DRAFT Field Sampling Guidance To be used this field season by DEC and consultants Initial focus on soil, groundwater, and vapor intrusion Future versions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PHASE II ESA 2014 ESA GUIDELINES. PHASE II ESA 2014 ESA GUIDELINES PROJECT DEVELOPMENT PROCESSES –PATH 2 AND 3 PROJECTS –PATH 4 AND 5 PROJECTS W/ WORK.
Advertisements

COMPARISONS OF SUB-SLAB SOIL GAS MEASUREMENTS TO MODELED EMISSIONS FROM SUBSURFACE CONTAMINATION by John A. Menatti and Robin V. Davis Utah Department.
Sampling: Your data is only as good as your field technicians.
2014 Vapor Intrusion Guidance Amendments Discussion Points Waste Site Cleanup Advisory Committee Meeting May 22, 2014.
Vapor Intrusion. What is Vapor Intrusion? The migration of volatile chemical vapors from the subsurface to overlying buildings.
Rhode Island Society of Environmental Professionals in conjunction with the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management Co-hosted by SAME’s Narragansett.
Hillcrest Community Environmental Investigation No Conflict of Interest Geo Strata is not affiliated with and does not hold contracts with the oil & gas.
Laboratory Tests for Petroleum Pre ME tests: TPH by EPA SW s Gasoline and Fuel Oil: DEP and Gasoline and Fuel Oil: DEP.
DRASTIc Groundwater Vulnerability map of Tennessee
Environmental Investigation by Con Edison Former E115th Street Gas Works November 13, 2007.
Proposed Changes to DEQ Heating Oil Guidance. Background Present guidance developed in 2006/early 2007 became effective in March heating oil.
Enviromental aspects of Brownfield Regeneration Barbara Vojvodíková, Marcela Maturová „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
Sam Winer Motors Technical Outreach Support for Communities Michigan State University East Lansing, MI November 29, 2001.
.
EnviroSense, Inc. An Overview of Environmental Factors in Developing Brownfields Sites in Massachusetts Presented By: Eric S. Wood, P.Hg., PG, LSP President.
Partitioning of VOCs: Why do we care? ä Determines how best to treat a site ä vapor extraction ä pump and treat ä remove contaminated soil ä Determines.
Vapor Intrusion Guidance Proposed Updates
Material Sampling.
Yield Determination Purpose Groundwater Classification Yield Methods Recent Issues.
Groundwater sampling and purge techniques Acquiring a representative sample.
Activity: Pratical exercise in Marine Pollution Marcia Caruso Bícego– Description and Teaching Materials The project is conduct in.
Monitoring Well Sampling. SAP (Sampling Analysis Plan) SAP (Sampling Analysis Plan) Frequency Frequency Purging Purging Pumps and Bailers Pumps and Bailers.
Vapor Intrusion Evaluation Strategy and Modeling Developments
Overview of US EPA’s Vapor Intrusion Guidance VAP CP Summer Coffee July 14 th, 2015 Carrie Rasik Ohio EPA CO- Risk Assessor
Enviromental aspects of Brownfield Regeneration Barbara Vojvodíková, Marcela Maturová „This project has been funded with support from the European Commission.
Of Massachusetts Department ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION Soil Vapor Intrusion... A Decade of Regulatory Requirements & Experiences Paul W. Locke MA DEP Bureau.
Gradient CORPORATION Vapor Intrusion Attenuation Factors (AFs) – Measured vs. EPA Defaults A Case Study Presented by Manu Sharma and Jennifer DeAscentis.
DTSC VAPOR INTRUSION GUIDANCE California Industrial Hygiene Council 16 th Annual Conference Dan Gallagher Department of Toxic Substances Control California.
Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop A Study of Vapor Intrusion Modeling in the Context of EPA’s Guidance The 20 th Annual International Conference on Soils,
Review of Work Plan for Leaded Gasoline Tank Bottom Disposal Pit Assessment and Interim Stabilization Measures Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain.
History and Cleanup at Chemical Commodities, Inc. Jeff Field US EPA Region 7 1.
GROUND WATER MONITORING TO EVALUATE EFFECTS OF LAND USE ON WATER QUALITY Mike Trojan Erin Eid Jennifer Maloney Jim Stockinger Minnesota Pollution Control.
Monitored Natural Attenuation and Risk-Based Corrective Action at Underground Storage Tanks Sites Mike Trombetta Department of Environmental Quality Environmental.
SITE STATUS UPDATE TOP STOP PETROLEUM RELEASE SITE GUNNISION, UTAH Morgan Atkinson – Division of Environmental Response and Remediation, Project Manager.
USEPA Region 2 Vapor Intrusion Study Cayuga Groundwater Contamination Site March 4, 2009.
Review of Current Conditions Report and Work Plan for Area 1 Presented by The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Technical Outreach Services for Communities.
1 of 39 The EPA 7-Step DQO Process Step 3 - Identify Inputs (45 minutes) Presenter: Sebastian Tindall Day 2 DQO Training Course Module 3.
Sheen Characterization 2009 Data and Observations July 2010 Progress Meeting McCormick & Baxter Superfund Site Portland, Oregon.
© 2008 Fox Rothschild MANDATORY GOVERNMENTAL REQUIREMENTS AND INCENTIVES: VAPOR INTRUSION June 25, 2008 By David Restaino, Esq. and Burton J. Jaffe, Esq.
Potential Addition of Vapor Intrusion to the Hazard Ranking System U.S. EPA Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response February 24, 2011 Listening Session.
Area I Burn Pit Santa Susana Field Laboratory RCRA Facility Investigation Work Plan February 19, 2008 Laura Rainey, P.G. Senior Engineering Geologist California.
1 Analytical Services Program Workshop September 2015 Data Usability Applications and Importance Kelly Black Statistician / President.
Today’s Topics Hartford Iron site assessment Cleanup to date Cleanup steps to come What can you do.
Today’s Lecture  Groundwater sampling. Announcements  Lecture  today: groundwater sampling  Thursday: HAZWOP – quiz (Bruce)  Lab  Lab 1: Phase I.
Greener Cleanups in the Region 10 PCB Program Michelle, Mullin R10 PCB Coordinator Clu-In Webinar November 17, 2015.
William Telliard U.S. EPA Office of Science and Technology
AMPS 2003 AMPS Delegates: All Member States and 10 Candidate Countries AMPS 1 February 2002 Drafting group: Table of existing methods EAF (4)-05/02/JRC-IES.
2650 East 40 th Avenue Denver, Colorado GROUND WATER SAMPLING WATER LEVEL & PRESSURE WATER SAMPLE FILTRATION GROUND WATER REMEDIATION.
Charge Questions for Expert Panel Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, and Water October 19, 2004 Amherst,
FAIR Meeting April 6, Groundwater Results – Fall 2003 Benzene ND 1,000 ug/L Product.
By Alex Walton Josh Bush Alex Walton, Josh Bush1.
Closing Session Modeling Vapor Attenuation Workshop Annual International Conference on Soils, Sediments, and Water October 19, 2004 Amherst, MA.
1. 2 Presentation Highlights BGOU overview Scope of the Remedial Investigation Investigation results Schedule 2.
1 FORMER COS COB POWER PLANT From Characterization to Redevelopment Brownfields2006 November 14, 2006.
Marshall Landfill Site.  Patrick Cabbage, Hydrogeologist/Site Manager  Bill Fees, Engineer  Carol Bergin, Public Involvement Coordinator.
Long-Term Management of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater – Iwilei District, Honolulu April 16, 2015.
 Clean Water Act 404 permit  Ohio EPA Division of Surface Water 401 water quality certification  Ohio Revised Code 6111 – Placement of dredged materials.
Setting the requirements for a method (including aspects of MU) Bertil Magnusson, SP Technical Research Institute of Sweden.
Risk CHARACTERIZATION
Proposed Plan for No Further Action
Environment and Climate Change Presentation to the Nunavut Water Board Regarding Doris North Project Type A Water Licence Amendment Application Nunavut.
Presented by Harry C. Elinsky, Jr. Filtech, Inc.
East Hennepin Avenue Site
Jay Peters Gina M. Plantz Richard J. Rago
RINGWOOD MINES/LANDFILL SITE PUBLIC MEETING December 6, 2016
Hold Your Breath—Ohio EPA’s TCE Initiative
Objectives Provide an overview of the triad approach and its application Describe the elements of the triad approach for practical application Describe.
FAQs for Evaluating the Soil-to-Groundwater Pathway
Gianniantonio Petruzzelli Francesca Pedron
VI Issues: Lessons Learned
Presentation transcript:

DRAFT Field Sampling Guidance To be used this field season by DEC and consultants Initial focus on soil, groundwater, and vapor intrusion Future versions to include remediation system and outdoor air sampling, surface water and sediment sampling

DRAFT Field Sampling Guidance Soliciting ideas for the document Living document For this field season-comments needed by March 15 th Are you on our List Serve?

Soil Sampling General guidelines Field screening Soil analytical sample collection Soil sampling equipment

Excavated Soil Sample Collection Guide Previous requirement: Field screening 1 per 10 CY. For untreated stockpile 2 lab samples for 0-50 CY, plus 1 lab sample per additional 50 CY or portion thereof. For treated stockpile 5 lab samples for CY, 7 lab for CY, 10 lab for CY, and 10+1 lab per 500 CY or portion thereof for CY (or as the department determines necessary)

Surface/Excavation Soil Sample Collection Guide Previous requirement: At least 1 field screening for every 100 sq ft of excavation bottom. For sidewalls, assess where contamination is most likely present. 2 lab samples for sq ft + 1 lab sample for each additional 250 sq ft or portion thereof.

Groundwater Sampling General groundwater sampling requirements Drinking water sampling and analysis Groundwater analytical sample collection (including no purge and passive groundwater sampling for VOCs) Groundwater sampling equipment (Bailers and peristaltic pumps not recommended for VOCs)

Air Sampling Vapor Intrusion DEC’s Draft Vapor Intrusion Guidance

Quality Control Measures Field documentation- include complete copy of field notes in reports Instrument calibration General sample collection QC Equipment decontamination Chain-of-Custody, sample handling, and shipment

Appendices A – References B – Initial comparison for selecting appropriate field screening method C – Technical and logistical screening method comparison D – Soil, sediment, sludge, and fill sample collection E – Groundwater, surface water, marine water, drinking water, and waste sample collection F – Determination of sampling and lab analysis for petroleum in soil and groundwater G – Summary of analytical methods for soil gas, indoor and ambient air samples

App. F: Determination of sampling and laboratory analysis for soils and groundwater Previous requirement: For any sample, if the sum of the hydrocarbon fractions (i.e. DRO, GRO, RRO) are greater than 500 mg/kg then PAH analysis was required. The other red highlighted areas were only required on a site specific basis previously. 7 For each source area, PAH analysis must be performed on a percentage on the samples with the highest DRO, RRO, GRO, concentrations to determine if PAHs are contaminants of concern. In general 10% are recommended for site characterization. If PAH concentrations are less than applicable cleanup levels, further PAH analysis is generally not required. PAHs should be sampled in groundwater if soil sample concentrations are above applicable cleanup levels and groundwater sampling is required.

Draft Field Sampling Guidance Questions?

Documented affects on VOCs Section A, page 46, loss of dissolved gasses due to vacuum. ASTM D7353- “Peristaltic pumps use a vacuum to transport the samples. This vacuum may cause some degassing and loss of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from the sample.” “Recent research focusing on the comparison of different types of ground-water sampling equipment demonstrates that significant loss of volatile organic compounds may occur when bailers are used to sample ground water (Pearsall and Eckhardt, 1987; Yeskis et al., 1988; Tai et al., 1991; Pohlmann et al., undated).” According to a study conducted by Barker and Dickhout (1988) to evaluate the loss of volatile organic analytes from groundwater ….”the peristaltic pump provided samples with a significant negative bias (9 to 33 percent lower) relative to the bladder pump and inertial-lift pump methods.” Regarding Bailers- …[VOC] …results may be biased low (due to aeration) and metals analytical results may be biased high (due to turbidity).