FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TREATMENT PLAN REQUIREMENTS
Advertisements

1 Strategies for addressing challenges around Termination of Parental Rights. Presenters: Bill Stanton, Consultant, ICF Consulting Mary Coogan, Esq. Advocates.
Overview of Child Protection Process Presented to: Task Force on Child Protection August 3, 2007 Bill Navas Office of Attorney General 13 th Judicial Circuit.
Subsidized Permanent Guardianship (SPG)
Alliance for Child Welfare Excellence CFWS In-Service.
Reinstatement of Parental Rights: The Oklahoma Experience Presented by: Judge Doris Fransein Richard, Ro’derick, and Richard Jr. Hampton Kimberly Lynn.
117_PAT_CM_ Putting It All Together During this review course, you will apply the knowledge, skills, and abilities learned during your training.
Subsidized Guardianship Permanency Initiative. SG Introduction Focuses on improving permanency outcomes for children in out-of-home care through a comprehensive.
1 North Dakota Children and Family Services Review Paul Ronningen, Division Director Don Snyder, Permanency Unit Manager.
The Path to Permanency Melissa D. Carter Committee on Justice for Children Parent Attorney Conference May 8-9, 2007.
1 Milwaukee County Child Welfare Legislative Audit Bureau September 2007.
Planning With Youth in Transition Tips, Tools and Techniques.
JUDY NORD STAFF ATTORNEY, STATE COURT ADMINISTRATION AND MANAGER, CHILDREN’S JUSTICE INITIATIVE Permanency Timeline.
Treatment Plans and Administrative Case Reviews In a Nutshell.
Child Welfare Services Family centered services to achieve well- being through ensuring self-sufficiency, support, safety, and permanence. Dual tracks-
PERMANENCY PLANNING. Permanency Planning  How is it defined?  What does it mean for parents? For children?
Return to Parent (Reunification) AdoptionPLC Fit and Willing Relative APPLA
One Chance at Childhood Every Child Deserves the Best Start.
Self Evaluation and Reporting using TDM CA Anne Abramson Center for Social Services Research UC Berkeley Jana Rickerson Technical Assistant (TDM) Annie.
Minnesota and Wisconsin CHIPS processes
Findings From the Initial Child and Family Service Reviews
Bethanie Barber Assistant Guardian ad Litem Program Coordinator Legal Aid Society of the O.C.B.A. 100 E. Robinson Street Orlando, Fl (407)
Services and Resources Available for Families & Children.
TOOLS FOR POLICY DEVELOPMENT AND ANALYSIS Goals and Objectives.
VISITATION 1. Competencies  SW Ability to complete visitation plans that underscore the importance of arranging and maintaining immediate, frequent,
Family/Whānau Caregiver Assessment and Approval Engaging with families to achieve better outcomes for children and young people.
1 Critical issue module 6 Separated children in emergency settings.
ICWA: Purposes, Procedures & Practice Implications Prepared by: Jerry R. Foxhoven, Executive Director, Drake Legal Clinic Director, Middleton Center for.
AB490 + San Francisco County’s Interagency Agreement.
Prepared by American Humane Association and the California Administrative Office of the Courts.
Kathleen McNaught, Project Director ABA Center on Children and the Law National Resource Center on Legal and Judicial Issues Legal Center for Foster Care.
CARE PROCEEDINGS REFORMS: An Overview Statutory Guidance and Public Law Outline Training.
Investigation and case planning Your responsibilities under the Children Act 1989 Brayne & Carr: Law for Social Workers: 10e Chapter 9.
Family Team Meeting Policy Updates Presented by Mitzie Smith August 10, 2009.
GUARDIANSHIP ORDERS WHAT THE BENCH LOOKS FOR AND NEEDS IN ORDER TO MAKE A GUARDIANSHIP ORDER UNDER S79A.
©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. Chapter 19 Planning Transitions to Support Inclusion.
Welcome to the Quarterly FTM Facilitator Advanced Training  Please make sure you have signed in.  In order to receive PE training hours you must be registered.
2012 Child Welfare Legislative Update Ann Ahlstrom
940: Concurrent Planning for Resource Parents. The Pennsylvania Child Welfare Resource Center Learning Objectives Participants will be able to: Define.
DIAKON Lutheran Social Ministries/Family Design Resources Tools That Work Conference 11/03 Implementing Best Practice Standards in Permanency Planning.
1 Quality Counts: Helping Improve Outcomes for Pennsylvania’s Children & Families September 22, 2008.
Kenny A vs State Principles Georgia’s Child Welfare System must actively promote the opportunity for children to grow up with in a family. Family contacts.
1 Child in Need of Protection or Services Proceedings Poverty Law II Irene M. Opsahl.
Implementing Fully Every Tool in the Child Welfare Toolbox Chuck Johnson President and CEO National Council For Adoption.
Concurrent Permanency Planning. Concurrent Permanency Planning (CPP) The process of working towards reunification while at the same time planning an alternative.
Maine DHHS, Office of Child and Family Services 1 Reinstatement of Parental Rights Policy Effective 2/1/2012.
Permanency Planning in Juvenile Court The options GALs have in finding a safe, permanent home for our kids.
Parent-Child Visitation: Could Practice Make a Difference? Washington State CASA Conference October 2015Washington State CASA Conference October 2015.
Adoption in the US Congress Kathleen Strottman March 4, 2011.
Georgia Georgia’s Lead Agency Plan Georgia 2 KVC Behavioral Healthcare The lead agency in the North East Region of Kansas and Metro Kansas City, Kansas.
DISPOSITION. Dispositional Hearing  What is it?  A dispositional hearing is required whenever a petition for dependency or neglect has been sustained.
Kamala H. Shugar Assistant Attorney in Charge Oregon Department of Justice Child Advocacy Section.
 Child in need of Protection or Services (CHIPS) › Reasonable efforts to reunite › Timelines › Permanency petition  Egregious harm › Can move right.
Permanency.
Lastensuojelun polku Path of child welfare. Societies are different Ways and models of operation are different due to different historical and cultural.
Case Planning Jeopardy! Tick-Tock The Main Course It’s the Law Practice Paradise GO TO FINAL OUTCOMES JEOPARDY!
Supervising to Permanency PRESENTED BY THE ALLIANCE FOR CHILD WELFARE EXCELLENCE.
Change Orders, Extras and Claims Presented by Geoffrey Cantello, City of Ottawa.
Being in Care. Joint priorities remain to… Improve outcomes for children, young people and families in Birmingham. In particular: Protect children from.
Child and Family Services Reviews Onsite Review Instrument.
Roles and Responsibilities of the IRO. Role and Responsibilities of IRO When consulted about the guidance, children and young people were clear what they.
Coalition for Educational Equity for Foster Youth
Completing the circle: concurrent planning and the use of Family Finding, Blended perspective meetings, and family group decision making processes.
Hon. Karen R. Carroll February 12, 2018
Tuolumne County Adult Child and Family Services
Ongoing Assessment and Permanency
Open Adoption Agreements
Texas Department of Family and Protective Services December 19, 2014
Permanency Planning Modified Manual
The Preventing Sex Trafficking & Strengthening Families Act
Presentation transcript:

FTMs and Foster Care Policy Kenny A: FTMs are to be held within 3-9 days after a child comes into care Held to make any key decisions regarding placement or permanency Helps to identify appropriate relative placements, Diligent Search (FCP ) Held to create an initial Case Plan which must be completed and submitted to the court within 30 days of removal (FCP & )

INITIAL CASE PLANNING Practice Issues Ideally, the Comprehensive Assessment is completed and its information shared at the MDT staffing prior to the initial case planning meeting with the family. If so, the initial Case Plan and the Comprehensive Child and Family Assessment are submitted to the court at the same time. If the Comprehensive Assessment is not completed within the first 30 days, then the initial Case Plan needs to be submitted to the court in a timely manner and amended later, if necessary. When the Assessment is received, the SSCM forwards it to the court.

CASE PLAN FOR REUNIFICATION Requirement The initial Case Plan for Reunification focuses on the proposed reunification services that will make it possible for the child to be returned safely to the family within a realistic time frame. The Plan is developed with the family within 30 days of the child’s removal. It is submitted to the court for consideration to become an order of the court. Unless the parent requests a hearing within five (5) days of receiving the Case Plan, the court enters an order incorporating a plan for reunification and specifying what must be accomplished before the family can be reunified.

INITIAL CASE PLANNING MEET AND DISCUSS: At the scheduled family team meeting, the Case Manager will openly and honestly discuss the following issues: The time-limited nature of foster care and potentially, the detrimental effects that prolonged placement can have upon a child; The need to begin immediately in determining a permanent plan for the child; i.e., where the child can be safe and will grow up, and who may be best able to provide for the child’s placement needs;

INITIAL CASE PLANNING The legal time frames for achieving the Case Plan outcome of reunification, and the consequences if not achievable in a timely manner (See “Permanency Time Lines” which may be used as a visual tool for the Case Manager and parent to “plot” a year of case actions before the permanency issue for the child must be settled); If appropriate, the need to proceed with concurrent plans for permanency as an added assurance that permanency for the child will be achievable either through reunification or some other means of permanency (e.g., adoption, guardianship, placement with a fit and willing relative or another planned permanent living arrangement);

INITIAL CASE PLANNING Reasons for placement and what the parent can do to have the child returned home, and what the county department can do to assist; The critical need for the parent to immediately become involved in planning and to cooperate in achieving the mutually developed Case Plan goals; The dual roles of the Case Manager in supporting the parent’s efforts, while at the same time, monitoring the progress (or lack of progress), and reporting to the court the outcomes. The optional use of Form 531 (available through Central Supply) entitled, “A Guide for Parents of Children Placed in Foster Care,” which the SSCM may review with the parent.

CASE PLAN for NON-REUNIFICATION Requirement Should the county department submit an initial Case Plan to the court that does not recommend reunification as the permanency plan, additional documentation is required. The court shall no later than 30 days following the filing of the Case Plan for Non-Reunification, hold a permanency hearing. At such time, the proposed plan is reviewed and the court shall determine by clear and convincing evidence whether “reasonable efforts to reunify a child with his or her family will be detrimental to the child and that reunification services, therefore, should not be provided or should be terminated.” A revised permanency plan for the child will be incorporated into an order.

CASE PLAN for NON-REUNIFICATION PROCEDURES CASE PLAN for NON-REUNIFICATION PROCEDURES 3. MEET AND DISCUSS At the scheduled family team meeting, the Case Manager will openly and honestly discuss the following: The reasons for placement and the circumstances/reasons which lead the county department to conclude that reunification is not appropriate for the child; The time-limited nature of foster care and the potentially damaging effect that prolonged placement can have upon a child; The need to begin immediately in determining a permanent plan for the child; i.e., where the child can be safe and will grow up and who may be best able to provide for the child’s placement needs;

CASE PLAN for NON-REUNIFICATION PROCEDURES Services (other than reunification) that the county department can offer and/or arrange for the parent as outlined in the Case Plan; e.g., visitation. The right of the parent to have a hearing within 30 days of the court’s receipt of the department’s Case Plan recommending Non-Reunification; and The optional use of Form 531 (available through Central Supply) entitled, “A Guide for Parents of Children Placed in Foster Care” which the SSCM may review with the parent.

Kenny A Settlement Initial FTM will be held within 3-9 days after a child enters Foster Care FTM will identify --needs of children and parents --goals for meeting needs --steps for meeting goals --strengths of family members

Kenny A Settlement (cont1) At FTM DFCS will make following determinations and secure services to meet “i. whether the child can be safely returned home ii. whether any evaluations are necessary of the child and/or parents to ensure the development of an appropriate case plan

Kenny A Settlement (cont2) iii. if the child cannot be safely returned home, whether there is an appropriate relative with whom the child can be placed iv. if the child has siblings in placement and are not placed together, the identity of necessary steps to place the siblings together in accordance with Section 5.C.4.d and necessary steps to ensure visitation

Kenny A Settlement (cont3) v. If the child is of school age, identify the steps that can be taken to ensure the child remains in school, does not miss school days extensively, and does not have to change schools if at all possible vi. The frequency with which visiting will take place between the child and the child’s parents and significant family members”