2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ENDEAVOR IV Acronym: ENDEAVOR IV. Lead investigator: Dr Martin Leon from Columbia University, New York Source: Transcatheter cardiovascular Therapeutics,
Advertisements

Introduction Recent guidelines considered PCI to be a potential alternative to CABG for ULMCA stenosis, based on several large registries and randomized.
J. Mehilli, MD, G. Richard, F-J. Neumann, S. Massberg, K-L. Laugwitz, J. Pache, J. Hausleiter, I. Ott, M. Fusaro, T. Ibrahim, A. Schömig, A. Kastrati Deutsches.
Five-Year Follow-up of Safety and Efficacy of the Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: Insights from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical Trial Program in Approximately.
3rd CEEGI Advisory Board1 Resolute in the DES era: Indications & Limitations Georgios I. Papaioannou, MD, MPH, FACC, FSCAI Athens Medical Center Cardiac.
Resolute all comers trial Objective:To compare the efficacy and safety of the new generation ZES stent versus the everolimus eluting stent. Study:Multicenter,
For distribution in the USA only. Trademarks may be registered and are the property of their respective owners. © 2013 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved.
Resolute IntegrityTM Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent System
Clinical Result Overview
Prasugrel vs. Clopidogrel for Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Managed without Revascularization — the TRILOGY ACS trial On behalf of the TRILOGY ACS.
Two-Year Clinical Outcomes Yan Li MD., PhD. On behalf of FIREMAN Investigators Associated Professor of Department of Cardiology of Xijing Hospital Fourth.
As presented by Keith D Dawkins MD FRCP FACC Southampton University Hospital United Kingdom EuroSTAR The European Cobalt Stent with Antiproliferative for.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
NOBORI New Generation Drug Eluting Stent Clinical Data Danny Detiege Clinical Manager - Cardiology Terumo Europe N.V. Leuven, Belgium.
1 of Presented by Gregg W. Stone, MD, ACC PROMUS Stent is a private-labeled Xience V Everolimus Eluting Coronary Stent System manufactured.
A Randomized Comparison of Everolimus-­ Eluting Absorb Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds vs. Everolimus-Eluting Metallic Stents: One-Year Angiographic and.
Endeavor Safety: Pooled Analysis of Early and Late Safety of a Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent Laura Mauri, MD, MSc Brigham and Women’s Hospital Harvard Clinical.
FRONTIER Registry The Guidant MULTI-LINK FRONTIER ™ Coronary Stent System for the Treatment of Pts with Native De Novo or Restenotic Bifurcation Coronary.
Two-Year Outcomes After Everolimus- or Sirolimus- Eluting Stents in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease in the ISAR-TEST 4 Trial Robert A. Byrne, Adnan.
RESOLUTE US One-Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal Multicenter RESOLUTE US Study Objective To evaluate the clinical effectiveness of the Resolute.
The Endeavor Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent: Device Description and Comprehensive Update of the Clinical Trial Program.
Endeavor 4: A Randomized Comparison of a Zotarolimus- Eluting Stent and a Paclitaxel- Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease Martin B.
Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial Myeong-Ki.
ISAR-CABG Objective To compare the efficacy of DES with BMS in a randomized trial powered for clinical events Sample 610 patients with de novo SVG lesions.
Compare Trial 2 year follow-up Peter Smits Maasstad Ziekenhuis Rotterdam The Netherlands.
For OMA distribution only. © 2014 Medtronic, Inc. All rights reserved DOC_1A 03/14 Four-Year Outcomes Following Resolute Zotarolimus-Eluting Stent.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
RAVEL 4 YEAR FOLLOW-UP - Cordis Cardiology / Cardialysis – Euro-PCR – Sousa – 24 May 2005 RAVEL A RAndomised, double-blind study with the Sirolimus-eluting.
NEXT A Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Cre8, a Polymer-Free Stent Eluting Sirolimus, to a Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent Didier Carrié, MD,PhD On behalf.
Philippe Généreux, MD for the Tryton Bifurcation Trial Investigators Columbia University Medical Center Cardiovascular Research Foundation New York City.
1 Do Tirofiban And ReoPro Give Similar Efficacy Outcomes Trial N Engl J Med 2001;344:
Durable Polymer DES: 5 Year Outcomes RESOLUTE Update Sigmund Silber, MD FESC, FACC, FAHA Heart Center at the Isar Munich, Germany On Behalf of the RESOLUTE.
Prof. Dr. Sigmund Silber, FESC, FACC On behalf of the RESOLUTE
David E. Kandzari, MD on behalf of the BIONICS investigators
The OPTIMAX first-in-man study Mid-term clinical outcome of Titanium-Nitride-Oxide-coated Cobalt Chromium stents in patients with de novo coronary artery.
Everolimus-eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffolds in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: ABSORB III Trial 2-Year Results Stephen G. Ellis, MD,
New Generation Resolute Integrity Drug-Eluting Stent Superior to Benchmark Xience Drug-Eluting Stent: Primary Endpoint Results from the PROPEL Study –
on behalf of the ABSORB II Investigators
Three-year results from the multicentre PROMUS Element European Post-Approval (PE-Prove) Registry: outcomes in 1010 unselected patients treated with a.
Main Arena IV - Plenary Session XXVII: First Reports #4
12 Month Outcomes in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus Implanted with a Resolute Zotarolimus-eluting Stent: Initial Results from the RESOLUTE Global Clinical.
LONG-DES II Trial Randomized Comparison of the Efficacy of Sirolimus-Eluting Stent Versus Paclitaxel-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Long Native Coronary.
The RESOLUTE Program: today and tomorrow
On behalf of J. Belardi, M. Leon, L. Mauri,
FINAL FIVE-YEAR CLINICAL OUTCOMES OF THE NOBORI2 TRIAL
Two-Year Extended Follow-up in Patients Receiving a Zotarolimus-eluting Stent in the E-Five Registry Martin T. Rothman, Ian T. Meredith, Keyur Parikh,
A Randomized, Prospective, Intercontinental Evaluation of a Bioresorbable Polymer Sirolimus-eluting Stent: the CENTURY II Trial: an Update with 2 Years.
Kyoto University Hospital, Japan
3-Year Clinical Outcomes From the RESOLUTE US Study
ENDEAVOR IV: 5 Year Final Outcomes
Patient Related OuTcomes with Endeavor versus Cypher Stenting Trial:
Five-Year Cumulative Rates of Clinical Events after Cypher™ Stent Implantation: Insights from a Patient-Level Pooled Analysis of Four Randomized Trials.
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
SIRIUS: A U.S. Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of the SIRolImUS-Eluting Stent in De Novo Native Coronary Lesions Presented at TCT 2002.
Incidence and management of restenosis after treatment of unprotected left main disease with drug-eluting stents: 70 restenotic cases from a cohort of.
On behalf of all principal COMPARE II investigators:
ENDEAVOR II Five-Year Clinical Follow-up
FOR DISTRIBUTION BY MEDTRONIC OFFICE OF MEDICAL AFFAIRS ONLY.
Gregg W. Stone, MD Columbia University Medical Center
The Synergy between Percutaneous Coronary Intervention with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery: The SYNTAX Study One Year Results of the PCI and CABG Registries.
ENDEAVOR III Multicenter Randomized Trial Clinical/MACE Angio/IVUS
Presented at TCT 2006.
Martin B. Leon, David R. Holmes, Dean J. Kereiakes, Jeffrey J
Long Term Clinical Results from the Endeavor Program: 5-Year Follow up
Maintenance of Long-Term Clinical Benefit with
DEScover: One-Year Clinical Results
Comparison of Everolimus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents: First Report of the Five-Year Clinical Outcomes from.
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs
The American College of Cardiology Presented by Dr. A. Abazid
ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial Zotarolimus- vs
Presentation transcript:

2 Year Clinical Outcomes from the Pivotal RESOLUTE US Study Laura Mauri MD, MSc on behalf of the RESOLUTE US Investigators Brigham and Women’s Hospital Boston, MA ACC 2012

Enrollment Complete - In Follow Up RESOLUTE 1 Non-RCT First-in-Human (R=139) 5 yr RESOLUTE AC 2,3 1:1 RCT vs. Xience V (R=1140; X=1152) 2 yr Non-RCT Observational (R=2349) 2 yr 2.25 – 4.0 mm Non-RCT vs. Hx Control (R=1402) 2 yr RESOLUTE US – 3.5 mm Non-RCT (R=100) vs. Hx Control RESOLUTE Japan 2 yr R Japan SVS 2.25 Non-RCT vs. PG (R=65) < 1yr 38 mm sub-study Non-RCT vs. PG (R=114) < 1yr RESOLUTE Asia Non-RCT Observational (R=312) < 1yr RI-US Registry Post-approval study (R=230) plan RESOLUTE US RESOLUTE Global Clinical Program RESOLUTE Global Clinical Program Enrolling / Planning 1:1 RCT vs. Taxus (R=200; T=200) R-China RCT < 1yr RESOLUTE Int 4 RESOLUTE Int 4 1 Meredith IT, et al. EuroIntervention. 2010;5: Serruys PW, et al. N Engl J Med. 2010;363: Silber S, et al. Lancet. 2011;377: Neumann FJ, et al. EuroIntervention. 2012;7(10): Yeung AC, et al. JACC. 2011;57: R-China Registry Non-RCT Observational (R=1800) < 1yr

Hx Controls Performance Goals Resolute stent 2.25–3.5 Clinical (n=1242) 2.25–3.5 Angio/IVUS (n=100) 4.0 Angio (n=60) 38mm Clinical (n=110–175) RESOLUTE US PI: M. Leon, L. Mauri, A. Yeung Primary Endpoints: 2.25–3.5 Clinical → Target Lesion Failure at 12mo2.25–3.5 Clinical → Target Lesion Failure at 12mo 2.25–3.5 Angio/IVUS → In-Stent LLL at 8mo2.25–3.5 Angio/IVUS → In-Stent LLL at 8mo 4.0 Angio → In-Segment LLL at 8mo4.0 Angio → In-Segment LLL at 8mo 38 mm Clinical → Target Lesion Failure at 12mo38 mm Clinical → Target Lesion Failure at 12mo Drug Therapy: ASA and clopidogrel/ticlopidine ≥ 6mo (per guidelines) De Novo Native Coronary Lesion Vessel Diameter: 2.25 – 4.2 mm Lesion Length: ≤ 27 mm (≤ 35 mmlesions tx w/ 38 mm stent) (≤ 35 mm lesions tx w/ 38 mm stent) Clinical endpoints Angio/IVUS endpoints 6mo4yr3yr2yr12mo18mo8mo5yr9mo30d N = max 1577 patients Up to 135 US sites Clinical Study Design Mauri L, et al. Am Heart J. 2011;161:

Key Inclusion Criteria Clinical evidence of ischemic coronary disease Single or double de novo lesion in native coronary artery Target lesion ≤27mm in length, diameter stenosis ≥50% <100%, and target RVD ≥2.25mm ≤4.2mm Target vessel TIMI flow ≥2 Patient is able to take DAPT for at least 6 months Treatment of up to two lesions, if the lesions are located in separate target vessels Key Exclusion Criteria Acute MI within 72 hours of index procedure Previous PCI of target vessel within 9 months pre-procedure Planned PCI of any vessel within 30 days post-procedure Hx stroke or TIA within 6 months LVEF <30% RESOLUTE US Key Eligibility Criteria Mauri L, et al. Am Heart J. 2011;161:

RESOLUTE US Patient Flow Chart 1Yr Clinical Follow-up n = % 1Yr Clinical Follow-up n = % Patients Enrolled N = 1402 Patients Enrolled N = Yr Clinical Follow-up n = % 2Yr Clinical Follow-up n = %

RESOLUTE US % All Patients (2.25 mm – 4.00 mm diameter) N = 1402 Patients / 1573 Lesions Age, years (mean ± SD) 64.1±10.7 Male68.3 Diabetes mellitus 34.4 IDDM9.6 Prior PCI 32.7 Reason for revascularization: Stable angina 56.1 Unstable angina 41.9 Myocardial infarction 2.1 LAD45.9 RVD (mm) 2.6 ± 0.5 Type B2/C lesion 75.2 Two vessel treatment 10.4 Stents per patient (mean ± SD) 1.2 ± 0.5 Stent length per patient (mm) 22.4 ± 10.5 Baseline Characteristics Yeung AC, et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57:

Cumulative Incidence of TLF (%) Time After Initial Procedure (Days) RESOLUTE US (N=1402) RESOLUTE US – All Patients Target Lesion Failure to 24 Months Error bars indicate a point-wise two-sided 95% confidence interval (±1.96*SE). Standard Error based on the Greenwood Formula % RESOLUTE All Comers (N=1140) RESOLUTE International (N=2349) 11.2% 9.8%

RESOLUTE US – All Patients Safety and Efficacy Outcomes at 24 Months Resolute ZES (n=1359/1402) TLR Cardiac Death TV-MI ST (ARC Def/Prob) TLF Target lesion failure (TLF) is defined as cardiac death, target vessel MI and TLR. TLR is ischemia driven. Events [%] 99/ /135920/13593/135926/1359

RESOLUTE US – All Patients %12M n = M n = 1359 Death (all) Cardiac MI (target vessel) Q Wave Non Q wave Cardiac death + target vessel MI ST Def/Prob (all) Early (0-30 days) Late ( days) Very late (>360 days) TLR TVR TLF (cardiac death, TV-MI, TLR) TVF Clinical Outcomes at 12 and 24 Months

DAPT to 24 Months Adherence to DAPT (%) Time After Initial Procedure (days) RESOLUTE US, All Comers, International Trials % % % R-US (N=1402) R-AC (N=1140) R-INT (N=2349)

Def/prob Stent Thrombosis to 24 Months RESOLUTE US, All Comers, International Trials Error bars indicate a point-wise two-sided 95% confidence interval (±1.96*SE). Standard Error based on the Greenwood Formula Time After Initial Procedure (days) % 1.0% RESOLUTE All Comers (N=1140) RESOLUTE International (N=2349) RESOLUTE US (N=1402) 0.2%

% (n) 30 Days n= Year n= Year n=1359 Stent thrombosis (ARC def/prob) 0.1 (1)0.1 (2)0.2 (3) Early (< 30 days)0.1 (1) Late ( days)n/a0.1 (1) Very Late (>360 days)n/a 0.1 (1) RESOLUTE US – All Patients Stent Thrombosis at 24 Months

RESOLUTE US Main Study ( mm single lesion) Safety and Efficacy Outcomes at 24 Months Resolute ZES (n=968/1001) TLR Cardiac Death TV-MI ST (ARC Def/Prob) TLF Target lesion failure (TLF) is defined as cardiac death, target vessel MI and TLR (ischemia driven). TLF rate at 2 years for Endeavor ZES was 8.1% (Post-hoc analysis, P noninferiority <0.001) Events [%] 57/968 10/96817/9681/96833/968

RESOLUTE US – 2.25mm Cohort Safety and Efficacy Outcomes at 24 Months Resolute ZES (n=147/150) TLR Cardiac Death TV-MI ST (ARC Def/Prob) TLF Target lesion failure (TLF) is defined as cardiac death, target vessel MI and TLR. TLR is ischemia driven. Events [%] 12/147 5/1472/147 7/147

RESOLUTE US – Diabetic Patients Safety and Efficacy Outcomes at 24 Months Resolute ZES (n=474/482) TLR Cardiac Death TV-MI ST (ARC Def/Prob) TLF Target lesion failure (TLF) is defined as cardiac death, target vessel MI and TLR. TLR is ischemia driven. Events [%] 42/474 10/4747/4740/47427/474

RESOLUTE US – Diabetic Patients Safety and Efficacy Outcomes at 24 Months Diabetic (n=474/482) TLR Cardiac Death TV-MI ST (ARC Def/Prob) TLF Target lesion failure (TLF) is defined as cardiac death, target vessel MI and TLR. TLR is ischemia driven. Events [%] 57/885 10/88519/885 3/885 31/885 Non-Diabetic (n=885/920) 42/474 10/4747/4740/47427/474

RESOLUTE US Out to 2 years, the TLF (primary endpoint) was consistently low in all groups studiedOut to 2 years, the TLF (primary endpoint) was consistently low in all groups studied –All patients 7.3%, main cohort ( single lesion) 5.9%, small vessels (2.25 mm) 8.2% Stent thrombosis was very low (0.2%) with only 1 new ST event after 1 year, indicating a favorable safety profileStent thrombosis was very low (0.2%) with only 1 new ST event after 1 year, indicating a favorable safety profile Very good outcomes in the diabetic subgroupVery good outcomes in the diabetic subgroup –Low rate of TLF (8.9%) and TLR (5.7%) –No stent thrombosis out to 2 years Conclusions