Philip Parker Administrator Training and Certification.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teacher Effectiveness Evaluation Pilot September 1, 2011 – September 30, 2012 NJ State Board of Education, July 13, 2011.
Advertisements

The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II for Specialists August 2013 Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Specialists.
Instructional Decision Making
Utah Effective Teaching Standards-based Jordan Performance Appraisal System Orientation (UETS-based JPAS)
Briefing: NYU Education Policy Breakfast on Teacher Quality November 4, 2011 Dennis M. Walcott Chancellor NYC Department of Education.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Teacher Evaluation Model
LDC Lessons Learned The Coaching Perspective. Lessons Learned Teachers need to know what supports are available and R- group space is a great place to.
State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness April 2011 CCSSO Ohio Principal Evaluation System.
EDUCATOR EFFECTIVENESS: 1 An Orientation for Teachers.
ESD 112 Professional Growth Cycle
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
Linking Principal Preparation Experiences to Initial Licensure Elementary Experiences: Implementing Change in Practica Joy Stapleton, Kristen Cuthrell,
Differentiated Supervision
Presenter: Gary Bates.  “If a certificated employee receives a rating of ineffective or improvement necessary, the evaluator and the certificated employee.
LPS Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth System Core Propositions 4 and 5 Documenting Practice Through Artifacts October 10, 2012.
Day 3. Agenda [always] Aligning RTTT Growth and Value-Added Update 21 st Century Readiness and APPR Evidence Collection Inter-rater agreement.
SCPS is…  We are a high-performing district  We are focused on student achievement  We are committed to achieving excellence and equity through continuous.
1 Confidential to Shelby County Schools and Memphis City Schools Reflective Practice Theory of Action.
Rhode Island Model Academy for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Day One Professional Practice.
Interim Joint Committee on Education June 11, 2012.
Key Teacher Development System Components
Session 3: pg The teacher will be able to compare and contrast present current homework practices with the Marzano recommendations to create a method.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
The Professional Learning and Evaluation Model. Missouri Essential Principles of Effective Evaluation Measures educator performance against research-based,
Evaluation Team Progress Collaboration Grant 252.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation Pilot (TPEP). Objectives & Agenda What we’re going to learn General Pilot Details …. Who, What, How, What Then Explore.
Evaluator Workshop for Personnel Evaluating Teachers Rhode Island Model The contents of this training were developed under a Race to the Top grant from.
The Portfolio ProcessThe Portfolio Process. Why do we think portfolios are the right choice?  Teacher developed and driven  Embedded professional development.
THE DANIELSON FRAMEWORK. LEARNING TARGET I will be be able to identify to others the value of the classroom teacher, the Domains of the Danielson framework.
TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.
The Delaware Performance Appraisal System II (DPAS II) for Teachers Training Module I Introduction to DPAS II Training for Teachers.
Lake County Schools LAKE COUNTY, FLORIDA. About Our District Lake County is a medium size district 40,000 students 2,700 teachers Mixture of rural, urban.
E VALUATION C HANGES SB290 R EQUIREMENTS January 17, 2013.
Final Reports from the Measures of Effective Teaching Project Tom Kane Harvard University Steve Cantrell, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
May 29, 2013 Chanute USD 413 And Kansas State Department of Education.
Frequently Asked Questions about the Teacher Evaluation System August 28, 2013 CFN 536- Gerard Beirne, Network Leader Center for Education Innovation –
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Rhode Island Model Teacher Evaluation & Support System Preparing for your End-of-Year Conference.
Aligning Academic Review and Performance Evaluation (AARPE) Virginia Department of Education Office of School Improvement Session Technical Assistance.
March Madness Professional Development Goals/Data Workshop.
TEACHER EVALUATION SUPPORT ESU 10 DEC. 14 TH, 2011.
Evidence in Evaluations. What is Evidence? ITED Document – Evidence refers to data, information, artifacts and performances that educators and evaluators.
Ohio Department of Education March 2011 Ohio Educator Evaluation Systems.
Teacher Growth and Assessment: The SERVE Approach to Teacher Evaluation The Summative or Assessment Phase.
Assessment Information from multiple sources that describes a student’s level of achievement Used to make educational decisions about students Gives feedback.
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
KVEC Presents PGES Observation Calibration Are You On Target?
Educator Effectiveness Dr. Mark Kirkemier, Coordinator Dr. Alison Grizzle, Education Administrator Dr. Kisha Tolbert-Woods, Education Specialist.
Lanphier High School The Future of Our SIG Efforts.
Innovate. Engage. Empower THE ONECLAY WRITES SCORING EXPERIENCE WELCOME! FIND A SEAT TALK TO OTHERS AT YOUR TABLE AND DISCUSS SUCCESSES SO FAR THIS YEAR.
NYSED Network Team and Teacher and Principal Evaluator Training Kate Gerson -Senior Fellow Ken Slentz -Associate Commissioner June 2,
UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Tri City United Public Schools August 6, 2013 “Leading for educational excellence and equity. Every day for every one.”
Deepening Student Impact Via Instructional Practice Data Joe Schroeder, PhD Associate Executive Director, AWSA.
CAEP Standard 4 Program Impact Case Study
SNRPDP Self Evaluation
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Professional Development: Imagine Difference Shapes and Sizes
Janice Creneti Project Coordinator Florida SPDG SIM
Curriculum Structures
Introduction to Teacher Evaluation
Learning Forward Annual Conference Session F28
Forum 1 Setting IPDP Goals Fall 2018 Name of School.
The Framework for Teaching
The Portfolio Process.
Mason County Schools Policy 5310 August 11, 2016.
Presentation transcript:

Philip Parker Administrator Training and Certification

We’ll discuss today… How we trained our administrators for a new observation process – Mechanics of the observation process – Figuring out what the rubric actually says How we certified our administrators in the College-ready teaching framework. – Ensure observer Accuracy – Improve inter-rater reliability

Our Experience is research-based Refreshingly, our practices were largely validated by the recent update to the MET study by the BMGF.

How did we train & certify our Administrators? Intensive training over the summer, prior to the school-year starting with a two-fold focus – Introduce and practice using the CRTF. – Teach and practice the mechanics of the observation process – Full Pilot – all Schools, all teachers 4-day summer training

Specifically, we taught these skills Gathering Evidence – Evidence from videos of teaching is scripted Emphasis on evidence (what is seen and heard) vs. interpretation – Evidence from written artifacts is gathered. Lesson Plan Pre-Obs. Reflection Post-Obs. Reflection

Specifically, we taught these skills Aligning that evidence with indicators on the CRTF – Ex: This is evidence collected during observation Indicator from Rubric

Specifically, we taught these skills Scoring the evidence gathered for each indicator

Specifically, we taught these skills Norming scores across administrators – In small groups, administrators discussed and argued for their ratings. – Always using evidence as the foundation of their discussion. “I think this teacher is at a level 3 because I saw…”

Practice, Practice, Practice We held practice sessions each day for our administrators to go through these steps prior to the certification assessment.

Certification followed the training Evidence Collection Gathering from artifacts (Lesson Plans, pre-/post- conference reflections). Scripting from video of teaching. Evidence Alignment Grouping evidence from each indicator. Evidence Rating Assigning a rating to each indicator.

What’s required to become certified? Proficiency in 3 categories – Evidence – Alignment – Accuracy Percent correct Average Score Differential

How good is good enough? In Green Dot, we decided that Conditionally Certified High was good enough to do evaluations, but the administrator still must receive coaching and certify. This was a sustainability decision which probably won’t need to happen again. In Green Dot, we decided that Conditionally Certified High was good enough to do evaluations, but the administrator still must receive coaching and certify. This was a sustainability decision which probably won’t need to happen again.

What did we learn? This work is hard, mostly because it’s new and different. – Slow and steady wins the race because it allows you to approach your change thoughtfully. – Don’t underestimate the amount of time and support you should provide to your administrators to practice and master these skills. – Remember that teachers are impacted too - Govern your change with many stakeholder groups. We govern ours like this…

Green Dot’s Governance Structure

What did we learn? Admin need personalized support in becoming certified. – Use district leaders to provide individual coaching to administrators who are struggling. – Utilize the data you gathered during his/her certification in order to identify the specific supports that are needed. Rating? Evidence collection? Evidence alignment?

What did we learn? Opportunities to practice helped to improve results. – We needed to offer several certification opportunities throughout the first semester, and fewer are planned this semester.