WHO IS THE ONLINE STUDENT? Barbara Truman-Davis Director, Course Development & Web Services Dale Voorhees Coordinator, Course Development Barbara Truman-Davis.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
First-Year Graduate Student Survey INTRODUCTION As part of the Graduate Schools recruitment and retention efforts, a graduate student survey was developed.
Advertisements

Assessment of the Impact of Ubiquitous Computing on Learning Ross A. Griffith Wake Forest University Ubiquitous Computing Conference Seton Hall University.
Do the Data Support our Assumptions? Charles D. Dziuban Patsy D. Moskal University of Central Florida.
Technology as a Tool for Effective Teaching and Learning Chuck Dziuban University of Central Florida.
NASULGC-Sloan National Commission on Online Learning.
Supporting Quality of Student Learning Online: Using Quality Matters to Strengthen Online Teaching and Learning Valencia College - Orlando, Florida Charles.
Implications of Web-based Learning for Student Evaluation of University Teaching Chuck DziubanSteve Sorg Research Initiative for Teaching Center for Distributed.
Reactive Behavior Patterns in Distributed Learning: Bridging Student Resources and Cognition Charles D. Dziuban Patsy D. Moskal University of Central Florida.
Graduating Senior Exit Survey Lindsay Couzens, M.S. And Bea Babbitt, Ph.D. Academic Assessment 1.
Opinions about Distance Education at Pace A New Attitude? Jim Stenerson, Director Center for Teaching, Learning & Technology & Christine Moloughney Coordinator.
A Look at Online Teaching and Learning at UCF Charles D. Dziuban Patsy D. Moskal University of Central Florida.
Process Management Robert A. Sedlak, Ph.D Provost and Vice Chancellor, UW-Stout Education Community of Practice Conference At Tusside in Turkey September.
Technology-Enhanced Learning: Opportunities and Challenges Charles D. Dziuban Patsy D. Moskal University of Central Florida.
Developing An Online Information Literacy Course Nancy O’Hanlon Ohio State University Libraries Wuhan University, China March 2007.
Summer Online Courses A Distance Learning Alternative for Traditional Campuses North East Regional Computing Program Annual Conference (NERCOMP) Boston.
Institutional Learning Outcomes: Assessing Academic and Career Technical Objectives Convocation – Fall 2014 College of the Redwoods Angelina Hill.
Data Collection and Preliminary Analysis Our survey addressed the first two of the questions presented in this study. The Qualtrics survey was framed by.
Expanding Blended Learning Through Tools and Campus Programs A UCF/AASCU Project Thomas Cavanagh, Ph.D. Assistant Vice President, Distributed Learning.
Making Big Classes Small: Penn State’s Blended Learning Initiative Renata Engel John T. Harwood January 30, 2006 Copyright Penn State, This work.
NERCOMP 2002, College for Lifelong Learning What Students, Faculty and the College are Learning about Teaching and Learning Online Managing the 24x7 Classroom.
Prince George’s Community College Online Express Training Faculty to Teach Online Mary Wells Margo Chaires Andrew Habermacher.
Institutional Learning Outcomes: Assessing Personal and Professional Development FLEX – Spring 2015 College of the Redwoods Angelina Hill.
Barry A. Berger Professor of Regulatory Affairs Temple University School of Pharmacy QA/RA Graduate Program 1Discussion-BABTechDay2012.
The Benefits & Challenges of Teaching Online A Presentation for Western Illinois University.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
MCCVLC Distance Learning Administrators Survey Results & Discussion.
An Online Learning Case Study Board of Governors Distance Learning Workshop March 23, 2011 Dr. Joel L. Hartman, Vice Provost & CIO University of Central.
2007 Office of the CIO Technology Poll Results Information Technology Questions Office of the Chief Information Officer.
AFCEA/AFA July 23,  There are 35 colleges and universities across the state that are members of the University System of Georgia.  All of them.
2005 The Ohio State University Poll Results Information Technology Questions Office of the Chief Information Officer.
2006 Office of the CIO Technology Poll Results Information Technology Questions Office of the Chief Information Officer.
Distance Learning at West Virginia University Sue Day-Perroots, Dean of Extended Learning Cindy Hart, Coordinator for Distance Learning.
Revisiting Retention: A Four Phase Retention Research Initiative 2012 SLOAN Conference October 10 th, 2012 Gary J. Burkholder, PhD Senior Research Scholar.
Monroe Community College Practices to Retain Students in Online Learning Dr. Jeffrey P. Bartkovich Marie J. Fetzner Monroe Community College May 11, 2004.
Using Technology to Enhance Instruction. Educational Technologies Blackboard, Content- Based Tools Distribution Tools Communicatio n Tools Presentatio.
Learners’ Attitudes and Perceptions of Online Instruction Presented by: Dr. Karen S. Ivers Dr. JoAnn Carter-Wells Dr. Joyce Lee California State University.
New Millennium Learners Chuck Dziuban Patsy Moskal University of Central Florida.
Student Satisfaction Survey Administered to 213 randomly selected lecture & lab courses, including courses from all campuses and all levels (response.
Bringing Together Survey Results of the UNLV Student Experience
Distance Education: New Offerings from Ball State Dr. Jim Flowers Associate Prof. & Director of Online Ed. Dept of Industry & Technology Ball State University.
The Redesigned Elements of Statistics Course University of West Florida March 2008.
Learning from Pharmacy Distance Learners by By Rae Jesano, MSLS, AHIP, Linda Butson, MLn, MPH, AHIP, Mary Edwards, MSLIS, Health Science Center Libraries,
Gouri Banerjee, Ph. D. Dept. Math & IT, Emmanuel College Boston, Massachusetts. 1 Gouri Banerjee Blended Learning Environments, 2010.
The Value Add of Technology Enhanced Learning Charles Dziuban Patsy Moskal University of Central Florida.
Moving the Mountain: Online Part-time Faculty Orientation.
MDC Quality Enhancement Plan Mathematics Discipline Meeting Update March 5, 2009.
Shaking Up Statistics: A Blended Learning Perspective My Vu, Erin M. Buchanan, Kayla Jordan, Marilee Teasley, Kathrene Valentine Missouri State University.
ITESM Virtual University Forum Monterrey May 30, 2003 Dr. Robert W. Jerome Assistant Provost for Faculty and International Programs.
Increasing Success Rates in Online Learning Kathy Coleman, Chattahoochee Technical College.
CCBC Associate to Bachelor’s (ATB) Option NSP II July 2013 – June 2016 Karen Wons, MS, RN, CNE Associate Professor, Project Director & Coordinator.
ETMSoE Off-campus Task Force Survey Results. Overview Open March 23-27, 2009 N = 43 (approximately 53%) Likert & Open-ended items Off-campus programming.
2004 The Ohio State University Poll Results Information Technology Questions Office of the Chief Information Officer.
State University of New York An Emerging Model for Online Learning MERLOT International Conference – August A Systemic Approach to Online Learning.
Graduate Program Development. Executed Master Services Agreement with Wiley April 2015 Launching four programs Spring 2016 –MS Cybersecurity –MS ECE –M.
1 Online Student Satisfaction & Adult Student Perceptions RESEARCH RESULTS AND LESSONS LEARNED Academic Affairs Assessment Symposium.
QEP Update Primary Outcomes improvement of students’ critical thinking skills 1. Measurable improvement of students’ critical thinking skills at the course,
An Assessment of the Readiness of a Tertiary Healthcare Organization in Saudi Arabia, in Adopting Effective Online Staff Development Programs Adnan D.
© 2012 CAPELLA UNIVERSITY T WENTY YEARS OF ENHANCING ONLINE STUDENT S UCCESS Amy Buechler-Steubing & Siri Sorensen Capella University – Learning Assistance.
Distance Learning and Accreditation Heather G. Hartman, Ph.D. Brenau University Online Studies and SACS Liaison.
The Use of Formative Evaluations in the Online Course Setting JENNIFER PETERSON, MS, RHIA, CTR DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SCIENCES.
Ron Owston Dean, York University Faculty of Education 4th International Conference on e-Learning and Distance Education -Riyadh March 2015 Student engagement.
Designing Innovative Instruction using Faculty Feedback on Technology Use and Faculty Attitudes toward Library Research Instruction Maria Perez-Stable,
Continuing Education Provincial Survey Winter 2012 Connie Phelps Manager, Institutional Research & Planning.
The Assessment of Blended Courses: Gathering and Using Faculty and Student Feedback to Maximize Program Effectiveness Orly Calderon, PsyD, Long Island.
REAL TIME VIRTUAL CLASSROOM Dale E. Parson, Kutztown University Computer Science & Information Technology Research & Teaching Seminar March 29, 2016, 11.
20 Years: What the Data Show and What They Don’t
A Tale of Two Contexts: Student Perceptions of Adaptive Learning
Adapting to Adaptive Learning
University of Central Florida
Distance Learning Facilitator Skills
Presentation transcript:

WHO IS THE ONLINE STUDENT? Barbara Truman-Davis Director, Course Development & Web Services Dale Voorhees Coordinator, Course Development Barbara Truman-Davis Director, Course Development & Web Services Dale Voorhees Coordinator, Course Development The University of Central Florida

The University of Central Florida The University of Central Florida

Scope of UCF’s Online Program Half (500) of all full-time faculty engaged Half (250) of these trained through IDL6543 1,000+ WebCT courses 800+ courses built with production support Six fully online programs, three graduate certificates

Current Online Degrees B.A. and B.S. in Liberal Studies B.S. in Voc. Ed. and Industry Training R.N. to B.S.N. Nursing A.A.-A.S. to B.S. in Health Services Administration M.A. and M.S. in Vocational Education M.A. in Educational Media M.S. in Forensic Science (partially online)

Institutional Support for Distributed Learning Course Development & Web Services: dedicated to online class support Center for Distributed Learning –marketing –long-range planning –registration –faculty training Office of Instructional Resources –ITV network

W eb-based courses: Delivered entirely over the Web, with no regular class meetings M ixed-mode courses: Delivered partially in classroom and partially over the Web (“reduced seat time”) E nhanced courses: Web presence UCF Online Delivery Models

Online Sections (All Modes)

Online Students (All Modes)

Internet tools Browser test Tutorials Assessment UCF information Connection to campus network Student Support CD-ROM

Distributed Learning Impact Assessment Learning styles Success rates Attitudes Demographics Withdrawal rates Strategies for success Students Critical thinking Effective instructional tools Quasi-experiments Faculty Accreditation Real time surveys Assessment techniques Personal theorizing

What We Have Found Regarding Online Students The majority of students enrolled in fully online (W) courses are also enrolled in F2F courses The distribution of students by ethnicity is approximately the same for all modalities Fully online (W) courses consistently have more females than other modalities On the average, students enrolled in W courses are oldest, followed by those in M sections then face-to-face

Success Rates of Fully Online and Mixed-mode Courses From Fall 1997 Through Spring 2000 Fall 97 Spr 98 Sum 98 Fall 98 Spr 99 Sum 99 Fully online Mixed-mode Face-to-face Fall 99 Spr Total N=52,218 students

Withdrawal Rates of Fully Online and Mixed-mode Courses From Fall 1997 Through Spring 2000 Fully online Mixed-mode Face-to-face Fall 97 Spr 98 Sum 98 Fall 98 Spr 99 Sum 99 Fall 99 Spr Total N=52,218 students

Percentage of Undergraduate and Graduate Students in Online Courses -- Spring ‘99 79% 72% 21% 18% GraduateUndergraduate Fully online (n=1,148) Mixed-mode (n=2,283)

Gender of Students Enrolled Differing Modalities and UCF Overall -- Spring ‘99 Mixed- mode sections N=2,283 Fully online sections N=1,148 Face-to-face sections N=4,743 57% 43% 73% 27% 56% 44% 55% 45% UCF overall N=30,009

Student Ages -- Spring ‘99 Face-to-face N=4,743 Media-enhanced N=2,283 Fully-online N=1,148 Mean=24 SD=6.9 Mean=26 SD=8.4 Mean=30 SD=9.3 Percentiles Age Type of class

Employment Status Reported by Students 51% 33% 16% Full timePart timeDo not work 42% 37% 21% Fully online (n=341) Mixed-mode (n=181)

Reported Location of Student Computers 88% 22% 20% 6% At homeAt campusAt jobOther 81% 51% 13% 3% Fully online (n=341) Mixed-mode (n=181)

Drive Time to UCF Campus Reported by Students 24% 17% 31% 17% 11% < Minutes 24% 21% 35% 16% 2% Fully online (n=341) Media-enhanced (n=181)

Reasons Given by Students for Enrolling in Fully Online and Mixed-Mode Courses 79% 44% 22% 19% 20% Convenience Try it Instructor Schedule conflicts Only available Other 20% 16% 14% 43% 34% Fully online (n=341) Mixed-mode (n=181)

Reported Student Satisfaction With Online Courses 3% 5% 7% 31% 54% Very unsatisfied UnsatisfiedNeutralSatisfiedVery satisfied 3% 7% 12% 43% 34% Fully online (n=341) Mixed-mode (n=181)

Student Attitudes Toward Taking Another Online Course Spring ‘99 (N=341) 2% 4% 5% 19% Definitely not Probably not Not sureProbablyDefinitely 2% 4% 8% 43% 70% 43% Fully online (n=341) Media-enhanced (n=181)

The Transition of Student Affect Regarding Online Courses UCF is responding to my needs I am more active in my learning I feel personally empowered My learning is more convenient My learning is self-paced …then (1998)…and now (2000)

Advice Students Would Give to Others Considering an Online Course Keep up and don’t procrastinate Attend the orientation Be disciplined Develop your computer skills Ask for help Keep in touch with the professor Check the forum daily

A Summary of Long Behavior Types Aggressive Independent –high energy –action-oriented –not concerned with approval –speaks out freely –gets into confrontational situations Passive Independent –low energy –not concerned with approval –prefers to work alone –resists pressure from authority Aggressive Dependent –high energy –action-oriented –concerned with approval –rarely expresses negative feelings –performs at or above ability Passive Dependent –low energy –concerned with approval –highly sensitive to the feelings of others –very compliant

Distribution of Long Types and Traits for Online Students AI 23% PI 17% AD 53% PD 7% 40% 73% 21% 33% (n=342)

Distribution of Long Types and Traits for CHM 1020 AI 27% PI 18% AD 37% PD 19% (n=133) 31% 60% 22% 55%

Student Reasons for Withdrawing From Fully Online Courses Technology issues Web stuff confusing Personal conflicts Lack of class organization Too much work/ time (N=52) 25% 23% 8% 6% Instructor issues Other

Student Benefits Cited by Online Faculty Improved learning flexibility Improved student interaction and feedback Technology as a learning resource Enhanced student responsibility Convenience

UCF Distributed Learning Impact Evaluation Website

Additional Contacts at the University of Central Florida Chuck Dziuban, Ph.D. University of Central Florida Distributed Learning Impact Evaluation P.O. Box Orlando, FL Patsy D. Moskal, Ed.D. University of Central Florida Distributed Learning Impact Evaluation P.O. Box Orlando, FL Steve Sorg, Ph.D. University of Central Florida Center for Distributed Learning Research Parkway, Suite 264 Orlando, FL For information regarding UCF’s Distributed Learning Impact Evaluation: For information regarding UCF’s institutional approach to distributed learning: