E3G, January 2014 The EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy Package.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies Marten Westrup
Advertisements

A 2030 framework for climate and energy policies Energy.
Climate Action EU ETS #EU2030 Jos Delbeke DG CLIMATE ACTION Carbon Expo 2014 – Cologne 28 May 2014.
Project Discovery Transmission Workstream, 4 March 2010 Ben Woodside.
1 ACT AND ADAPT: CLIMATE CHANGE IN SCOTLAND Climate Change Division.
The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Rationale and Lessons learnt Artur Runge-Metzger Head of International Climate Negotiations, European Commission.
EU-Russia Seminar “Post-2012 action to abate climate change”
Lena Ek Member of the European Parliament. Lena Ek Member of the European Parliament The EU risks permanently lowered growth path The European economy.
The 2030 Framework for Climate and Energy Sustainable Development or Expensive Dreams? PRESENTATION by Michael STEURER Warsaw, 15 October 2014.
EU Energy Strategy
Ad Hoc Working Group on Article 3.9 of the Kyoto Protocol Battling global climate change - the EU’s perspective (Part II) Artur Runge-Metzger European.
The Paris Protocol - a blueprint for tackling global climate change beyond 2020 Securing a new international climate agreement applicable to all to keep.
Energy Tom Howes DG Energy European Commission Europe's renewable energy strategy.
1 Brendan Devlin Adviser, Markets and Infrastructure Directorate B, DG ENER European Commission.
EU Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
Charting the Upsurge in Hydropower Development 2015
Round table: COVENANT OF MAYORS (Energy policy of EU) Varna – 10th -12th September 2014.
WIND ENERGY Is there a Latvian Master Plan? CHRISTIAN KJÆR Chief Executive Officer European Wind Energy Association SSE Riga, 4 December 2008 © EWEA/L.
Owen WILSON Environment and Sustainable Development Committee, EURELECTRIC POWER CHOICES EURELECTRIC Study on low-CO2 Europe by 2050 POWER CHOICES EURELECTRIC.
Key developments and challenges in the Nordic region - Eurelectric Members’ Day Oluf Ulseth CEO, Energy Norway Brussels, February 6, 2012.
UK Renewable Energy Policy with particular reference to bioenergy
Heat and Energy Saving 02 March 2009 John Russell
1 1 CURRENT ENERGY POLICY CHALLENGES. THE 2030 ENERGY AND CLIMATE FRAMEWORK DG Energy, European Commission.
© OECD/IEA 2010 Energy Policies of the Czech Republic 2010 In-depth Review Energy Policies of the Czech Republic 2010 In-depth Review Prague, 7 October.
1 Macroeconomic Impacts of EU Climate Policy in AIECE November 5, 2008 Olavi Rantala - Paavo Suni The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
© OECD/IEA 2012 Mexico City, July 13, 2012 Richard H. Jones, Deputy Executive Director Dr. Markus Wråke, ETP Project Leader,
EU Climate Action EU – Central Asia Working Group on
E R E F European Renewable Energies Federation Expectations on the EU Energy Union European Economic and Social Committee Dirk Hendricks 12 May 2015.
European Commission Next Steps Post-Kyoto: U.S. Options The EU Experience Sustainable Energy Institute Washington D.C, March 30, 2005 Robert Donkers, Environment.
Building a low-carbon economy The UK’s innovation challenge 19 th July
UK experience of and plans for reducing emissions of greenhouse gases
EU 2030 climate and energy update. Climate Action Network Europe over 120 member organisations in more than 25 European countries.
Anni Podimata MEP Member, Committee on Industry, Research and Energy 8th Inter-Parliamentary Meeting on Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Budapest,
ENERGY UNION AND SMART ISLANDS EESC, 10 July 2015 EUROCHAMBRES The Association of European Chambers of Commerce and Industry.
European Commission DG TREN / C: Conventional Energy Greenhouse gas mitigation and energy policy, a European perspective Presentation by Cristóbal.
WEC Bulgarian Energy Day 18 th June 2010 Climate change policy beyond 2012.
Commission’s Climate change and energy package: ETUC’s viewpoint S. Dupressoir, Adviser European Trade Union Confederation, Conference What energy policy.
EU COMMON STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FUNDS IN ENGLAND INITIAL PROPOSALS FROM HMG 21 NOVEMBER 2012.
The EU's Climate and Energy Policy Manchester, 24 October 2012
European Commission Directorate-General for Economic and Financial Affairs Global Economic Prospects 2009: Commodity Markets at the Crossroads Nathalie.
© OECD/IEA 2015 Budapest, 19 October © OECD/IEA 2015 Energy & climate change today A major milestone in efforts to combat climate change is fast.
Climate Action Meeting the EU’s Kyoto commitments & Avoiding a gap after 2012 Doha, 27 November 2012 Paolo CARIDI Policy Coordinator DG Climate Action.
AMBITIOUS TARGETS FOR ENERGY RD & D MEETING PLANETARY EMERGENCIES.
Informal Thematic Debate of the General Assembly Climate Change as a Global Challenge 31 July 2007, United Nations The way forward: International Context.
ETS POST REVISION THE LIME SECTOR Ms. Eleni Despotou EuLA Secretray General.
Conference of European Churches EU on the way to the UN climate change conference in Paris Peter Pavlovic Conference of European Churches.
Climate Change October Main concepts Climate change – lasting change of some or all characteristics, describing the average weather condition Greenhouse.
European Commission EU policy response to the crisis EU policy response to the crisis ILO Thematic Dialogues Geneva, 4 June 2009 Robert Strauss, DG EMPL.
EAI Board The EU 2030 Climate and Energy Framework 11 th March 2014.
The European Climate and Energy Policy Assessment and future prospects Co-finanziato Dal Programma LLP dell’Unione Europea L’autore è il solo responsabile.
Dutch presidency agenda on ensuring industrial competitiveness Erik Janssen, Ministry of Economic Affairs The Netherlands.
MEM and the road to Poznan and to Copenhagen Alberto Devoto Embassy of Italy, Washington DC.
Energy Union Leonardo ZANNIER, Policy Officer, ENER A1
© OECD/IEA Do we have the technology to secure energy supply and CO 2 neutrality? Insights from Energy Technology Perspectives 2010 Copenhagen,
“Strengthen the EU ETS to cost- effectively decarbonise the EU economy” Giuseppe Montesano Chair of EURELECTRIC’s Environment & Sustainable Development.
Agriculture and Food security related challenges Jerome Mounsey Policy Officer Land Use and Finance for Innovation DG Climate Action European Commission.
The European Energy Union
Source: Directorate-General for Energy Post Paris: Future of Automotive Fuels Political challenges Philip Good DG Energy - European Commission.
1 Europe's Climate and Energy Policy Jean-Arnold Vinois European Commission Directorate-General for Energy and Transport
Climate Action Climate and Energy: EU perspective Madrid, Universidad Pontificia Comillas 18 May 2015 Jos DELBEKE Director General for Climate Action European.
CLEAN ENERGY FOR ALL EUROPEANS
Karl Vella - EURELECTRIC
Energy for a changing world
Introduction into Bio Based Economy
The revision of the EU Emissions Trading System for phase 4 and the implementation process Stakeholder Meeting on the Preliminary Carbon Leakage List for.
Roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050
EU ENERGY UNION Lucas Maurer DG Energy, European Commission.
EU ENERGY UNION Lucas Maurer DG Energy, European Commission.
EU climate policies delivering
EU plan: Supporting directives • The EU Renewable Energy Directive was adopted at the end of 2008 • EU Renewable Energy Directive.
Presentation transcript:

E3G, January 2014 The EU’s 2030 Climate and Energy Package

About E3G About us – E3G is an independent, non-profit organisation operating in the public interest. We have a global outlook and reach, with offices in London, Brussels, Berlin and Washington DC, together with a regular presence in China. Mission – E3G works to accelerate the transition to sustainable development Strategy – E3G mobilises multi-sector coalitions to deliver strategically important outcomes – E3G develops and disseminates new methods and models for change E3G - Third Generation Environmentalism 2

Presentation Outline 1.What is the EU 2030 Package? 2.How ambitious is the 2030 package? 3.How the EU’s 2030 Ambition Compares – What It Means for Paris 4.The Politics of 2030 E3G 3

Background: The EU “ Package” The EU first developed a unified approach to climate and energy policy in 2008: package:  Building momentum before Copenhagen  Personal commitment by political leaders, including the President of the European Commission  EEA Report: targets will be met 2030 Package following the same structure E3G 4

Continues Trajectory of EU Decoupling GDP Growth and Carbon Emissions : EU GDP increased by 42%, GHG emissions decreased by 17%: E3G 5

6 The 2030 Framework for Climate & Energy: Agreed Headline Targets E3G Ref: European Commission

The 2030 Framework for Climate & Energy: Agreed Headline Targets II A binding EU target of at least 40% domestic reduction in GHG emissions compared to 1990, delivered collectively with reductions in – ETS sectors: 43% by 2030 compared to 2005 – non-ETS sectors: 30% by 2030 compared to An EU-wide binding target of at least 27% for the share of renewable energy consumed in the EU by A non-binding EU target of 27% energy efficiency improvements against future energy consumption projections; will be reviewed by 2020, having in mind an EU level of 30%. A target of 15% by 2030 for interconnections; the minimum interconnection target of 10% is to be met urgently, and no later than E3G 7

What Legal Force for the 2030 Package? 2030 package ≙ a political agreement between EU Heads of State and Government. EP more ambitious: achieved inclusion of EE target. EU Commission to implement the agreement through legislative and non-legislative procedures ( ) period. Approval for legislation necessary by European Parliament and Council of the European Union: ETS reform, RES and EE targets. E3G

The 2030 Framework for Climate & Energy: The ETS Elements of the 2030 Agreement ETS cap to decline with 2.2% from 2021 onwards, from 1.74%. Continued free allocation (to prevent carbon leakage) Innovation Fund (“NER400”) 400m allowances For CCS, RES, low carbon innovation in industrial sectors For projects in all Member States New Modernisation Fund 300m allowances For energy efficiency improvements and modernisation of energy systems For 10 lower income Member States (same states benefiting from free allocation to energy sector) Involvement of EIB E3G 9 All items subject of the European Commission’s consultation on the revision of the EU ETS directive running until mid- March 2015

Structural Reform of the European Carbon Market: New ETS Legislation in 2015 In January 2014, the European Commission proposed an automatic mechanism to remove the 2bn surplus of ETS allowances – to meet the medium-term target in a cost-effective manner. to make the ETS more resilient to possible future demand shocks. The Market Stability Reserve (MSR) would introduce more flexible auction supply by: Putting allowances in the reserve in case of too high surplus Releasing allowances from the reserve when allowances get scarce. MSR to come into force in 2021, institutionalising a surplus of ETS allowances between 400 and 833 million tonnes. Next steps: The European Parliament is currently examining the proposals; negotiations between Parliament, European Council and Commission are expected in March-April, for a possible plenary vote on the final text in July E3G

Market Stability Reserve (MSR) E3G 11

Alongside the 2030 Framework A Resilient Energy Union  Vice-President for Energy Union Maroš Šefčovič’s vision evolves around 5 pillars: Security, solidarity and trust: Better coordination, cooperation with neighbours (Energy Community & Mediterranean countries), potential common purchasing of gas. Completion of a competitive internal energy market: through more regional cooperation, better and smarter infrastructure, and with support of the Investment Package. Moderation of demand, by improving energy efficiency; possibly supported by a higher EE target for The decarbonisation of the EU energy mix, notably through a commitment to renewables and to the international process. Research and innovation for new energy technologies. E3G 12

Presentation Outline 1.What is the EU 2030 Package? 2.How ambitious is the 2030 package? 3.How the EU’s 2030 ambition compares – What It Means for Paris 4. The Politics of 2030 E3G

EU 2030 Agreed by Consensus: Coal Dependency of Poland Pulled Down EU Ambition E3G [Ref: E3G analysis]

Most CEE Countries Still Low Efficiency and Low Carbon “Technology Takers” E3G 15 Large EE potential & High carbon intensity Low innovation capacity – “technology takers”  Need positive low carbon economy offer [Ref: E3G analysis based on Eurostat]

Central and East European countries to benefit most from energy efficiency E3G 16 Low Efficiency/ High Import Dependency Countries

40% GHG Cuts Are Not the Most Cost- Effective Trajectory -40% GHG goal based on modelling in 2013 on cost effective trajectory to meet 80% reduction by Since this modelling was undertaken: – Uncertainty in the oil markets has increased, – Natural gas prices have increased due to Ukraine-Russia crisis, – Renewable and LED prices dropped by 40%-100% between 2001 and – GDP growth forecasts for the EU have fallen by half A more cost-effective goal would be 45-47% domestic cuts. E3G 17

Renewable Energy Deployment Rates Would Have to Slow E3G 18

Potential for Increased Investment in Energy Efficiency including before 2020 Europe far from utilising its cost-effective EE potential in all sectors: – a 27% EE target was agreed  big battle, but not over. – a 40% target would have increased EU GDP by 4.5% GDP in 2030 (or around €457 billion) vs. 1% for a 30% target. – EE could drive job creation: construction (+20%), engineering (+4%) & manufacturing (+2%). Energy Security concerns driving more interest in EE through EU Energy Union especially in low efficiency, gas-dependent countries. Individual EU MS developing their own EE measures and policies: Germany and France. More EU funding available for EE but challenges with MS capacity and expertise: struggle to deliver effective projects. Juncker Plan for €300bn stimulus prioritises EE and renewables investment.  More reforms needed to enable large-scale EE uptakes (e.g. Buildings). E3G 19

Energy Intensity in Comparison E3G 20 Source: Eurostat 2014

1.What is the EU 2030 Package? 2.How ambitious is the 2030 package? 3.How the EU’s 2030 ambition compares – What It Means for Paris 4.The Politics of 2030 Presentation Outline E3G 21

What Does This Mean for Paris? Package is focused on EU domestic policy. Package will form basis of EU INDC in March Unclear if GHG target (“at least”) will increase: could allow use of external offsets and ETS trading. Process for translating package into INDC still unclear. EU also needs to make decisions on pre-2020 action and finance (pre and post 2020) before Paris. E3G 22

How the EU Compares: US-China Agreement US to reduce GHG emissions by 26-28% by 2025 (1990 levels) China to peak emissions by 2030 latest E3G 23

Presentation Outline 1.What is the EU 2030 Package? 2.How ambitious is the 2030 package? 3.How the EU’s 2030 Ambition Compares – What It Means for Paris 4.The politics of 2030 E3G 24

Businesses Backing More Ambition High carbon/energy intensive businesses concerned about competitiveness due to high electricity prices in Europe. But: Business Europe not representing all businesses: e.g. Unilever left in August Counter-arguments by low carbon business champions lobbying for more ambition on EE (e.g. Prince of Wales Corporate Leaders Group): – Incentivising energy savings to reduce dependence on electricity prices. – Business opportunities: wind turbines, power lines, smart demand services, insulation, etc. E3G 25

Cities Backing More Ambition Cities more vocal because of increased vulnerability to climate impacts. Covenant of Mayors, Committee of the Regions and city networks including Energy Cities backed more ambitious, binding 2030 targets (50% GHG, 40% RES, 40% EE). The Covenant of Mayors includes over 5,000 EU cities and regions which voluntarily committed to cut CO2 emissions by over 20% by Compact of Mayors (incl. Turkish Mayors) initiative alongside COP20 in Lima setting climate targets and reporting mechanisms. E3G 26

Four Conclusions on EU The EU 2030 package is a major contribution to global efforts to keep global climate risk below the agreed 2C threshold. The “at least 40%” domestic GHG reduction target is (just) consistent with EU 2050 goal of 80% GHG cuts. The politics of economic crisis prevented a stronger target. E3G 27

Four Conclusions on EU The EU is likely to achieve more than a 40% GHG cuts by EU 2030 targets for renewable energy and energy efficiency continue business-as-usual growth rates. The efficiency target does not utilise EU cost-effective potential. Energy security concerns will drive national policies to go beyond EU goals. E3G 28

Four Conclusions on EU The EU will increase action before The EU is likely to deliver 24-25% GHG cuts by 2020, mostly due to policy actions & the impact of the economic crisis. Low carbon investment will be prioritised in the €300 billion stimulus package. ETS reform and further efficiency measures will be agreed by 2016, including in increased in vehicle efficiency. E3G 29

Four Conclusions on EU The EU and Member States are implementing deep reforms. Member States such as UK, Denmark, Germany and France have legislated deep reforms to their energy markets, including power sector decarbonisation goals. The EU Energy Union will drive more coherent energy policy and the 2030 interconnection target will support the emergence of regional electricity free trade areas. All new buildings will be zero carbon from E3G 30

What Are the Messages from Lima? COP20 highlighted need for fossil fuel phase-out. Climate Finance as a political tool: rebuilds confidence amongst developing countries that developed countries are serious about their commitments. Climate Finance provides the means and incentives for developing countries to act on both mitigation and adaptation measures.

An EU Perspective on Paris COP must reframe success – we need a new mindset of reciprocity and trust. A “deal” ≠ success – a deal is necessary but not the arbiter of success. The immediate reaction to and perception of the agreement from business and media is critical. There is a spectrum of success –2015 will unlikely deliver an outright 2°C outcome. Vital to cap worst case scenarios, build effective capacity to ratchet up ambition. E3G 32

What Does This Mean for Turkey? EE as a way to tackle issues around energy dependence and competitiveness. RES potential in Turkey one of the biggest in the OECD (wind, solar, hydro, geothermal). Energy trading hub: to include RES? Climate risks and extreme weather events = the “new normal”? Impact on cities. Resource pressures and economic interdependence requiring cooperation in energy and climate policy E3G 33

Please visit our website You can contact us at Thank You E3G 34