CCD testing Enver Alagoz 12 April 2010. CCD testing goals CCD testing is to learn how to – do dark noise characterization – do gain measurements – determine.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A flat fielding primer Pete Kalajian NEAIC 2010.
Advertisements

CMSC 2006 Orlando Active Alignment System for the LSST William J. Gressler LSST Project National Optical Astronomy Observatory (NOAO) Scott Sandwith New.
Parameters to choose the CCD The CCD test bench *Temperature range : -55 to +40°C. *Stabilization : < 0.05°C/hour. *5 temperature probes : CCD and electronics.
Cameras for scientific experiments A brave attempt to give an overview of the different types and their pros & cons Grouptalk Optical Sciences, may
CHARGE COUPLING TRUE CDS PIXEL PROCESSING True CDS CMOS pixel noise data 2.8 e- CMOS photon transfer.
CCDs in Astronomy History of CCDs How do CCDs work ?
Astronomical Detectors
Preliminary Performance Measurements for Streak Camera with Large-Format Direct-Coupled CCD Readout* 15th Topical Conference on High-Temperature Plasma.
Mid-IR photon counting array using HgCdTe APDs and the Medipix2 ROIC
SDW20051 Vincent Lapeyrère LESIA – Observatoire de Paris Calibration of flight model CCDs for CoRoT mission.
CCD Image Processing: Issues & Solutions. Correction of Raw Image with Bias, Dark, Flat Images Flat Field Image Bias Image Output Image Dark Frame Raw.
Charge-Coupled Device (CCD)
Signal vs Noise: Image Calibration First… some terminology:  Light Frame: The individual pictures you take of your target.  Dark Frame: An image taken.
Overview of Scientific Imaging using CCD Arrays Jaal Ghandhi Mechanical Engineering Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison.
EMVA 1288 ITE 2008 M. Wäny CMOS IMAGE SENSORS Clear definitions for a clear VISION EMVA 1288 Standard for Measurement and Presentation of.
Page 1 Lecture 10 1: Project “Starter” activity, continued 2: Detectors and the Signal to Noise Ratio Claire Max Astro 289, UC Santa Cruz February 7, 2013.
Different sources of noise in EM-CCD cameras
Measurement of the absolute efficiency,
AST3 detector properties
Photon detection Visible or near-visible wavelengths
Limits on Reciprocity Failure in 1.7  m cut-off NIR astronomical detectors Wolfgang Lorenzon T. Biesiadzinski, R. Newman, M. Schubnell, G. Tarle, C. Weaverdyck.
ISUAL Sprite Imager Electronic Design Stewart Harris.
Photon Transfer Method 1. Using two identical flat field exposures it is possible to measure the read noise of a CCD with the Photon Transfer method. Two.
Topic 8: Calibrating your system Arne Henden Director, AAVSO
Corner Raft Test Station Kirk Arndt, Ian Shipsey Purdue University LSST Camera Workshop SLAC Sept , 2008.
1 K. Gilmore - SDW The Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) Status Summary Kirk Gilmore SLAC/KIPAC.
Low Light Level CCDs (LLLCCD) A new idea from Marconi (EEV) to reduce or eliminate CCD read-out noise.
Measurement Results Detector concept works! Flood fields show MCP fixed pattern noise that divides out Spatial resolution consistent with theory (Nyqvist.
CCD Detectors CCD=“charge coupled device” Readout method:
Telescope Guiding with a HyViSI H2RG Used in Guide Mode Lance Simms Detectors for Astronomy /2/09.
Performances of the COROT CCDs for high accuracy photometry Pernelle Bernardi and the CCD team From Meudon : Tristan Buey, Vincent Lapeyrere, Régis Schmidt,
Testing and characterizing the CCDs of the OmegaCam wide-angle camera F. Christen 2, C. Cavadore 1, B. Gaillard, O. Iwert 1, K. Kuijken 2, D. Baade 1,
Zone Plate Testing at 1-BM-B Preliminary Results Michael J. Wojcik, Shashidhara Marathe, Naresh Gandhi Kujala,
Solar-B SOT/FPP 1 SOT April 2006Ted Tarbell FPP CCD Camera Performance Ted Tarbell 17-Apr-2006.
Eusoballoon optics test Baptiste Mot, Gilles Roudil, Camille Catalano, Peter von Ballmoos Test configuration Calibration of the light beam Exploration.
10/26/20151 Observational Astrophysics I Astronomical detectors Kitchin pp
CDE CDR, September 14, 2004 Your Position, Your Name 1 GATS AIM Science Team Meeting January 23-24, 2007 CIPS Calibration Review, Aimee Merkel, Bill McClintock.
September 16, 2008LSST Camera F2F1 Camera Calibration Optical Configurations and Calculations Keith Bechtol Andy Scacco Allesandro Sonnenfeld.
Astronomical Institute University of Bern 31th IADC Meeting, April , 2013, ESOC, Darmstadt, Germany Improved Space Object Observation Techniques.
1 Optical observations of asteroids – and the same for space debris… Dr. D. Koschny European Space Agency Chair of Astronautics, TU Munich Stardust school.
Novel Semi-Transparent Optical Position Sensors for high-precision alignment monitoring applications Sandra Horvat, F.Bauer, V.Danielyan, H.Kroha Max-Planck-Institute.
TIPS - Oct 13, 2005 M. Sirianni Temperature change for ACS CCDs: initial study on scientific performance M. Sirianni, T. Wheeler, C.Cox, M. Mutchler, A.
Tests of spectrometer screens Introduction Layout Procedure Results Conclusions L. Deacon, B. Biskup, S. Mazzoni, M.Wing et. al. AWAKE collaboration meeting,
Physics 114: Lecture 8 Measuring Noise in Real Data Dale E. Gary NJIT Physics Department.
14 January Observational Astronomy SPECTROSCOPIC data reduction Piskunov & Valenti 2002, A&A 385, 1095.
Optical Receivers Theory and Operation
Basic Detector Measurements: Photon Transfer Curve, Read Noise, Dark Current, Intrapixel Capacitance, Nonlinearity, Reference Pixels MR – May 19, 2014.
LSST Photometric Calibration D. Burke SLAC/KIPAC DOE SLAC Program Review June 6-7, 2006.
Charts for TPF-C workshop SNR for Nulling Coronagraph and Post Coron WFS M. Shao 9/28/06.
Photodetection EDIT Absolute Measurement of the Quantum Efficiency of a Classical PMT Task: measure the QE of a PMT in the wavelength interval 200 to 800.
Instrument Control System Seminar, 20 th -24 th October rd Generation TCCD at ESO P. Duhoux, ESO/DoE/CSE.
Cameras For Microscopy Ryan McGorty 26 March 2013.
Digital Cameras in Microscopy Kurt Thorn Nikon Imaging QB3/UCSF.
Topic Report Photodetector and CCD
Binomial Distribution Possion Distribution Gaussian Distribution Lorentzian Distribution Error Analysis.
1 Topic Report Photodetector and CCD Tuan-Shu Ho.
CCD Calibrations Eliminating noise and other sources of error.
Digital Light Sources First introduced in 2001.
Relative Spectral Response and Flat Fields with Internal Calibration Lamps Luisa M. Lara IAA-CSIC Granada (SPAIN)
Detector development for
Charge Transfer Efficiency of Charge Coupled Device
IR detector for demonstrator and Readout
LSST Camera Detector Status
Detector development for
Detective Quantum Efficiency Preliminary Design Review
LSST Photometric Calibration
Technical Intro to Digital Astrophotography Part 1
Image calibration Geoff Smith, September 2018.
Modern Observational/Instrumentation Techniques Astronomy 500
IN5350 – CMOS Image Sensor Design
Presentation transcript:

CCD testing Enver Alagoz 12 April 2010

CCD testing goals CCD testing is to learn how to – do dark noise characterization – do gain measurements – determine quantum efficiency These experiences will be useful for the LSST wavefront and guider sensor studies at Purdue

CCD testing setup

Apogee CCD camera 12 V power USB control Upgradeable firmware 16 bit digitization TEC cooling (dT = 50 C) Fans for heat-sink RTD under chip and on heat-sink CCD sensor sealed in a inner chamber filled with gas Argon 25 mm opening window Mechanical shutter power USB shutter Kodak KAF-0402ME 768x512 pixels (9x9 μm 2 ) Saturation: 102 K electrons At T CCD = -31 °C Gain [e-/ADU] = 1.6 Readnoise 10.3 e-’s Bias: 2633 counts Dark: 0.03 e-/pixel/sec Microlenses to enhance QE at λ < 600 nm

Kodak CCD QE T CCD = 25 °C QE measurements of Kodak before Apogee camera assembly Micro lenses enhances QE at λ < 600 nm Micro lenses enhances QE at λ < 600 nm poly-Si gate

Camera window reflectance Camera window has 2x fuse silica coated with Broad Band Anti-Reflection (BBAR)

Bias level

Bias and dark measurements - Bias - Dark+Bias

ADU = Analog digital unit Dark measurements

Readout noise Gaussian fit Two bias frames with zero time exposure Subtract from each other and get the readout noise R C = σ/sqrt(2) R C = 6.3 ADU = 10.1 electrons

Light measurements Tungsten lamp 100 W power λ = 580 nm

Gain N C (N E ) = signal noise [ADU] ([e - ]) g = gain [e - /ADU] S C (S E ) = signal [ADU] ([e - ]) σ E = photon noise σ o,C (σ o,E ) = flat field noise [ADU] ([e - ]) R C (R E ) = readout noise [ADU] ([e - ]) Slope of S C as a function of N 2 C is g Using photon statistics

Variance Illumination images A and B Mean signals: S A and S B Ratio: R = S A /S B Multiplication: R x image (B) Subtraction: image (A) – image (B) Take σ 2 /2.0 of residual histogram = variance Plot S versus variance Repeat for all time exposures

Variance

Gain: variance vs mean signal Dark frames are subtracted 100x100 pixels window Gain = 1/slope

Gain T CCD = -20 °C

Optical power measurements

QE Calculation I is mean image for a given wavelength [ADU] D is dark count [ADU] G is gain per wavelength [e-/ADU] W is CCD window transmission per wavelength [%] PD power is the optical power measured by PIN diode [W] Pix area is the single CCD pixel area [m 2 ] PD area is the PIN diode area [m 2 ] T exp is the time exposure [sec] E γ is the single photon energy per wavelength [Joule]

Photons on CCD Measure power from PIN diode Normalize power to CCD pixel area Calculate single photon energy E γ = ħν where ħ = 6.63x [J.s] and ν = c[m/s]/λ[nm] E γ = 1.989x / λ [J] Calculate number of photons on a CCD pixel Etotal [J] = Pin power [W] x time exposure [s] E total /E γ = # of γ’s per CCD pixel area

QE (per pixel/sec) Expected measurements from Kodak (T CCD = 25 °C)

ErrorSourceEffectError in % Wavelength (λ) - Monochromator: 1.wavelength settings 2.wavelength calibration - Bandwidth is out of range of PIN diode responsivity Wrong QE <= 0.1 BiasBias and image data with different clocksWrong QE Pixel windowBadly chosen pixel windowWrong QE I(λ)1.Bad image (e.g. too low signal) 2.Contaminated CCD 3.Non linear CCD behavior 4.CCD is distance from integrating sphere exit port Wrong QE T exp 1.Software latency (15 ms) 2.PC clock latency (?) 3.Shutter latency&integration time (20 ms) Wrong QE PD power 1.Current measurement error 2.Calibration error Wrong QE 5 Window1.Window transmission errorWrong QE<= 0.6 GWrong gainWrong QE Error budget

Next QE measurements at +25 °C to validate results Dark and bias measurements -30 °C Optical light system error budget Write up measurements and methods for a LSST document Plan to use optical setup with WFS testbed …

BACKUP SLIDES

QE Each blue line represents QE results for a time exposure ( sec with 0.5 sec steps)

Integrating sphere Light exit port 4” Detector port 0.5” Light input port 1” Integrated sphere 12” PIN & detector port adaptor 5 PM 1 PM11 AM 8 AM

Photodiodes Two calibrated photodiodes (# 381 and # 384) mm diameter 1 cm2 active area Calibration accuracy ? Wavelength [nm] Responsivity 381 [A/W] Responsivity 384 [A/W] Difference [%]

Photodiode calibration Diodes were calibrated before shipped to Purdue (Ref. Newport) PIN 384 PIN 381

Light power measurements Dark box PIN Sphere exit port PIN displacements

Light power measurements Power measured At 50.8 mm from sphere exit port with: PIN 381 is nW PIN 384 is nW At CCD position 508 mm with: PIN 381 is 11.8 nW PIN 384 is 11.5 nW PIN 381 measured nW at sphere detector port (0 mm) PIN 384 measured nW at sphere detector port (0 mm)

Wavelength scan