2-23-12 National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention April 2 & 3, 2012 177 Square miles 1,000,000 + people 10 th largest U.S. city 4 th Safest U.S. city.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Virginia Juvenile Justice Association EFFECTIVE PAROLE TRANSITION & RE-ENTRY: WHO, WHAT, WHERE, WHEN & HOW November 2, 2006 David M. Altschuler, Ph.D.

Advertisements

Building a Foundation for Community Change Proposed Restructure 2010.

O PERATION : S AFE C OMMUNITY 2 Implementation Planning National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Photo Credit: Memphis Mayor.

Ojjdp.gov T L O A Tribal Law and Order Act Overview of the Law’s Impact on Tribal Youth and Discussion on Juvenile Detention Centers with Laura Ansera,

MAINE Approximately 35,000 Square Miles Population of 1.3 million 16 Counties 32 Court Houses 14 County Jails 6 State Prisons 2 Juvenile Institutions.

RECIDIVISM STUDY PROPOSAL MONTGOMERY COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION AND REHABILITATION DETENTION SERVICES DETENTION SERVICES PRE-RELEASE AND REENTRY SERVICES.

State Administrative Agency (SAA) 2007 Re-Entry Grant Training Workshop The Governor’s Crime Commission Re-Entry Grants and Federal Resource Support Programs.

Development and Implementation of a CIT Training Curriculum in a County Jail.

Police chiefs | formerly incarcerated people | pretrial service administrators | probation officials | state legislators | substance abuse treatment providers.

Study of Expansion of Rehabilitation Programs for Inmates in Escambia and Santa Rosa Counties Report February 18, 2012 Tryon Library.

National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Implementation Update November 1 & 2, 2011 Washington D.C

CALIFORNIA’S JUVENILE JUSTICE CRIME PREVENTION ACT. By Janine Niccoli. POLS 680. April 14, 2008.

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.

Funding the Work of Reentry Julie Boehm, Reentry Manager Missouri Department of Corrections.

Second Chances: Housing and Services for Re-entering Prisoners National Alliance to End Homelessness Annual Conference Nikki Delgado Program Manager Corporation.

Implementing Evidence Based Principles into Supervision March 20,2013 Mack Jenkins, Chief Probation Officer County of San Diego.

National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention Dennis Mondoro Strategic Community Development Officer Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.

Reentry Services Project Shelley Ford, MN Department of Corrections Sally Dandurand, Reentry Services Project June 2008, Connecting Youth to Success 1.

FUNDING OPPORTUNITIES. BACKGROUND New category of funding in the FY13 Harold Rogers Prescription Drug Monitoring Program Official title is “Category 3:

C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition

C OUNTY S OLUTIONS FOR K IDS IN T ROUBLE Benet Magnuson, J.D. Policy Attorney Texas Criminal Justice Coalition

The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Juvenile Probation Commission.

SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY 2011 PUBLIC SAFETY REALIGNMENT PLAN AUGUST 30, 2011.

Presentation Outline Why we need a prisoner reentry program What is happening with MPRI statewide What is happening locally How you can help Questions.

Mayor’s Office of Homeland Security and Public Safety Gang Reduction Program Los Angeles.

Planning for Re-alignment in San Diego

Ohio Justice Alliance for Community Corrections October 13, 2011.

NAMI Conference February 10, 2015 “Changing Lives: Changing Futures” Operating Rehabilitative Detention Facilities NAMI Conference February 10, 2015 “Changing.

1 1 Bureau of Justice Assistance: Resources for Tribal Justice Systems October 19, 2012.

Probation and Parole in the United States Your presenter:

Housing: A Significant Reentry Barrier Nicole E. Sullivan NC Department of Correction Office of Research and Planning.

Pretrial, Probation and Parole

May 18, 2009 Montebello Unified School District Presentation By: Debbie Nelson, Director.

The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.

Comprehensive Gang Initiative Bettering our schools, empowering our communities, Building a Safer Tulsa.

Evidence-Based Reentry Practices in a Jail Setting

Ursula Hill February 2012 Notre Dame-AmeriCorps Mid-Year Conference.

TASK FORCE REPORT REDUCING JUVENILE RECIDIVISM IN ALABAMA.

Salient Factor Score CTSFS99. What it is How to use it.

Missouri Reentry… It’s a Process! George A. Lombardi, Director Missouri Department of Corrections.

OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.

1 Evaluating the Orange County School Mobile Assessment and Response Team (SMART) Association for Criminal Justice Research, California 63rd Semi-Annual.

Practice Area 1: Arrest, Identification, & Detention Practice Area 2: Decision Making Regarding Charges Practice Area 3: Case Assignment, Assessment &

Evidenced Based Practices In Probation Challenges and Considerations Scott MacDonald Chief Probation Officer Santa Cruz County.

National Center for Youth in Custody First Things First: Risk and Needs Assessment Data to Determine Placement and Services Alternatives.

THE COORDINATED RESPONSE TO REENTRY Alameda County Reentry Network.

Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.

Salinas, California Addressing the Roots of Violence Through a Collective Impact Approach.

CLASSIFICATION Risk Institutional violence/misconduct Institutional violence/misconduct Suicide Suicide Recidivism Recidivism A standardized assessment.

Oregon Youth Authority Meeting the Challenge through Collaboration and Partnerships Oregon´s juvenile justice system is composed of a network of local.

Improving Outcomes for Young Adults in the Justice System Challenges and Opportunities.

Cleveland Municipal Drug Court: SAMHSA CSAT Adult Treatment Drug Court Grant Dr. Margaret Baughman Madison Wheeler, BS Paul Tuschman, BA Begun.

Comprehensive Youth Services Assessment and Plan February 21, 2014.

Fort Worth City Council May 12, 2009 Presenter: Randy Turner Chief Juvenile Probation Officer Tarrant County Juvenile Services Scott D. Moore Juvenile.

Michigan Prisoner ReEntry Initiative (MPRI) Creating safer neighborhoods and better citizens.

Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Winters April 9 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.

Department of Corrections Joint Judiciary Hearing July 25, 2013.

The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Board of Supervisors,

Youth First Initiative National Survey Results and Analysis.

Yolo County AB 109 Realignment Public Planning Davis April 8 th, 2014 Yolo County Board of Supervisors And Community Corrections Partnership.

BCJ 3150: Probation and Parole

Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation

Juvenile Reentry Programs Palm Beach County

Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?

Rapid Response October 4, 2011

Transition from Prison to Community: the German Case

TEXAS STUDY USED MORE THAN 1

24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year

Senate Health and Human Services Committee

History (Continued) In May, 2011, Federal Court required that the prison population of California be decreased from 180% of prison capacity to no more.

Presentation transcript:

National Forum on Youth Violence Prevention April 2 & 3, Square miles 1,000,000 + people 10 th largest U.S. city 4 th Safest U.S. city with population over 500,000

Mayor’s Gang Prevention Task Force History 1990: Stopping the violence 2000: Reclaiming our youth - Building the full continuum of service: Prevention, Intervention and Suppression 2007-Present: Transforming our youth through Results Proven Programs

Continual Improvement Working Subcommittees Inter-agency Collaborative - Re-Entry Network - Alternative Schools Community Engagement - Crime and Gang Prevention Summit - Faith Initiative Technical Team City/School Collaborative Continual Improvement

Current Efforts & Focus We must work in closer partnership with our faith community. Gangs do not respect city, county or state boundaries, we must work locally, regionally and nationally to address the issue holistically. The city and county needs to work together to reduce the recidivism rate of those coming out of the prison system. 60% of released inmates are San Jose residents.

Santa Clara County ReEntry Network

Re-Entry Network of Santa Clara Count: “Support, Services, & Supervision for Success” RE-ENTRY NETWORK OF SANTA CLARA COUNTY “SUPPORT, SERVICES, & SUPERVISION FOR SUCCESS” VISION To build safer communities and strengthen families through successful reintegration and reentry of formerly incarcerated individuals back into Santa Clara County. MISSION To reduce recidivism by using evidence-based practices in implementing a seamless system of services, supports, and supervision.

Implementation of dynamic, validated risk and needs assessment tools to identify criminogenic needs, across juvenile & criminal justice system touch points. Juvenile Probation: JAIS - Juvenile Assessment & Intervention System (NCCD) Department of Correction & Adult Probation : CAIS – Correctional Assessment & Intervention System (NCCD) Office of Pretrial Services: State of Virginia, Pretrial Justice Institute, currently doing validation study O BJECTIVE I DENTIFICATION & S EAMLESS D ELIVERY

EFFECTIVE RE-ENTRY: GET YOUR HOUSE IN ORDER!

THE WORK Implementation of Seven Challenges Program (SAMSHA) for seamless transition of substance abuse services in custody to community GRID: Guiding Responses Informed Decisions Expansion of alternative to incarceration:  The EDGE – Education, rehabilitation, CBT program in the community with gang affiliations, history of delinquency and substance abuse  Electronic Monitoring: Improved consistency, set guidelines for response strategies RESULT: 7% increase in success rate to 74%

RESULTS: 63% reduction in program violations 50% reduction in new arrests, one year after exit!

GOOD TRENDS! WRAPAROUND SERVICES “ the family is vital to the treatment process” family viewed as “expert, staff serve as facilitators”

FactorsVariable Percent Recidivated Age at arrest24 or younger58% Gang involvementReported being in a gang at arrest75% Drug offenseCharged with “any” drug offense71% Prior arrests1 or more 6 or more 57% 77% Prior probation violations or more 71% 85% Not involved in treatment Re-arrests (6-24 mo.) Re-convictions (6-24 mo.) Re-incarcerations (6-24 mo.) 34%-64% 24%-42% 24%-59% Comprehensive Adult Re-Entry

Moving Forward Forging a working Private/ Public Partnership Increasing efficiencies on the Task Force through partnerships Increase Funding Development Moving Forward