 A system of instruction or study of law focused upon the analysis of court opinions rather than lectures and textbooks; the predominant method of teaching.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KEYS TO ACADEMIC SUCCESS LESSONS IN CRITICAL THINKING.
Advertisements

Value conflicts and assumptions - 1 While an author usually offers explicit reasons why he comes to a certain conclusion, he also makes (implicit) assumptions.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2013 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. Chapter 16 Professionalism, Ethics, and Career Planning.
ACTION PLAN Mrs. ROMINA NOUSHEEN THE CITY SCHOOL O’LEVEL.
Boston Massacre - Mr. Lundberg Group Members 1.. ____________________________ 2.. ____________________________ 3.. ____________________________ 4.. ____________________________.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 8, 7 May 2014.
Dylan Grace, President ISSU.  Plan for when and how the new Junior Cycle will be introduced has been outlined  Expectation that new senior cycle and.
Analysing information and being ‘critical’
Definitions – John Dewey
HOW TO EXCEL ON ESSAY EXAMS San José State University Writing Center Dr. Jim Lobdell.
Modeling for Expert Learning Dr. Mok, Y.F.. Many university students do not study Their decoding is inefficient, making comprehension weak & difficult.
Argumentation - 1 We often encounter situations in which someone is trying to persuade us of a point of view by presenting reasons for it. We often encounter.
Chapter 12 Instructional Methods
From the Courtroom to the Classroom: Learning About Law © 2003 Constitutional Rights Foundation, Los Angeles, CA All rights reserved.
Developing Higher Level Study Skills
THE CASE METHOD OF LAW TEACHING
Evaluation of Law-Making Through Courts. Evaluation The main role of the courts is to resolve disputes. Precedent develops as judges reach decisions in.
The Supreme Court at Work
2 23,503 hours in FY 2013, compared with 21,273 hours in FY ,651 interview hours in FY 13 have been charged through the AFCP program. Interview.
Philosophy and the Scientific Method Dr Keith Jones.
Dr. MaLinda Hill Advanced English C1-A Designing Essays, Research Papers, Business Reports and Reflective Statements.
The Common Core Curriculum By Dean Berry, Ed. D. Gregg Berry, B.A.
Developing Mathematics Lessons “The Big Ideas”. The Verbs of Doing Mathematics Explaining Investigating Exploring Interpreting Analyzing Describing Deriving.
U.S. Legal Education The Future of Legal Education Prof. Cunningham By: Diana Grant.
Not Just for Students: An Archives Workshop for Faculty Rachel Grove Rohrbaugh Chatham University Archives | Pittsburgh, Pa. | (412)
Introduction to Socratic Seminar. What does Socratic mean? Socratic comes from the name Socrates. Socrates (ca B.C.) was a Classical Greek philosopher.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
Where questions, not answers, are the driving force in thinking.
The Socratic Method or the Case Method Christoffer Wong, Faculty of Law, Lund University
“USING EFFECTIVE ARGUMENTATIVE TECHNIQUES TO FACILITATE A SUCCESSFUL COLLEGE ADMISSIONS PROCESS” Do Your Students Have The WRITE” Stuff? Presented by:
Between Indonesia and Thailand
What is Critical Thinking, and How to Teach It?
LAW AND POLITICS The aim of this tutorial is to help you learn to identify and evaluate the foundations of the American legal and political system.
The Socratic Seminar 1. Socrates Socrates was a famous Greek philosopher. His focus was the development of the human character. His method of teaching.
What is Cross-examination? “The process of questioning the opposing advocate for purposes of clarification and refutation.” (Kay and Ziegmueller)
1  How has history shaped the evolution of inclusive education?  What are the major components of IDEA 2004?  What are the five components of NCLB?
Summer Reading Performance Task The Fault in Our Stars.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 8.
TOPIC 4 UNDERSTANDING CASE LAW Mr. Mahyuddin Daud Department of Laws, CFSIIUM.
ENGLISH FOR LAWYERS II INTRODUCTION. Lecturer Prof.Dr. Lelija Sočanac Prof.Dr. Lelija Sočanac Office hours Monday – h, Gundulićeva 10, Room.
 The teacher is the decision maker and it is her job to decide on what units to include during the year or what tomorrow’s lesson plan will be.  Thought-out.
 Textbooks tend to be written in declarative statements  “the civil war stated on April 12 th, 1861”  Educators should change learning from declarative.
Synthesizing Historical Significance – Responding to Text The BLaST IU 17 Liberty Fellowship November 15, 2012 Fran Macko, Ph.D.
Copyright © 2011 Wolters Kluwer Health | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins Chapter 21 Evidence in Learning and Teaching.
Developing Questions That Matter
Welcome to…. Who am I?...  Mrs. McLeod   We will use a blog as a way of communication in this course.  There.
We believe that children's engineering can and should be integrated into the material that is already being taught in the elementary classroom -it does.
Writing Exercise Try to write a short humor piece. It can be fictional or non-fictional. Essay by David Sedaris.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
The Case Method of Law Teaching UNIT 17. Case method  a system of instruction or study of law focused upon the analysis of court opinions rather than.
The Toulmin Model in Brief “The heart of moral experience does not lie in a mastery of general rules and theoretical principles, however sound and well.
Classroom Questioning Basic elements of Classroom Questioning techniques.
Chapter 2: Thinking and Reading Critically ENG 113: Composition I.
1Chapter SECTION OPENER / CLOSER: INSERT BOOK COVER ART Defining Ethics Section 1.1.
Socratic Seminar Socrates (June 4, ca. 470 BC – May 7, 399 BC) was a Greek (Athenian) philosopher.June 4470 BCMay 7399 BCAthenianphilosopher.
Attorney/Judge. The purpose of opening statements by each side is to tell jurors something about the case they will be hearing. The opening statements.
The Case Method of Law Teaching
THE SOCRATIC METHOD Presented By: Bill Rigney, Erik Repella, and Chris Umbrell EDUS 515: Instruction & Technology / Secondary Education Dr. Patricia Duncan.
Class 2 Questions, comments Discussion of Assignment 1 Assign
Case Method of Law Teaching
Welcome to Strategies for Teaching ACT Science Skills
“The unexamined life is not worth living” -Socrates
The Paradoxes of Debate
Small Group Discussions
The Case Method of Law Teaching
Honors Debate Wednesday, January 6, 2016.
Socratic Seminars.
What is the “Common Law”
Chapter 12.3 INFLUENCING COURT DECISIONS
CONSTRUCTIVISM Submitted To: Ma’am Misbah Yasmeen BPGCW (Air University)
Presentation transcript:

 A system of instruction or study of law focused upon the analysis of court opinions rather than lectures and textbooks; the predominant method of teaching in U.S. law schools today.

 CHRISTOPHER COLUMBUS LANGDELL, a law professor, often receives credit for inventing the case method although historians have found evidence that others were teaching by this method before him. Regardless, Langdell by all accounts popularized the case method.

 Langdell introduced the method around1870 at Harvard Law School  Langdell viewed the law as a science and believed that it should be studied as a science:  Law consists of certain principles or doctrines. To have such a mastery of these as to be able to apply them with constant facility and certainty to the ever-tangled skein of human affairs, is what constitutes a true lawyer; and hence to acquire that mastery should be the business of every earnest student of law.

 Throughout the 1800s, the prevalent approach for teaching law school classes was the lecture method. Although professors and textbooks interpreted the meaning of various court decisions, they did not offer a significant opportunity for students to do so on their own.

 The case method, on the other hand, forced students to read, analyze, and interpret cases themselves. It was Langdell's opinion that law students would be better educated if they were asked to reach their own conclusions about the meaning of judicial decisions.

 Langdell's ideas were, at first, overwhelmingly rejected by students, other law professors, and attorneys alike. These critics viewed the case method as chaotic compared with organized lectures. They believed that instead of soliciting law students' opinions regarding cases, professors should simply state their own interpretations.

 Law students, afraid that they were not learning from Langdell's method, dropped out of his class, leaving him with only a few pupils. Enrollment in the Harvard Law School decreased dramatically because of concern over Langdell's case method and alumni called for his dismissal.

 The president of Harvard University, Charles W. Eliot, supported Langdell and his case method. This backing allowed Langdell to withstand the criticism long enough to prove the case method's success: Langdell's students were becoming capable, skilled attorneys.

 In 1870 Langdell became law school dean. As time passed he replaced his critics on the Harvard faculty with professors who believed in his system of teaching and the case method soon became the dominant teaching method at Harvard. Other U.S. law schools took note.

 By the early 1900s, most US law schools had adopted the case method, and it remained the primary method of legal instruction throughout the twentieth century and beyond.

 Gvo8 Gvo8  Explain Langdell’s reasons for advocating the case method of law teaching!

 “Socratic method”:The case method is usually coupled with a type of classroom teaching called the Socratic method. Through the Socratic method students orally respond to an often difficult series of questions designed to help them gain further insight into the meaning of the law.  Professors question students on the actual cases assigned for a particular class  Students challenge unquestioned assumptions and reveal underlying legal principles

 Lecturer as a facilitator  The dialogue form of teaching  Active participation in the class

 Review the background information and the facts in the case  Determine the main issue in the case  Examine alternative arguments on the issue in the case  Consider the decision and legal reasoning in the case  Assess the implications and the significance of the case in constitutional history

 h2s h2s

 It stimulates active involvement of students and prepares them for adversarial debates and quick retorts required by practicing lawyers  Students learn the skill of critical analysis this way: they learn to discern relevant from irrelevant facts; they learn to distinguish between seemingly similar facts and issues; and they learn to analogize between dissimilar facts and issues.

 Critics argue that the case method fails to impart moral values, causes unnecessary and harmful stress, fosters incivility and overly competitive attitudes and leaves students unprepared for the realities of practice

 What do you think about the case method?  Would you like to participate in the classes featuring this method?  Do you believe it causes additional stress?