TOM FLYNN BARRISTER–AT-LAW 1 ENFORCEMENT OF EU ENVIRONMENTAL LAW.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Enforcement issues, including status of ITU-T Recommendations APT-ITU workshop on the International Telecommunications Regulations Bangkok, 6-8 February.
Advertisements

Administrative Law Chapter 13 Notice and Discovery Audi Alteram Partem (Hear the Other Side) David J. Mullan By: Heddy Cordova.
Chapter 1 Legal Framework Affecting Public Schools
Last Topic - Natural Justice
Prof. Jan H. Jans EU and Aarhus Jurisdictional Cmpetition?
Federal Court Procedure – Aboriginal Law Case Study A.2 Federal Court Workshop CBA Legal Conference 2014 St. John’s Newfoundland.
JUDICIAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION-MAKING SEPTEMBER 30, 2013.
Columns Picture here Reflections on the Future of Environmental Justice in Ireland Áine 3 April 2014 #envucc2014.
Columns Picture here Access to Information & Enforcement at Member State Level Áine Ryall Maastricht, 30 June #AarhusMaastricht.
Columns Picture here Aarhus Convention & Irish Environmental Law: Key Points & Potential Impact Áine Ryall Dublin, 4 February 2014.
6228v2 Grounds for refusing recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards Justin Williams.
1 27 Sep Access to Justice in DK Implementation of the Aarhus Convention in Denmark Ratified on the 29th September 2000 Costs of implementation –
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
Columns Picture here Environmental Justice in Ireland: Problems & Prospects Áine Ryall.
Access to Justice in the Public Participation Context Aarhus Convention, Article 9(2) Áine Ryall School of Law, University College Cork, IRELAND Warsaw,
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 7.
Introduction to EU Law Cont.d. ECJ – TFI (Arts ) “The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, each within its jurisdiction, shall ensure.
European Convention on Human Rights Act 2003: Five Years On Aspects of the impact of the ECHRA on the right to a fair trial and the right to an effective.
Legal status of CMS circulars Paul Midlane. Confused? Performance based incentives for managed healthcare is not permitted CMS indaba cancelled Supporting.
EC Study on the Implementation of Articles 9.3 and 9.4 of the Aarhus Convention in the EU Presentation at the 5th meeting of the Task Force on Access to.
Human Rights Act 1998 The European convention on human rights The European convention on human rights The Convention rights The Convention rights How does.
LITIGATION COSTS IN CIVIL AND ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS IN ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS AND PRINCIPLE OF OBJECTIVE INVESTIGATION MARTA OŠLEJA LEGAL DEPARTMENT,
Judicial Review Judicial review –means by which courts control the exercise of governmental power –ensure that public bodies (government departments; local.
Public Law Remedies Judicial Review. Introduction Part 54 Civil Procedure Rules Procedure The remedies available.
Course: Law of the European Union [5] Administrative and judicial procedures in the European Union Filip Křepelka,
APPLICATION FOR ACCESS (PAIA) Mandatory protection (which must be refused in terms of Chap 4 subject to S46) DENIAL OF ACCESS (PAIA) Internal Appeal to.
Fifth Meeting of the Access to Justice Task Force June 13 th – 14 th, 2012 Geneva.
The Aarhus Convention and Access to Justice in Ireland Where are we now? Michael Ewing Coordinator of the Environmental Pillar
Article 9, paras.1 and 2 of the Aarhus Convention: overview “IMPLEMENTING THE AARHUS CONVENTION TODAY: PAVING THE WAY TO A BETTER ENVIRONMENT AND GOVERNANCE.
Small claims procedure Regulation (EC) No 861/2007of European Parlament and of the Council of 11 July establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ.
Drafting Instructions Presentation to the Ministry of Natural Resources, Government of the Turks and Caicos Islands By Professor Tom Johnson York University.
School Law and the Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders, 5e © 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 1 Legal Framework.
Public law governs:  relationships between individuals and the state/government; and  the structure, administration and operation of the state/government.
1 Workshop on the Directive 96/61/EC concerning (IPPC) Integrated pollution prevention and control INFRA Public participation & access to environmental.
Court of Justice of the European Union
Opole University1 Jerzy Jendrośka Public participation in the findings of the Compliance Committee The Aarhus Convention Expert Group on Public Participation.
Environmental Impact Assessment of public and private projects EIA Directive 85/337/EEC as amended by 97/11/EC and 2003/35/EC Recent developments Laura.
Lecturer: Miljen Matijašević Session 7, 30 April 2014.
The Aarhus Convention and the Access to Justice Pillar: Article 9.3 Stephen Stec Tirana, November 2008.
The EU and Access to Environmental Information Unit D4 European Commission, Directorate General for the Environment 1.
Cases C-401 to 403/12 and C-404 to 405/12: No review of legality in light of the Aarhus Convention Dr. Mariolina Eliantonio, LL.M. Prof. Chris Backes Maastricht.
EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS Regional protection of human rights.
European Law in the Case- law of the Constitutional Court of Latvia Kristine Kruma.
LECTURE 11 ICJ INTERNATIONAL COURT OF JUSTICE The statute of the ICJ consists of 70 articles and is annexed to the UN Charter. A UN member is an automatic.
Environmental justice in Czech Republic & Poland.
THE ROLE OF COURTS AND TRIBUNALS IN ENHANCING ACCESS TO JUSTICE IN ENVIRONMENTAL LITIGATION SEVENTH ANNUAL COLLOQUIUM OF THE IUCN ACADEMY OF ENVIRONMENTAL.
Legal Foundations of European Union Law II Tutorials Karima Amellal.
Key challenges in implementing access to justice
PCO’s & Planning & Environmental Law
THE NEW GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION: A EUROPEAN OR A GLOBAL STANDARD? Bart van der Sloot Senior Researcher Tilburg Institute for Law, Technology,
Administrative law Ch1 scope and Nature of Administrative Law.
(Portfolio Committee on Justice and Correctional Services)
Filip Křepelka, Masarykova univerzita
Principles of Administrative Law <Instructor Name>
Chapter 1 Legal Framework Affecting Public Schools
ICASA AMENDMENT BILL Vodacom’s Presentation to the
Data protection issues in regulatory investigations
Chapter 1 Legal Framework Affecting Public Schools
Private and Public law lesson 4 The European integration process and the European legal order (overview)
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
Judicial Review and Planning Update
Access to Justice in Environmental Matters
European actions.
Function of the International Court of Justice (ICJ):
Sources of Law Legislature – makes law Executive – enforces law
Private and Public law lesson 4 The European integration process and the European legal order (overview)
Public Participation in Czech Republic
Article 9 of theAarhus Convention: overview
Access to Environmental Justice: the ongoing Influence of EU Law
Presentation transcript:

TOM FLYNN BARRISTER–AT-LAW 1 ENFORCEMENT OF EU ENVIRONMENTAL LAW

Introduction 2 Effective enforcement of EU environmental law in Ireland a persistent multidimensional problem Key problem is with access to courts to secure enforcement of EU environmental law with the costs of legal proceedings a particular issue. Impact of Aarhus Convention & EU Law

Aarhus Convention (AC) 3 AC imposes a number of obligations on parties in respect of public participation in environmental decisions, which include: an obligation to ensure that members of the public have access to administrative /judicial procedures to challenge acts and omissions by private persons and public authorities which contravene provisions of its national law relating to the environment such procedures must provide adequate and effective remedies, including injunctive relief as appropriate, and be fair, equitable, timely and not be prohibitively expensive

Aarhus Convention & EU Law 4 EU ratified AC & enacted measures to incorporate it into EU Law Directive 2003/35/EC on Public Participation amended EIA & IPPC Directive by inclusion of ‘access to justice clause’ i.e. ‘Not probhitively expensive’ requirement Directive 2003/04 on public access to environmental information enacted. Krizan (Case C- 416/10) LZ (Case C-240/09) AC has force in domestic law through the scope of application of EU law

Implementing/Transposing AC into Irish Law 5 Has/is proving problematic First moves - AIE Regulations/PDA 2006 s.50A C-427/07 in Commission v Ireland – existing discretionary costs rules in breach of EU law PDA B - special costs rule further amended by EMPA. EMPA- Part II – s.3 – new special costs rules applies to certain civil cases as set out in s.4. Requirement that judicial notice be taken of the Aarhus Convention

Status of the Aarhus Convention in the domestic law of Ireland 6 Kimpton Vale Developments Ltd v An Bord Pleanala – Hogan J Oireachtas has not chosen to legislate directly to provide that the Aarhus Convention forms part of the law of the State, or to specify it would be enforceable in domestic law under certain conditions contained in the transposing legislation itself. AC has binding force as part of the domestic law of State it is only by virtue of the force of and within the proper scope of application of EU law EMPA should be interpreted in a manner which best gives effect to the corresponding provisions of the AC What is the nature & extent of the interpretative obligation ?

Scope of application of s.3 of EMPA 7 S.4(1)(a)(b) –not apply where court proceedings are brought to ensure compliance with planning or environment law in a situation where– in other words in the case no planning permission, consent or licence has been obtained i.e. only applies where there is an existing permission Appears this was clearly the intention of the Oireachtas from Dail Debates s.3 EMPA applies to certain JR proceedings s.3 not apply to proceedings instigated by public authorities

Hunter v Nuerendale Ltd t/a Panda Waste 8 Scope of application of s.3 EMPA considered in context of s.160 proceedings in Hunter - Hedigan J “The fact that the applicant claims both the failure to comply with planning permission and the absence of planning permission in the same set of proceedings does not appear to me to take the case out of s. 3. In any event, because s.4 refers to the enforcement of a statutory requirement, it appears to me that s. 3 would cover a situation where there was no planning permission in existence because that would be a situation where there had been a failure to comply with the statutory requirement”

Procedure under s.7 of EMPA 9 Application for determination that s.3 applies may be made at any time before, or during the course of, the proceedings Application made on motion – ex parte application not possible - Supreme Crt - Re Coffey’s Application [2013] IESC 31, In Re Maher [2012] IEHC 445. The grant of a declaration under s.7 is discretionary – what factors should the court take into account ? Is a declaration under s.7 is irreversible ?

Procedure under s.7 of the EMPA - Hunter 10 Hunter [ Para 16] proceedings should be brought by motion on notice supported by an affidavit of the applicant which should set out- 1. broadly the expenses involved in such an application would be; 2. a broad statement of the claimant's financial situation; 3. the reasons why he believes that there is a reasonable prospect of success; 4. set out clearly what is at stake for the claimant and for the protection of the environment; 5. deal with any possible claim of frivolous proceedings, should that arise; and 6. applicant should deal with the existence of any possible legal aid scheme or any contingency arrangement in relation to costs that may have been made with their solicitors.

Relationship between s.3 of EMPA and s.50B 11 S.50B of PDA applies special costs rule to limited categories of cases: EIA/SEA/IPPC – cases J.C. Savage Supermarket Limited v An Bord Pleanála Shillelagh Quarries Limited v An Board Pleanala – impacted by the EMPA ? s.6(a) EMPA new costs rule apply to “proceedings in the High Court by way of judicial review or of seeking leave to apply for judicial review, of proceedings referred to in s. 4 or s.5”. Kimpton Vale – in summary no - JC Savage applies

Procedure under s.7 of the EMPA 12 Hunter requirements taken from CJEU decision in Edwards (para 45) Obiter ? – possibly - but in practice must be complied with at least on a without prejudice basis Open to criticism that they have no statutory basis & conflate s.7 declaration with an application for a PCO order May be difficult to operate in practice Rules of Court needed ?

AC & Legal Representation 13 Does the AC Convention have any impact on the right to be represented by a non-lawyer ? General rule must be represented by lawyer or may represent yourself – non-parties have no right of audience In Re Coffey [2013] IESC Feb 2013 Rule is not altered by the AC convention – “The fundamental rule is that the only persons who enjoy a right of audience before our courts are the parties themselves, when not legally represented, a solicitor duly and properly instructed by a party and counsel duly instructed by a solicitor to appear for a party”

AC & Legal Capacity to bring proceedings 14 Sandymount & Merrion Residents Association v An Bord Pleanala & others (Supreme Crt. 27/11/2013). Does a residents association have legal capacity to bring JR proceedings ? The traditional position, at common law, is that an unincorporated body does not have legal personality and, thus, cannot bring either a public or private law action - this can be altered by statute S. 50A of PDA 2000 provides standing for certain ENGO’s organisations/bodies which meet certain criteria Not disputed residents association met criteria under s.50A of PDA

AC & Legal capacity to bring proceedings 15 “50A(3) The Court shall not grant section 50 leave unless it is satisfied that— (a) there are substantial grounds for contending that the decision or act concerned is invalid or ought to be quashed, and (b) (i) the applicant has a sufficient interest in the matter which is the subject of the application, or (ii) where the decision or act concerned relates to a development identified in or under regulations made under section 176, for the time being in force, as being development which may have significant effects on the environment, the applicant— (I) is a body or organisation (other than a State authority, a public authority or governmental body or agency) the aims or objectives of which relate to the promotion of environmental protection, (II) has, during the period of 12 months preceding the date of the application, pursued those aims or objectives, and (III) satisfies such requirements (if any) as a body or organisation, if it were to make an appeal under section 37(4)(c), would have to satisfy by virtue of section 37(4)(d)(iii) (and, for this purpose, any requirement prescribed under section 37(4)(e)(iv) shall apply as if the reference in it to the class of matter into which the decision, the subject of the appeal, falls were a reference to the class of matter into which the decision or act, the subject of the application for section 50 leave, falls).”

AC & Capacity to bring legal proceedings 16 Clarke J, referred to AC, the Public Participation Directive & the wording of s.50A of the PDA and concluded that: “on its proper construction, s. 50A of the 2000 Act (as amended) carried with it a necessary implication that there is thereby provided an exception to the general rule that unincorporated bodies and associations do not have the capacity to bring legal proceedings. Within the parameters of the types of proceedings referred to in the section bodies complying with the criteria therein specified have, in my view, both capacity and standing to bring proceedings” Minister is empowered by s.50A to bring in regulations to regulate the types of bodies which may bring proceedings subject to compliance with the Public Participation Directive

Outstanding Issues 17 Law evolving, uncertain and unsatisfactory Will decision in Hunter re scope of s.3 of the EMPA be followed ? What are proper procedures under s.7 of EMPA? What factors should the Courts take into account when making a declaration under s. 7 ? Costs of an s.7 declaration ? What is the precise scope of s. 5oB & is the approach adopted re s.50B of the PDA in JC Savage correct ?

Outstanding Issues 18 What is role of AC in context of taxation Klohn v ABP and Kenny v TCD – Impact of Legal Services Bill ? Is AC being correctly implemented by Ireland ? – due to ratification Aarhus Convention Compliance Committee now has jurisdiction & complaints anticipated Have AC obligations under EU law been correctly transposed particularly in light of Edwards ? Further infringement proceedings against Ireland ?