© NMISA 2010 Multilateration Laser Tracker Systems Speaker : Pieter Greeff

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
New Non-Contact, Laser-Based Gauge for Measuring Length and Speed of Gypsum Board Stuart Manser Beta LaserMike.
Advertisements

Frequency Scanning Interferometry (FSI) measurements
Solomon William KAMUGASA
Computer Networks Group Universität Paderborn Ad hoc and Sensor Networks Chapter 9: Localization & positioning Holger Karl.
February, 2008 IWAA08 G. Gassner, R. Ruland 1 Georg Gassner Robert Ruland, SLAC February, 2008 Introduction Rotary Table Calibration.
22-Nov-2004 © Renishaw plc Not to be reproduced without written permission from Renishaw Laser & Calibration Products Division Slide 1 Laser.
Metrology and pre-alignment of the components of CLIC in the PACMAN project S. W. Kamugasa, V. Vlachakis CLIC Workshop January 2015 CERN, Geneva,
Alignment of DB and MB quadrupoles Hélène MAINAUD DURAND 17/11/2011 With a lot of input from Sylvain GRIFFET.
Attitude Determination - Using GPS. 20/ (MJ)Danish GPS Center2 Table of Contents Definition of Attitude Attitude and GPS Attitude Representations.
Initial Calibration and Stability Results from the LiCAS RTRS FSI System John Dale for the LiCAS Collaboration IWAA February 2008.
Use of a commercial laser tracker for optical alignment James H. Burge, Peng Su, Chunyu Zhao, Tom Zobrist College of Optical Sciences Steward Observatory.
High index glass spherical targets for laser interferometry Miroslav Sulc 1st PACMAN worshop 1.
1 Seventh Lecture Error Analysis Instrumentation and Product Testing.
Pre-alignment solutions applied to girders 1/19 Sylvain GRIFFET, 06/07/2010.
Dimensional Metrology Dimensional Metrology Program Steve Phillips Program Manager MEL Metrology Support for Laser Trackers and Scanners Supports Industrial.
Modern Optical Metrology Techniques used in James Webb Space Telescope Segment Optics and Space Instruments Modern Optical Metrology Techniques used in.
Reconfigurable Inspection Machine (RIM). NFS Engineering Research Center for Reconfigurable Manufacturing Systems College of engineering, University of.
DELTA Quadrant Tuning Y. Levashov, E. Reese. 2 Tolerances for prototype quadrant tuning Magnet center deviations from a nominal center line < ± 50  m.
ESPACE Porto, June 2009 MODELLING OF EARTH’S RADIATION FOR GPS SATELLITE ORBITS Carlos Javier Rodriguez Solano Technische Universität München
Performance Analysis of an Optoelectronic Localization System for Monitoring Brain Lesioning with Proton Beams Fadi Shihadeh (1), Reinhard Schulte (2),
Geodetic Metrology and Engineering Geodesy Institute of Geodesy and Photogrammetry C URRENT I NVESTIGATIONS AT THE ETH Z URICH IN O.
Mission Planning and SP1. Outline of Session n Standards n Errors n Planning n Network Design n Adjustment.
Error Analysis Accuracy Closeness to the true value Measurement Accuracy – determines the closeness of the measured value to the true value Instrument.
David Urner, Oxford University, RHUL – June StaFF Stabilization of Final Focus Motion Stabilization with Nano-Meter Precision David Urner Paul Coe.
LASER AND ADVANCES IN METROLOGY
Automotive Test & Measurement Case Studies SAAMF Roadshow Durban CSIR NML Eddie Tarnow Metrologist: Torque & Automotive 14 June 2006.
H. MAINAUD DURAND, on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team MDI alignment plans IWLC2010 International Workshop on Linear Colliders 2010.
Development & validation of an absolute FSI network STATUS & NEXT STEPS SU internal meeting 16 July 2015 Solomon William KAMUGASA.
H. MAINAUD DURAND PACMAN WP1 OUTLINE Tasks & role of associated partner Plans for training.
Photogrammetry for Large Structures M. Kesteven CASS, CSIRO From Antikythera to the SKA Kerastari Workshop, June
BEPCII Prealignment Installation Survey and Alignment Accelerator Center of IHEP Xiaolong Wang
Status of the Alignment 17/12/04 Dario Autiero. Measurements taken so far: 13/9 TT8 On the mounting arch 12/11 TT7 Standalone in the target 19/11 TT7.
Moisture Measurement in Paper Pulp Using Fringing Field Dielectrometry Kishore Sundara-Rajan Xiaobei Li Nick Semenyuk Alexander Mamishev Department of.
A new Ad Hoc Positioning System 컴퓨터 공학과 오영준.
Alignment Bars Requirements Strategy Layout Length Prediction Shape Prediction Readout Scheme Model to predict bar shape in the experiment Calibration.
1/10 Tatsuya KUME Mechanical Engineering Center, High Energy Accelerator Research Organization (KEK) ATF2-IN2P3-KEK kick-off meeting (Oct. 10, 2006) Phase.
Development of a laser slit system in LabView
Validation of the Measurement Performance of a 3-D Vision Sensor by means of a Coordinate Measuring Machine Giovanna Sansoni1, Simone Carmignato2, Enrico.
CLIC Module meeting, 22/08/2011 N. Chritin (EN/MME) Cradles design for CLIC module supporting system (EDMS )  General principle  Main inputs an.
ILC Main Linac Alignment Simulations John Dale 2009 Linear Collider Workshop of the Americas.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fiducials Requirements Fabien Rey ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group ACCELERATOR TECHNICAL BOARD 23/09/2015.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fabien Rey Pawel Garsztka ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group.
Survey, Alignment and Metrology Fabien Rey Pawel Garsztka ESS Survey, Alignment and Metrology Group Interface Workshops for ESS Warm-Linac: ISrc - LEBT.
WP3 The LiCAS Laser Straightness Monitor (LSM) Greg Moss.
BME 353 – BIOMEDICAL MEASUREMENTS AND INSTRUMENTATION MEASUREMENT PRINCIPLES.
Solomon William KAMUGASA
Fiducialisation and initial alignment of components for CLIC Mateusz Sosin on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team CLIC Workshop 2015.
Contents: 1. Introduction 2. Gyroscope specifications 3. Drift rate compensation 4. Orientation error correction 5. Results 6. Gyroscope and odometers.
Company LOGO Technology and Application of Laser Tracker in Large Space Measurement Yang Fan, Li Guangyun, Fan Baixing IWAA2014 in Beijing, China Zhengzhou.
1 Research on laser tracker measurement accuracy and data processing Liang Jing IHEP,CHINA
Midterm Review 28-29/05/2015 Progress on wire-based accelerating structure alignment Natalia Galindo Munoz RF-structure development meeting 13/04/2016.
Instrumentation & Measurement
Carousel Interferometer for Metrological Applications
on behalf of the CLIC active pre-alignment team
Recent developments on micro-triangulation
Review on collimator movement with stepping motors
Copyright SwissFlow B.V.
Stages for the SSW translation system for PACMAN
Background With new accelerators delivering beams always smaller and more energetic, requirements for very precise beam alignment become more and more.
LCLS Undulator Fiducialization
Contacts for underside connectors
MEASUREMENT AND INSPECTION
Review on collimator movement with stepping motors
Torsten Bräuer and the Metrologyteam
ILC Main Linac Alignment Simulations
Accuracy and comparability of xCT measurements
Dispersive Comb-Spectrum Interferometer: Metrological Characterization
Mounting & Alignment Malcolm Guthrie
Alignment, Scanning Malcolm Guthrie
Presentation transcript:

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration Laser Tracker Systems Speaker : Pieter Greeff

© NMISA 2010 Contents 1.Introduction 2.The Project 3.Multilateration 4.Conclusion

© NMISA 2010 Standards Calibration Chain Lower Accuracy CMM Reproducible standard as prescribe in Metrology: Laser Radiation (Iodine 127) SI unit for length (metre definition) Step Gauge NMISA activities inside border National Standard for length as in Government Gazette: Laser Interferometer (CSIR 4) National Standard for length as in Government Gazette: Laser Interferometer (CSIR 4) End Standards: CMM Standard (R10 000) End Standards: CMM Standard (R10 000) Length Bar System Standard CMM (R ) Standard CMM (R ) Squares Laser Interferometer

© NMISA 2010 Standards Calibration Chain CMM Measurements (R 50 mil estimation) CMM Measurements (R 50 mil estimation) Lower Accuracy CMM Reproducible standard as prescribe in Metrology: Laser Radiation (Iodine 127) SI unit for length (metre definition) Step Gauge CMM Calibrations (350 CMMs/year: R3,5mil) CMM Calibrations (350 CMMs/year: R3,5mil) CMM Measurements (R ) CMM Measurements (R ) Automotive Exports (R 65 bill estimation) Automotive Exports (R 65 bill estimation) NMISA activities inside border National Standard for length as in Government Gazette: Laser Interferometer (CSIR 4) National Standard for length as in Government Gazette: Laser Interferometer (CSIR 4) End Standards: CMM Standard (R10 000) End Standards: CMM Standard (R10 000) Length Bar System Standard CMM (R ) Standard CMM (R ) Squares Laser Interferometer

© NMISA 2010 Introduction Application and Technology Applications of three dimensional metrology: –measure parts and assemblies: ship building, aeroplane construction, rotor blades, satellite dish antennas, turbines, cars… Instruments for three dimensional metrology: –photogrammetry systems, bridge type CMM (Coordinate Measuring System), portable measurement arms, total stations, GPS, indoor GPS systems, laser trackers

© NMISA 2010 Introduction Laser Tracker Selection Motivation Accuracy: –A laser tracker is the most accurate type of device, for its measurement volume, on the market Volume restriction: –not have the size restriction of the bridge type CMM or portable measuring arm. Traceability –A multilateration system is directly traceable to the metre, reducing uncertainties caused by intermediate calibration steps. The level of the required accuracy of dimensional metrology in manufacturing industries are increasing geosystems.com/

© NMISA 2010 Laser Tracker Laser Interferometer CMM Measurements CMM Calibrations Laser Laser Tracker Home Position Retroreflective Target

© NMISA 2010 Laser Tracker aser_Tracker.htm Laser Tracker Target Relative Distance L r θ α (L,θ,α)  (X,Y,Z) L = L i + L r (X,Y,Z) (0,0,0) Initial Distance L i

© NMISA 2010 Beam Offset δx Measurement Beam Beam Steering Mechanism Optical Tracking Sensor Beam Splitter Control System Beam Offset δy Movement of Retroreflective Target The Laser Tracker Working Principle: Tracking

© NMISA 2010 The Project 1.What is it about? a)Traceability b)Resource Development c)Technical Development 2.What did we obtain? a)Better System Understanding b)Multilateration Algorithm c)Multilateration Simulations

© NMISA 2010 Understand System Better Main Kinematic Error Source Deadpath Beam Steering Mechanism Interferometer Deadpath Error Target Deadpath Change in Target Position

© NMISA 2010 Understand System Better Kinematic Modelling Model based on [10], described gimbal type mirror with 10 parameters Source Beam bibi Mirror Front Surface bobo bcbc Target Position P I OmOm Gimbal Axis 2 x b, x 1 zmzm θ 2, z 1 θ1θ1 Gimbal Axis 1 ObOb O1O1 xmxm zbzb bibi bobo bcbc OmOm zmzm xmxm ymym cxcx cycy I Mirror Frame

© NMISA 2010 Z X Y Mirror Centre Covariance Ellipsoid Understand System Better Kinematic Modelling

© NMISA 2010 Understand System Better Build a Laser Tracker Prototype Design Scope Design scope –select type of beam steering mechanism, design and build it –sensor signal conditioning –control of the system CAD model of manufactured prototype tracker

© NMISA 2010 Understand System Better Laser Tracker Prototype Component Integration

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration: Solve target point coordinates, with only the distance between the target points and the station points precisely known Similar to triangulation or trilateration At least 4 tracker Stations Points (SP) At least 10 Target Points (TP) Z X Y

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration Concept Cost Function: minimise residual Residual (e ij ); (i th target point, j th station position): Initial distances Measured distances Assumed TP locationAssumed SP location TP: Target Point SP: Station Point Optimisation algorithm seeks local minimum for E: Receives: initial TP ((xyz) i ) and SP ((XYZ) j ) and initial length (l j ) Measured Distances (L ij )

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration Test Sequential Multilateration Test Setup 20 target points Use only one tracker Sequentially at 6 different positions Z X Y TP1 TP3 TP4 TP5 TP6 (700) (450) (700) (416) (Distances in mm) TP2 (200)

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration Test Result Sequential Multilateration: Optimisation History Cost Function, E (mm) Iteration Number

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration Test Result Sequential Multilateration Tests Results: 3D Distances: 200 mm: (-1,5 μm < Error < 2,0 μm) mm Distance Number

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration Test Result Sequential Multilateration Tests Results: 3D Distances: 450 mm: (140 μm < Error < 160 μm) mm Distance Number

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration and Uncertainty Estimation Worst Case Error CMM (2,4 + 3L) µm, Max 1 m/ axis Maximum TP (CMM): 5,4 µm TP1TP2 5,4 µm SP1

© NMISA 2010 SMR Repeatability (Spherically Mounted Retroreflector) 10,6715,3318,3310,67 Average of Differences (µm)

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration and Uncertainty SMR and Tracker Repeatability From table = 10,67 µm CMM: 5,4 µm SMR: 10,67 µm

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration and Uncertainty CMM: 5,4 µm SMR: 10,67 µm Laser Tracker (L in metres) Radial accuracy (1 + 1L) µm, (Max radial distance 4 m) Transverse accuracy (3 + 1L) µm. (Max transverse displacement 1 m) Worst case maximum: Sqrt(5^2 + 4^2*2) = 7,55 µm TRACKER: 7,55 µm

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration and Uncertainty 5,4 µm 10,67 µm 7,55 µm Combined worst case TP uncertainty: Sqrt(5,4^2 + 10,67^2 + 7,55^2) = 14,2 µm Worst case 3D distance uncertainty: 14,14x 2 = 28,28 µm 16,07 µm 14,14 µm

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration and Uncertainty: Tracker Measurement Result Tracker Average Error per 3D Distance (Rounded to 5 μm) AxesDistance Min (μm) Max (μm) Z X,Z Y,Z X,Y X,Y,Z Y X,Y,Z Y,Z X X200-55

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration and Uncertainty: Fit Measurement Result Total: 10 μm Variable: 140 nm Max and Min for 3D Distances (With Initial Length Suppressed, Rounded to 5 μm) Components Distance (mm) Min (μm) Max (μm) Z X,Z Y,Z X,Y X,Y,Z Y X,Y,Z Y,Z X X

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration and Uncertainty Assumed SP Position (cm precision) Distance (1 + 1L) µm FIT SP Position (µm precision) TP Repeatability 14 µm Residual Error 1.If TP, SP1 or SP2 moves relative to each other in the X-axis, it will have a 1 to 1 effect on residual. 2.However, if SP3 moves in X-axis, it will only have a cosine effect on residual. 3.Since there are more SP in the X-axis, over the full range of it, more information is available to solve it, while for the Y axis less data is available. SP1 SP2 SP3

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration: Effect of SP Positions: Setup 1 TP SP

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration: Effect of SP Positions : Setup 2 TP SP

© NMISA 2010 Multilateration: Effect of SP Positions : Setup 3 TP SP

© NMISA 2010 Result Summary of SP Effect Analysis For a 100 iterations for each setup Max at 450 and 492 Min at 200 and 400

© NMISA 2010 Result Summary of SP Effect Analysis For a 100 iterations for each setup Max at 450 and 492 Min at 200 and 400 Setup 1 Setup 2 Setup 3 Measured with Trackers

© NMISA 2010 Reduction in Measurement Error with Multilateration For a 100 iterations for each setup Measurement with Fit (Setup 3) Simulated Measurement with Trackers Average Error: -300 nm Max Deviation: 800 nm Average Error: 600nm Max Deviation: 1100 nm

© NMISA 2010 Conclusion Laser Tracker –A laser tracker is a highly accurate measuring instrument, with many applications in the coordinate measurement field. Multilateration –The concept of multilateration should be able to even further improve the obtainable accuracy, due to direct traceability. –However constraints are the beam steering mechanisms dead path error contribution and the fit algorithm’s dependence on SP coordinates. Future Work –Investigate the absolute accuracy of the fit and effect of the kinematic errors –Further development of the beam steering mechanism

© NMISA 2010 Acknowledgements OA Kruger and the NMISA for their sponsorship for this project Mechatronic Engineering Department of the University of Stellenbosch Prof. K Schreve, for supervising this project. Photo of prototype tracker

© NMISA 2010 References

© NMISA 2010 Thank You! Any questions? Covariance Ellipsoid Plot, for system kinematic parameters