1 (Almost) Everything You Need To Know About the Annual Count.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DEPARTMENT OF SPECIAL SERVICES PROJECTIONS PREPARED BY KIM CULKIN, DIRECTOR OF SPECIAL SERVICES MARCH 2013.
Advertisements

1 Title I, Part D Data Reporting and Evaluation: What You Need To Know Dory Seidel and Jenna Tweedie, NDTAC Karen Neilson, California Department of Education.
The IEP Individualized Educational Program. The IEP is the process and document that outlines what a free appropriate public education (FAPE) is for an.
The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
1 ND Community Call Salmon Community 21 October 2014.
High-Quality Supplemental Educational Services And After-School Partnerships Demonstration Program (CFDA Number: ) CLOSING DATE: August 12, 2008.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk PROGRAM OVERVIEW APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS ANNUAL REPORTS.
October 5, 2010 Title III Services to Private Schools.
1 Gold ND Community Call October 7, Agenda “That Time of Year”: Data Team Updates A Closer Look: Subgrantee Monitoring Review of Recent TA Requests.
Strategies for Developing Efficient and Effective Annual Count Processes Stephanie Lampron, DeAngela Milligan, and Marcia Calloway.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
1 Title I Services For Children Enrolled In Private Schools Molly Little Associate Director, Instructional Services and Federal Programs North Clackamas.
1 Planning and Funding Basics Lauren Amos and Liann Seiter, NDTAC Chandra Martin, Arkansas Department of Education.
1 Monitoring Review: What Every New Coordinator Should Know Victoria Rankin and Greta Colombi, NDTAC.
Equitable Services for Private School Students March, 2012 Consultation Process & Meeting Agenda’s Marcia Beckman, Director Elementary & Secondary Education.
Mathematics/Science Partnerships U.S. Department of Education: New Program Grantees.
Title I, Part D and the Annual Count: Understanding the Grant and the Count Process.
ND Community Call Salmon Community October 23, 2013.
1 Gold ND Community Call June 3, Agenda Peer-to-Peer Discussion: Adapting to the 2014 GED “That Time of Year”: Subgrantee Monitoring A Closer.
Title I, Part D State Plans Katie Deal, NDTAC State Liaison.
Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At Risk Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 What’s It All About?
Overview of the SPDG Competition Jennifer Doolittle, Ph.D. 1.
Meeting the Educational Needs of Diverse Learners DeAngela Milligan and Sarah Bardack.
Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes John McLaughlin, U.S. Department of Education and Nicholas.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 3) 22 September 2015 – Katie Deal.
1 Supplemental Regulations to 34 CFR Part 300 Assistance to States for the Education of Children with Disabilities and Preschool Grants for Children with.
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA) Office of Non-Public Education Office of Innovation and Improvement Office of Special.
1 ND Communities Meeting. 2 Agenda Activity: Planning training and technical assistance Compelling technical assistance requests NDTAC has received Activity:
1 Infant & Toddler Connection of Virginia Early Intervention System Presentation for Financing Systems Workshop OSEP National Early Childhood Conference.
Overview of Title I Part A Farwell ISD. The Intent of Title I Part A The intent is to help all children to have the opportunity to obtain a high quality.
Title I Part D: Neglected & Delinquent Program, Subparts 1 & 2 Prevention & Intervention Programs for Children & Youth Who Are Neglected, Delinquent, or.
Melvin L. Herring, III Program Director, Title I, Part D Florida Department of Education.
Making Sound Use of Funds Decisions for Title I, Part D Nicholas Read and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC Jeff Breshears, California Department of Education.
The Power of Monitoring: Building Strengths While Ensuring Compliance Greta Colombi and Simon Gonsoulin, NDTAC.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability N or D Application.
A Catalyst for Program Improvement Federal Monitoring: Added Value.
Program Evaluation NCLB. Training Objectives No Child Left Behind Program Series: Program Evaluation To provide consistency across the State regarding.
Equitable Services, Part 2 Planning for Equitable Services Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Title I.
The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Annual Counts: Understanding the Process and Its Implications.
Title I Part D Subpart 2 Are You Feeling Neglected or Delinquent??? November 2011 Don McCrone, N&D Liaison PDE – Division of Federal Programs Joe Hiznay,
Children With Disabilities Enrolled by Their Parents in Private Schools 34 CFR §§ Equitable Participation (EP) Child Find Free and Appropriate.
Title ID Subpart 2 Introduction Coordinator Tutorial
TITLE I, PART D STATE PLANS John McLaughlin Federal Coordinator for the Title I, Part D Program NDTAC Conference May
Overview of the Counting Process DeAngela Milligan.
July 18, Glover Marietta, Georgia 1.  Federally funded program which provides resources to schools, based on the poverty percent at that school.
Instructional Support Team (IST) By Kelli Reisinger Unit 13 Presentation.
Virginia Department of Education Office of Program Administration and Accountability Spring N or D Application.
Annual Count for Local Agency Programs (Subpart 2) Greta Colombi.
TITLE I, PART D Prevention and Intervention Programs for Children and Youth who are Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk.
Petraine Johnson, Moderator, Presenters: Millie Bentley-Memon, Fengju Zhang, Elizabeth Judd Office of English Language Acquisition Language Enhancement.
NDTAC Jeopardy True or False?. $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500 $100 $200 $300 $400 $500.
1 ND Topical Call Series: NDTAC Resources to Meet Technical Assistance Needs (Call 2) 26 August 2015 – Katie Deal.
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 2 LEAs and TACF Neglected,
Consolidated State Performance Report & Survey to Generate Title I Neglected and Delinquent Funds for Subpart 1 State Agencies Neglected,
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
1 New Coordinator Orientation Lauren Amos, Katie Deal, and Liann Seiter.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
1 ND Community Call Teal Community 27 October 2015.
1 ND Community Call Gold Community 22 October 2015.
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective Dr. Vanessa Nelson-Reed Federal Program Administrator NCDPI.
1 Effectively Addressing Administrative Challenges of Implementing Title I, Part D Katie Deal, Rob Mayo, Liann Seiter, and Jake Sokolsky.
February 25, Today’s Agenda  Introductions  USDOE School Improvement Information  Timelines and Feedback on submitted plans  Implementing plans.
1 Welcome! Choose a photo from the table that appeals to you or represents you in some way. Write the answers to the following questions on a 3×5 notecard.
Call with the US Department of Education and Title I, Part D Coordinators October 17, 2016 Katie Deal.
The Administration of Subrecipient Agreements
Annual October Count of Children in
Administering Federal Programs-A Charter School Perspective
Using Data to Monitor Title I, Part D
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Presentation transcript:

1 (Almost) Everything You Need To Know About the Annual Count

What Is the Annual Count? The Annual Count is an annual survey that collects an estimate of the number of students who are “eligible” for Title I, Part D (TIPD), funds in each State. −Eligibility for counting and eligibility for serving are different! The U.S. Department of Education (ED) uses Annual Count data (along with other data) from each State in formula calculations for the State for both Subpart 1 and Subpart 2. 2

(1) ED distributes the Annual Count Survey and guidance (mid-October) (2) Child count periods are selected (3) SEAs submit counts to ED (January) (4) ED prepares funding tables based on counts and funds available (5) ED announces preliminary awards in April/May and releases funds in July Annual Count Process: An Overview 3

Finite Funding: Approximately the same amount of funds is allocated to Part D every year. National Fluctuations: Although your counts may change significantly, they may be counterbalanced by changes in other States—OR you could greatly benefit, depending on the changes. Hold Harmless: If States experience a significant decrease in counts one year, they are protected by hold-harmless provisions The Relationship Between the Count and Final Allocations 4

To understand the counting requirements To provide technical assistance to subgrantees To partner with State and local agencies to collect an accurate count of students To verify and submit the count to ED Role of the Part D Coordinator 5

Understand the nuances of the instructions and guidance (who can be counted and when) Understand the difference between counting, serving, and the Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) Know where to find the resources to assist you Key Pieces To Conduct the Annual Count Successfully 6

Part 1 of the Survey = Local Education Agency (LEA) Section Count of students who are delinquent (Part D, Subpart 2, funds) Count of students who are neglected (Title I, Part A, funds) Part 2 of the Survey = State Agency (SA) Section Count of students who are neglected or delinquent (Part D, Subpart 1, funds) Two Parts of the Count Survey 7

THE 1-DAY COUNT Annual Counts for State Agency Programs Under Subpart 1 8

State Agency Eligibility Agencies responsible for providing free public education to children and youth who are in N or D institutions, community day programs, or adult correctional institutions Facility Eligibility Facilities that serve children and youth who are neglected OR delinquent AND have an average length of stay of at least 30 days Student Eligibility Students who are aged 20 years or younger Students who are enrolled in a State-funded regular program of instruction for at least 15 hours/week if in an adult facility or 20 hours/week in a juvenile facility or community day program State Agency/Subpart 1 Annual Count: Eligibility 9

The S1 Count Window (a.k.a. “Count Day”) and Formula Eligible SAs select a date –Each State agency may select any 1 day during the current calendar year. –Each SA may select its own date, but every institution under a particular SA must use the same date. SEAs may also work with SAs to select a date to use for all SAs. SAs or facilities adjust the count to reflect the length of the school year of the specific agency or institution (single day count) × (length of school year in days)

Students Counted (Annual Count) In a program for youth who are N or D, including juvenile and adult correctional facilities and community day programs Enrolled in a State-funded “regular program of instruction”* Enrolled in a program that has an average length of stay of at least 30 days on day of count during the calendar year 20 years of age or younger Students Served In a program for youth who are N or D, including juvenile and adult correctional facilities and community day programs Enrolled in a State-funded “regular program of instruction” Enrolled in a program that meets the length-of-stay requirements for a given program type (requirements vary) 21 years of age or younger * A regular program of instruction is defined as an educational program that consists of classroom instruction in school subjects such as reading and math. For a juvenile facility, the program must provide at least 20 hours of instruction per week; for an adult facility the program must provide at least 15 hours of instruction per week. State Agency/Subpart 1 Program: Students Counted vs. Students Served 11

THE “30-DAY COUNT” OR THE “OCTOBER COUNT” Annual Counts for Local Agency Programs Under Subpart 2 12

Same Rules, Same Form, Different Funding Streams* Students in Neglect Programs = Title I, Part A Students in Delinquent Facilities = Title I, Part D, Subpart 2 *This highlights the distinctions between counting, funding, and serving in Subpart 2 The Different Purposes of the N and D Count 13

LEA Eligibility LEAs with children and youth in locally operated N or D facilities not operated by the State, including public or private institutions Facility Eligibility Locally operated facilities that meet the definition of an institution for children and youth who are neglected, an institution for children and youth who are delinquent, or an adult correctional institution Facilities need not have a 30-day average length of stay. Student Eligibility Students 5  17 years old Students NOT counted in the State agency/Subpart 1 Annual Count Students who reside at a residential institution or facility for at least 1day within the 30-day count window (1day of which must be in October) Local Education Agency/Subpart 2 AND Part A Annual Count: Eligibility 14

Each eligible facility must be designated as a neglect OR delinquent institution, but not both, even if it serves both. −A facility should maintain consistency with how it was designated last year. −If a facility has never counted before or its charter has changed, designate it according to its charter. −If a facility’s charter is not clear or unavailable and the facility never counted before, designate the facility based on its enrollment. Facility Eligibility and Designation 15

SEAs or eligible LEAs select a 30-day count window. At least 1 day in the 30-day window must be in October. SEAs can set the 30-day window for all LEAs to use, or elect to allow LEAs and facilities to select their own windows. Count each unique case/enrollment in a facility’s caseload. Any given student has to be enrolled for only 1 day. “Unique” refers to unique commitment, enrollment, and discharge periods. The 30-Day Count Window 16

Students Counted (Annual Count) Living in local institutions for children and youth who are N or D or adult correctional institutions Living in the institution for at least 1 day during the 30-day count period 5  17 years of age Students Served Living in local institutions for children and youth who are delinquent or in adult correctional institutions; eligible for services under Title I, Parts A and C; or identified as “at risk” (e.g., migrants, immigrants, gang members, pregnant or parenting youth)* 21 years of age or younger * Neglect and at-risk programs may receive Subpart 2 funding and services per the Title I, Part D, statute even though students in those programs are not included in the count upon which Part D funding allocations are based. Local Agency/Subpart 2 Program: Students Counted vs. Students Served 17

Final Clarification: Annual Count vs. the CSPR Students in the Annual Count Purpose: to determine formula counts for allocating funds Instructions differ per Subpart. A subset of “eligible” students enrolled during a specific time period within the calendar year Adjustments are made to calculations to estimate the student population (SA/Subpart 1). Multiple enrollments within a facility can be counted (LEA/Subpart 2). Students in the CSPR Unduplicated Count Purpose: to track student achievement Instructions do not differ per Subpart. −Adult corrections = Subpart 1 −At-risk programs = Subpart 2 ALL students who benefitted from Part D funding during the school year Unduplicated counts are not adjusted—they are actual counts of the total population served. Students are counted once per facility, regardless of multiple enrollments. 18

Counting-Specific Resources All Centrally Located on the NDTAC Site!! U.S. Department of Education (ED) counting guidance, worksheets, and survey forms NDTAC TIPD Annual Count Guide −Checklists for both subparts NDTAC’s Webinar—The Annual Count: Understanding the Process and Its Implications −Download and use this in your own trainings. Title I, Part D, Statute Title I, Part D, Nonregulatory Guidance 19

What You Can Do To Enhance Count Efficiency and Accuracy Understand all the requirements and the process. Be proactive and provide T/TA in advance. Provide technical assistance in a way that best suits your resources and subgrantees. Develop materials and include eligibility requirements and supplemental instructions with the survey. Implement a verification process and do what works for your State. 20

Annual Count Questions 21

Local Educational Agency/Subpart 2 Annual Count: Counting Quiz 2 SunMonTueWedThuFriSat Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Bobby Tim Linda Tim Linda Tim Linda Tim Jennie Tim Jennie Delinquent Child Count = 4 How many students who reside in a facility designated as a delinquent institution should be counted ? Tim, Linda, and Jennie are considered delinquent and Bobby is considered neglected. 22

Local Educational Agency/Subpart 2 Annual Count: Count Window September SMTWTFS October SMTWTFS November SMTWTFS An LEA’s Subpart 2 count window can start as early as September 2 or as late as October 31. The window must be for 30 consecutive days and at least 1 day of that window must be in October. The SEA may set the window for all LEAs, or it may allow LEAs and facilities to choose their windows independently. 23

Keeping Title I, Part D, True to Its Purpose: Planning and Funding Based on Needs and Outcomes

Objectives Participants will better understand: The important differences between Subparts 1 and 2 The differences between counting for and allocating Part D funds The necessity of using needs assessments and formal agreements Their roles as training and technical assistance (TA) providers, collaborators, and relationship builders 25

Subpart 1 vs. Subpart 2 Subpart 1 is quite straightforward. –State plan –“Supplement not supplant” –Transition reservation Subpart 2 is far more open. –Different/more complicated counting process –No “supplement not supplant” clause –Part A reservation 26

Counting for vs. Administering Funds Different eligibility requirements Different reporting requirements and timeframes –Annual Child Count –Consolidated State Performance Report (CSPR) The youth themselves are different. 27

28 Allocating and Managing Part D Dollars Administering Funds

Why Plan Your Funding? To be more effective –Foster better outcomes for youth. –Meet Federal, State, and local requirements. –Meet program, agency, and facility goals and mandates. –Ensure future Federal program funding. To be more efficient –Do more with less in times of financial struggle. –Effectively administer Part D along with other responsibilities. 29

Your Roles in the Funding Process Manager/coach Training and TA provider Monitor Data collector and analyzer Program improvement leader 30

Fund Allocation Steps 1.State plans 2.Application development a.Needs assessment b.Formal agreements 3.Application review a.“Use of funds” proposals 4.Fund allocation and TA 31

Step 1: Know Your State Plan Read your State plan! It is… –The foundation of your Part D program –An agreement with the ED Know when to change it, when these occur: –New understandings of Part D –Changes in populations and/or needs –Reauthorization 32

The State Plan A plan: A.For meeting the educational needs of children and youth who are neglected, delinquent, and at-risk; B.For assisting in the transition of children and youth from correctional facilities to locally operated programs; and C.That is integrated with other programs under this Act or other Acts, as appropriate. 33

The State Plan (cont.) Each State plan shall: A.Describe the program goals, objectives, and performance measures established by the State that will be used to assess the effectiveness of the program in improving the academic, vocational, and technical skills of children in the program; B.Provide that, to the extent feasible, such children will have the same opportunities to achieve as they would have if they were in the schools of local educational agencies in the State; 34

The State Plan (cont.) Each State plan shall: C.Contain an assurance that the State educational agency will: i.Ensure that programs assisted under this subpart will be carried out in accordance with the State plan described in this subsection; ii.Carry out the evaluation requirements of section 1431; iii.Ensure that the State agencies receiving subgrants under this subpart comply with all applicable statutory and regulatory requirements; and iv.Provide such other information as the Secretary may reasonably require. 35

The State Plan (cont.) Each such State plan shall— A.Remain in effect for the duration of the State's participation under this part; and B.Be periodically reviewed and revised by the State, as necessary, to reflect changes in the State's strategies and programs under this part. 36

Step 2: Use the Application as a Tool The Part D application is like an RFP; the application: Provides the chance to shape State and local programs through: –Meeting Federal requirements –Providing additional guidelines and/or regulations –Setting funding/serving priorities Offers the opportunity to provide more guidance now for fewer difficulties later through: –Asking for more in program narratives and budgets 37

Part D Funding Applications Subpart 1 19 required elements in Sect. 1414(c): Academic assessment Yearly budgets Program evaluation Coordination with other programs Record sharing Transition/reintegration Parent involvement Students with disabilities And more… Subpart 2 13 required elements in Sect. 1423: Formal agreements Comparable education Student needs Coordination to meet social, health, and other needs Parental involvement Coordination with other programs Work with probation and other release entities for reentry And more… 38

Step 2a: Focus Applications on Needs Needs assessments: Can be conducted at the State, agency, and facility/program levels Can focus on a single interest area or a whole system or program Can be completed by: 1.Defining the purpose and scope 2.Establishing a planning team 3.Developing an agency/facility/program profile 4.Identifying desired data, availability, usability, and collection methods 5.Analyzing data, identifying needs, and setting priorities 39

What a Needs Assessment Tells You Educational offerings within facilities and programs Additional available services and supports Students’ demographics and their unique needs Academic and vocational outcomes Transitional/postrelease outcomes Professional development offerings and needs Relationships and their quality Where we are now. Where we need/want to be. How we can get there. 40

Step 2b: Create Meaningful Formal Agreements A formal agreement is: A contract between funder and provider –Keeps expectations clear and creates lines of accountability for services Required for local education agencies (LEAs) and facilities—a good idea for State agencies (SAs) and facilities As the SEA, consider including more specificity in the application. 41

Step 2b: Create Meaningful Formal Agreements Formal agreements inform funders… How the grantee will use funds—meeting all requirements and student/staff needs Which students will be served Which staff (if any) will be funded and their qualifications What materials and equipment will be used and their costs Any potential for blended/braided funding What types and frequency of data will be collected How data will be used for program improvement 42

Step 2b: Create Meaningful Formal Agreements Formal agreements inform recipients about the… Purpose of the funds Application requirements Award amount Period of agreement and reapplying timelines Use of fund requirements and restrictions Data collection and reporting requirements Monitoring expectations Consequences of not complying with the agreement 43

Step 3: Conduct Thorough Application Reviews Did I receive what I asked for? –Initially prescriptive vs. open and optimistic Does what I received make sense? –At the facility, agency, and State levels –How does one program affect the others? Is the application focused on improvement? –Does it take into account past outcomes? –Does it address current needs? 44

Step 3a: Evaluate “Use of Funds” Proposals Decide on allowable and appropriate uses. –Use detailed decision rules. –Start with musts, work through to shoulds. Remember Federal, State, and agency/program priorities and goals. Be strategic. Feel comfortable with the process and confident in your decisions. 45

Step 4: Allocations and Technical Assistance Funding can be formulaic or competitive/ discretionary. –Submitting a count does not have to mean receiving funds. –Hybrid funding models can be used. The SEA, SAs, and LEAs are not just “pass throughs.” These agencies: –Facilitate coordination and build relationships. –Maintain ongoing knowledge of programs. –Make course corrections along the way. –Provide ongoing TA to foster better monitoring outcomes. 46