1 Centralized Support for Service Desk and Desktop across UCSF Campus and Medical Center – A Case Study Presented to UC-CSU By Julie Cox and Sian Shumway.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Presentation to the Cabinet A Presentation to Stakeholders
Advertisements

What Did We Learn About Our Future? Getting Ready for Strategic Planning Spring 2012.
1 Division of Aging and Adult Services (DAAS) Knowledge Management and Transfer Project 7/30/12.
UC BERKELEY CAMPUS SHARED SERVICES RESEARCH ADMINISTRATION: A Central Office Perspective 1.
How to commence the IT Modernization Process?
Governor’s Center for Efficient Government. Mission The mission of the Governor's Center for Efficient Government is to promote fair and transparent best.
TECH Project Company X Documentation Plan Champion/Define Phase
HR Manager – HR Business Partners Role Description
An Intro to Professionalizing Procurement & Strategic Sourcing
1 Response to the Employee Survey Recommendations.
Knowledge Management, Texas-style Session 508. Presented by: Belinda Perez Stephanie Moorer Knowledge Management, Texas-Style.
Delivery Business Solutions April 29, Nashville PMI Symposium April 29, 2013 Stephanie Dedmon, PMP Director, Business Solutions Delivery Department.
OCTOBER 25, m-NET Mobilizing National Educator Talent (“m-NET”) is an innovative, nontraditional program to help special education teachers earn.
System Office Performance Management
Oracle General Ledger, Financial Reporting and Data Warehouse 6/22/2015 RIAS PHASE II Overview.
Joint Unit Liaison Meeting 1 INFORMATION AND TECHNOLOGY SERVICES Transforming U-M: Joint UL Meeting July 21, 2009.
Financial Model ‘An integrated model for STFC’ Draft Blueprint Design v0.1 Project Manager: Mark Affonso Project Champion: Jane Tirard.
By Saurabh Sardesai October 2014.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
Enterprise Financial System Project Overview & Update Council of Research Associate Deans March 22,
PwC Project Management Steve P. Russell IBM Manager Infrastructure Projects Depaul University November 6, 2002.
Human Resources Update Academic Senate Coordinating Committee February 2, 2015.
System Office Performance Management
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
UCPath Center Job Opportunities. 2 UCPath is a core part of the University's strategy to maintain its academic excellence while improving services for.
UCSF HUMAN RESOURCES UPDATE November 20, Agenda  Recap of Chazey recommendations  HR opportunities for transformation and preliminary timeline.
Charting a course PROCESS.
Final Client Briefing Call Center Wait Time Project August 27, 2012 – December 11, 2012 State of Florida – Department of Economic Opportunity Florida State.
May Agenda  PeopleSoft History at Emory  Program Governance  Why Upgrade Now?  Program Guiding Principles  High-Level Roadmap  What Does This.
Financial Area Representative Meeting FAR UTShare PeopleSoft Update October 16,
March 2010Developed by Agency Human Resource Services, DHRM1 Organization Assessment Example of an Organizational Design Review and Recommendations.
Module 2.1 Finance and Administration Cabinet Organizational Changes and Agency Impact March
Supporting tools in an IT Project & Portfolio Management environment Ann Van Belle -
Best Practices: Aligning Process, Culture and Tools Michael Jordan Senior Project Manager - Microsoft Consulting Services
1 Human Performance Improvement Process INTRODUCTION Connie Johnson.
PROJECT AND PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT AT UNM IT David McGuire, Associate Director, IT Project & Service Mgmt Tech Days, 4 June 2015, 2:30-3:30.
Optimized IT Gae Lyn DeLand, IT Director In. March 15, 2007 IT Governance General Description: “This Bill consolidates information technology services.
GBA IT Project Management Final Project - Establishment of a Project Management Management Office 10 July, 2003.
March 21, 2006 NERCOMP 2006 Worcester, Massachusetts 1 Copyright Sunny Donenfeld, This work is the intellectual property of the author. Permission.
Creating Pathways for Education, Career and Life Success Webinar: Developing a Pathways Plan January 18, 2013 Facilitated by Jeff Fantine, Consultant.
Financial Systems Needs Assessment Administrator Briefing Spring Quarter 2009.
OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE READINESS STAFFING STRATEGIES February 28, 2011.
1-2 Training of Process Facilitators 3-1. Training of Process Facilitators 1- Provide an overview of the role and skills of a Communities That Care Process.
6 Key Priorities A “scorecard” for each of the 5 above priorities with end of 2009 deliverables – with a space beside each for a check mark (i.e. complete)
Creating a Virtual School Drawing board to Implementation.
1 Local Readiness Team Lead Meeting June 6, 2007.
UCSF Human Resources Update to stakeholders December 18, 2014.
Staff Assessment Technology Services Department Palmyra Area School District.
Info-Tech Research Group1 Manage IT Budgets & Cost World Class Operations - Impact Workshop.
University of Wyoming Financial Reporting Initiative Update April 2016.
Vision to Reality: How Knowledge Sharing Promotes Efficiencies Through Process Improvement  History of the Knowledge Collaboration Centre (KCC)  The.
What is a Service Level Agreement? Service level agreements are part of a quality approach to help teams identify and agree what ‘good quality’ looks like.
Shared Services Initiative Summary of Findings and Next Steps.
1 Developing Your Internal Processes to Ensure Consistency Across Service Channels Integrating Government Service Channels Conference February 11, 2003.
Student Support at the Service Desk Presented to UCSF Education Committee September 8, 2011 Julie Cox Director, IT Customer Services and Service Desk.
I P M 1 City of Fort Worth City Council Presented by Doug Rademaker, Deputy Director, PMO Ken Hall, IPM Program Manager, CH2M HILL October 6, 2009 I n.
Strategic Program Subgroup Meeting December 8, 2016
Enhance customer service access options;
Harvard CRM Service Strategy
Enterprise Content Management Owners Representative Contract Approval
One ODOT: Positioned for the Future
The Mentoring Process Martha Majors.
Project Charter General Information Project Title Date
Educational Information System Replacement Plan Overview
Roadmap to an Organizational Culture of QI
Performance Playbook for GPO Value
Plan your journey.
Welcome to Your New Position As An Instructor
IT Next – Transformation Program
Presentation transcript:

1 Centralized Support for Service Desk and Desktop across UCSF Campus and Medical Center – A Case Study Presented to UC-CSU By Julie Cox and Sian Shumway Directors, UCSF IT Service Desk and Field Services July 11, 2013 “ If the customer feels like it was poor service, then it was poor service. We are in the customer service perception business.”

2 Objectives of Consolidated Service Desk and Field Services “To provide elevated and expanded services while driving efficiencies through standardization, systems, tools and processes” “One Team Approach” to allow for transparency and quicker problem resolution through better collaboration and communication

3 Context for Collaboration Operations Excellence directive from Chancellor Consolidation was based on: o Service improvement o Reduced cost, improved efficiency Anticipated benefits o Single point of contact o Improved service o Transparency for our customers o Lower cost o 24 x 7 support o Student support

4 Service Desk Design Relocation of all help desks to single location Staff would remain in their own departments/budgets but would report to one Director o Introduced a challenge that still exists Begin with 4 major help desks and add others as Field Services consolidated as a second phase Add Student Support

5 Implementation Implementation began at the end of January Consolidation was dependent on conversion to single Service- now ITSM tool Met planned Go Live of December 31, 2011 Implementation resources used – Project Manager (ended up with only a 20% resource)

6 Implementation Experienced Transition Consultant (75%) Documenter for Knowledge Base (25%) Trainer (utilized existing supervisor and manager) Service-now Team (internal team) Implementation Team o PM, Director, Managers of existing teams o Brought in other existing resources as needed to participate in and lead specific areas, i.e. Remote access, metrics, communications, desktop workflow, etc.

7 Implementation Costs Service-now implementation$827,000 (Not just Service Desk) Consulting 344,000 Training ( Knowledge/Mac)15,000 Service Desk temps120,000 Co-location expenses68,000 Software (Bomgar/OpenScape)159,000 Hardware (Mac-minis)14,000 Total $1,547,000

8 Challenges: Implementation Project Management (20%) Broke up project plan into 10 different key sections and identified an internal resource to manage each section Decentralized desktop support Developed individual workflows within KB Identified desktop support team by customer Continues to be a challenge

9 Challenges: Implementation School of Medicine/ SF General Hospital Needed to maintain specific support levels (high touch) Skilled a smaller team to handle these calls Training took longer for this skill group Added Student Support during implementation Determined most similar to campus Trained campus agents to take these calls until consolidation complete Worked with Library to handle on site support Brought Library staff up on Service-now earlier

10 Challenges: Implementation Commitment to reduce staff without support doc Took on SFGH support as well as student support with 2 fewer staff This had less of an overall impact and was mostly handled by skills-based routing Commitment to reduce additional 4 FTE’s at go live Unable to achieve due to volume increase and complexity of the environment Received agreement from CIOs to re-evaluate within 3 months

11 Challenges: Implementation Service-now not implemented for campus until mid November This delayed the build of the KB and training of the staff Put all of the workflows in the KB and trained staff on how to find them KB search not very efficient Focused training during the last week which was a slow week (close to December holiday)

12 Challenges: Service Delivery Different workflows/equipment/service expectations for desktop support Continues to be a challenge until desktop consolidation complete Affects our ability to be as efficient as possible Continue to develop our KB Brought in HDI to provide KCS training Purchased Mac-minis for all analysts Used outside firm to develop online Mac training Utilized staff/expertise from other departments to assist in training

13 Challenges : Service Delivery Brought in a desktop resource at the SD during peak time Continue to have one smaller skill-based team Determined highest priority service delivery is to answer calls within 60 seconds or less Increased volume, inconsistency in environment, complexity in environment o Added 3 temporary staff for 6 months – still utilizing staff. Will re-evaluate when FS consolidation complete o Volume increased somewhere between 12%-26%

14 TOTAL CALL VOLUME FOR CY 11/12

15 WEEKLY TREND REPORT

16 WEEKLY TREND REPORT

17 WEEKLY TREND REPORT

18 UCSF Service Desk

19 Symon Board - Queues by Skill

20 UCSF IT SERVICE DESK

21 Desktop Support Consolidation Operational Excellence recommendations: Consolidate departmental desktop support staff into Information Technology Services (central IT) Departmental conversions over a period of 2 yrs Staff would report to Director of IT Field Services Planned consolidation for Medical Center IT Field Services near end of consolidation Provide two service levels for customers Charges would be allowable to contracts and grants

22 Desktop Support Consolidation Early deliverables: Two largest providers of desktop support consolidated first: School of Medicine and Information Technology Service Organizational design proposal Staffing strategy developed and implementation Recharge rate approval Negotiations for inclusion of support costs to contracts and grants Advisory Board formation

23 Timeline 3/2012OE Recommendations finalized 6/2012Director hired 8/2012Implementation design team formed Organizational design proposed 9/2012Service Catalog defined 10/2012Implementation team formed Job descriptions finalized and classified 11/2012–1/2013Complete Manager and Phase 1 Field Technician Hiring 2/2013Staff training: ITFS Field Techs and Service Desk 2/25/2013Service Go-Live 3/ /2014Convert departments

24 Implementation Design Using the OE recommendations as a guide a team of campus stake holders were brought together for six weeks to develop: Services descriptions Service catalog Draft Service level agreement At the end of the sprint, a smaller core team was formed to carry out implementation.

25 Implementation Planning The devil is always in the details: Escalation planning for hand-offs Training for staff Knowledge base expansion Conversion process Communication strategy Staffing transitions Operational procedures Storage and backup solution scaling And everything else that came up!

26 Implementation Costs Software/Supplies: ServiceNow enhancements15,000 Mac end point management30,000 BigFix server upgrade, test licenses20,000 S&E for Staff (computers, phones etc)90,000 Backup250,000 Staffing Senior Project Manager232,000 Project Mgr & Business analyst160,000 Desktop Engineering team820,000 Increased staffing during transition600,000 TOTAL (est)2.22M

27 Staffing strategy All positions undergo open recruitment Variety of communications to campus Hire first year (2012)of positions with staggered start dates Hire second year of staff the following year (2014) with staggered start dates Recruitment limited to UCSF career employees to give them first priority o Unfilled positions will be recruited externally Tiered recruiting (supervisory, senior positions first)

28 Staffing principles Hire and retain the best UCSF staff Leverage/preserve support relationships where possible Recognize the importance of UCSF experience and expertise Staggered onboarding to minimize customer support impact

29 Organizational chart

30 Go-Live preparations Extensive training all done internally Sessions taught by SMEs and recorded Communications: service introductions and forming new relationships with departments Shared management in partnership with Service Desk for vacant Field Manager position Go-live consisted of the existing customer bases of ITS, School of Medicine, and a few early adopters.

31 Conversion challenges Based on early adopter conversions, developed a detailed, robust process utilizing all levels of the organization Complexity of environment Varying degrees of support needs Departmental cost constraints Software and hardware supportability Rate of conversion to sustain financial model Service desk workflow Service level differentiation Operating procedures

32 Current State Administrative departments not already supported converting first Required participation is expected across the organization with limited opt-out pending proof of service levels Staff rotation and collaboration for employee development and training Demonstrated service delivery improvement with IT partners

33 What the Future Holds Planned CIO consolidation for Campus and Medical Center Further IT consolidation planned to eliminate redundancy, reduce complexity in the organization to improve the customer experience Focus on employee engagement and cultural change Focus on delivering exceptional customer service Reduce overall costs while improving service

34 Lessons Learned Hire a full time project manager Do not commit to reduce staff until optimization is complete Agree on Service Level targets early on Don’t underestimate the resource requirements for training and documentation Ensure all tools are consolidated early enough before training begins Evaluate the complexities in the environment and set expectations early on; revisit during implementation and optimization Begin desktop consolidation earlier so a majority of the planning occurs in parallel Think “Outside the Box”

35 Critical Success Factors Leadership support Financial resources Communications Governance: Oversight Committee and Advisory Board Oversight Committee Rapid recruitment/hiring process – minimize disruption

36 Questions and Answers Julie Cox, Director IT Service Desk Sian Shumway, Director IT Field Services