The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PLANCK L’IMPATTO SULLA COSMOLOGIA ALESSANDRO MELCHIORRI.
Advertisements

K. Ganga – CMB Science and Observations 1 Rencontres du Vietnam /08/09 CMB Science and Observations K. Ganga.
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT Osamu Tajima (KEK) QUIET collaboration 1.
Adaptive Hough transform for the search of periodic sources P. Astone, S. Frasca, C. Palomba Universita` di Roma “La Sapienza” and INFN Roma Talk outline.
First results from QUIET Osamu Tajima (KEK) The QUIET Collaboration 1.
Planck 2013 results, implications for cosmology
The Ability of Planck to Measure Unresolved Sources Bruce Partridge Haverford College For the Planck Consortium.
S-PASS, a new view of the polarized sky Gianni Bernardi SKA SA On behalf of the S-PASS team CMB2013, Okinawa, June th 2013.
The Sunyaev-Zel’dovich Effect Jason Glenn APS Historical Perspective Physics of the SZ Effect Previous Observations.
Systematic effects in cosmic microwave background polarization and power spectrum estimation SKA 2010 Postgraduate Bursary Conference, Stellenbosch Institute.
Photo: Keith Vanderlinde Detection of tensor B-mode polarization : Why would we need any more data?
QUaD: A CMB Polarization Experiment … First Year Results, arXiv: v1 Robert B. Friedman The University of Chicago GLCW
29 June 2006Bernard's Cosmic Stories1 1 st results from the QUaD CMB polarisation experiment Michael Brown (University of Edinburgh)
K. Ganga – CMB Science and Observations 1 Rencontres du Vietnam /08 The QuaD CMB Polarization Experiment K. Ganga APC.
Contamination of the CMB Planck data by galactic polarized emissions L. Fauvet, J.F. Macίas-Pérez.
WMAP. The Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe was designed to measure the CMB. –Launched in 2001 –Ended 2010 Microwave antenna includes five frequency.
Component Separation of Polarized Data Application to PLANCK Jonathan Aumont J-F. Macías-Pérez, M. Tristram, D. Santos
N. Ponthieu Polarization workshop, IAS, Orsay, 09/15/ N. Ponthieu (IAS) The conquest of sky polarization The upper limits era First detections Prospects.
BICEP: B ackground I maging of C osmic E xtragalactic P olarization “The Muscle Behind Curls” Jamie Bock Hien Nguyen Caltech/JPL Andrew Lange Brian Keating.
Advanced Cosmology Bolometer Array Receiver (ACBAR) on Viper Jeff Peterson - CMU –Ravinder Bhatia (Caltech) –Jamie Bock (JPL) –Andrew Lange (Caltech) –Peter.
High Resolution Observations of the CMB with the CBI Interferometer XVIII th IAP Colloquium - July Carlo Contaldi CITA.
CMB Polariztion B. Winstein Chicago, CfCP General Introduction to the Problem The CAPMAP Solution.
Einstein Polarization Interferometer for Cosmology (EPIC) Peter Timbie University of Wisconsin - Madison Beyond Einstein SLAC May
Ground-based and Future Observations of the Cosmic Microwave Background Anthony Lasenby Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University.
1 CMB Polarimetry with BICEP: Probing Inflationary Gravitational Waves IAS - Polarization 2005 Denis Barkats.
Thoughts on Ground-based lensing measurements Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford/SLAC KIPAC.
SLAC, May 12th, 2004J.L. Puget PLANCK J.L. Puget Institut d'Astrophysique Spatiale Orsay.
Separating Cosmological B-Modes with FastICA Stivoli F. Baccigalupi C. Maino D. Stompor R. Orsay – 15/09/2005.
Simulating the Interferometer In order to simulate the performance of an interferometer, 20 by 20 degree sections were extracted from the simulated CMB.
The CMB and Gravity Waves John Ruhl Case Western Reserve University 3/17/2006, CERCA at St. Thomas.
PHY306 1 Modern cosmology 4: The cosmic microwave background Expectations Experiments: from COBE to Planck  COBE  ground-based experiments  WMAP  Planck.
University of Oxford B. R. Johnson 1 Title Slide MAXIPOL: A Bolometric, Balloon-Borne Half-Wave Plate Polarimeter for Measuring the Polarization of the.
Angelica de Oliveira-Costa University of Pennsylvania The Cosmic Microwave Background: New Challenges. XI Advanced School of Astrophysics Campos do Jordao,
The Atacama Cosmology Telescope New Views of the Universe December 11, 2005 Joe Fowler Princeton University.
Astronomy & Astrophysics Advisory Committee (AAAC) May 11, 2006 Vladimir Papitashvili Antarctic Sciences Section Office of Polar Programs National Science.
CMB observations and results Dmitry Pogosyan University of Alberta Lake Louise, February, 2003 Lecture 1: What can Cosmic Microwave Background tell us.
QUIET Q/U Imaging ExperimenT. QUIET Project Miami Physics Conference 2009 December 16 Raul Monsalve for the QUIET Collaboration University of Miami QUIET.
US Planck Data Analysis Review 1 Christopher CantalupoUS Planck Data Analysis Review 9–10 May 2006 CTP Working Group Presented by Christopher Cantalupo.
The W ILKINSON M ICROWAVE A NISOTROPY P ROBE Mission.
BOOMERanG Launch (Dec. 28, 1998) EPS HEPP Prizes – Grenoble July 25, 2011 P. de Bernardis – Sapienza – Roma.
Joint analysis of Archeops and WMAP observations of the CMB G. Patanchon (University of British Columbia) for the Archeops collaboration.
Planck/HFI uses Jet Propulsion Laboratory (JPL) spider-web and polarization-sensitive bolometers cooled to 0.1 K to map the sky in 6 frequency bands from.
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
The Millimeter-wave Bolometric Interferometer (MBI) Peter Hyland University of Wisconsin – Madison For the MBI Collaboration New Views Symposium December.
B Polarization Measurement of the CMB
EBEX The E and B EXperiment Will Grainger Columbia University Moriond 2008.
QUIET Experiment Rencontres de Moriond 2010 March 14 th, 2010 Akito KUSAKA (for QUIET collaboration) University of Chicago, EFI and KICP.
Superconducting Cold-Electron Bolometer with SIS´ and Josephson Tunnel Junctions and JFET Readout Leonid Kuzmin Chalmers University of Technology, MC2.
The Very Small Array Angela Taylor & Anze Slosar Cavendish Astrophysics University of Cambridge.
Chao-Lin Kuo Stanford Physics/SLAC
High Resolution Measurements of CMB Anisotropies with ACBAR U.C. Berkeley: W.L. Holzapfel (co-PI) M.D. Daub M. Lueker Case-Western: J. Ruhl (co-PI) J.
EBEx foregrounds and band optimization Carlo Baccigalupi, Radek Stompor.
The Planck Satellite Hannu Kurki-Suonio University of Helsinki Finnish-Japanese Workshop on Particle Cosmology, Helsinki
Adventures in Parameter Estimation Jason Dick University of California, Davis.
Observation and Data Analysis Activityin SPOrt and BaR-SPOrt Exp.s Ettore Carretti Bologna 7-9 January 2004.
OLIMPO An arcmin-resolution survey of the sky at mm and sub-mm wavelengths ( Silvia Masi Dipartimento di Fisica La Sapienza,
Blind Component Separation for Polarized Obseravations of the CMB Jonathan Aumont, Juan-Francisco Macias-Perez Rencontres de Moriond 2006 La.
150GHz 100GHz 220GHz Galactic Latitude (Deg) A Millimeter Wave Galactic Plane Survey with the BICEP Polarimeter Evan Bierman (U.C. San Diego) and C. Darren.
2-year Total Intensity Observations year Polarization Observations Cosmic Background Imager Tony Readhead Zeldovich celebration.
Planck, COBE, WMAP, and CMB Polarization. The image on the reverse side shows part of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) sky as measured by three different.
OLIMPO An arcmin-resolution survey of the sky at mm and sub-mm wavelengths ( Silvia Masi Dipartimento di Fisica La Sapienza,
Cosmic Microwave Background Carlo Baccigalupi, SISSA CMB lectures at TRR33, see the complete program at darkuniverse.uni-hd.de/view/Main/WinterSchoolLecture5.
Detecting the CMB Polarization Ziang Yan. How do we know about the universe by studying CMB?
CMB physics Zong-Kuan Guo 《现代宇宙学》
Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization
Observational Cosmology Lab University of Wisconsin-Madison
12th Marcel Grossman Meeting,
A Measurement of CMB Polarization with QUaD
CMB Observations with the Cosmic Background Imager
Separating E and B types of CMB polarization on an incomplete sky Wen Zhao Based on: WZ and D.Baskaran, Phys.Rev.D (2010) 2019/9/3.
Presentation transcript:

The second LDB flight of BOOMERanG was devoted to CMB polarization measurements Was motivated by the desire to measure polarization : –at 145 GHz (higher wrt WMAP, DASI, CBI etc.) –with bolometers (vs. coherent amplifiers of WMAP, DASI, CBI etc.) –controlling the dominant foreground (dust) by means of simultaneous observations at higher frequencies (245, 345 GHz) –in one of the best sky regions (foreground-wise) –in a multipoles range where the polarization signal can be higher than the foreground signal.

Universita di Roma, La Sapienza: P. de Bernardis, G. De Troia, A. Iacoangeli, S. Masi, A. Melchiorri, L. Nati, F. Nati, F. Piacentini, G. Polenta, S. Ricciardi, P. Santini, M. Veneziani Case Western Reserve University: J. Ruhl, T. Kisner, E. Torbet, T. Montroy Caltech/JPL: A. Lange, J. Bock, W. Jones, V. Hristov University of Toronto: B. Netterfield, C. MacTavish, E. Pascale Cardiff University: P. Ade, P. Mauskopf IFAC-CNR: A. Boscaleri INGV: G. Romeo, G. di Stefano IPAC: B. Crill, E. Hivon CITA: D. Bond, S. Prunet, D. Pogosyan LBNL, UC Berkeley: J. Borrill Imperial College: A. Jaffe, C. Contaldi U. Penn.: M. Tegmark, A. de Oliveira-Costa Universita di Roma, Tor Vergata: N. Vittorio, G. de Gasperis, P. Natoli, P. Cabella BOOMERanG-03

The Polarization-sensitive BOOMERanG: B03 Distribution of the PSBs in the focal plane : 8 pixels in the focal plane, separated by 30. Masi et al astro-ph/

The focal plane : all you see is cooled at 270 mK 10 cm

Sun Shield Ground Shield Solar Array Cryostat and detectors Primary Mirror (1.3m) Differential GPS Array Star Camera the B OOMERanG balloon-borne telescope B03 Sensitive at 145, 245, 345 GHz

BOOMERanG Is a microwave telescope ( GHz) with sensitive bolometric receivers (10 resolution) scanning the sky from the Antarctic stratosphere.

06/01/2003

[Masi et al. 2005] 145 GHz T map (Masi et al., 2005) the deepest CMB map ever

In the deep survey the S/N is high. The fluctuations are gaussian. D T rms = ( ) m K M1,M2 = first and second halves of the observations of the deep region. sum=(M1+ M2)/2 diff =(M1- M2)/2

Detection of anisotropy signals all the way up to l =1500 Time and detector jacknife tests OK Systematic effects negligible wrt noise & cosmic variance B03 TT Power Spectrum Jones et al. 2005

The use of fast estimators (FASTER, Hivon et al; XFASTER Contaldi et al.) allow us to carry out a very detailed analysis of how possible systematic effects propagate to the spectrum. The short summary is that all systematics we have considered are negligible wrt the effect of noise. B03 TT Power Spectrum [Jones et al. 2005] Jones et al. 2005

TE Power Spectrum Piacentini et al Smaller signal, but detection evident (3.5) NA and IT results consistent Error bars dominated by cosmic variance Time and detectors jacknife OK, i.e. systematics negligible Data consistent with TT best fit model

EE Power Spectrum Montroy et al Signal extremely small, but detection evident for EE (non zero at 4.8). No detection for BB nor for EB Time and detectors jacknife OK, i.e. systematics negligible Data consistent with TT best fit model Error bars dominated by detector noise.

EE Power Spectrum Montroy et al Time and detectors jacknife OK, i.e. systematics negligible Data consistent with TT best fit model and with other experiments: