Cougar Ridge Assessment Results 2012 Debra Hawkins Director, Assessment and Research Teaching and Learning Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
May 3, 2006WV Department of Education Annual Measurable Objectives for Improving the Achievement of LEP Students Title III AMAOs.
Advertisements

Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) “No Child Left Behind” Act of 2001 Public Law (NCLB) Brian Jeffries Office of Superintendent of.
Assessment and Accountability at the State Level NAEP NRT (Iowa Tests) Core CRTs DWA UAA UBSCT NCLB U-PASS Alphabet Soup.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER RENEWAL Overview of Proposed Renewal March 6, 2015 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
ANNUAL 2012 REPORT OF STUDENT ASSESSMENT DATA 1 HAMILTON TOWNSHIP SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Academically Gifted and Talented Program for Greenwood District 50 By: Cathy S. Chalmers Initial Creation July 2008 Revised July 2014 Contact Information:
ARD Training Education Service Center and School District Training TEA Student Assessment Division.
September, 2010 Accomack County Public Schools. DEFINITION OF AN LEP STUDENT  An LEP student is one: Who was not born in the U.S. or whose native language.
ELL (English Language Learner) Program.  An ELL student is a student who:  Was not born in the United States  Or whose native language is not English.
MARCH 12, 2015 Testing at Lees Corner ES. Still Online? Online Testing  Grade Level Common Assessments Mostly in grades 3-6  eCart Windows Grades 3-6.
Overview of Gifted Implementation and Advanced Learning Program (ALP)
Seattle Public School ELL Data Veronica Maria Gallardo, Director of ELL 1.
Common Questions What tests are students asked to take? What are students learning? How’s my school doing? Who makes decisions about Wyoming Education?
Agenda 2017 Standards & Instruction –W–What and how should kids learn? Assessments and Data Systems –H–How do we know if they learned it? School and Educator.
What ACCESS, the New Virginia Test for LEP Students, Means for School Districts LEP Caucus Presentation July 2008.
Academically Gifted and Talented Program for Greenwood District 50 By: Cathy S. Chalmers Toni Justus Harold Moffitt Pacquitta Welton-Wideman Revised July.
Title III Accountability. Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives How well are English Learners achieving academically? How well are English Learners.
ESEA NCLB  Stronger accountability  More freedom for states and communities  Use of proven research-based methods  More choices.
Austin Elementary School August 20 and 27, 2015
Torrance Unified School District Annual Student Achievement Dr. George W. Mannon, Superintendent Dr. E Don Kim, Senior Director of Elementary Education.
Acquiring English Proficiency in the Torrington Public Schools Programs, Process, and Student Progress Cheryl F. Kloczko.
Robert Barnoski (Barney) Washington State Institute for Public Policy Phone: (360) Institute Publications:
What is Title I ?  It is federal funding that is attached to NCLB/ESEA legislation  It is intended to help students who are falling behind.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
Agenda (5:00-6:30 PM): Introduction to Staff Title I Presentation PTA Information Classroom visits (two 30 minute rotations)
1 Watertown Public Schools Assessment Reports 2010 Ann Koufman-Frederick and Administrative Council School Committee Meetings Oct, Nov, Dec, 2010 Part.
Virginia Department of Education May 8, English Language Proficiency Targets: Title III Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAOs) 2.
CogAT Cognitive Abilities Test ™ Report to Parents What does CogAT measure? CogAT measures cognitive development of a student in the areas of learned reasoning.
Standards-Based Assessment Overview K-8 Fairfield Public Schools Fall /30/2015.
Jackson County School District A overview of test scores and cumulative data from 2001 – 2006 relative to the following: Mississippi Curriculum Test Writing.
ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE INDEX (API) ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS (AYP) PROGRAM IMPROVEMENT (PI) SEPTEMBER 18, 2014 Accountability Progress Reporting Update.
Cognitive Abilities Test McKinney ISD
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
No Child Left Behind. HISTORY President Lyndon B. Johnson signs Elementary and Secondary Education Act, 1965 Title I and ESEA coordinated through Improving.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability.
Drewry Mason Elementary Annual Title I Meeting 12:00-1:00, 3:00-4:00, 6:00-7:00 August 9, 2012.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test and Title III.
Parents as Partners: How Parents and Schools Work Together to Close the Achievement Gap.
Assessment Report October 26, Types of Assessments Given Formative Summative Aptitude/Achievement Curriculum Based Assessments.
No Child Left Behind Impact on Gwinnett County Public Schools’ Students and Schools.
GEORGIA’S CRITERION-REFERENCED COMPETENCY TESTS (CRCT) Questions and Answers for Parents of Georgia Students February 11, 2009 Presented by: MCES.
Title III: 101 Jacqueline A. Iribarren Ph.D. Title III, ESL & Bilingual Ed. Consultant October 20, 2011.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Title I Annual Meeting What Every Family Needs to Know!
6/14/2016 “A Horse of a Different Color” No Child Left Behind and Accountability The State Testing Program Louisiana.
Curriculum Night Middle School. What do I as a parent need to know to support student assessments at CCAS? Essential Question.
A GUIDE FOR CANTON PUBLIC SCHOOL DISTRICT’S PARENTS AND STAKEHOLDERS The Mississippi Literacy-Based Promotion Act
Understanding the Common Core Standards Adopted by Nevada in 2010 Our State. Our Students. Our Success.
Kansas Association of School Boards ESEA Flexibility Waiver KASB Briefing August 10, 2012.
1. Every Student Succeeds Act ESSA December
An overview presented by: Cheryl Dyer, Assistant Superintendent
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Accountability in California Before and After NCLB
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
Title III of the No Child Left Behind Act
CogAT Cognitive Abilities Test ™ Report to Parents
Pacquitta Welton-Wideman
January 2015 Jenny Singh, Administrator Academic Accountability Unit
Linden Elementary Title I Parent Night
Grand Ridge Assessment Overview 2015
Assessment and Identification
Assessment Overview School Year
Gifted and Talented at Garden Oaks Montessori Magnet
UNDERSTANDING LCFF & LCAP LCAP Priorities: Conditions of Learning
PHILLIPS PREPARATORY SCHOOL
CogAT Cognitive Abilities Test ™ Report to Parents
Ace it!SM Tutoring Teacher Training
Central Middle School August 20, 2019
Tomlinson Middle School August 27, 2019
Presentation transcript:

Cougar Ridge Assessment Results 2012 Debra Hawkins Director, Assessment and Research Teaching and Learning Division

Goals for Tonight  Provide an Overview of the Assessments given K-5 and Recent Results from these assessments  Explain the rationale behind recent assessment changes  Discuss the impact of WA State ESEA Waiver  Review District Position on Practice tests  Identify What is Coming in the World of Assessment

State/Federal Level Testing Requirements  Washington English Language Proficiency (WELPA)/Placement and Annual Test  Second Grade Reading Assessment  Measurements of Student Progress (MSP)  National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)  Classroom Based Assessment/Civics

Annual Measurable Achievement Objectives (AMAO) Results  AMAO Target 1-MET  Measures the annual increase in the number or percentage of children making progress in learning English  AMAO Target 2-MET  Measures the number or percentage of children attaining English proficiency.  AMAO Target 3-MET  Measures the number or percentage of students learning English who reach academic standards in reading and math based on the state’s assessments.

Second Grade Reading Assessment  Mandates that every student in the state of Washington be assessed at the beginning of the second grade using a grade-level equivalent oral reading passage. Students whose performance is found to be substantially below grade level must be provided an intervention plan that involves the student, parents, and school.

Measurements of Student Progress  Third grade-Reading and Math  Fourth grade- Reading, Math and Writing  Fifth grade Reading, Math, and Science

What is a good score on the MSP?  Advanced (Level 4)  Proficient (Level 3)  Basic (Level 2)  Below Basic (Level 1) Students generally have to achieve a score that represents approximately 60-65% of the points possible on each test to pass. That score or above means they have met the required standard for proficiency in that subject.

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)  An essential measurement of student achievement in the United States  Required by federal government for all states receiving Title I funding  National results are reported for grades 4, 8, and 12  In the ISD Cascade Ridge and Maywood Middle School will participate this year

Classroom-based Assessment- Civics  State mandated assessment are multi- stepped tasks or projects aligned to specific state standards which target skill and knowledge necessary for engaged, informed citizenship  Most of the assessments ask students to develop a position on an issue, event, or question, include background on the issue, event, or question, provide reasons for the position and cite the sources used to develop and support the position

District Required Assessments  Fountas & Pinnell Reading Assessment  Everyday Math Assessment  Stanford 10 Achievement Test  Cognitive Abilities Test (CogAT)  Structure of the Intellect (SOI)

Fountas & Pinnell Reading Assessment  Spring 2011-Fountas and Pinnell Reading assessment was selected by the Reading scope and sequence committee  Determines 3 reading levels for each student  Independent, Instructional, Hard  Provides placement level for guided reading instruction  Allows teachers to tailor their reading program more accurately to a wide range of reading abilities

Stanford 10 Achievement  Nationally standardized, norm-referenced achievement test  Group administered  Collects achievement data from a nationally representative group of students so that others have a current norm group against which to compare their scores  Given at 1, 2, and 5 th grade

CogAT/SOI  Group-administered ability test battery and creativity measured  CogAT-Used to assess students’ abilities in reasoning and problem solving using verbal, quantitative, and nonverbal symbols  SOI-Used to assess creativity (figural-spatial, symbolic and verbal abilities are measured)  Used as part of the identification process for Gifted/Talented students eligibility

Rationale behind Assessment Changes  WASL to MSP  Stanford 10 Achievement K-12, to Stanford 10 Achievement administration only at 1, 2, and 5

WA State ESEA Flexibility Waiver  Superintendent Dorn announces ESEA Waiver approval July 6, 2012  Effective immediately Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) rules are replaced by Annual Measurable Objectives (AMO)calculations

What’s Coming in Assessment?  Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium  Common Core State Standards  On-line Testing  Teacher-Principal Evaluation Pilot  Common Assessments

The Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project  The Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project (TPEP) is part of a broad education reform bill (E2SSB 6696) passed by the Washington State Legislature in  Traditional evaluation systems have a two-level ranking of “satisfactory” or “unsatisfactory”. The legislation calls for a four-level rating system and eight minimum criterion

Links for additional information    

Need help with Assessment Issues?  Debra Hawkins  Director of Assessment and Research 