2012-2013. The goal of the Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative (CALI) is to provide a model of state support to districts and schools to.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
In August, the historic CORE district waiver was approved allowing these districts to pursue a new robust and holistic accountability model for schools.
Advertisements

PORTFOLIO.
SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGISTS Helping children achieve their best. In school. At home. In life. National Association of School Psychologists.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
Quick facts about the Washington State ESEA waiver.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Common Core State Standards AB 250 and the Professional Learning.
1 Visions of Community 2011 March 12, 2011 The Massachusetts Tiered System of Support Madeline Levine - Shawn Connelly.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
NAEYC Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs Serving Children from Birth through Age 8.
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
District System of Support A systems approach to supporting effective master scheduling.
SIOP: Sheltered Instruction Observation Protocol Dr. Kelly Bikle Winter 2007.
1 Ohio’s Entry Year Teacher Program Review Ohio Confederation of Teacher Education Organizations Fall Conference: October 23, 2008 Presenter: Lori Lofton.
1 North Dakota Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Grades K-12 Adopted June 2011 Effective July 1, 2013 “After July 1, 2013, all public school districts.
Webinar: Leadership Teams October 2013: Idaho RTI.
NEXT GENERATION BALANCED ASSESSMENT SYSTEMS ALIGNED TO THE CCSS Stanley Rabinowitz, Ph.D. WestEd CORE Summer Design Institute June 19,
Connecticut Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Grant.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
The Framework for Teaching Domain 1 Planning and Preparation.
The goal of CALI is to provide a model of state support to districts and schools to support the process of continuous school and district.
Let’s Get S.T.A.R.T.ed Standards Transformation and Realignment in Thompson.
Instructional leadership: The role of promoting teaching and learning EMASA Conference 2011 Presentation Mathakga Botha Wits school of Education.
Preparing to Use This Video with Staff: Materials/Resources:  Print copies for each person of the following resources found on any OIP Stage 0 Module.
Common Core State Standards Background and ELA Overview Created By: Penny Plavala, Literacy Specialist.
SRBI One-Day Basic Day, Date Location, City Co-Trainers:Name, Agency Name, Agency 1.
Guidance from the CSDE on SRBI Implementation May 14, 2010 CAPSS Assistant Superintendents’ Meeting Mary Anne Butler, Education Consultant Iris White,
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
PRESENTED BY THERESA RICHARDS OREGON DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION AUGUST 2012 Overview of the Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and.
RtII for Middle School Bethann M. McCain; RtII Consultant
Assessment Practices That Lead to Student Learning Core Academy, Summer 2012.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. April 4, 2006.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
21 st Century Education A conversation regarding the changes in academic standards, assessment, funding, and accountability.
The goal of CALI is to develop and offer a model of state support to districts and schools to support the process of continuous school and.
Statewide Systems of Support Oregon School Improvement Facilitators Carol Larson, Willamette ESD Christina Reagle, Oregon Dept. of Education.
Distinguished Educator Initiative. 2 Mission Statement The Mission of the Distinguished Educator is to build capacity in school districts to enable students.
Standard 1: Teachers demonstrate leadership s. Element a: Teachers lead in their classrooms. What does Globally Competitive mean in your classroom? How.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Mentoring School Name Date Mentor’s Name. OVERVIEW What is Mentoring? The Mentoring Menu The Coaching Process.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Smarter Balanced Interim and Formative Assessment PTE Summer Conference June 17, 2014 Nancy Thomas Price, Comprehensive Assessment Coordinator.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training January 2010.
PIIC/PLN UPDATES AIU3 Coaches’ Workshop September 11, 2014.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Presented at the OSPA Summit 2012 January 9, 2012.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Welcome to the 2015–16 CAASPP Institute! California Assessment.
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
WHAT A GREAT IDEA!! Focusing on Results and Using IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) Part D Investments to Support Improved Outcomes for.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
The Every Student Succeeds Act Highlights of Key Changes for States, Districts, and Schools.
Colorado Accommodation Manual Part I Section I Guidance Section II Five-Step Process Welcome! Colorado Department of Education Exceptional Student Services.
Meeting the LEAPS Act May 5, PEI: Building Rigorous and Robust PreK-3 Family Engagement 1.
FLORIDA EDUCATORS ACCOMPLISHED PRACTICES Newly revised.
Aim: Does the US need to reform the educational system? Do Now: Make a list of the best aspects of the education you receive and make a list of the worst.
TEAM Teacher Education and Mentoring Program. What is the TEAM Program? Legislation passed in October 2009 has established a Teacher Education and Mentoring.
SIOP Implementation in Manatee County A Title I and Title III Partnership Presented by: Debra Estes, ESOL Coordinator.
MTSS MULTI-TIERED SYSTEMS OF SUPPORT A LOOK AT THE SYSTEMS TODAY IN CALIFORNIA GAIL LANCASTER –ASSOCIATE FACULTY NATIONAL UNIVERSITY/FRESNO CAMPUS RESOURCE.
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Montgomery Township Board of Education
RTI & SRBI What Are They and How Can We Use Them?
Study Questions To what extent do English language learners have opportunity to learn the subject content specified in state academic standards and.
Maryland State Board of Education October 25, 2011
Response to Intervention in Illinois
Presentation transcript:

The goal of the Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative (CALI) is to provide a model of state support to districts and schools to support the process of continuous school and district improvement and to accelerate the closing of Connecticut’s achievement gaps.

Accessing CALI CALI statewide training is free and open to educators in all districts with priority/early registration given to educators in the Alliance Districts. Each RESC and SERC has consultants who are qualified and available to provide these trainings in district for a fee.

CALI: CALI was initiated in 2004 in collaboration with an international expert on school and district improvement, Dr. Doug Reeves. The CALI theory of action focuses on the use of data-driven decision making and standards-based instruction to address the learning needs of each and every student in the classroom. This initiative has grown since 2004 in response to needs identified by schools and districts.

CALI: Common Formative Assessments (CFAs) 2.Data Driven Decision- Making (DDDM) 3.Engaging Classroom Assessment (ECA) 4.Effective Teaching Strategies (ETS) 5. ELL Learners 6.Improving School Climate 7.Scientific Research-Based Interventions (SRBI) 8.Culturally Responsive Education (CRE) The goal of the Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative (CALI) is to develop and offer a model of state support to districts and schools to support the process of continuous school and district improvement and to accelerate the closing of Connecticut's achievement gaps.

CALI: 2011 The redesigned modules were developed in response to educator need to better understand the connections between assessment, data analysis, and differentiation of instruction to improve student achievement. They were also developed to align with Connecticut’s adoption of the CCSS and SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC) to deliver a consistent message across all programs and trainings presented and supported by the CSDE. 1.Getting Ready for the Next Generation of Assessments 2.Improving School Climate 3.School and Instructional Data Teams 4.Using Differentiated Instruction to Implement the Common Core State Standards (CCSS)

CALI: Culturally Responsive Education 2.Effective Tier I Practices for English Language Learners (ELLs) 3.Getting Ready for the Next Generation of Assessments 4.Improving School Climate 5.School and Instructional Data Teams 6.Using Differentiated Instruction to Implement the Common Core State Standards All modules support the principles of Connecticut’s approved No Child Left Behind (NCLB) waiver and the goals of two new Connecticut State Department of Education (CSDE) initiatives: Alliance District Funding and the Commissioner’s Network.

ESEA Waiver Connecticut waiver calls, in part, for implementation of the Common Core State Standards and new assessments aligned to those standards in and authorization of intensive interventions and supports necessary to turn around Connecticut’s lowest performing schools and districts. ESEA Approved Waiver Request: requests/ct.pdf.

Alliance Districts Public Act created the Alliance District program with the goal of providing new resources to the districts in greatest need – provided they embrace key reforms to position their students for success. Alliance Districts are required to take appropriate intervention measures to improve student performance in Focus Schools and in the larger category of “Review Schools, “ which includes both Focus Schools and other low-performing schools. Alliance Districts must tier schools according to need and must implement support and interventions as appropriate. More information regarding Alliance Districts can found on this page:

30 Alliance Districts AnsoniaNew Britain BloomfieldNew Haven BridgeportNew London BristolNorwalk DanburyNorwich DerbyPutnam East HartfordStamford East HavenVernon East WindsorWaterbury HamdenWest Haven HartfordWinchester KillinglyWindham ManchesterWindsor MeridenWindsor Locks Middletown Naugatuck

Commissioner’s Network The Commissioner’s Network was created as part of education reform legislation signed into law by the Governor. Public Act authorizes intensive interventions in 25 of Connecticut’s lowest performing schools over the next three years. The Commissioner’s Network is designed to serve as a vehicle for innovative initiatives, a platform for sharing effective practices, and a model for other schools and districts throughout the state. For more information regarding the Commissioner’s Network:

Improving School Climate to Support Academic Achievement   In this two-day basic training module, participants learn that the quality of school climate is all about relationships, which are determined by how well the people within the school treat each other physically, emotionally, and intellectually.   This module offers practical strategies including data gathering on how to improve school climate to support student achievement. 12

School and Instructional Data Teams 13 In this two-day training, participants will learn an explicit process that focuses on adult actions (cause data) and their impact on student outcomes (effect data). As a result of this training, School and Instructional Data Teams will understand how to use data to develop, implement, monitor, and adjust school and instructional improvement plans designed to support effective teaching and learning.

Using Differentiated Instruction to Implement the Common Core State Standards In this two-day training, participants will analyze a definition of differentiated instruction and come to understand that high-quality differentiation is a proactive, decision-making process. Participants will look closely at four principles of the differentiated classroom: The teacher crafts an environment that actively supports each student in the hard work of learning. Teachers must have absolute clarity about the learning destination. Teachers must persistently know where students are in relation to the destination. The teacher adjusts instruction to accommodate a critical student learning difference. 14

Getting Ready for the Next Generation of Assessments 15 District teams will be able to formulate an action plan to improve the capacity of the district, school and classroom to engage in assessment practices that support and promote high quality learning. District teams will be able to recognize and understand the components of a balanced assessment system? Interim assessments, formative assessment tools and practices, and summative assessments in alignment with the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium (SBAC)

Culturally Responsive Education This workshop will provide participants with key knowledge areas to better enable educators to work with diverse students and to prepare all students for a future of diversity. The Culturally Responsive Education workshop is an intensive, interactive two-day event. The focus is on providing critical knowledge and awareness but also practical skills. There are seven modules: Module 1: An Historical Perspective Module 2: Defining the Need for Culturally Responsive Education Module 3: Understanding and Working with Bias Module 4: Cultural Competence – Aspects of Culture, Global Skills Module 5: Understanding Student Characteristics and Needs Module 6: Characteristics of Culturally Responsive Teachers and Schools Module 7: Families as Partners in Education

Effective Tier I Practices for English Language Learners This two day workshop is designed for teams of general education teachers, ESL specialists and school administrators who can provide on-site embedded support for teachers in their school districts. As a result of participating in this program, participants will: understand the stages of language acquisition and provide differentiated instruction for students based on these stages; use language and content assessment data to make instructional decisions for their classrooms, and identify and practice sheltered instructional strategies, which are specifically advantageous to the learning needs of ELLs.

? Need Additional Information? Please contact: Iris White Education Consultant CSDE, Bureau of Accountability and Improvement (860) General Information: Registration: