Simvastatin Increases HDL-C and Apolipoprotein A-1 Levels Significantly More Than Atorvastatin John P. Kastelein, Evan A. Stein, Michael A. Davidson, John.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Lipid-altering Efficacy and Safety Profile of Co-administered Extended Release Niacin/Laropiprant and Simvastatin in Patients With Dyslipidemia Gilbert.
Advertisements

1. 2 The primary Objective of IDEAL LDL-C Simvastatin mg/d Atorvastatin 80 mg/d risk CHD In stable CHD patients IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease.
HPS2-THRIVE: Treatment of HDL to Reduce the Incidence of Vascular Events Jane Armitage on behalf of the THRIVE Collaborative Group Financial Disclosure:
TROPHY TRial Of Preventing HYpertension. High-normal BP increases CV risk Vasan RS et al. N Engl J Med. 2001;345: Incidence of CV events in women.
Robert K Huff PharmD. Candidate May Objectives The study was designed to examine 3 main aspects Biochemical effects Safety Tolerability Evacetrapib.
Henry C. Ginsberg, MD College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York For The ACCORD Study Group.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Pravastatin or Atorvastatin Evaluation and Infection Therapy (PROVE IT): Design Cannon CP.
TNT: Study Design Treating to New Targets 2 5 years 10,001 Patients Clinically evident CHD LDL-C 130  250 mg/dL following up to 8-week washout and 8-week.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
Primary Prevention of Acute Coronary Events with Lovastatin in Men and Women with Average Cholesterol Levels Results of AFCAPS/TexCAPS John R. Downs, Michael.
VBWG IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Study.
Treating to New Targets Study TNT Trial Presented at The American College of Cardiology Scientific Sessions 2005 Presented by Dr. John C. LaRosa.
Henry N. Ginsberg, MD College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, New York For The ACCORD Study Group.
An Academic Research Organization of Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Harvard Medical School LAPLACE-TIMI 57 Primary Results A Double-blind, Randomized,
CE-1 CRESTOR ® Clinical Development Efficacy James W. Blasetto, MD, MPH Senior Director, Clinical Research.
Lipid-Modulating Effects of Evacetrapib, a Novel CETP Inhibitor, Administered as Monotherapy or in Combination with the Most Commonly-Used Statins SJ.
 High density lipoproteins (HDL) protect against cardiovascular disease  A novel mechanism for raising HDL levels is to inhibit a protein known as CETP.
Downloaded from Slide 1 Ezetimibe Coadministered with Atorvastatin in Patients with Hypercholesterolemia and Coronary Heart.
ASTEROID A Study To evaluate the Effect of Rosuvastatin On Intravascular ultrasound- Derived coronary atheroma burden.
Role of Rosuvastatin in the Treatment of Dyslipidemia
Clinical experience with ezetimibe/simvastatin in a Mediterranean population The SETTLE Study I. Migdalis a, A. Efthimiadis b, St. Pappas c, D. Alexopoulos.
Clinical Trial Results. org The ERASE Trial: Effect of rHDL on Atherosclerosis-Safety and Efficacy Presented at American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific.
Downloaded from Slide 1 Dual Inhibition of Two Sources of Cholesterol: Absorption and Production in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes FIELDFIELD Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 2005 Presented.
Slide 1 EZT 2002-W-6022-SS Ezetimibe Co-administered with Statins: Efficacy and Tolerability Copyright © 2003 MSP Singapore Company, LLC. All rights reserved.
BackgroundBackground HDL-C levels are inversely related to CV event rates. HDL-C levels are inversely related to CV event rates. Torcetrapib, a cholesteryl.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
Comparison of the Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis for Two High Efficacy Statin Regimens with Different HDL Effects: SATURN Study Results SJ Nicholls,
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S) The Lancet, Vol 344, November 19, 1994.
Slide 1 Downloaded from Ezetimibe Factorial Coadministration Studies.
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
Incremental Decrease in Clinical Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Trial IDEAL Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific.
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
WOSCOPS: West Of Scotland Coronary Prevention Study Purpose To determine whether pravastatin reduces combined incidence of nonfatal MI and death due to.
SATURN: Objective To compare the effects of rosuvastatin 40 mg versus atorvastatin 80 mg on progression of coronary atherosclerosis assessed by intravascular.
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
Arterial Biology for the Investigation of the Treatment Effects of Reducing Cholesterol 2 ARBITER-2 Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific.
Clinical Trial Results. org SAGE Trial Prakash Deedwania, MD; Peter H. Stone, MD; C. Noel Bairey Merz, MD; Juan Cosin-Aguilar, MD; Nevres Koylan, MD; Don.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
COMET: Carvedilol Or Metoprolol European Trial Purpose To compare the effects of carvedilol (a β 1 -, β 2 - and α 1 -receptor blocker) and short-acting.
Effect of on Oral Agent Inducing ApoA-I Synthesis on Progression of Coronary Atherosclerosis: Results of the ASSURE Study SJ Nicholls, CM Ballantyne, PJ.
Results of the First Major Clinical Trial of An Oral Agent Inducing ApoA-I Synthesis: A New Approach to Raising HDL and CV Risk Modification SJ Nicholls,
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Clinical Trial Results. org METEOR Trial Presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session March, 2007 Presented by Dr. John R.
Manufacturer: Amgen Inc FDA Approval Date: August 27, 2015
Downloaded from Slide 1 Dual Inhibition of Two Sources of Cholesterol: Absorption and Production Results of a Clinical Trial.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Reversal of Atherosclerosis with Aggressive Lipid Lowering (REVERSAL) Nissen SE et al. JAMA.
DIABETES INSTITUTE JOURNAL CLUB CARINA SIGNORI, D.O., M.P.H. DECEMBER 15, 2011 Atherothrombosis intervention in metabolic syndrome with low HDL/High Triglycerides:
Steven E. Nissen MD MACC*
Clinical Trial Results. org ILLUSTRATE Presented at the American College of Cardiology Annual Scientific Session March, 2007 Presented by Dr. Steven E.
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Title slide.
European Society of Cardiology 2017 Clinical Trial Update I
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Effects of Anacetrapib on the Incidence of New-Onset Diabetes Mellitus and on Vascular Events in People With Diabetes Louise Bowman & Martin Landray on.
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)
Oxford Niacin Trial.
The ASSERT Study.
Effects of Combination Lipid Therapy on Cardiovascular Events in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes
Section 7: Aggressive vs moderate approach to lipid lowering
This series of slides highlights a report based on a presentation at the Late-Breaking Trial Sessions of the 2005 American Heart Association Scientific.
Screening, Lipid Stabilization, and Placebo Run-in
Efficacy and safety of niacin/laropiprant
LRC-CPPT and MRFIT Content Points:
The Heart Rhythm Society Meeting Presented by Dr. Johan De Sutter
Major classes of drugs to reduce lipids
VK2809 in NAFLD: a phase 2 study
Section 6: Update on lipid treatment guidelines
Presentation transcript:

Simvastatin Increases HDL-C and Apolipoprotein A-1 Levels Significantly More Than Atorvastatin John P. Kastelein, Evan A. Stein, Michael A. Davidson, John R. Crouse, Leiv Ose, Minzhi Liu, Michael R. Melino, Laura O’Grady, Michel Mercuri, Yale B. Mitchel For the Simvastatin Atorvastatin HDL Study Group; Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Merck Research Laboratories, Rahway, New Jersey, USA JACC February 2000 Volume 35 Number 2 (supplement A): 315A ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA

Simvastatin/Atorvastatin HDL Study Background HDL-C and apolipoprotein (apo) A-1 levels are inversely related to the risk of coronary heart disease.HDL-C and apolipoprotein (apo) A-1 levels are inversely related to the risk of coronary heart disease. Recently the VA-HIT study suggested that modest increases in HDL-C could have significant benefits on cardiovascular events.Recently the VA-HIT study suggested that modest increases in HDL-C could have significant benefits on cardiovascular events. Statins, in addition to lowering LDL-C and TG, increase HDL-C levels.Statins, in addition to lowering LDL-C and TG, increase HDL-C levels. However, recent data suggest that a differential effect of simvastatin and atorvastatin on HDL-C exists, in that at higher doses of both drugs simvastatin raises HDL-C more than atorvastatin.However, recent data suggest that a differential effect of simvastatin and atorvastatin on HDL-C exists, in that at higher doses of both drugs simvastatin raises HDL-C more than atorvastatin. JACC February 2000 Volume 35 Number 2 (supplement A): 315A ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA

Simvastatin/Atorvastatin HDL Study Methods This multicenter, double-blind, 36-week dose titration study was designed to evaluate the effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on HDL-C and apo A-1 levels.This multicenter, double-blind, 36-week dose titration study was designed to evaluate the effects of simvastatin and atorvastatin on HDL-C and apo A-1 levels. Following a 4-week diet run-in period, 826 patients (47% female) with LDL-C > 160 mg/dL and TG 160 mg/dL and TG < 350 mg/dL were randomized to simvastatin or atorvastatin for 36 weeks. JACC February 2000 Volume 35 Number 2 (supplement A): 315A ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA

Simvastatin/Atorvastatin HDL Study Design TreatmentTreatment –Simvastatin 40 mg/day period 1 (6 weeks), and 80 mg/day periods 2 (6 weeks) and 3 (24 weeks) –Atorvastatin 20 mg/day period 1 (6 weeks), 40 mg/day period 2 (6 weeks) and 80 mg/day period 3 (24 weeks) Primary lipid endpoint for week 6, 12 and 18/36 efficacy analysisPrimary lipid endpoint for week 6, 12 and 18/36 efficacy analysis –HDL cholesterol Key secondary lipid endpoint for week 6, 12 and 18/36 efficacy analysisKey secondary lipid endpoint for week 6, 12 and 18/36 efficacy analysis –Apolipoprotein A-1 JACC February 2000 Volume 35 Number 2 (supplement A): 315A ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA

Study Design Diet run-in Kastelein et al, JACC Vol 35: 2: Suppl. A, pg 315 Abstract Double Blind, randomized, 36-week dose titration study Double Blind, randomized, 36-week dose titration study Patient eligibility: LDL-C > 160mg/dL and TG 160mg/dL and TG < 350mg/dL 826 patients (47% female) 826 patients (47% female) Treatment Treatment Treatment Simvastatin 40 Simvastatin 80 Atorvastatin 20 Atorvastatin 40 Atorvastatin 80 VisitWeek Screening Period 1 6 weeks Period 2 6 weeks Period 3 24 weeks randomization Primary lipid endpoint for week 6, 12 and 18/36 * - HDL cholesterol Primary lipid endpoint for week 6, 12 and 18/36 * - HDL cholesterol Key secondary lipid endpoint for week 6, 12, and 18/36* - Apolipoprotein A-1 Key secondary lipid endpoint for week 6, 12, and 18/36* - Apolipoprotein A-1 * Avg. of weeks 18, 24, 30 and 36

Simvastatin/Atorvastatin HDL Study Demographic Characteristics Simvastatin Atorvastatin Total (n=414) (n=412) (n=826) Gender [No. (%)] Females 177 (42.8%) 213 (51.7%) 390 (47.2) Males 237 (57.2%) 199 (48.3%)436 (52.8%) Mean Age, yrs 55 ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA

Simvastatin/Atorvastatin HDL Study Baseline Lipid Levels SimvastatinAtorvastatin Baseline Lipid, mg/dLN=414N=412 HDL-C Apolipoprotein A LDL-C Total cholesterol Triglycerides (median) ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA

Simvastatin/Atorvastatin HDL Study Changes in HDL-C and Apo A-1 at Week 6/12 S 40/80 A 20/40 HDL-C HDL-C S 40/80 A 20/40 Apo A-1 Apo A-1 * * *p<0.001 between treatment groups JACC February 2000 Volume 35 Number 2 (supplement A): 315A ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA

Simvastatin/Atorvastatin HDL Study Change in HDL-C for Each Treatment Period 1.3%3.2%*4.4%* Bars represent difference between treatment groups Week Simvastatin40 mg 80 mg 80 mg Atorvastatin20 mg 40 mg 80 mg ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA Mean % Change *p<0.001

Simvastatin/Atorvastatin HDL Study Change in Apo A-1 for Each Treatment Period 1.6%4.5%*6.0%* Bars represent difference between treatment groups Week Simvastatin40 mg 80 mg 80 mg Atorvastatin20 mg 40 mg 80 mg ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA Mean % Change *p<0.001

Larger Increases in HDL-C with Simvastatin Were Seen in Patients with Both Low and High HDL-C Levels Simvastatin 40 mg 80 mg80 mg Atorvastatin 20 mg 40 mg 80 mg Mean % Difference Between Treatment Groups Low HDL-C Stratum (M: < 40 mg/dL; F: < 50 mg/dL) 40 mg 80 mg80 mg 40 mg 80 mg80 mg 20 mg 40 mg 80 mg 20 mg 40 mg 80 mg High HDL-C Stratum (M: > 40 mg/dL; F: > 50 mg/dL) ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA

Simvastatin/Atorvastatin HDL Study Change in LDL-C for Each Treatment Period 3.7%* 2.6%* 5.6%* Bars represent difference between treatment groups Week Simvastatin40 mg 80 mg 80 mg Atorvastatin20 mg 40 mg 80 mg ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA Mean % Change *p<0.001

Simvastatin/Atorvastatin HDL Study Change in TG for Each Treatment Period 1.3%* 5.7%* 7.8%* Bars represent difference between treatment groups Week Simvastatin40 mg 80 mg 80 mg Atorvastatin20 mg 40 mg 80 mg ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA Mean % Change *p<0.001

Number of Patients with Clinically Relevant Elevations in ALT and CK During the Third Treatment Period S 80 mgA 80 mg n/m*(%) n/m*(%) n/m*(%) n/m*(%)Consecutive ALT > 3X ULN 2/384(0.5) 15/392**(3.8) Female 1/162(0.6) 12/202(5.9) Female 1/162(0.6) 12/202(5.9) Male 1/222(0.5) 3/190(1.6) Male 1/222(0.5) 3/190(1.6) CK > 10X ULN 3/384(0.8) 2/392(0.5) Female 0/162(0.0) 0/202(0.0) Female 0/162(0.0) 0/202(0.0) Male 3/222(1.4) 2/190(1.1) Male 3/222(1.4) 2/190(1.1) ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA Note: There were no clinically significant events during the first two treatment periods *Number of patients with elevated tests/patients tested **2 patients with aesthenia, fatigue Simvastatin 80 mg vs atorvastatin 80 mg, p<0.004

Simvastatin/Atorvastatin HDL Study ~ Summary At clinically equipotent doses for lowering LDL-C, simvastatin increased HDL-C and apo A-1 more than atorvastatin:At clinically equipotent doses for lowering LDL-C, simvastatin increased HDL-C and apo A-1 more than atorvastatin: –Differences between the drugs in increasing HDL-C were larger at higher doses. –80 mg simvastatin increased HDL-C by 7.6% (compared to 3.1% with atorvastatin 80 mg) and raised apo A-1 2.5% (compared to a 3.5% decrease with atorvastatin). These data on HDL and apo A-1 confirm previously reported results of another large comparative multicenter trial.These data on HDL and apo A-1 confirm previously reported results of another large comparative multicenter trial. Both drugs produced comparable and substantial reductions in LDL-C.Both drugs produced comparable and substantial reductions in LDL-C. –Differences between atorvastatin and simvastatin were statistically significant but small in comparison to the magnitude of LDL-C reduction. Both drugs produced substantial reductions in TGs, with atorvastatin showing slightly larger reductions than simvastatin.Both drugs produced substantial reductions in TGs, with atorvastatin showing slightly larger reductions than simvastatin. At the 80 mg dose more patients treated with atorvastatin were discontinued due to clinically significant increases in ALT (3.8% of total participants or 5.9% of women) compared to simvastatin (0.5% and 0.6%, respectively).At the 80 mg dose more patients treated with atorvastatin were discontinued due to clinically significant increases in ALT (3.8% of total participants or 5.9% of women) compared to simvastatin (0.5% and 0.6%, respectively). ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA

Simvastatin/Atorvastatin HDL Study ~ Conclusions Simvastatin increased HDL-C and apo A-1 consistently more than atorvastatinSimvastatin increased HDL-C and apo A-1 consistently more than atorvastatin Both agents were well tolerated at doses that led to approximately 50% reductions in LDL-C (atorvastatin 40 mg and simvastatin 80 mg).Both agents were well tolerated at doses that led to approximately 50% reductions in LDL-C (atorvastatin 40 mg and simvastatin 80 mg). LDL-C reduction achieved with 80 mg atorvastatin during the final 24 week period was 2.3% greater than that achieved with 40 mg atorvastatin.LDL-C reduction achieved with 80 mg atorvastatin during the final 24 week period was 2.3% greater than that achieved with 40 mg atorvastatin. However, at the highest dose of atorvastatin (80 mg), the benefit of the small additional percent LDL-C reduction may be offset by:However, at the highest dose of atorvastatin (80 mg), the benefit of the small additional percent LDL-C reduction may be offset by: –higher risk of clinically significant and consecutive increases in ALT necessitating withdrawal from study –reduction in apo A-1 –modest effect on HDL-C Benefits need to be weighed against the risk for the increased incidence of liver adverse effects with 80 mg atorvastatinBenefits need to be weighed against the risk for the increased incidence of liver adverse effects with 80 mg atorvastatin ACC 2000, Anaheim, CA