Governance of integrated projects: the strategy of GRIP-IT for component 2 Work shop for participants Oct 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 The new ESF Investing in your Future -
Advertisements

Commission européenne The European Social Fund Investing in your Future.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, July 2005 Rural Development.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions.
New opportunities for regional development through cross-border cooperation Ministry of Environmental Protection and Regional Development November 16,
Cyprus Project Management Society
Stefanos Fotiou, April 16th – 17th, 2014 The 10-Year Framework of Programmes on Sustainable Consumption and Production (10YFP) From Policy to Action.
Community Strategic Guidelines DG AGRI, November 2005 Rural Development.
„South East Europe Programme” as a financing opportunity for projects in the Danube region and complementarity to other instruments COMPLEMENTARITY OF.
Presentation of the workshop results to the plenary session A) Strengthening rural entrepreneurship by connecting the local production with other economic.
CULT Culture Upholding Local Tourism. CULT partnership structure COMUNITA’ MONTANA ALTO BASENTO (Basilicata) as LPT MESTO JICIN (Hradec Kralove) as PT.
1 LoProDeN Local Product Development Network (Foundation and start a cooperation in the GRIP IT partner regions) € ,00 Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia.
Pierre GODIN, Policy Analyst
Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development Department of Rural Development LEADER+ TYPE MEASURE IN POLAND International Conference: „Future of European.
1 ToNe Tourism Network in Historic Centres Integrated project linking past and future ESF programming period € ,00 Regione Autonoma Friuli Venezia.
The Component II By Rosanna Losasso Hradec Kralove Region – Czech Republic 15th of November Regione Basilicata – GRIP_IT Project.
Leader as a part of the new CAP
EU FUNDING OF NATURA 2000 Graham Bennett. PHARE PROJECT CZECH REPUBLIC Implementation of Natura 2000 ● March 2004–September 2005 ● Main partners: – DDH.
EU Rural Development Policy and Tourism Jean-Michel Courades DG Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
Axis 3: Diversification of the rural economy and Quality of Life in rural areas Axis 4: The Leader approach DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND GreenInfraNet/Smart Europe final conference, 4 November 2014, Almere EU Interregional Cooperation State of play and.
EUROPEAN COHESION POLICY AT A GLANCE Introduction to the EU Structural Funds Ctibor Kostal Sergej Muravjov.
November 6, 2006EU-NET kick off meeting1 EU-NET Kick off meeting Nachod, Czech Republic November 6th, 2006.
04/2007 European Funds in Bulgaria Supported by the European Commission (DG ENV)
Urban-Nexus – Integrated Urban Management David Ludlow and Michael Buser UWE Sofia November 2011.
Financing Growth and Cohesion in the enlarged EU 24 November 2005 Financing urban actions and sustainable communities Financing urban actions and sustainable.
Common Strategic Framework Commission proposal Dominique Bé 3-4 May 2012, Bratislava.
Riga – Latvia, 4 & 5 December 2006
Prague, Operational Programmes aimed at innovation in the new EU Member States, and the implementation of Lisbon Agenda Dr. Csaba Novák Director.
European Commission Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development EU rural development policy.
COEPA What is COEPA? COEPA is the Business Confederation of the Province of Alicante Established in 1978 COEPA is the organisation representing.
Presentation WG 2 Managing EU Funds on the Regional Level Republic of Albania Ministry of European Integration (MEI) Regional Conference EU Perspectives.
Contribution of the Territorial Cooperation Programmes to the EU Strategy for the Danube Region Kiril Geratliev, Director General “Territorial Cooperation.
How to Use the Structural Funds ? 1.Financing sustainable energy projects. 2.Practical support – RUSE operation. Jana Cicmanova Energie-Cités.
EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Measures, tools, methods for supporting cross-border cooperation prepared used for adoption and implementation of joint.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Innovation and the Structural Funds, Antwerp, 16 January 2007 Veronica Gaffey Innovative Actions Unit.
European Commission Introduction to the Community Programme for Employment and Social Solidarity PROGRESS
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture 1 EU rural development policy Nikiforos SIVENAS European Commission Directorate General.
│ 1│ 1 What are we talking about?… Culture: Visual Arts, Performing Arts, Heritage Literature Cultural Industries: Film and Video, Television and radio,
B R U S S E L S Partnership of local authorities in sciences and business Best practices of Brussels-Capital Region Sofia, 31st October 2008.
Regional Policy EU Cohesion Policy 2014 – 2020 Proposals from the European Commission.
Legal Aspects Related to Brownfield Regenerations Prof. Maros Finka, M.arch., Ph.D. „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
1 LIFE+ COUNCIL WORKING GROUP 4 OCTOBER Discussion Points 1. LIFE+ in Context: Environment funding under the Financial Perspectives.
A European Dialogue on Interregional Co-operation The Case For a Rural Inter-Regional Focus Going Forward AER Conference Strasbourg October 2nd Mr Jack.
Loretta Dormal Marino Deputy Director General DG for Agriculture and Rural Development, European Commission IFAJ Congress 2010 – Brussels, 22 April 2010.
MINISTRY OF EUROPEAN INTEGRATION General Directorate for Regional Development Regional Policy and Pogramming Directorate REGIONAL OPERATIONAL PROGRAMME.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION EN The Urban Dimension in Future Cohesion Policy Urban content of the regulations and the Community strategic guidelines.
1 EUROPEAN FUNDS IN HALF-TIME NEW CHALLENGES Jack Engwegen Head of the Czech Unit European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy Prague,
REGIONAL POLICY EUROPEAN COMMISSION The contribution of EU Regional/Cohesion programmes Corinne Hermant-de Callataÿ European Commission,
The delivery of rural development policies: Some reflections on problems and perspectives in EU countries INEA conference: The territorial approach in.
. Great expectations. Perspectives of the Regional development programme in Romania from the point of view of the potential future beneficiaries * by Biagio.
Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 Valeria Cenacchi, “Thematic Coordination, Innovation” Unit, European Commission, DG Regional Policy, Brussels EU.
Investment into smart growth! How we can help!. “…the EU and its Member States should adopt a strategic and integrated approach to innovation whereby.
Developing coherence mechanisms (ERDF/EARDF) in Poland Andrzej Hałasiewicz, PhD Nicolaus Copernicus University in Torun Foundation of Assistance Programmes.
ENPARD I Pilot Rural Development Projects
INTERREG-IIIB CADSES Neighbourhood Program: a general overview
Elena Zamsa National Contact Point Network Coordinator
University of agribusiness and rural development
Thematic platform 1 Competitiveness & Attractivness
Leader as a part of the new CAP
The European Social Fund
Title: EastAgri Workshop
Advancing South-South Cooperation for Effective Implementation of
ENI CBC Joint Operational Programme Black Sea Basin
Purpose of the CSF and Staff Working Document
Expert Group on Natura 2000 Management
Regional Development Planning
Biodiversity, Natura 2000 & Green Infrastructure in the Regional Policy Mathieu Fichter European Commission, DG Regio Team leader "sustainable.
Presentation transcript:

Governance of integrated projects: the strategy of GRIP-IT for component 2 Work shop for participants Oct 2006

1.GRIP-IT RFO scope 2.The GRIP-IT Approved sub projects 3.sub-project synergies and complementaries, contribution to GRIP-IT objectives 4.Perspectives in AGENDA

 We need Integration of interventions for successful local development strategies.  integrated approach is easily consistent with the EU principle of partnership for programming, but difficult to extended to the implementing stage.  The experience of Integrated projects in current programming period proves the need for further enhancement of governance effectiveness. GRIP-IT RFO. Why GRIP IT?

GRIP IT objectives  Innovation in governance of Integrated projects.  Exchange of experiences in integrated projects for structural funds.  Creation of Methodologies for integrated project  Promotion of SUB-PROJECTS: partnerships in integrated projects, in the field of local development, infrastructures, cultural resources.  RESULTS AND LONG TERM IMPACT: GRIP IT projects models implemented in Extended adoption of the integrated approach in Local development policies.

 The GRIP-IT partnership represents a complex and heterogeneous system of structural conditions, Structural funds frameworks, past experiences in cohesion policies, objectives of local development.  Wide range of economic developement levels in relation to EU development.  Three partners in Objective 1 and one in Objective 2  Two partners in New member states, two in a funding member  One partner leaving objective one and moving to competitivity GRIP IT partnership

 Studies and common work on methodologies for structural funds integrated projects in comp. 3 for the next programming period.  Sub projects: 7 international partnerships in the fields of cultural resources, tourism, health services, local networks.  Information : the website: information initiatives to spread knowledge and awareness on project integration. GRIP IT activities

 MUSNET: conservation and enhancement of local cultures.  EU-NET : interregional cooperation initiatives for local development  TONE: Tourism networks in Historical centres.  LoProDeN: Development of typical products establishing an interregional network.  H E A LT H-Y E C O N O M Y: creation of projects for public-private partnerships for health services.  GOSER: institution building of new patterns for the governance of Local Productive Systems  CULT: enhancement of cultural resources uses GRIP IT sub projects: what can you do for GRIP-IT?

 Cultural services for economic development  how to integrate projects in human resources and cultural services provision  How to create economic development impact from initiatives of traditional values and cultures preservation  Governance: partnerships of local administrations and non profit organization active in cultural services: institutional and financial relations.  MUSNET: conservation and enhancement of cultural resources.

 Interregional cooperation in the new programming period.  Finance of interregional partnerships in the mainstream programmes.  Integration of interregional cooperation and local development initiatives  Governance: how to extend the partnership after the project ends. Institutional and financial coordination  EU-NET : interregional cooperation initiatives for local development

 Integration of public Infrastructures, private investment, human resources development project  Coordination of interventions of ESF and ERDF  Timing and coordination of interventions in private and public properties.  Promotional initiatives in support of economic activities. How to finance, how to make effective.  Governance : institutional settings for the operation of widespread public and private infrastructures. Coordination of institutions responsible of preservation of historical respources and institutions responsible of development.  TONE: Tourism networks in Historical centres

 ISSUES: integration in the new regulation for European Agricultural and Rural Development Fund.  Integration of measures in priority One, two, three of the new Programmes for Rural Development. Integration in Leader Approach  Governance :  Temporary associations of agricultural and food industries entrepreneurs for the implementation of integrated projects  Launch of permanent consortiums for products development and promotion  Institutional settings for the operation of New leader initiatives  Coordination of Leader institutions and local development institutions, Mountainous communities associations, etc.  LoProDeN: Development of typical products establishing an interregional network.

 ISSUES: Health services has an opportunity for innovation and growth.  Integration of research activities, industrial production, services provision.  Partnerships for spill over initiatives?  Governance : institution building for partnerships in the health services sectors.  Integration of innovation objectives in Integrated projects strategy.  H E A LT H-Y E C O N O M Y: creation of projects for public-private partnerships for health services.

 ISSUES: Local Industrial Networks for economic development  Infrastructures, Innovation promotion, and Human Resources strategies in Integrated projects  Governance : PPP for local development.  Management of Grant schemes at local level.  Innovations in Financial tools for integrated projects in industrial development?  GOSER: institution building of new patterns for the governance of Local Productive Systems

 ISSUES: Investment in restoring cultural heritage resources and operation of the recovered infrastructures: administrative and economic feasibility.  Integrated investments in cultural services provision and restoring of cultural heritage.  Governance : institution building for PPP in the cultural sector.  Management of Grant schemes at local level.  Coordination of Leader initiatives and integrated projects supported  CULT Cultural heritage resources as

 Feasibility studies in integrated projects for:  Cultural Heritage resources.  Tourism Networks  Traditional and typical products  Guidelines for:  Integrated projects for interregional cooperation,  Local productive systems networks,  Traditional products promotion,  Exchange of experiences.  Establishment of interregional networks Activities and outputs of GRIP IT sub projects

 Basilicata in statistical phasing out objective competition.  In , Regional operational programmes in Hungary and Czech Republic.  One programme one fund approach in new EU regulations.  Limited reference to “integration” principle in SF regulations.  Interregional cooperation in mainstream programmes and objective cooperation. Perspectives: the GRIP IT partnership in the future cohesion policy

GRIP-IT Basilicata region Grazie, mockrát děkuji; köszönöm szépen