Self-Assessment for Continuous Improvement: Tools and Techniques 16 September 2009.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model Refreshing Review INTRODUCTION. Content Explain the Process used Talk about changes at different levels Question and Answer session What next?
Advertisements

Group Feedback Performance & Quality Improvement.
Austrian Cooperative Research (ACR) Research Experts for Small and Medium sized Enterprises Umbrella Organization Network of 17 cooperative research organizations.
EVALUATOR TIPS FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT WRITING The following slides were excerpted from an evaluator training session presented as part of the June 2011.
Striving for Business Excellence: Implementing the EFQM Excellence Model at Statistics Sweden Lilli Japec, Dan Lisai, Åke Pettersson, Sara Hoff and Marie.
The Aged Care Standards and Accreditation Agency Ltd Continuous Improvement in Residential Aged Care.
Head of Learning: Job description
Topic 6 - The Investors in People award
1 GRS and Accreditation March Learning objectives After reviewing this presentation, you will understand  How the Global Rating Scale supports.
Basic Concepts of Strategic Management
INTRODUCTION OF QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN THE REVENUE ADMINISTRATION Yıldırım BOZBIYIK Strategic Development Department – Head of Group Senior Programme Officer–
©2006 OLC 1 Process Management: The Foundation for Achieving Organizational Excellence Process Management Implementation Worldwide.
An introduction to Learning in Future Environments (LiFE)
FedEx Corporation Must be included:
Business Excellence within The University of Bolton Strategic Planning Process 17 th October 2006.
Benchmarking as a management tool for continuous improvement in public services u Presentation to Ministry of Culture of the Russian Federation u Peter.
© Centre for Integral Excellence Sheffield Hallam University Excellence in Education EFQM.
© Centre for Integral Excellence Sheffield Hallam University Education Community of Practice University of Bergen, January.
Organizational Project Management Maturity: Roadmap to Success
The ISO 9000 family of standards
Customer Service Excellence Standard – adding value for your students Helen Loughran Libraries and Learning Innovation Leeds Metropolitan University
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU Introduction Mapping approaches to quality management in the.
Sina Keshavaarz M.D Public Health &Preventive Medicine Measuring level of performance & sustaining improvement.
Scoring 1. Scoring Categories 1 – 6 (Process Categories) Examiners select a score (0-100) to summarize their observed strengths and opportunities for.
Session 1: Getting started on the PSQM Journey.
Certificate IV in Project Management Introduction to Project Management Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
Investors in People Champions. Interpretation of the Standard Purpose To give a brief overview with the necessary background information on the Investors.
Project Management Chapter 9 Project Quality Management Dr. Jana Jagodick Polytechnic of Namibia, 2012.
Quality Management.  Quality management is becoming increasingly important to the leadership and management of all organisations. I  t is necessary.
EFQM Excellence Model & Levels of Excellence Learning Edge - July 05.
Presented by Linda Martin
Developing people, growing organisations 1 Delivering change through effective governance Care & Repair Cymru Stephanie Bamford Thursday 20 September 2012.
Inspire Personal Skills Interpersonal & Organisational Awareness Developing People Deliver Creative Thinking & Problem Solving Decision Making, Prioritising,
Voluntary Code of Good Governance from Principles…to Practice!
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
© 2002 Systex Services1 BUSINESS EXCELLENCE - using the European Foundation for Quality Management (EFQM) self- assessment process.
Capacity Self-Assessment as a management tool for organisational development planning u A model used for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and European Integration,
Enterprise Estonia Estonian Tourist Board Kerli Hallikmäe 6. Sept
NHS Education for Scotland Defining A Quality Improvement Framework For A Coordinated Service Model Workshop 27 th May 2003 Dr Ann Wales NHS Scotland Library.
Programme Objectives Analyze the main components of a competency-based qualification system (e.g., Singapore Workforce Skills) Analyze the process and.
Self Assessment Using EFQM Excellence MODEL Down Lisburn Trust’s Experience of Continuous Improvement John Simpson Down Lisburn Trust.
Quality & Involvement Aims of the day To explore how to involve service users To explore how to evidence involvement in your work To explore the links.
Hellenic American Educational Foundation Athens College – Psychico College EFQM Excellence Model European Foundation for Quality Management ATHENS COLLEGE.
2.4 Key Management Roles KEY CONCEPT
Quality Assuring Deliverers of Education and Training for the Nuclear Sector Jo Tipa Operations Director National Skills Academy for Nuclear.
Open ECBCheck Methods for Quality Development Rafael García Rodríguez University of Augsburg, 2010.
Validated Self Evaluation of Alcohol and Drug Partnerships Evidencing Implementation: The Quality Principles – Care Inspectorate/The Scottish Government.
EFQM Levels of Excellence
Needs for changes and adjusting to them in the management of statistical systems Panel discussion Prospects and Risks for the Future: How to manage uncertainties.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Use of Resources Calderdale workshop 18 May 2009 Janet Matthews- Audit Commission Steve Brennan- Calderdale PCT.
Self Assessment SELF ASSESSMENT FOR YOU Ann Pike 30 th September 2010.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
Systems Accreditation Berkeley County School District Accreditation Team Chair Training October 20, 2014 Dr. Rodney Thompson Superintendent.
WELCOME Challenge and Support. What is challenge and support Table discussion As a governor what do you think Challenge and Support looks like?
National PE Cycle of Analysis. Fitness Assessment + Gathering Data Why do we need to asses our fitness levels?? * Strengths + Weeknesses -> Develop Performance.
EFQM Excellence Model and EFQM Community of Practice for Police Forces and Services Vilnius, March 29-30, 2007.
Comparison between the EQAVET process and the ISO 9001 and the EFQM Model Hungarian experience Katalin Molnar-Stadler Information Seminar for National.
How Good are you at Managing your Processes? Operational Excellence.
PERFORMANCE MEASURES GROUP 4. DEFINITION PERFORMANCE MEASURES. These are regular measurements of outcomes and results which generates reliable data on.
WORKSHOP, Nicosia 2-3rd July 2008 “Extension of SAFETY & QUALITY Common Requirements to the EMAC States” Item 6 : Towards the Implementation of Quality.
Basic Principles of Good Management
Organisational perspectives from a higher education institute and challenges of assessing UN activities at the community level Dzulkifli.
تشریح منطق ارزیابی رادار و روش های خودارزیابی
سمینارآشنايی با مفاهيم خودارزيابی و سرآمدی سازمانی
كارگاه آموزشي آشنائي با روشهاي خودارزيابي
بِسْمِ اللهِ الْرَّحْمنِ الْرَّحيم
Introduction to CPD Quality Assurance
Quality Managements Frameworks
Customer Service Excellence
Presentation transcript:

Self-Assessment for Continuous Improvement: Tools and Techniques 16 September 2009

Continuous Improvement = making both incremental and strategic changes to all the functions of an organisation to make it excellent Self-assessment = a comprehensive, systematic and regular review by the organisation of its activities and results referenced against a model of Excellence which allows an organisation to discern clearly its strengths and areas in which improvements can be made and culminates in planned improvement actions that are then monitored for progress Strategic planning = the plans that an organisation puts in place to enable it to achieve its mission and vision Definitions

-Compliance against a standard - Can tend to be negative-corrective action - Usually done by an “outsider” or “specialist” - Gives an historical view - Auditor is often looking to find fault -Positioning against a framework - Usually positive- strengths and areas for improvements - Best done by yourself, perhaps facilitated by a specialist - Both historical and forward looking - Aim is to be motivating for those involved -Is a competition - Marketing tool/Publicity - Is a way of recognising a level of achievement - Involves a judging process - Gives an historical view - Motivating for those receiving the award Relationship between Audit, Self- Assessment and Award Audit Self- assessment Award

1. Providing a highly structured, fact-based technique to identifying and assessing your organisation’s strengths and areas for improvement. 2. Improving the development of your business plan and strategy. 3. Creating a common language and conceptual framework for the way you manage and improve your organisation. 4. Educating people in your organisation on the Fundamental Concepts of Excellence and how they relate to their responsibilities. Self-assessment - Potential Benefits List

5. Involving people at all levels/units in process improvement. 6. Identifying and facilitating the sharing of your “Good Practice” within the organisation. 7. Facilitating comparisons with other organisations. 8. Providing opportunities to recognise both progress and outstanding levels of achievement through internal or external awards. 9. Effecting sustained improvement in management practices. 10.Providing all of the information needed for external agencies. However, the main purpose of gathering the information is for internal purposes. Self-assessment - Potential Benefits List (cont’d)

11. Helping plan what an institution aims to achieve and, crucially, how it will achieve its aims. 12. Increasing people’s understanding of the organisation’s goals and bringing people closer together. 13. The cost of quality savings made through acting upon the results of self- evaluation can be significant.

Results Orientation Customer Focus Leadership & Constancy of Purpose Management by Processes & Facts People Development & Involvement Continuous Learning, Innovation & Improvement Partnership Development Corporate Social Responsibility The Fundamental Concepts of Excellence

The EFQM Excellence Model

QUESTIONNAIRE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP PRO-FORMA AWARD SIMULATION COMBINATIONS BASED ON YOUR DESIRED OUTCOMES AND BENEFITS, HOW WILL YOU? Collect evidence/data Document evidence/data Assess evidence/data Document results Present results Self-Assessment Techniques

QUESTIONNAIRE ASSESSMENT WORKSHOP PRO-FORMA AWARD SIMULATION COMBINATIONS MANAGEMENT MEETING / EVENT To consider the S-A outcomes To prioritise actions To produce improvement plan To agree what to communicate To recognise the efforts of others Self-Assessment - Different Techniques, Same Destination

Characteristics: 1.This technique can be one of the least resource intensive. 2. An approach that is completed very quickly, provided an existing and proven questionnaire is used. 3. It is an excellent way of gathering information on the perceptions of people within an organisation. 4. Some organisations use simple yes/no questionnaires, other slightly more sophisticated versions that use a rating scale The Questionnaire Technique

Quick and easy to use - basic awareness training being sufficient to get things started Can readily involve many people within the organisation Enables the organisation to receive feedback which can be segmented by function and by level Can be used in conjunction with an Assessment Workshop to provide a more balanced view of deployment for the management team Can be used to facilitate group discussions between teams on the opportunities for improvement within their unit The Questionnaire Technique - Benefits

Characteristics: 1. An Assessment Workshop is an event, typically 0.5 and 1.5 days that involves members of a team in a discussion and decision making process linked to assessing evidence and data presented and reaching consensus on Strengths and Areas for Improvement. 2. A second discussion and decision-making process would be used to prioritise the list of potential improvement actions, assign ownership and agree timescales for delivery of the improvements. 3. The team involved can consist of anyone from within the organisation – one of main advantages of this self-assessment method is the opportunity to gain the active involvement of the management team. The Assessment Workshop Technique for Self-Assessment

The Assessment Workshop Technique for Self-Assessment (cont’d) Characteristics: 4. Typically, each member of the team will take responsibility for one or more Criteria of the EFQM Excellence Model and will ensure that data and evidence relevant to his/her area of responsibility is gathered before the Assessment Workshop. 5. At the workshop team members present to their peers the data and evidence gathered. This provides the start point for the team to discuss and reach consensus. 6. Consideration needs to be given to the order in which the nine criteria are addressed.

An excellent way to get the team to understand the Model and gain their commitment to it Discussion and agreement by the team on the strengths and areas for improvement helps to build a common view Ownership by the team of the outcomes, subsequent prioritisation and agreement to action plans An opportunity for team building An agreed list of strengths and areas for improvement is produced which will drive improvement actions The Assessment Workshop Technique - Benefits

Pathway Features: Online tool that allows you to assess your organisation’s performance straight from your desktop Can be applied to the whole organisation or to specific departments User-friendly self-assessment tool that can be adapted to reflect the needs of your organisation

Easy to use Evidence-based Can involve a range of people in the organisation Output readily accessible Enables the organisation to receive feedback and scores which can be segmented by function and by level Can be used to facilitate group discussions between teams on the opportunities for improvement within their unit Enables benchmarking to take place Pathway - Benefits

Resource effort Knowledge of Model Trained Assessors Site Visit Strengths & AFIs Accuracy of score QuestionnaireLow/ Medium No Low Assessment Workshop MediumYes plus Facilitator NoYesMedium Pro-formaMedium/ High Yes OptionalYesMedium - High Award Simulation HighYes OptionalYesHigh Selection Criteria - Input/Output Differences

Supported by Evidence Award Simulation Pro-forma Questionnaire Assessment Workshop High Process Rigour Based on Opinion Low Process Rigour Selection Criteria - Rigour & Evidence/Opinion Differences

Selection Criteria - Maturity/Effort Differences MATURE ORGANISATION Appropriate Questionnaire Assessment Workshop Pro-forma supported by Peer evaluation Award Simulation or Award Application ON THE WAYQuestionnaire & Workshop Facilitated Assessment Workshop Pro-forma Facilitated Assessment Workshop Pilot Award Simulation STARTING ON THE EXCELLENCE JOURNEY Elementary Questionnaire More detailed Questionnaire Customised Questionnaire Facilitated Assessment W/shop LOW EFFORTMEDIUM EFFORTHIGH EFFORT