Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
Advertisements

Progress Towards Reading Success: The Reading First Evaluation Prepared by: Amy Kemp, Ph.D. Research Associate and Patricia A. Muller, Ph.D. Associate.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Policy & Practice Institute June 25, 2008 Mike Stetter and Lori Duerr Delaware Department of Education.
Instructional Decision Making
Response to Intervention (RtI) in Primary Grades
A Guide to Implementation
RTI Implementer Webinar Series: Establishing a Screening Process
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Winchester School District In Need of Improvement Plan DINI Team: Mel Harrison, Valerie Wilber, Hannah Gagnon, Dee Salonen, Amanda Nordberg, Jane Cardinale,
Pennsylvania’s Continuous Improvement Process. Understanding AYP How much do you know about AYP?
Progress Monitoring project DATA Assessment Module.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Arizona Department of Education School Improvement and Intervention.
Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux,
C4K – Building an efficient and effective delivery system to impact critical outcomes for kids Our initial focus as we build this system is early literacy.
MTSS – What’s That? Session 1 Response to Instruction and Intervention (RtI 2 ) – Work we are doing Multi-Tiered System of Supports (MTSS)  What is this.
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level “I think what makes a difference for our kids is that they graduate with a sense of place: high school,
RtI Assessment CED 613. Universal Screening What is it and what does it Evaluate? What is the fundamental question it is asking? What is the ultimate.
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
1 Reading First Internal Evaluation Leadership Tuesday 2/3/03 Scott K. Baker Barbara Gunn Pacific Institutes for Research University of Oregon Portland,
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Materials sponsored by the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta,
Using Targeted Interventions to Support School Improvement Presenter: Kathleen Smith Director Office of School Improvement.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
Fostering ELLs’ Achievement in Middle SchoolLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Materials sponsored by the Office of English Language Learners, New York.
DRIVING INSTRUCTION THROUGH DATA WITHOUT DATA IT IS JUST AN OPINION.
Wisconsin’s New Kindergarten Screener A training for the administration and scoring of the Phonological Awareness Literacy Screener.
5-Step Process Clarification The 5-Step Process is for a unit, topic, or “chunk” of information. One form should be used for the unit, topic, etc. The.
How It’s Being Done in Burlington Public Schools! Susan Astone Ellen Johnson John Lyons Deborah Dressler Dr. Eric Conti Superintendent of Burlington Public.
Jackson Public School District Holistic Accountability in Action.
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION A schoolwide, systematic, collaborative process in which ALL school resources are seamlessly integrated and singularly focused.
Response to Intervention (RtI) at Cesar Chavez Academy.
PARENT COORDINATOR INFORMATION SESSION PARENT ACCOUNTABILITY Wednesday, July 20, 2011 Madelene Chan, Supt. D24 Danielle DiMango, Supt. D25.
RtII: Data Analysis Teaming. Goals of Today’s Session  Compare and contrast types of collaborative teams Building-wide teams Grade-level teams Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Materials sponsored by the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta,
RtI in Georgia: Student Achievement Pyramid of Intervention
School Improvement Planning Today’s Session Review the purpose of SI planning Review the components of SI plans Discuss changes to SI planning.
THE KEY TO CLOSING THE ACHIEVEMENT GAP The key to predictable results in improving student achievement requires connecting curriculum, assessment and instruction.
Clare-Gladwin RESD Fall 2013 Alignment for Career and College Readiness.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
Winston/Salem Forsyth County Schools RESPONSIVENESS TO INSTRUCTION (RTI)
Expeditionary Learning Queens Middle School Meeting May 29,2013 Presenters: Maryanne Campagna & Antoinette DiPietro 1.
Supports K–12 School Effectiveness Framework: A Support for School Improvement and Student Success (2010). The integrated process of assessment and instruction.
RTI Response To Intervention. What is RTI ? Response to intervention is a multi – tier approach to the early identification and support of students with.
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
PLCS & THE CONNECTION TO RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION Essentials for Administrators Sept. 27, 2012.
Northwest ISD Target Improvement Plan Seven Hills Elementary
Academic Program Survey Kern County Superintendent of Schools Office RSDSS Region 8.
Overview Check for Understanding - Activity Collaboration/Discussion WASD Oct RtII is: [Student] Reponse to Instruction and Intervention:
◦ Using Data to Support the Response to Intervention Process.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Assessment Small Learning Communities. The goal of all Small Learning Communities is to improve teaching, learning, and student outcomes A rigorous, coherent.
KLA - ISLN Updates January Introducing the Content Specialists.
Assessment for Learning “Assessment for Learning”: A brief synopsis of a PLC working towards higher student achievement through assessment, data-based.
Using Data to Implement RtI Colleen Anderson & Michelle Hosp Iowa Department of Education.
PENFIELD CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: K-5 LITERACY CURRICULUM AUDIT Presented by: Dr. Marijo Pearson Assistant Superintendent for Curriculum, Instruction,
School-Based Problem-Solving for Individuals (SBIT)
Response to Instruction and Intervention and how it could apply to High Achievers/Gifted Education Tanya Morret, Dr. Christine.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
ADVANCED (SACS) SYSTEM SUMMARY FY15. STANDARD ONE INDICATORS 1.1-The system engages in a systematic, inclusive and comprehensive process to review, revise.
Response to Intervention for PST Dr. Kenneth P. Oliver Macon County Schools’ Fall Leadership Retreat November 15, 2013.
Richard Woods, Georgia’s School Superintendent “Educating Georgia’s Future” gadoe.org Quality Comprehensive Improvement System Key School Performance Standards.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Refining & Aligning: Recommendations for preparation policy to support rti2 and Special Education in Tennessee Kim Paulsen, vanderbilt university Blake.
Data Usage Response to Intervention
The Principles of Data Use in a RtI / 3-Tier Model
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Department of Education
RTI Response to Intervention (RTI) is a multi-tier approach to the early identification and support of students with learning and behavior needs. Struggling.
Presentation transcript:

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway ANALYZING ASSESSMENT RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Session Goals RTI Groundwork Examining Assessment Systems Data Analysis and Instructional Design Advancing your RTI Model  Analyze our current assessment battery to determine:  What assessment types are in use  Alignment between type and function

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Today’s Process Step 1 Understand Assessment Types Step 2 Categorize the Assessments within a School’s Battery Step 3 Determine if the Assessment Type Matches the Function RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Today’s Guiding Principles: 1. There are no “good” or “bad” assessments There are, however, good and bad ways of interpreting and using assessments 2. Assessments should fit into an RTI system that: Promotes student reading development Supports instructional decision making Minimizes time spent on testing  “Assessment per se guarantees nothing by way of improvement, no more than a thermometer cures a fever.” -T. J. Marchese RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway What are your goals for your students as readers? To use print as a tool in a lifelong journey of learning To use new words to convey ideas precisely To use language to explore new ideas  Our assessment battery should support these goals RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway UNDERSTANDING ASSESSMENT TYPES RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Today’s Process Step 1 Understand assessment types Step 2 Categorize the assessments within a school’s battery Step 3 Determine if the assessment type matches the function RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Tier 1 Assessment System Tier 1 Universal / school wide system to inform instructional planning and support all students’ learning Tier 2 Targeted for a smaller subset of students to inform intervention and monitor progress Tier 3 Individualized to better understand persistent difficulties and adjust intervention RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Review: 4 Assessment Types for Tier 1 RTI Formative Tied to the curriculum and daily instruction. Largely driven by teacher observation, although they can be formal as well as informal Examples: DRA, F&P Benchmark (formal); quizzes, check-ins (informal) Screening Quick assessments that provide a reference point for student performance outside of the curriculum in specific, separable skills Examples: DIBELS, STAR, Gates Outcome Normative assessments given once or twice a year. Examples: New York State ELA Assessment, NYSESLAT Test Prep Mimics state Assessment to provide a sense of how students will perform at the end of the year Examples: Acuity InFormation Alignment with Day-to-Day Instruction Not part of an RTI model

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Supporting the Analysis: Step 1 Distribute handout and allow participants time to read Allow some time for questions and/or discussion (5 minutes) Direct them to use the handout as a resource as they move forward in their next step RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway For You to Know

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway The Goal: Alignment of Assessment Type with its Function in an RTI System Type of Assessment Function RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway CATEGORIZING ASSESSMENT TYPES

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Today’s Process Step 1 Understand Assessment Types Step 2 Categorize the Assessments within a School’s Battery Step 3 Determine if the Assessment Type Matches the Function RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Identify the assessment types in your current battery  Write out a list of each assessment used at your school  Using the “Assessment Types” handout as a guide, decide which of the measures are formative, progress monitoring, outcome, or test prep These 2 columns can wait for today

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway MATCHING ASSESSMENT TYPE TO FUNCTION RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Today’s Process Step 1 Understand Assessment Types Step 2 Categorize the Assessments within a School’s Battery Step 3 Determine if the Assessment Type Matches the Function RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway The Goal: Alignment of Test Type with its Function in the RTI Model Type of Assessment Function RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Using Formative Data Appropriately Teacher To check for understanding as part of day-to-day planning To form (and rearrange) instructional groups To drive lesson planning Instructional Leader To enrich discussions of pedagogy  Formative Data should NOT be used to screen for difficulties relative to state or national standards. Results are central to the work of teachers and should not be collected or aggregated as a school. RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Hallmarks of Good Implementation: Formative Assessments In the School Teachers administer on their own time-table—as needed to inform instruction Scores stay at the individual level; they are not aggregated across classrooms or a school In the Classroom Data is used to better understand students’ needs in the context of instruction RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Appropriate Use of Screeners Teacher To understand student performance relative to state or national standards To identify patterns of instructional needs in a classroom To identify priority areas for Tier 1 (core) instruction To create profiles of student risk Instructional Leader To identify patterns of student performance To identify priority areas for professional development To ensure a timely and appropriate model of service delivery To evaluate curriculums and programs  Screeners identify potential problems—they do not tell us the best course of treatment. RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Hallmarks of Good Implementation: Screeners In the School School-wide schedule and timeline for administration and scoring Alignment of test type across grades In the Classroom Used as a quick “green light, yellow light red light” to identify needs for more intensive instruction (NOT how to design instruction) Patterns in the data across students drive instructional priorities RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Appropriate Use of Outcome Assessments Teacher Identify how her students are doing compared to the “outside world” Instructional Leader Identify broad areas of strength and weakness Gauge how well school is serving student groups  Outcome measures should not be used to drive instruction. Teaching test items does not build up the underlying skills. RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Hallmarks of Good Implementation: Outcome Assessments In the School Used as a broad indicator of how groups are performing against expectations for the school-age population In the Classroom Results inspire inquiry into potential student needs RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Appropriate Use of Test Prep Measures Teacher Provide test preparation and practice Instructional Leader Provide an option for test prep for students and teachers  Test Prep is not part of an RTI assessment model RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Hallmarks of Good Implementation: Test Prep Measures In the School or Classroom Used sparingly to provide familiarity with the process of taking a standardized test RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Timing Dictated by Teacher Timing Dictated by School Timing Dictated by State Recipe for A Strong Assessment System: Universal Measures Formative Measures Screening Measures Outcome Assessment Code Based Meaning Based Ongoing as needed to calibrate instruction Periodic check-in on student mastery against external benchmarks Annual, summative assessment of student achievement in broad content areas

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Identify the assessment types in your current battery  Check off the way each assessment is being used  Feel free to take any notes on alignment between type and function RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway For Discussion: How can we better match the type to function in how we administer and use assessments? What information are we missing on our students? RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway CLOSING AND REFLECTION RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway

Materials developed in collaboration with the Office of English Language Learners, New York City Department of Education RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway Summary and Take-Aways Scores on literacy assessments tell us about students’ instructional needs In order to fully understand students’ needs, we must use screening as well as formative assessments To have an efficient assessment battery that prioritizes instructional time, we need to carefully match each assessment type to its function RTI Model for ELL Academic SuccessLesaux, Marietta, & Phillips Galloway