 21, 2011.
Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.
Why Now? Taking Action for the Future of Public Health Nursing Pamela A. Kulbok, DNSc, PHCNS-BC, FAAN, University of Virginia Susan M. Swider, PhD, APHN-BC,
Program Planning for Evidence-based Health Programs.
State of Family Planning & Reproductive Health WISCONSIN FAMILY PLANNING REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATION.
Drug Enforcement Administration
Budget Study Sessions Strategic Support Proposed Operating Budget OUTCOMES: - A High Performing Workforce that is Committed to Exceeding.
Building and Sustaining a Multicultural Partnership
Kathleen Amos, MLIS & C. William Keck, MD, MPH
Criteria for Cross-Jurisdictional Sharing in Public Health
TSMO Program Plan Development
Wisconsin Caregiver Coalition Project
Aging Plan Reviewer Assignments
Long-Term Power Outage Regional Planning Workshop
COVERAGE MAP Rhinelander Wausau DMA Market Data* DMA Demographics
Wisconsin Caregiver Coalition Project
Implementation Guide for Linking Adults to Opportunity
How Will We Achieve Strategy?
Family and Community Services
Protective Factors and Youth Thrive
Service Array Assessment and Planning Purposes
Certified Peer Specialists by County as of September 2012
MODULE 11: Creating a TSMO Program Plan
Presentation transcript:

Criteria for Cross-Jurisdictional Sharing in Public Health Perspectives from a literature review, health officers interviews and policymakers discussion groups in the Northwoods Shared Services Project, April 2014

A Roadmap for Sharing: Explore Prepare & Plan Implement & Improve Source: Center for Sharing Public Health Services

Goals and Expectations: Is in alignment with our mission and core values Evidence based and when applicable, designed to improve population health Accomplish at least one of the following:  Achieve an essential public health service  Advance initiatives in a priority area in our community health plan  Enhance the quality of the existing service  Improve capacity for achieving public health accreditation Why Consider CJS?

Scope of the Agreement Assures adequate service levels for the investment of resources for our agency The agreement is clear about which services will NOT be shared, including:  Functions (e.g. billing, human resources, information technology)  Programs and Capacity (e.g. WIC, environmental health, epidemiology, lab)

Partners and Stakeholders Have experience working together in CJS agreements, trust each other and have an understanding of the culture and history of each jurisdiction Adequate support for the CJS from policymakers, constituents, clients, and other stakeholders who may be affected by it Relationships Public Support

Partners and Stakeholders The proposed outcomes, service model and delivery, and staffing model feasible and supported by the partners, stakeholders and others affected by the CJS initiative. The partners are in agreement on their respective roles and responsibilities and they are willing to enter into a written agreement. Policymaker & Stakeholder Support Written Agreements

Fiscal & Service Implications Is there a service benefit such as:  New services for less money than could be achieved by doing it alone  Enhanced quality of service for an affordable investment? Service

Fiscal & Service Implications Is there a fiscal benefit such as:  Savings through avoiding capital costs over the medium and long term (3-10 years)  Reduced annual rates of increase in expenditures  Decreased annual operating cost  No increase in annual operating costs  Lower than expected rate of increase in annual operating costs? Fiscal

Fiscal & Service Implications  Funding is adequate to support staff and resources needed to meet program/service outcomes  Funds pay for the increased indirect costs to the lead agency  Funding is at least 2 – 5 years versus one- time, one year funding that is unlikely to be sustainable  There is a plan for sustainable funding Funding

Leadership The lead agency has experience managing CJS arrangements and the appropriate infrastructure in place for all reporting requirements Lead Agency

Personnel Can we recruit staff from the area workforce with the desired expertise in the location(s) needed?

Criteria for Cross- Jurisdictional Sharing in Public Health In Summary:  Goals and Expectations  Scope of the Agreement  Partners and Stakeholders  Fiscal and Service Implications  Leadership  Personnel

Northwoods Public Health Community: Shared Services Learning Community Grant Acknowledgements: This work was funded by a grant from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and the Center for Sharing Public Health Services Fiscal Agent and Contact for the Grant: Marathon County Health Department

Northwoods Public Health Community: Shared Services Learning Community Grant Grant Partners:  Ashland County Health & Human Services  Bayfield County Health Dept.  Florence County Health Dept.  Forest County Health Dept.  Iron County Health Dept.  Lac Courte Oreilles Band of Lake Superior Chippewa  LCO - send reminders to her also  Langlade County Health Dept.  Lincoln County Health Dept.  Marathon County Health Dept.  Marinette County Health & Human Services  Oneida County Health Dept.  Portage Co. Health & Human Services Dept.  Price Co. Health & Human Services  Sawyer County Health & Human Services  Shawano-Menominee Counties Health Department  Taylor County Health Dept.  Vilas County Health Dept.  Wood County Health Dept.