1 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education IISME Teacher Retention and Program Impact Study Study conducted in 2001by Dr. Kathryn Sloane Weisbaum.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
How Leadership for Technology Is Distributed Among Leaders, Followers, and The Situation -Sara Dexter University of Virginia.
Advertisements

The Common Core State Standards: Opportunities and Challenges for the Mathematical Education of Teachers.
Student Survey Results and Analysis May Overview HEB ISD Students in grades 6 through 12 were invited to respond the Student Survey during May 2010.
State Council of Higher Education for Virginia January 2006State Council of Higher Education for Virginia GEAR UP Summer Programs.
A Proposal of Needed Research and Analyses Kendra Stanley ALHE 4060 – Research in Allied Health April 26, 2009 Employment Satisfaction and Curricula for.
Enhancing Academic Practice Nigeria Role of Newcastle University.
How many of you are 10 1.Masters students 2.PhD Students 3.Undecided
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals: Fellowship Track Washington, DC January 9, 2014.
Perkins 202 Dr. Michelle Crary – Staff Development and Accountability Coordinator Nori Cannell – Director – Guidance & Career and Technical Education.
Graduate Program Assessment Report. University of Central Florida Mission Communication M.A. Program is dedicated to serving its students, faculty, the.
Issues Surrounding the Evaluation of Teacher Internship Programs Donna Barrett Center for Education Integrating Science, Mathematics & Computing Georgia.
Noyce Program Evaluation Conference Thursday, December 6, 2007 Frances Lawrenz Michelle Fleming Pey-Yan Liou Christina Madsen Karen Hofstad-Parkhill 1.
Catherine Cross Maple, Ph.D. Deputy Secretary Learning and Accountability
A Mathematics Specialist Program: Its Structure and Impact on Practicing Elementary Teachers Nadine Bezuk & Susan Nickerson.
CLASS PROJECT: CAREER PATHWAYS CSD 509J Mid-Year Update.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
OER10, March 22-24, 2010 Cynthia Jimes, PhD Institute for the Study of Knowledge Management in Education ISKME: Siyavula: Building Communities to Support.
2007 ENA Membership Needs Assessment Presentation of Key Findings and Strategic Implications Prepared and Presented by Stuart Meyer, Marketing Membership.
© 2013 K12 Insight Central Office Climate Survey Results Las Cruces Public Schools March , 2013.
Assessment Day 2012 Focus: Educator as Member of Communities Data: Alumni Survey Initial Programs Employer Survey Initial Programs Alumni Survey Advanced.
SENSE 2013 Findings for College of Southern Idaho.
Teacher Research Experience Outcomes Jay Dubner Columbia University’s Summer Research Program for Science Teachers Conference on Teacher Research Experiences.
MSCA6-1- Students will understand the personal nature of work and how it relates to them as individuals and as integral parts of society. a) Identify reasons.
School Effectiveness Questionnaire Application (SEQ) School District of Palm Beach County Designed and developed by: Maria-Alexandra Paladines March 2012.
Outreach to Districts and Schools ?Is there a drop down menu with three items, or does it go to a page on outreach, or both?
Student Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Student and Teacher Research Experience. Research on the Research experience for undergraduates We operate on the principle that undergraduate research.
1 Newly Certified Teachers: Experiences of and Opinions About Teacher Induction in Illinois Brenda K. Klostermann Illinois Education Research Council Southern.
The Effects of Professional Learning Communities on Student Achivement Erin N. Fyffe School of Teacher Education, Western Kentucky University Methods and.
Evaluating the Vermont Mathematics Initiative (VMI) in a Value Added Context H. ‘Bud’ Meyers, Ph.D. College of Education and Social Services University.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
The Impact of the Maine Learning Technology Initiative on Teachers, Students, and Learning Maine’s Middle School 1-to-1 Laptop Program Dr. David L. Silvernail.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
CENTER FOR EDUCATOR RECRUITMENT, RETENTION & ADVANCEMENT.
A Report on the Texas Parent Survey for Students Receiving Special Education Services DataSource: Statewide Survey of Parents of Students Receiving Special.
Chicago Public Schools Science Perspective DR. JOHN F. LOEHR, ACTING SCIENCE DIRECTOR CHICAGO PUBLIC SCHOOLS OFFICE OF TEACHING & LEARNING - SCIENCE A.
The Use of Distance Learning Technology by Business Educators for Credentialing and Instruction Christal C. Pritchett, Ed.D. NABTE Research Session Anaheim,
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Teacher Engagement Survey Results and Analysis June 2011.
Mentoring Preservice Teachers: Survey Results Updated last: 9/15/2008.
Take Charge of Change MASBO Strategic Roadmap Update November 15th, 2013.
Hawai‘i Public School Teachers Survey Prepared for: The Learning Coalition February 2012 Ward Research, Inc. 828 Fort Street, Suite 210 Honolulu, Hawaii.
11 Report on Professional Development for and Update Developed for the Providence School Board March 28, 2011 Presented by: Marco Andrade.
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Proposal Writing Workshop Features of Effective Proposals.
Quality Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents Qualitative State Research Team Kristin Gansle Louisiana State University and A&M College Value-Added.
Comparative Alumni Research 2011 Update Overall Comparison: Lutheran Colleges to Flagship Public Universities Lutheran Educational Conference of North.
Science Mentoring Program Hughes STEM High School Community Partnership Experiences February 7, 2012 Kent Buckingham, Ph.D., Program Coordinator.
Assessment System Overview Center for Education Overview for the NCATE BOE Team April 18-22, 2009.
New Employee Induction Program
General Member Survey VI Presented to: NEA West Region Field Team October 24, 2007.
December 3 rd, 2015 Director: Lindsey M. Swagerty – (479) Coordinator: Priscilla R. Wetzel – (479)
Connecting K-12 Schools Nationwide to Support Sustainable School Improvement October 2008 “We” Survey Suite with Linda Lucey
Past, Present, & Key to our Future. * In 1995 a survey was conducted across DE and it was found that the predominant form of Science Education was textbook.
Center for Educator Recruitment, Retention, & Advancement.
Leadership Meeting April 23, Clear Learning Goals: Use The Framework of Teaching in Domain 1 (Planning & Preparation) & Domain 4 (Professional Responsibilities),
Developing Structures for Teacher- Lead Learning Communities Jill Cabrera, Ph.D. Western Kentucky University.
THE METLIFE SURVEY OF THE AMERICAN TEACHER: CHALLENGES FOR SCHOOL LEADERSHIP Gwendolyn Thomas Kimberly Patterson Shannon Biggs.
School Improvement Needs Assessment – © Iowa Association of School Boards Assessment Conducted by the Iowa Association of School Boards.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California Mathematics and Science Partnership (CaMSP) Grant.
Graduate Program Completer Evaluation Feedback 2008.
Cross State Analyses of Results TELL Survey. New Teacher Center (NTC) worked collaboratively with 11 state coalitions—including governors,
TELL Survey 2015 Trigg County Public Schools Board Report December 10, 2015.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Foundations of American Education: Perspectives on Education in a Changing World, 15e © 2011 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Teaching.
AUB Alumni Survey Report 2016
Redesigning College Teaching at Sacramento State University
Meeting the need for special education teachers in rural areas.
Milwaukee Public Schools University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee
Presentation transcript:

1 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education IISME Teacher Retention and Program Impact Study Study conducted in 2001by Dr. Kathryn Sloane Weisbaum Surveyed 734 teachers who held IISME Fellowships from % return rate 100 non-respondents traced to assess whether non-respondents’ answers differed Full report available on IISME’s website: Presented by Kaye Storm, Director of Special Projects, IISME,

2 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education Average Annual Teacher Attrition Rates Category of Teacher Average Annual Attrition Rate IISME Fellows Leaving Education*2% IISME Fellows Leaving Classroom Teaching4% California and U.S. Teachers Leaving Classroom Teaching (1999) 8% (All categories include retirement.) *Categorizes counselors, administrators, technology and curriculum specialists, and district personnel as “still in education.”

3 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education Positions in Education Held in Past Five Years Position TitleFrequency Percent Selecting Item Classroom Teacher34393% Department Chair or School Administrator15943% Professional Development or Curriculum Development Specialist 13035% Computer/Technology Specialist7119%

4 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education How IISME Encourages Fellows to Stay in Teaching * More than one category could be selected. How did IISME encourage you to stay Frequency (n=281) Percent Selecting Item Offered me a professional challenge22781% Gave me new perspectives on my role as teacher17964% Increased my enthusiasm for teaching16659% Added income so I could stay in teaching15856% Gave me a breather to refresh for the fall13548% Affirmed my commitment to teaching12846% Offered me a professional support network10140% Increased my awareness of benefits of teaching7627% in teaching? *

5 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education IISME Program Effects *More than one category could be selected. ** Respondents could select “weak,” “moderate,” or “strong” effect. Area of Program Effect* Frequency Indicating "Some Effect”** Percent Indicating "Some Effect” ** (N=332) Professional Self-concept27683% Knowledge of Careers27583% Professional Development26680% Commitment to Teaching23872% Access to Community Resources23370% New Class Content22969% New Teaching Strategies17051% Professional Advancement16349%

6 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education Retention Rates SampleStill in EducationStill in Teaching Initial Respondents (n=326) 88.3%78.8% Late Respondents (n=99)79.8%68.7% Combined Sample (n=425) 86.4%76.5% Weighted Estimate for Population (n=734) 83.4% (+/- 2.2%)73.5% (+/- 2.4%)

7 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education IISME Total Attrition Rate by Number of Years in Education *13.6% total attrition over 16 years equals 2% average annual attrition. Number of Years in Education Number of Respondents in Cohort Number of Cohort who Left Education Percent of Cohort who Left Education 2 to % 4 to 53638% 6 to % 11 to % % Missing data531426% Total %*

8 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education IISME as Impetus for Staying in Education Did IISME serve as impetus to stay in teaching? Categories of Respondents Number Responding “Yes” Percent Responding “Yes” Still in Education32977% Left Education4367%

9 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education Career Choices for Those Leaving Education Current Status Frequency (n=58) Percent of “Leavers” Took job in industry1831% Retired1322% Unemployed712% Went back to school610% Self-employed610% Took job in education-related field, medicine, or religion 47% Did not report47%

10 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education Percentages of Teachers Considering Leaving Education *Nationwide survey of science teachers. **Over one-third who are contemplating leaving have 26+ years of teaching experience so they are close to retirement. Considering Leaving Profession? IISME Fellows (n=367) NSTA Sample* (n=1,365) Yes32%**38% No58%59% No response10%3%

11 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education Why Teachers are Considering Leaving Education

12 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education Teacher Ratings of Quality of IISME Program

13 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education Classroom Transfer *More than one category could be selected. Increases in Types of Classroom Practice* Frequency of "Yes" Percent of "Yes" (n=332) Add examples & illustrations23471% Provide more career information21565% Add new content18656% Use more team/group work17653% Implement Education Transfer Plan15647% Use more problem solving11936% Connect students w/ industry10431% Improve classroom management strategies3410%

14 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education Leadership Activities Pursued *More than one category could be selected. Leadership Activity* Frequency (N=332) % Reporting Effect More professional development15246% Mentor other teachers14945% More professional networking11334% New leadership roles10933% New school programs6018%

15 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education Rating Benefits of Multiple Fellowships *More than one category could be selected. (Only teachers with multiple fellowships responded to this question.) Statement of Benefits* Frequency of “Agree” or “Strongly Agree” % Who “Agree” or “Strongly Agree” (N=189) There are important differences in what I gained each summer % The professional benefits accumulated with each year of participation % It is important to have this sort of professional development experience more than once for maximum benefit %

16 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education Principals’ Perceptions of IISME Summer Fellowship Program Conducted December 2002 by Dr. Jennifer Benjamin as her Ph.D. dissertation Surveyed all public school principals whose teachers held IISME Fellowships in 2000, 2001 or respondents

17 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education

18 Bringing Excitement and Relevance to Education Principal Survey Highlights The principals reported that, following their IISME participation:  66% of their teachers integrated more technology into their curriculum.  64% increased their content knowledge and continued to acquire information relevant to their field (this was significantly higher among high school teachers than K-8 teachers).  57% strengthened their commitment to teaching.  56% provided more access to career information and resources for their students.  47% assumed more leadership roles in their school.  46% challenged themselves to a greater degree intellectually and professionally.