M. Chatib Basri Institute for Economic and Social Research Faculty of Economics University of Indonesia Keeping Trade Policy Open: The case of Indonesia
Outline Questions to be addressed Indonesia’s export performance Trend of trade protection Factors determine the change of trade protection over time How to keep trade policy open
Question to be addressed How conflict over trade policy takes place in Indonesia? How to keep trade policy open?
Current trade performance
Exports performance: mainly driven by commodity prices Constant pricesCurrent price Price effect Growth Categories * 90- ' ' '06 Oil/Gas Rubber Coffee & Cocoa Minerals Copper Nickel and Tin
Constant pricesCurrent price Price effect Growth Categories * 90-' ' '06 Total non- oil/gas Labor intensive manufactured exports Textiles & footwear Furniture Total-labor intensive manuf
Trend of trade protection: Indonesia’s protection is low Cited from :Rebuilding Indonesia’s Export competitiveness, World Bank (2005)
Structure of tariff Tariff Weighted tariff* Mean Std. DevMean Std. Dev Sector: agriculture mining manufacturing Goods: consumer goods intermediate goods capital goods *Weighted by import value Source: MOIT Cited from :Rebuilding Indonesia’s Export competitiveness, World Bank (2005)
Tariff has declined and dispersion has improved Cited from :Rebuilding Indonesia’s Export competitiveness, World Bank (2005)
Trade reform pre crisis Combination of the drop in oil price and the rupiah’s devaluation raised the price ratio of traded to non-traded goods, thus raised the profitability of all other non-oil traded sectors. Technocrats won support from Soeharto The role of media, academic
Various contending groups in Indonesia’s trade policy Ministry of Finance: tends to support trade liberalization Ministry of Trade: tends to support trade liberalizaton Ministry of Agriculture: tends to be protectionist Ministry of Industry: tends to be protectionist KADIN (Indonesia Chamber of Commerce): unclear Industry association, unclear Media: tends to be protectionist Academics: majority tend to be protectionist Fragmentation decision making process
Creeping protectionism? Raising wages and rigidity in the labour market Raising wages and rigidity in the labour market High cost economy High cost economy Appreciation of rupiah Appreciation of rupiah High commodity price in the international market tend to push government to impose export tax High commodity price in the international market tend to push government to impose export tax Tend to blame the economic liberalization as the cause of economic crisis; economic nationalism
Case of Rice: Poverty and rice price Source: Basri and Patunru, 2006; World Bank 2006
Trend of new export tax? Case of Coal (has been phased out) Case of Coal (has been phased out) Case of CPO Case of CPO Case of natural gas Case of natural gas
Unilateral, multilateral or FTA? Unilateral: strong pressure for trade protection Multilateral: prospect of WTO and DDA ? FTA: - 2 nd best solution for reform? - Rule of origin issues? - Low rate of utilization - Divert the focus from multilateral
How to keep trade policy open Keep inflation low Reduce high cost economy: economic deregulation Revise the current labour law The role of media, success story
Thank you
Severance payments and lay-off procedures are perceived as the most severe constraints Labor problems are more severe for export oriented firms and large firms Source: LPEM, 2006
Cost to handle labor problems has increased from 3.7% to 4.6% of production cost About 35% of respondents stated that labor regulations reduce their firms’ competitiveness (slightly higher than the previous survey value of 30%) Source: LPEM, 2006
Logistics Costs in Indonesia LPEM/JBIC
Informal Payments to Government Officials Informal payments to government officials have slightly declined Frequency of harassment visits by government officials remains unchanged: on average firms are visited 15 times in 6 months the most frequent visits are from police/military 21 Source: LPEM, 2006
Appreciation in the RER increase the demand for trade protection Shock To Respons e In Cumulative IRF up to 1 period4 periods8 periods DLPOILDLAVT DLRERDLAVT Source: Basri and Hill, 2004