Introduction to Cooperative Learning and Foundations of Course Design Karl A. Smith STEM Education Center / Technological Leadership Institute / Civil.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Advertisements

Economic Education and How People Learn Scott Simkins, Interim Director Academy for Teaching and Learning (ATL) North Carolina A&T State University Acknowledgements:
Effective, Interactive Strategies for Facilitating Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota.
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota.
Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota University.
Design and Implementation of Active and Cooperative Learning Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of.
University of Missouri – Rolla Center for Educational Research & Teaching Innovation January 5, 2006 Karl Smith University of Minnesota Civil Engineering.
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Foundations of Design of High Performance Team Learning Environments – Understanding by Design and How People Learn Karl A. Smith Engineering Education.
1 Teaching for Learning: Using Active Learning Strategies & Cooperative Student Groups to Promote Learning in Lecture Classes – Session 4 Karl Smith Civil.
An Approach to Creating and Facilitating Workshops Library Instructor College Fall 2010 Charles Dershimer Erping Zhu Center For Research on Learning and.
1 Problem-Based Cooperative Learning Karl Smith Civil Engineering Estimation Exercise.
Getting Started Designing Your Online Class Jim Wright Bagwell College of Education.
Levels of Education Inquiry Source: Streveler, R., Borrego, M. and Smith, K.A Moving from the “Scholarship of Teaching and Learning” to “Educational.
Enhancing Student Success: Teaching Well With Technology October 23, 2009.
Design Down Curriculum Planning & Cooperative Learning Douglas Gosse, PhD Nipissing University, Office H120 TEL: ,
Introduction to Cooperative Learning and Foundations of Course Design Karl A. Smith STEM Education Center / Technological Leadership Institute / Civil.
I’m In Activity Reflect on the morning in 1-2 sentences “I’m in”
How People Learn & Understanding by Design Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota
Evidence-Based Practices for Innovative STEM Education Karl A. Smith STEM Education Center/Civil Eng – University of Minnesota Engineering Education –
Pedagogies of Engagement: Reflections on Readings Karl A. Smith STEM Education Center / Technological Leadership Institute / Civil Engineering – University.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Using Understanding by Design
Engaging Faculty and Students in Talking about Teaching and Learning (Informed by Assessment Data) Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University.
1 Teaching for Learning: Using Active Learning Strategies & Cooperative Student Groups to Promote Learning in Lecture Classes – Session 3 Karl Smith Civil.
Evidence-Based Practices for Innovative Education Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University STEM Education Center/Civil Eng – University.
Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University
Structuring Cooperative Learning: Examples from Small group learning in higher education (SGLHE) Karl A. Smith University of Minnesota Cooperative.
State University of New York An Emerging Model for Online Learning MERLOT International Conference – August A Systemic Approach to Online Learning.
Introduction to Cooperative Learning and Foundations of Course Design Karl A. Smith Engineering Education – Purdue University Technological Leadership.
Design Down Curriculum Planning & Cooperative Learning Douglas Gosse, PhD Assistant Professor, Faculty of Education Office A145 Nipissing University 100.
Formal Cooperative Learning: Text Comprehension/Interpretation Karl A. Smith Laura Apol.
Design and Implementation of Active and Cooperative Learning in Large Classes Michigan State University 12th Annual Spring Institute Karl Smith University.
Carol Hurney, James Madison University Jenny Knight, University of Colorado – Boulder Janet Branchaw, University of Wisconsin – Madison Alix Darden, University.
Karl ’ s Story Process Metallurgy Researcher Dissolution Kinetics – liquid-solid interface Iron Ore Desliming – solid-solid interface Metal-oxide reduction.
Exploring Research-based Principles of Learning and Their Connection to Teaching Dr. Susan A. Ambrose Associate Provost for Education Director, Eberly.
CDIO: Overview, Standards, and Processes (Part 2) Doris R. Brodeur, November 2005.
Learning Assessment Techniques
Using Cognitive Science To Inform Instructional Design
What factors motivate Students to Learn?
Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Formal-Informal-Base
OSEP Leadership Conference July 28, 2015 Margaret Heritage, WestEd
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Active/Cooperative Learning (ACL) & Teamwork
The Art of Teaching and the Science of Learning
University of Minnesota – Duluth
CTE 2010 Summer Institute on Teaching and Learning
Drake University Designing Courses that Help Students Learn
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Karl A. Smith Civil Engineering - University of Minnesota
Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning
Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning
Utah State University Designing Courses that Help Students Learn
Introduction to Cooperative Learning and Foundations of Course Design
Project-Based Cooperative Learning
California State University – Dominguez Hills
Design & Implementation of Cooperative Learning
National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
National Academy of Engineering Frontiers of Engineering Education
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Brigham Young University
Design & Implementation of Problem-Based Cooperative Learning
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Design and Implementation of Pedagogies of Engagement
Three Ways to Structure Cooperative Learning: Formal-Informal-Base
Structuring Cooperative Learning:
Individual Identity: Typical Student Team Roles
LEARNER-CENTERED PSYCHOLOGICAL PRINCIPLES. The American Psychological Association put together the Leaner-Centered Psychological Principles. These psychological.
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to Cooperative Learning and Foundations of Course Design Karl A. Smith STEM Education Center / Technological Leadership Institute / Civil Engineering – University of Minnesota & Engineering Education – Purdue University - Clarkson University Design and Implementation of Cooperative Learning June 3-5, 2013

2 Session 1 Layout Welcome & Overview Cooperative Learning Basics Course Design Foundations Design and Implementation

Overall Goal Build your repertoire of cooperative learning strategies as well as skills and confidence for implementing them 3

4 Workshop Objectives Participants will be able to : –Describe key features of cooperative learning and effective, interactive strategies for facilitating learning –Summarize research on How People Learn (HPL) –Describe key features of the Understanding by Design (UbD) process – Content (outcomes) – Assessment – Pedagogy –Explain key features of and rationale for Cooperative Learning –Identify connections between cooperative learning and desired outcomes of courses and programs Participants will begin applying key elements to the design on a course, class session or learning module

Reflection and Dialogue Individually reflect on Effective, Interactive Strategies for Facilitating Learning. Write for about 1 minute –Context? Subject, Year, School/Department –Structure/Procedure? –Outcome? Evidence of Success Discuss with your neighbor for about 3 minutes –Select Story, Comment, Question, etc. that you would like to present to the whole group if you are randomly selected

Seven Principles for Good Practice in Undergraduate Education Good practice in undergraduate education: –Encourages student-faculty contact –Encourages cooperation among students –Encourages active learning –Gives prompt feedback –Emphasizes time on task –Communicates high expectations –Respects diverse talents and ways of learning 6 Chickering & Gamson, June,

Clicker Usage 7 1.Never (A) 2.Occasionally (B) 3.Frequently (C) 4.Always (D) 5.Considering it (E)

Process Metallurgy Dissolution Kinetics – liquid-solid interface Iron Ore Desliming – solid-solid interface Metal-oxide reduction roasting – gas- solid interface

Dissolution Kinetics Theory – Governing Equation for Mass Transport Research – rotating disk Practice – leaching of silver bearing metallic copper

First Teaching Experience Practice – Third-year course in metallurgical reactions – thermodynamics and kinetics

Lila M. Smith

Engineering Education Practice – Third-year course in metallurgical reactions – thermodynamics and kinetics Research – ? Theory – ? Theory Research Evidence Practice

University of Minnesota College of Education Social, Psychological and Philosophical Foundations of Education Statistics, Measurement, Research Methodology Assessment and Evaluation Learning and Cognitive Psychology Knowledge Acquisition, Artificial Intelligence, Expert Systems Development Theories Motivation Theories Social psychology of learning – student – student interaction

Lila M. Smith

Cooperative Learning Theory – Social Interdependence – Lewin – Deutsch – Johnson & Johnson Research – Randomized Design Field Experiments Practice – Formal Teams/Professor’s Role Theory Research Evidence Practice

Lewin’s Contributions Founded field of social psychology Action Research Force-Field analysis B = f(P,E) Social Interdependence Theory “There is nothing so practical as a good theory”

Cooperative Learning Positive Interdependence Individual and Group Accountability Face-to-Face Promotive Interaction Teamwork Skills Group Processing [*First edition 1991]

Cooperative Learning Research Support Johnson, D.W., Johnson, R.T., & Smith, K.A Cooperative learning returns to college: What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30 (4), Over 300 Experimental Studies First study conducted in 1924 High Generalizability Multiple Outcomes Outcomes 1. Achievement and retention 2. Critical thinking and higher-level reasoning 3. Differentiated views of others 4. Accurate understanding of others' perspectives 5. Liking for classmates and teacher 6.Liking for subject areas 7. Teamwork skills January 2005March 2007

Cooperative Learning is instruction that involves people working in teams to accomplish a common goal, under conditions that involve both positive interdependence (all members must cooperate to complete the task) and individual and group accountability (each member is accountable for the complete final outcome). Key Concepts Positive Interdependence Individual and Group Accountability Face-to-Face Promotive Interaction Teamwork Skills Group Processing

What is your experience with cooperative learning? 20 1.Little 1 (A) 2.Between 1&3 (B) 3.Moderate 3 (C) 4.Between 3&5 (D) 5.Extensive 5 (E)

“It could well be that faculty members of the twenty-first century college or university will find it necessary to set aside their roles as teachers and instead become designers of learning experiences, processes, and environments.” James Duderstadt, 1999 Nuclear Engineering Professor; Former Dean, Provost and President of the University of Michigan

What is your experience with course (re)design? 22

What do you feel are important considerations about course (re) design? What are challenges you have faced with course (re) design? What do you already know about course design? [Background Knowledge Survey] Short Answer Questions

NoYes Good Theory/ Poor Practice Good Theory & Good Practice No Good Practice/ Poor Theory Sources: Bransford, Brown & Cocking How people learn. National Academy Press. Wiggins, G. & McTighe, J Understanding by design, 2ed. ASCD. Science of Instruction (UbD) Science of Learning (HPL) Design Foundations

What is your level familiarity with learning theories (e.g.,HPL) & instruction (e.g., UbD) theories? 25

Part I – Introduction 1 Learning: From Speculation to Science 3 Part II – Learners and Learning 2 How Experts Differ from Novices 31 3 Learning and Transfer 51 4 How Children Learn 79 5 Mind and Brain 114 Part III – Teachers and Teaching 6 The Design of Learning Environments Effective Teaching: Examples in History, Mathematics, and Science Teacher Learning Technology to Support Learning 206 Part IV – Future Directions for the Science of Learning 10 Conclusions Next Steps for Research

27 How People Learn (HPL) Expertise Implies (Ch. 2): –a set of cognitive and metacognitive skills –an organized body of knowledge that is deep and contextualized –an ability to notice patterns of information in a new situation –flexibility in retrieving and applying that knowledge to a new problem Bransford, Brown & Cocking How people learn. National Academy Press. HPL Framework

28 Key Resource 28

29 Understanding by Design Wiggins & McTighe (1997, 2005) Stage 1. Identify Desired Results Stage 2. Determine Acceptable Evidence Stage 3. Plan Learning Experiences and Instruction Overall: Are the desired results, assessments, and learning activities ALIGNED? From: Wiggins, Grant and McTighe, Jay Understanding by Design. Alexandria, VA: ASCD

Backward Design Context Content Assessment Pedagogy C & A & P Alignment? End Start Yes No Understanding by Design (Wiggins & McTighe, 2005) Content-Assessment-Pedagogy (CAP) Design Process Flowchart 30 Streveler, Smith & Pilotte (2012)

Understanding by Design vs. Engineering Design Identify the Desired Results Determine Acceptable Evidence Plan Learning Experiences Are the desired results, assessments, and learning activities ALIGNED? Develop or use established metrics to measure against outcomes Determine requirements/ specifications Plan and develop process, system, etc. to implement 31

Bransford, Vye and Bateman – Creating High Quality Learning EnvironmentsBransford, Vye and Bateman – Creating High Quality Learning Environments

1.Students prior knowledge can help or hinder learning 2.How student organize knowledge influences how they learn and apply what they know 3.Students’ motivation determines, directs, and sustains what they do to learn 4.To develop mastery, students must acquire component skills, practice integrating them, and know when to apply what they have learned 5.Goal-directed practice coupled with targeted feedback enhances the quality of students’ learning 6.Students’ current level of development interacts with the social, emotional, and intellectual climate of the course to impact learning 7.To become self-directed learners, students must learn to monitor and adjust their approach to learning

34 Related Integrated Course Design Model Fink, L.D Creating significant learning experiences: An integrated approach to designing college courses. Jossey-Bass Fink, L.D A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning. uidetoCourseDesignAug05.pdf

35 A Self-Directed Guide to Designing Courses for Significant Learning L. Dee Fink Creating significant learning experiences. Jossey-Bass.

Your turn Review your course syllabus and Select a topic, class session or learning module you would like to (re)design especially by incorporating cooperative learning 36

37 Session Summary (Minute Paper) Reflect on the session: 1. Most interesting, valuable, useful thing you learned. 2. Things that helped you learn. 3. Question, comments, suggestions. 4.Pace: Too slow Too fast 5.Relevance: Little Lots 6.Instructional Format: Ugh Ah

Q4 – Pace: Too slow Too fast (2.8) Q5 – Relevance: Little Lots (3.6) Q6 – Format: Ugh Ah (3.9) Clarkson University – Session 1 (6/3/13)