Organisation of sampling programmes EU experience Jean-Marc Spieser / Marta Miquel Interregional Seminar for Quality Control Laboratories involved in WHO.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
EPAA Conference 5 November 2007 Georgette LALIS Enterprise and Industry DG European Commission The international dimension of regulatory acceptance.
Advertisements

Quality Assurance Processes for TB Drugs. GDF Quality Assurance Processes.
Registration in Europe Current situation and future outlook Thomas K ü rner, M.D. Nippon Boehringer Ingelheim Co., Ltd.
CMD(h) Report Progress report Truus Janse-de Hoog HMA meeting Budapest April 2011.
Introduction to PPDs Regulatory requirements and rationale.
UNICEF Medicines Supply Strengthening WHO Technical Briefing Seminar on Essential Medicines and Health Products Tuesday 29 October 2013 Technical Specialist.
ICH GCP, the MHRA and PATHOLOGY PATHOLOGY QUALITY ASSURANCE Rob Wosley MRQA SEPTEMBER 2009.
IPC meeting June 2014 Dr Joelle DAVIAUD, Quality Assurance Specialist Model Quality Assurance System for procurement agencies.
The European Railway Agency in development
Good Manufacturing Practices for Blood Establishments
EU Directive 2001/83/EC Dr. P. V. Appaji, M.Pharm, Ph.D
3rd Baltic Conference on Medicines Economic Evaluation, Reimbursement and Rational Use of Pharmaceuticals Pricing and Reimbursement of Pharmaceuticals.
Requirements of EU pharmacovigilance legislation for distributors Julia Sipos Quality Management Director Pharmacovigilance coordinator Version 03.
Quality Control Testing in Procurement Helene Möller, M.Pharm, PhD Interregional Seminar for Quality Control Laboratories involved in WHO Prequalification.
Information Exchange and International Collaboration in Quality Testing Richard Wanko Interregional Seminar for Quality Control Laboratories involved in.
Pharma.be The Initiative to Promote Clinical Trials in Belgium Key Performance Indicators: Impact on Clinical Research of European Legislation Square –
Training Workshop on Pharmaceutical Development with a Focus on Paediatric Medicines / October |1 | Prequalification programme: Priority essential.
Introduction to ISO New and modified requirements.
Need for integrated and sustainable regulatory surveillance of veterinary biologicals Gábor Kulcsár VBRN Advisory Group Meeting of HMA, Visegrád, 28 April.
Jean-Marc Spieser, 23/09/09 ©2009 EDQM, Council of Europe, All rights reserved 1 Principles of Article 58 - possible support to 3rd countries for licensing.
PRODUCT TRANSFER.
Railway Transport Equipment (RTE) Certification Railway Transport Equipment Certification Procedure Application for railway transport equipment certification.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Quality Assurance José Viegas Ribeiro IGF, Portugal SIGMA.
Recognition: the national centre and the ENIC Network Seminar on the recognition of qualifications Baku, 22 April 2005 Gunnar Vaht Head of the Estonian.
DMF Procedures and Communication between API, FP Manufacturers and Regulatory Authorities Jean-Louis ROBERT National Health Laboratory L – 1011 LUXEMBOURG.
Monograph Development Process for the European Pharmacopoeia: How to participate in the work programme of the European Pharmacopoeia Dr Claude Coune Head.
Principles of quality control of registered medicines, non- registered medicines and counterfeits of medical products Jean-Marc Spieser, Head of Department.
European Enforcement of Pharmacovigilance and Inspection Trends Is compliance possible within the EU? June 7, 2007 Dr. M.C. Koster CEO Vigilex Group.
Third OIE Global Conference on Animal Welfare Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia The OIE PVS Pathway Dr. Mariela Varas OIE International Trade Department.
Meeting for EU Generic Manufacturers and EU MA holders for generic medicines, Copenhagen, 26 November 2009 Generics approved by stringent regulatory authorities:
Paediatric Worksharing CMDh participation Work-sharing in Art 45 and 46 procedures Experiences in Art 29 procedures Presidency meeting 29 September 2011.
JRC - IRMM – 17/18 June 2008 – EAQC-WISE project workshop – Held1 The EAQC-WISE blueprint: Recommendations for a quality control system for chemical monitoring.
IRG/ERG Gabrielle Gauthey Member of the Board of ART.
1 The Future Role of the Food and Veterinary Office M.C. Gaynor, Director, FVO EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate.
General Aspects of Quality assessment of multisource interchangeable medicines Rutendo Kuwana Technical Officer, WHO, Geneva Training workshop: Assessment.
UNICEF Medicines Supply Strengthening WHO/UNICEF Technical Briefing Seminar on Essential Medicines Policies Tuesday 30 October 2012 Technical Specialist.
International conference Quality of Active Pharmaceutical Ingredients Hyderabad, September 2009 API Inspections: the EDQM experience – 7 September.
The New Legislative Framework
SEMINAR /WORKSHOP ON INTRODUCTION OF EU LEGISLATION ON COSMETIC PRODUCTS TAIEX Serbia MSc Ivona Vidić Štrac, Biol.Sci-Toxicology Head of.
PharmacoVigilance: Development of PhV systems and processes.
Visit us at E mail: Tele:
DOCUMENTATION ISO/IEC 17025:2005 Documentation.
Overview of the EU regulatory system and governance
China EU Pharmaceutical Forum
1 |1 | WHO Prequalification – Medicines Assessments Andrew Chemwolo, Technical Officer Prequalification Team – Medicines Assessment.
PharmacoVigilance: Development of PhV systems and processes VICH Workshop, Dar Es Salaam, Tanzania, 24 June 2015.
European Diagnostic Manufacturers Association EQA contribution and industry expectations Dr. Claude GIROUD – Chairman Standardization, Quality & Risk Management.
DMF Procedures and Communication between API, FFP Manufacturers and Regulatory Authorities Jean-Louis ROBERT National Health Laboratory L – 1011 LUXEMBOURG.
Organization and Implementation of a National Regulatory Program for the Control of Radiation Sources Program Performance Criteria.
European network for Health Technology Assessment | JA | EUnetHTA European network for Health Technology Assessment THL Info.
Good Laboratory Practice - general information Pirkko Puranen Senior Inspector, Ph.D. Inspectorate.
Evaluation of quality and interchangeability of medicinal products - EAC/EC/WHO Training workshop / September |1 | Prequalification programme:
Slide 1 The contribution of a world-class regulatory environment to the future of the industry in Ireland Pat O’Mahony Chief Executive, Irish Medicines.
Date: in 12 pts MARKET SURVEILLANCE IN THE EU ROLE IN THE NLF - EU ACTIONS and DEVELOPMENTS Rita L'Abbate European Commission DG ENTERPRISE AND INDUSTRY.
Tanzania, August 2006 Dr. Barbara Sterzik, BfArM, Bonn 1 Bioequivalence dossier requirements for the prequalification project WHO Training Workshop.
An agency of the European Union EU ISO IDMP Roadmap to enable eprescription cross-borders Towards a trans-atlantic solution to univocally identify medicinal.
1 The contribution of VICH to the global One Health approach VICH5 CONFERENCE, OCTOBER 2015, TOKYO Jean-Pierre Orand, Anses, France, OIE Collaborating.
POST APPROVAL CHANGE MANAGEMENT PROTOCOLS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION
A capacity building programme for patient representatives
TRANSPORT SCIENCE: INNOVATIVE BUSINESS SOLUTIONS
Periodic Safety Update Reports (PSUR)
Introduction of the National Center for Epidemiology (NCE) Hungary
REGULATORY PROBLEMS IN CARING OUT PRE- AND POST- AUTHORISATION CLINICAL TRIALS Dr Penka Decheva GCP Inspector, BDA.
Multinational collaboration in the Authorisation of VMPs: the EU approach VICH Outreach Forum Tokyo, Nov 2017 Noel Joseph European Commission.
GMP Inspection Process
OECD Principles of GLP and Test Guidelines
Changing the Reference Member State (RMS)
Variations and Mock-ups
Pharmacovigilance inspections: what HPRA expects
EUnetHTA Assembly May 2018.
Presentation transcript:

Organisation of sampling programmes EU experience Jean-Marc Spieser / Marta Miquel Interregional Seminar for Quality Control Laboratories involved in WHO Prequalification Programme and/or participating in respective sampling and testing projects, Nairobi, Kenya, September

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September |2 | Sampling & Testing programmes within the OMCL Network  The EDQM coordinates a series of (voluntary) collaborative programmes within the OMCL Network, with the aim of controlling the quality of medicinal products available on the European market: 1.MSS (Market Surveillance Studies) 2.MRP/DCP Post Marketing Surveillance Scheme (Mutual Recognition Procedure/Decentralised Procedure) 3.CAP Sampling and Testing Programme (Centrally Authorised Products)  Advantages of having coordinated surveillance programmes:  Sharing of work => avoid duplication of tests => save resources  Exchange of information/results

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September |3 |  In order to allow confidence, harmonisation and mutual recognition of results => a common approach is needed (when planning, performing and reporting the testing activities) => harmonised Quality Management Systems (QMS)  Advantages of having a well established QMS  processes/activities are under control => reduce the risk of errors.  increases traceability of activities (possible to go back and find cause of error).  increases confidence in test results => mutual recognition of results between labs/countries.  facilitates cooperation/exchanges/harmonisation between labs.  better use of resources => reduction of costs => labs can be more efficient.  better protection of public health. Sampling & Testing programmes within the OMCL Network

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September |4 |  With the purpose of establishing/maintaining harmonised QMS within the OMCL Network => EDQM coordinates 2 External Quality Assessment Programmes (voluntary, but participation is strongly recommended): –Audit/Visit/Training programme aimed to coach and help OMCLs establishing and improving their QMS (based on ISO/IEC and complementary OMCL guidelines, e.g. validation of analytical methods, uncertainty of measurement, qualification of equipment, etc). –PTS (Proficiency Testing Studies) aimed to provide the laboratories (within and outside the OMCL Network) with an objective and independent tool to demonstrate that the results they produce are accurate and reliable ( regular comparison of a laboratory’s results at intervals with those of other laboratories). Sampling & Testing programmes within the OMCL Network

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September |5 | Drug Quality Surveillance Programmes within the OMCL Network 1.MSS 2.MRP/DCP 3.CAP

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September |6 | 1 - Market Surveillance Studies (MSS)  Objective: control of the quality of the medicines (“screening”) on the European market, which are, as a rule, commercialised with a national marketing authorisation (MA).  Products tested: different types of preparations of active ingredients, herbals...  29 MSS have been finalised since the beginning of the programme, with an average participation of 12 OMCLs per MSS.  Since 1995 a yearly MSS programme is elaborated by EDQM, based on proposals from:  Advisory Group of the OMCL Network  OMCLs (e.g. after detection of quality problems during routine analytical work)  Inspectorates

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September |7 | Steps: 1.EDQM collects MSS proposals => programme => adopted by OMCL Network (annual meeting). 2.Head of MSS project appointed (normally from the proposing OMCL) => proposes the testing method (common protocol for all participants) + provides the Common Testing Sample. 3.Protocol is verified by a second laboratory (EDQM Dlab or another OMCL). 4.SAMPLING: participant OMCLs take samples along the distribution chain (wholesalers, retail pharmacies) from their national markets, in connection with the national competent services. 5.Participant OMCLs test the samples according to the common protocol. 6.In case of OOS, the product is retested using the method of the MA file. 7.OMCLs send results to EDQM => statistical evaluation of results => MSS report. 8.Subsequent actions and follow-up are the responsibility of the National Competent Authorities. 9.If a Pharmacopeia issue is identified, the report is forwarded to the concerned EDQM Dpt. Market Surveillance Studies (cont.)

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September |8 | Examples of Market Surveillance Study : Tablets and/or capsules containing lithium, tamoxifen, acyclovir, ibuprofen, lisinopril dihydrate, etc. Erythromycin Liquid Preparations. Omeprazole gastro-resistant tablets. Procaine in aqueous solutions for injection. Suspensions of dihydrostreptomycin or amoxicillin. Cadmium in herbal drugs. Studies on pharmaceutical technology (preparations for inhalation, uniformity of unidose preparations, tablets for which subdivision is authorised…). Market Surveillance Studies (cont.)

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September |9 | 2 - Post Marketing Surveillance Scheme of MRP/DCP  Objective: control of the quality of medicinal products on the EU/EEA market (European Union/European Economic Area = 27 EU countries + Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein) having received a MA through the Mutual Recognition Procedure (MRP) or the Decentralised Procedure (DCP) => identical MA dossier in all concerned member states (identical specifications and test methods).  Yearly programme, regularly run since 2005 (Trial Phase ). About 300 medicinal products tested per year, including generics.  More than 2300 MRP projects have been registered in a database (information shared) since  2 basic principles of the Scheme:  Work-sharing => to reduce duplication of testing => 1 single “testing lab”  Exchange of test results => Database

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September | Post Marketing Surveillance Scheme of MRP/DCP (cont.) Steps 1.Programme: OMCLs register in the database the product they plan to test. Tested material: approx. 2% APIs; 98% finished dosage forms. A risk based model for targeting medicinal products for market surveillance testing has been developed within the OMCL Network. 2.SAMPLING: the “testing OMCL” (or the Competent Authority of the Member State) takes samples from the national market. Other participating OMCLs might voluntarily send samples taken from their country to the testing OMCL. 3.Testing: tests are performed as a rule in one lab, according to MA dossier, or a method developed and validated by the OMCL (in-house method), or compendial methods. 4.Reporting: testing OMCL publishes the test results on the database. 5.Follow-up: follow-up measures are reported in the database. In general follow-up activities are the responsibility of the National Competent Authorities.

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September | 3 - CAP Sampling and Testing Programme  Objective: control of the quality of medicinal products on the EU/EEA market, having received a MA valid throughout EU/EEA => Centrally Authorised Products “CAP” (according to regulation EC/726/2004) (about 550 CAPs are currently available).  Unless a major issue is identified, CAPs are not tested by national authorities in their routine testing programmes.  Since 1999 the EMEA (European Medicines Agency) has implemented a post- authorisation sampling and testing programme: CAP programme.  As EMEA has no lab facilities => CAP programme is run by EDQM on behalf of EMEA, in collaboration with the EEA OMCL Network and the EEA National Inspection Services.  354 CAP projects have been run since the beginning of the CAP programme.

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September | Steps: 1)EMEA proposes the CAP programme => from 2010, products will be exclusively selected on the basis of a risk analysis, including a 5% of randomly selected additional products per year. 2)The MAH sends MA file and technical SOPs to EDQM. 3)EDQM prepares the testing protocol accord. to recommendations from the assessors (NCAs). 4)EDQM proposes the list of participating OMCLs => approved by the OMCL Network. 5)EDQM proposes a sampling plan based on the information received from the MAHs about the marketing situation 6)Sampling plan is sent to Inspectorates (sampling contact points). 7)SAMPLING is done along the distribution chain (preferably as closely as possible to patients) by the competent national services in 3 countries (1 batch per country => 3 batches). CAP Sampling and Testing Programme (cont.)

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September | Steps (cont.): 8)Inspectors send samples to EDQM under the required transport conditions. 9)EDQM requests the MAH to send 1 sample (control test sample) + reference materials. 10)Samples are labelled at EDQM + dispatched to testing OMCLs (1 OMCL if chemical/physico- chemical tests are requested, 2 OMCLs if biological tests are requested) + protocol + Results Data Sheet + ref. materials + Safety Data Sheet + other info if required. 11)OMCLs send back results to EDQM. 12)EDQM prepares individual product report => sent to EMEA and the OMCL Network via a secured system. 13)EMEA is responsible for the actions and follow up measures as an outcome of the results (feedback received from the assessors of the NCAs). CAP Sampling and Testing Programme (cont.)

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September | EMEA EDQM OMCLs (testing) National Inspectors (sampling) MAHs protocol report ref. mat. samples ref.mat. documentation CAP

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September | 1- MSS2- MRP/DCP3- CAP National MAMA via MRP/DCP procedureMA via Centrally Authorised Procedure Whole OMCL NetworkEU/EEA OMCL Network Variable no. participants (many testing OMCLs) Variable no. participants (1 testing OMCL as a rule) Defined no. participants (1 OMCL for chemical, 2 for biologicals) Variable no. samples Defined no. samples Protocol established by the Head of the MSS project Protocol based on the MA dossier + SOPs of manufacturer, or internal method or compendial Protocol based on MA dossier + SOPs from manufacturer Table of differences: Objective of the 3 programmes: survey of the quality of medicinal products

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September | Potential impact in case of confirmed OOS results:  Major or minor variations in the marketing authorisation file (change of specifications of an active substance or finished product and/or change of method).  Recall of a batch (in case of a confirmed quality defect).  If European Pharmacopoeia methods are concerned:  Revision of a monograph/general chapters and methods  Establishment of a new method

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September | MSS: MRP/DCP: CAP: QA: PTS: PTS programme 2009: QA OMCL Guidelines: For more information on EDMQ/OMCL Network programmes:

Sampling and testing for Quality Control Laboratories, Nairobi, September | Thank you for your attention