Presented by Peter D. Marle, B.A. Influence of Parental Involvement by Gender on Student Outcomes in STEM Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Katherine L. Hughes & Melinda Mechur Karp
Advertisements

Building capacity in the use of secondary data: undergraduate students in the field of Education Dr Emma Smith School of Education University of Birmingham.
Center for STEM Education Also, Peter D. Marle and Lisa L. Decker
Building for Success in Calculus David Bressoud St. Paul, MN The First Two Years of College Math: Building Student Success Reston, VA October 5–7, 2014.
Contexts in Which Best and Worst CBC are Most Valuable: Application to School Choice Joel Huber: Duke University Namika Sagara: Duke University Angelyn.
The persons whose photographs are depicted in the slides are professional models. They have no relation to the issues discussed. Any characters they are.
126th Annual Meeting and Conference December 9, 2011 Discussion of Significant Findings and Aggregate Data Based on the Results of the Endicott College.
Research Experiences for Teachers (RET) in Engineering Program Engineering Education NSF Awardees Conference-Sept , 2007 Mary Poats, Program Manager-RET.
Dr. Judith Marwick, Provost, Harper College
Vinetta C. Jones, Ph.D. Howard University QEM—Baltimore, Maryland September 20, 2013.
{ Driving Up or Dialing Down Competition in Introductory STEM Courses: Individual and Classroom Level Factors Bryce E. Hughes, Sylvia Hurtado, and M. Kevin.
Fostering STEM Diversity OPAS Vision for the Year All Oregonians have the opportunity to choose and successfully pursue engineering or applied science.
The Cultural Contexts of Teaching and Learning Stuart Greene Associate Professor of English Director of Education, Schooling, and Society Co-founder of.
Teachers for A New Era Neag School of Education Teacher Preparation Program’s Fall 2008 Common Entry Survey Results Teachers for A New Era (TNE) Teacher.
The Influence of Parent Education on Child Outcomes: The Mediating Role of Parents Beliefs and Behaviors Pamela E. Davis-Kean University of Michigan This.
Gender Issues in Studying CS - Balkan Perspective Mirjana Ivanović, Zoran Budimac, Zoran Putnik, Nikola Trkulja 10 th Workshop “Software Engineering Education.
RENEW Evaluation Sarah Hough, Ph. D. & Niki Sandoval, M. A. University of California, Santa Barbara.
Correlation Research Examines relationships between two or more variables.
Maria Cristina Matteucci, Dina Guglielmi
Classroom Climate and Students’ Goal Structures in High-School Biology Classrooms in Kenya Winnie Mucherah Ball State University Muncie, Indiana, USA June,
Women, Minorities, and Technology Jacquelynne Eccles (PI), Pamela Davis-Kean (co-PI), and Oksana Malanchuk University of Michigan.
Washington State Prevention Summit Analyzing and Preparing Data for Outcome-Based Evaluation Using the Assigned Measures and the PBPS Outcomes Report.
Teacher-Student Relationships: A Study of Teachers’ Perceptions of Their Roles and Responsibilities and Their Relational Management Practices Elizabeth.
Math Interests and Motivation from Late Childhood to Adolescence Math Interests and Motivation from Late Childhood to Adolescence Funded by NSF #
Gender Equity in Computing Rita M. Powell Department Manager Dept. of Computer & Information Science.
Purdue University, Master’s Degree Graduate Student Esmeralda Cruz July 24, 2014 EXAMINING TEACHERS’ KNOWLEDGE AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS IMMIGRATION AND UNDOCUMENTED.
Chapter 6 Education and Achievement ___________________________.
Implication of Gender and Perception of Self- Competence on Educational Aspiration among Graduates in Taiwan Wan-Chen Hsu and Chia- Hsun Chiang Presenter.
The Impact of CReSIS Summer Research Programs that Influence Students’ Choice of a STEM Related Major in College By: Alica Reynolds, Jessica.
Parent Involvement and Literacy Achievement Vanessa DeVito Education Spring 2008.
Central Oregon Community College | 2600 N.W. College Way | Bend, Oregon | (541) | Moving Into Town--and Moving On: The Community.
EVALUATION REPORT Derek R. Lane, Ph.D. Department of Communication University of Kentucky.
Student Engagement Tony Frontier, PhD Cardinal Stritch University EMOTIONALBEHAVIORALCOGNITIVE.
Ivan Novosel, S3I Research on informal science education.
ASHE Annual Conference November 17, 2011 Maintaining Career Aspirations in Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics (STEM) among College Students.
Frances Lawrenz and The Noyce evaluation team University of Minnesota 1 Acknowledgement: This project was funded by National Science Foundation (Grant#REC )
“Diversity and Its Discontents”: A Report on Graduate Student Experiences in PhD-Granting Institutions ASA Annual Meeting 2012 Denise A. Segura.
the best method of teaching
C R E S M E T Competing in a ‘Flat World’ Economy: Getting & Keeping Arizona Students in the Math & Science They Need to Succeed October 24, 2006.
+ Third Party Evaluation – Interim Report Presentation for Early Childhood Advisory Council December 19, 2013.
Why Do Parents Become Involved? What Can We do to Encourage Involvement? Kathleen V. Hoover-Dempsey Associate Professor, Psychology and Human Development.
Mark DeCandia Kentucky NAEP State Coordinator
Factors Influencing Preparation in Mathematics for Selective Admission to College in High Schools with Low College-going Rates Faith G. Paul Student Affairs.
Student Engagement and Academic Performance: Identifying Effective Practices to Improve Student Success Shuqi Wu Leeward Community College Hawaii Strategy.
Resources for Supporting Engagement for Each and Every Family 1.
A Comparison of Educationally Advantaged and Disadvantaged College Students: Academic Goal Engagement and Psychological Well-Being Presented by Daniel.
NOVA Evaluation Report Presented by: Dr. Dennis Sunal.
GENDER GAPS IN EDUCATION Angelica SALVI DEL PERO Social Policy Division Evidence from the OECD Flemish Ministry of Education & Training 18 October 2012.
A presentation of methods and selected results 1.
SciGirls Tallahassee Evaluation and Research Roxanne Hughes, PhD (Director of the Center for Integrating Research and Learning) Presentation at SciGirls.
Presented by David MacLennan, Thompson Rivers University Kristy Callaghan, Stefania Maggi, & Amedeo D’Angiulli, Carleton University Financial support for.
Montgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin Elementary SchoolMontgomery County Public SchoolsWoodlin.
CEP 680 Career Intervention: Planning a Career Day Presented By: Rachel Depner Jessica Stewart.
Six Types Family/School/Community Partnerships Learning at HomeType 4 Based on the work of Joyce Epstein, Johns Hopkins University Baltimore Maryland.
VAM Training. Florida’s value-added model developed by Florida educators  The Department convened a committee of stakeholders (Student Growth Implementation.
Welcome! Three Approaches to Measuring STEM Education Innovations: Moving Toward Standardization and Large Data Sets Wendy DuBow, PhD, National Center.
An Evaluation Protocol for STEM Outreach Programs American Evaluation Association Conference November 5, 2011.
High School Students’ Motivations and Views of Agriculture and Agricultural Careers upon Completion of a Pre- College Program Kaylie Scherer April 28,
School Context: Achievement Outcomes H607: Ethnicity, Context, and Family Dynamics.
Paulding County School District Hutchens Elementary Parent Presentation Powerpoint information has been adapted from resources available at
What Difference Can Portfolio Make in Radiographer Work Practice
How Can High School Counseling Shape Students’ Postsecondary Attendance? Exploring the Relationship between High School Counseling and Students’ Subsequent.
Contents 1. Overview of NAEA NAEA Results 3. Implication.
Supporting a College- and Career-Ready America
Issue Under Review: STEM
Consequential Validity
–Anonymous Participant
STEM Communal Affordances
Compensation Disparities by Gender in Internal Medicine
Gender Equity in Computing
Presentation transcript:

Presented by Peter D. Marle, B.A. Influence of Parental Involvement by Gender on Student Outcomes in STEM Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM Presented By Peter D. Marle, B.A.

Center for STEM Education Model Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM Student & Family Characteristics Demographics, Family Encouragement Peer Influence Giftedness STEM Learning Variables (PIPES) K-12 STEM Workshops & Summer Camps (intensity, duration, breadth) Science and Math Professional Development Academies Interests Intentions Decisions Major Choice Career Choice PIPES: Partnership in Innovative Preparation for Educators and Students

What the Literature Says Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM Recent 2009 Meta-Analysis (Hill & Tyson, 2009) 50 studies in parent involvement for middle-school students Parent involvement is positively associated with achievement Academic socialization was strongest type Communication of expectations Value for education Fostering child’s aspirations Planning for future

PIPES’ Parent Involvement and Attitude Variables Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM ConstructInstrument / ScaleLiterature / Source Parent Attitudes toward Math and Science Attitudes about Math Survey (Adopted for Science) Fennema and Sherman (1976) Mason and Kahle (1988) Smith and Hausafus (1996) Parent Encouragement Measures of Science Advantage and Motivation for a Science Career Stake and Mares (2001) **Student Measures adapted for use with Parents Demographics and Characteristics of Student and their Family  Gender, Race/Ethnicity, Family SES, Family type  Parents’ Level of Education / Occupation  Classification (e.g., Gifted)  Grade Level  Parents’ Expectations for College Math and Science Interest Survey-PARENT Questionnaire Student Information Survey (Parent Version) Some items adopted from GK-12 Outreach – University of Arkansas

Literature and PIPES’ Parent Variables Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM Parent Involvement through Academic Socialization Communication of expectations Motivation for a Science Career (also adapted for math) Value for education Attitudes about Math Survey (also adapted for science) Fostering child’s aspirations Measures of Science Advantage (also adapted for math) Planning for future Motivation for a Science Career (also adapted for math) Parents’ expectations for college

Sample Parent Survey Items Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM Parent Involvement through Academic Socialization Motivation for a Science Career (also adapted for math) “Having a science career would be interesting for my child” Attitudes about Math Survey, Math Beliefs subscale (also adapted for science) “Math is one of the most important subjects for my child to study in school” Attitudes about Math Survey, Math Action subscale (also adapted for science) “I encourage my child to take advanced math in school” Measures of Science Advantage (also adapted for math) “Our family is interested in the science courses my child takes” Parents’ expectations for college “What is the highest level of education you expect your child to complete”

PIPES’ Student Characteristics Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM *Data excludes participants without parent response on the parent attitude and involvement surveys

PIPES’ Parent and Family Characteristics Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM *Data excludes participants without parent response on the parent attitude and involvement surveys

Parent Survey Statistics Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM Science Portion (N = 833; 53% female); Math Portion (N =813; 53% female) These measures were aggregated for the following analyses into a Parent Attitude and Involvement Variable Median r for science measures =.64 (p <.001, N = 814), for math measures =.52 (p <.001, N = 814)

Parent Survey Statistics Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM Child’s Gender: p <.001, η 2 =.02 (small) Parent’s Gender: p =.187, η 2 =.002 Interaction: p =.359, η 2 =.001 Aggregated Parent Attitude and Involvement M = 5.03, SD = 0.60 (range 1.98 to 6.00; N = 792)

Parent Survey Statistics Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM Child’s Gender: p <.001, η 2 =.02 (small) Race: p =.289, η 2 =.007 Interaction: p =.006, η 2 =.02 (small) Simple Main Effects Pairwise Comparisons: * p <.05, ** p <.01, *** p <.001; η 2 =.01,.01,.02, respectively

Parent Survey Statistics Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM With exception of Careers in Teaching and Medical Fields, p <.001 for all comparisons. Median mean difference = 0.54 (range of 0.25 [Science Teacher Scale] to 1.01 [Career in Eng.]); Median d = 0.47 (range of 0.33 [Science Teacher Scale] to 0.82 [Motivation for a Science Career]; small to large effect sizes).

Parent Survey Statistics Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM Math (low n = 136, high n = 144); Science (low n = 132, high n = 142); d = 0.25 & 0.19 * p =.036; ** p =.123 (ns) Math (low n = 61, high n = 85); Science (low n = 62, high n = 85); d = 0.10 & 0.08 * p =.541; ** p =.626 Pre SurveyPost Survey

Direction for the Future Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM What Does this Mean for STEM Research (PIPES)? Parent Involvement is remarkably constant across student measures Our differentiation of Low and High Involvement (split at 5.03 on a 1 to 6 scale) What are the implications of even lower parent involvement Can low/no involvement be ameliorated? Do PIPES programs ameliorate the effect of lower parent involvement on student outcomes? Will they sustain an effect? PIPES model

Influence of Parental Involvement in STEM Questions? Thank You for Listening!