Using Data to Plan High Quality Professional Development Findings From Interviews With Massachusetts Educators May 2015 Massachusetts Department of Elementary.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Self-Study Tool for Alaska Schools Winter Conference January 14, 2010 Jon Paden, EED Deborah Davis, Education Northwest/Alaska Comprehensive Center.
A Guide to Implementation
Overview of the New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Framework Opening Day Presentation August 26, 2013.
“SMARTer” Goals Winter A ESE-MASS Workshop for superintendents and representatives from their leadership teams.
The New Massachusetts Educator Evaluation Natick Public Schools.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Unpacking the Rubrics and Gathering Evidence September 2012 Melrose Public Schools 1.
 Reading School Committee January 23,
Educator Evaluation Regulations, Mandatory Elements & Implementation MTA Center for Education Policy and Practice August 2014.
Educator Evaluation System Salem Public Schools. All DESE Evaluation Information and Forms are on the SPS Webpage Forms may be downloaded Hard copies.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
Slide 1 is the title slide.
Beginning Teacher Support Program Peer Review Process Training for Charter Schools June 2013.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
Differentiated Supervision
1 GENERAL OVERVIEW. “…if this work is approached systematically and strategically, it has the potential to dramatically change how teachers think about.
Seven Levers for Establishing High Quality Professional Development Findings From Interviews With Massachusetts Educators May 2015 Massachusetts Department.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
Today’s website:
Student Achievement Teacher and Leader Effectiveness Principal Professional Growth and Effectiveness System Field Test Overview.
New England Regional Colloquium Series “Systems of State Support” B. Keith Speers January 24, 2007.
1-Hour Overview: The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation September
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
1 Orientation to Teacher Evaluation /15/2015.
Department of Elementary and Secondary Education July, 2011
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
 Reading Public Schools Staff Presentations March 30, 2012.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Introduction: District-Determined Measures and Assessment Literacy Webinar Series Part 1.
Module 3: Unit 1, Session 3 MODULE 3: ASSESSMENT Adolescent Literacy – Professional Development Unit 1, Session 3.
Comprehensive Educator Effectiveness: New Guidance and Models Presentation for the Special Education Advisory Committee Virginia Department of Education.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
Geelong High School Performance Development & Review Process in 2014.
Designing Local Curriculum Module 5. Objective To assist district leadership facilitate the development of local curricula.
MVSA Ron Noble - ESE October 16, 2013 DDMs: Updates and Discussion.
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
March 23, NYSCSS Annual Conference Crossroads of Change: The Common Core in Social Studies.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation AARPE Session 5 Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement.
MWSD. Differentiated Supervision Mode (DSM)  Reference Pages in Plan Book 8-16 Description of Differentiated Mode Relevant Appendices 34 Teacher.
Fidelity of Implementation A tool designed to provide descriptions of facets of a coherent whole school literacy initiative. A tool designed to provide.
Moving Title IA School Plans into Indistar ESEA Odyssey Summer 2015 Presented by Melinda Bessner Oregon Department of Education.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Office of Service Quality
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
 Teachers 21 June 8,  Wiki with Resources o
Goal Setting in Educator Evaluation Sept. 11 th,
Planning for Success Advancing district planning practices MASS/MASC Joint Conference November 5, 2014 Carrie Conaway, Associate Commissioner Planning.
Type Date Here Type Presenter Name/Contact Here Creating & Implementing Your Plan October 2012.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Springfield Public Schools SEEDS: Collecting Evidence for Educators Winter 2013.
Indicator 5.4 Create and implement a documented continuous improvement process that describes the gathering, analysis, and use of student achievement.
Educator Supervision and Evaluation Clarke and Diamond MS September 2013.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
DESE Educator Evaluation System for Superintendents
Leadership for Standards-Based Education
DISTRICT ACCREDITATION QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW
Administrator Evaluation Orientation
Using Data to Assess High Quality Professional Development Findings From Interviews With Massachusetts Educators May 2015 Massachusetts Department.
Presentation transcript:

Using Data to Plan High Quality Professional Development Findings From Interviews With Massachusetts Educators May 2015 Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1

Background The purpose of this set of three presentations to is to convey key findings from a study conducted by the American Institutes for Research and the Concord Evaluation Group on behalf of the Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. These presentations are one component of a larger project to help Massachusetts educators envision what it takes to ensure that all educators have access to high quality professional development (HQPD). The focus of this presentation is on how educators in four nominated sites in Massachusetts use data to plan HQPD. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

About This Project What is it? Case profiles of four sites engaged in building systems to support HQPD. The case profiles are based on interviews and collected documents. What are the goals of the project? To highlight for professional learning leaders across the Commonwealth how some Massachusetts educators are working to establish HQPD in their schools and districts. Please see ESE’s Resources for PD Leaders and Educators page for relevant PD resources, including the full case studies. Which sites participated? Cambridge Public Schools Easthampton High School of Easthampton Public Schools Lexington Public Schools Melrose Public Schools Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

About the Project How were sites selected? Teacher and Principal Advisory Cabinet members nominated districts or schools that were making consistent use of the Massachusetts Standards for Professional Development to inform professional learning by doing things such as: Building internal staff capacity to facilitate high quality, results-oriented professional development in creative ways Doing an exceptional job coordinating/managing professional development and creating the conditions for educators to engage in deep learning, and/or Thoughtfully using educator evaluation data to inform planning and delivery of professional development ESE, in collaboration with AIR, selected four sites from among the many nominated based on the comprehensiveness of their approach. What were the key themes observed across the sites? Seven key themes were identified as important levers in ensuring HQPD; they are listed on the next slide. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Seven Key Levers the Profiled Sites Used for Establishing HQPD Instilling a “growth mindset” among educators Collaborating for change using data Making time for learning Embedding professional learning in educators’ daily work Empowering teachers to choose their own path toward growth Using data (including goals, evidence, and standards) to plan HQPD Using data to assess HQPD Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

About This Presentation Some useful definitions (slides 7–14) How the profiled sites used data to plan HQPD (Lever 6) (Slides 15–26) Please see ESE’s Resources for PD Leaders and Educators page for relevant PD resources, including the full case studies. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

What Is HQPD? High Quality Professional Development (HQPD) is a set of coherent learning experiences that is systematic, purposeful, and structured over a sustained period of time with the goal of improving educator practice and student outcomes.   Source: http://www.doe.mass.edu/pd/standards.html Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

What Are the Massachusetts HQPD Standards? Released in 2013, the Massachusetts Standards for Professional Development describe the research-based features of HQPD. For more information visit: http://www.doe.mass.edu/pd/standards.html Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

What Is HQPD Planning? This slide deck focuses on two aspects of building an HQPD system: Set goals: Identifying areas of strength and challenge Setting goals for student & educator learning Plan: Designing and selecting offerings and formats Differentiating HQPD according to goals The HQPD Planning & Assessment Process Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

What HQPD Formats Are Used in the Profiled Sites? Courses Internally and externally led workshops and summer institutes Multi-year induction programs Professional Learning Communities Action research Lesson study Coaching * Some sites use some formats more than others depending on HQPD goals. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

What Are Educator Plans? Part of the 5-Step Cycle of evaluation, each educator develops an Educator Plan, which is differentiated based on experience and past performance, and includes individual or team S.M.A.R.T. goals for professional practice and student learning as well as key action steps for achieving the goals. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

What Are Summative Performance Ratings? The Summative Performance Rating is the final step of the 5-Step Cycle of educator evaluation. Upon consideration of an educator’s evidence of practice and progress toward goals, evaluators apply professional judgment and assign one of four possible overall ratings to each educator: Exemplary Proficient Needs Improvement Unsatisfactory Educators also are assigned a rating for each of the four standards of effective practice for teaching or administrative leadership. For more information see the Quick Reference Guide on Performance Ratings. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

What Are Learning Walkthroughs (or Learning Walks)? Learning Walkthroughs are a systematic and coordinated method of gathering data on student learning and instructional practice to inform district and school-level decisions. During the walkthroughs, a team of teachers and administrators visits a sample of classrooms for periods of 20 minutes each. Observations are recorded on a protocol designed to capture a variety of teacher and student behaviors related to specific learning goals. At the end of the walkthrough day, the team meets to debrief about their observations and discuss what they learned. The Learning Walkthroughs enable the leadership team to gather critical data about classroom practice to identify HQPD needs at the school. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

What Are Two Other Sources of Data Used in Planning HQPD? TELL MASS Survey: A statewide survey of school-based educators to determine if they have the supports necessary for effective teaching. The online survey was a source of information used in HQPD planning in several sites. Conditions for School Effectiveness Self-Assessment: This tool is designed to be used at the school level by leaders, those responsible for day-to-day instruction, and key stakeholders. It is a tool for conducting a scan of current practice, identifying areas of strength, and highlighting areas requiring greater focus. the tool delineates the level of development of each condition along a continuum: 1 (Little Evidence), 2 (Developing), 3 (Providing), and 4 (Sustaining) Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

How Do the Profiled Sites Use Data to Plan HQPD (Lever 6)? Key Cross-Site Observations Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Using Data for Planning HQPD: Key Observations Site leaders use multiple and varied sources of data, evidence, and standards to set goals and plan HQPD. Site leaders work to align HQPD goals with Educator Plan goals (i.e., professional practice and student learning S.M.A.R.T. goals), which often map to school goals, which map to district goals. District, school, educator, and HQPD goals are informed by the careful review of student learning data from multiple sources. Once goals are articulated, PD leaders and PD Committees work to design or select HQPD. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Using Data for Planning HQPD: Key Observations Educator feedback (from formal surveys as well as anecdotal input) informs HQPD planning decisions. Evaluators bring the patterns they see in teachers’ performance ratings from educator evaluation to site leaders to inform HQPD goal setting and planning. Site leaders see the HQPD Standards as a tool for HQPD planning & assessment. Each of these key observations are described more fully in the slides that follow. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

1. Site leaders use multiple and various sources of data, evidence, and standards to set goals and plan HQPD The lists below contain the sources of information that have been used to inform each planning activity: Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

HQPD goals for individuals and teams. 2. Site leaders work to align HQPD goals with educator goals, which often map to school goals, which map to district goals District leaders collaborate with school leaders, teachers, the School Committee, and other stakeholders to set or refine district strategic goals. Principals, in collaboration with other administrators and teachers, set schoolwide goals, which map to the district goals. Individual educators set their own Educator Plan goals, which often map to the district and school goals for student learning. HQPD goals for individuals and teams. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

3. District, school, educator, and HQPD goals are informed by the careful review of student learning data from multiple sources: Statewide and national assessments Massachusetts Comprehensive Assessment System (MCAS) data Preliminary SAT/National Merit Scholarship Qualifying Test (PSAT/NMSQT) data SAT data Advanced Placement (AP) data (participation rates and scores) District benchmark assessments Reviews of student work (e.g., end-of-unit assessments, writing samples, problem sets, lesson quizzes) Data from Learning Walkthroughs Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

4. Once goals are articulated, PD leaders and PD Committees work to design or select HQPD In the selected districts, assistant superintendents tended to have chief responsibility for planning HQPD, often working with a district-level HQPD coordinator. These HPQD leaders worked closely with or were members themselves of the Professional Development Committees, which: Review and approve educators’ proposals for HQPD Plan district-wide HQPD and other initiatives to meet HQPD goals Relay anecdotal feedback on HQPD to district leadership In Easthampton High School, the principal and a teacher leader plan HQPD in collaboration with a learning walk team and the data Team. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

4. PD Committees’ and leaders’ work, continued In the selected district sites, there is a formal proposal and review process for district-sponsored HQPD courses. Teachers and administrators are encouraged to propose courses or workshops for the district to provide or support. Course proposal forms typically require: Proposed course title and instructor(s) and target audience Number of sessions/hours and course timeline Course objectives and rationale Description of the relevance to school or district goals Description of the documentation or artifact produced as a result of the course Number of Professional Development Points offered New in 2015 in Cambridge Public Schools is an electronic proposal form that requires proposers to indicate which standard(s) of effective practice for teaching or administrative leadership the course addresses. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

4. PD Committees’ and leaders’ work, continued PD Committees and leaders reference district and school goals and student learning data when collaboratively reviewing proposals. They also discuss whether the proposed course relates to a sufficient number of educators’ HQPD goals. In some cases, PD leaders work with proposers to revise their offerings. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

5. Educator feedback (from formal surveys as well as anecdotal input) informs HQPD planning decisions PD Committee members in the sites are often participants in HQPD themselves, and can provide crucial anecdotal information to planners. Feedback surveys on previous courses are also reviewed to help decide which formats are most helpful, which instructors to engage again, and which courses to offer again. Cambridge Public Schools sets HQPD goals in part based on findings from the MASS TELL Survey. In fact, findings on that survey sparked a major overhaul of their HQPD system. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

6. Evaluators bring the patterns they see in teachers’ performance ratings from educator evaluation to site leaders to inform HQPD goal setting and planning Through the 5-Step Cycle of evaluation, principals and other evaluators get to know the strengths of educators as they observe their performance and review the artifacts they submit. Patterns in performance ratings are shared with PD leaders and PD Committees to inform HQPD. (This is aggregated data, not individual educator-level data.) For example, in Melrose Public Schools, leaders noticed that a significant proportion of new teachers across the district were receiving low ratings on the teacher practice rubric element of effective teaching 1-A-4: Well-Structured Lessons. The district responded by adding a component to the induction program that provides additional guidance on lesson planning, and added a performance-assessment task consisting of planning and implementing a lesson to a group of colleagues. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

7. Site leaders see the HQPD standards as a tool for HQPD planning & assessment At the time of the interviews, none of the sites were using the HQPD standards to plan their professional development. Some had designed their HQPD using Learning Forward’s Standards for Professional Learning as a guide. All four sites used the HQPD standards as a check to make sure they were on the right track. Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

Looking Ahead The third slide presentation in this series explores how the profiled sites used data for HQPD assessment. Assess: Examining the quality and impact of HQPD for the purposes of improvement and future planning. Reflect: Reflecting on the results of the assessment process to inform continuous improvement. The HQPD Planning & Assessment Process Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education

For more information about this project and to read the site profiles: Please see ESE’s Resources for PD Leaders and Educators page for relevant PD resources, including the full case studies. Email: profdev@doe.mass.edu Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education