Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Template: Making Effective Presentation about Your Evidence-based Health Promotion Program This template is intended for you to adapt to your own program.
Advertisements

MAPP Process & Outcome Evaluation
Introduction to Monitoring and Evaluation
Intelligence Step 5 - Capacity Analysis Capacity Analysis Without capacity, the most innovative and brilliant interventions will not be implemented, wont.
Donald T. Simeon Caribbean Health Research Council
Designing an Effective Evaluation Strategy
Evaluating Risk Communication Katherine A. McComas, Ph.D. University of Maryland.
COMMUNITY RESOURCE MAPPING Train the Trainer MAST - NH December 15, 2006 Facilitated by: Kelli Crane.
Decision Making Tools for Strategic Planning 2014 Nonprofit Capacity Conference Margo Bailey, PhD April 21, 2014 Clarify your strategic plan hierarchy.
Program Evaluation and Measurement Janet Myers. Objectives for today… To define and explain concepts and terms used in program evaluation. To understand.
A plain English Description of the components of evaluation Craig Love, Ph.D. Westat.
Evaluation is a professional and ethical responsibility and is a core part of PHN professional practice Commitment to evaluation helps build the PHN intelligence.
PPA 502 – Program Evaluation
The P Process Analysis. Presentation Objectives By the end of this session you should be able to: explain the rationale for conducting a situation analysis;
Evaluation. Practical Evaluation Michael Quinn Patton.
CDC Evaluation Process Harlen Hays, MPH Office of Health Promotion, KDHE.
Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI)
Evaluation of Math-Science Partnership Projects (or how to find out if you’re really getting your money’s worth)
How to Develop the Right Research Questions for Program Evaluation
Community Partnership Evaluation for Injury Prevention Susan J. Snelling, PhD Health Promotion Field Support Specialist, Evaluation.
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:3 Inform, Educate, and Empower People about Health Issues.
FORMATIVE EVALUATION Intermediate Injury Prevention Course August 23-26, 2011, Billings, MT.
ISTEP: Technology Field Research in Developing Communities Instructor: M. Bernardine Dias CAs: Sarah Belousov and Ermine Teves Spring 2009.
Health promotion and health education programs. Assumptions of Health Promotion Relationship between Health education& Promotion Definition of Program.
The County Health Rankings & Roadmaps Take Action Cycle.
Performance Measurement and Analysis for Health Organizations
The Evaluation Plan.
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Fundamentals of Evaluation for Public Health Programs ROBERT FOLEY, M.ED. NIHB TRIBAL PUBLIC HEALTH SUMMIT MARCH 31,
Evaluation Assists with allocating resources what is working how things can work better.
Outcome Based Evaluation for Digital Library Projects and Services
Developing Indicators
Measuring effects and impact: Analysis of practices in Analysis of practices in HI & partners projects Impact and evaluation seminar - 2 to 6 December,
Evelyn Gonzalez Program Evaluation. AR Cancer Coalition Summit XIV March 12, 2013 MAKING A DIFFERENCE Evaluating Programmatic Efforts.
Health Promotion as a Quality issue
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Developing a Framework In Support of a Community of Practice in ABI Jason Newberry, Research Director Tanya Darisi, Senior Researcher
Evaluation Plan Steven Clauser, PhD Chief, Outcomes Research Branch Applied Research Program Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences NCCCP Launch.
The Literacy and Numeracy Secretariat Le Secrétariat de la littératie et de la numératie October – octobre 2007 The School Effectiveness Framework A Collegial.
1 The project is financed from the European Union funds within the framework of Erasmus+, Key Action 2: Cooperation for innovation and the exchange of.
Evaluation: from Objectives to Outcomes Janet Myers, PhD MPH AIDS Education and Training Centers National Evaluation Center
Prevention Education Meeting May 29, 2013 Evaluation 101.
School Development Goal Development “Building a Learning Community”
Evaluation and Implementation 21 October 2015 PUBH 535.
1 DEMONSTRATION PROJECTS TO ENSURE STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES RECEIVE A QUALITY HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAM Performance Measurement, Program and Project Evaluation.
RE-AIM Framework. RE-AIM: A Framework for Health Promotion Planning, Implementation and Evaluation Are we reaching the intended audience? Is the program.
IMPLEMENTING LEAPS IN CENTRAL AND EASTERN EUROPE: TRAINERS’ HANDBOOK Monitoring and Evaluating Results.
Implementation Science: Finding Common Ground and Perspectives Laura Reichenbach, Evidence Project, Population Council International Conference on Family.
Development of Gender Sensitive M&E: Tools and Strategies.
| Contact CDC at: CDC-INFO or The findings and conclusions in this report are those of the authors and do not necessarily.
Evaluation What is evaluation?
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
Critical Program Movement: Integration of STD Prevention with Other Programs Kevin Fenton, MD, PhD, FFPH Director National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis,
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 10. Evaluation.
Applied Methodologies in PHI Session 5: Evaluation Kath Roberts (NOO/EMPHO)
Guidance for Analyses of Pilot Interventions European Workplace and Alcohol Berlin, 9 November 2012 Jon Dawson.
Stages of Research and Development
Evaluating the Quality and Impact of Community Benefit Programs
Designing Effective Evaluation Strategies for Outreach Programs
SNAP-Ed Evaluation Framework: Breakfast with Andy
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Gender-Sensitive Monitoring and Evaluation
Right-sized Evaluation
Fundamentals of Monitoring and Evaluation
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Introduction to Program Evaluation
NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF CHRONIC DISEASE DIRECTORS (NACDD)
MaryCatherine Jones, MPH, Public Health Consultant, CVH Team
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Presentation transcript:

Evaluating Physical Activity Intervention Programs Thomas Schmid, PhD Physical Activity and Health Branch CDC Atlanta, Georgia, USA

 Evaluation Definitions and Principles  CDC Physical Activity Evaluation Handbook – 6 Steps  Evaluation issues

The systematic examination and assessment of features of a program and its effects. Evaluation is designed to produce information that can be used by those who have an interest in the improvement or effectiveness of an initiative or program.

 To assess the effects and value of a program ◦ for accountability ◦ for progress ◦ to identify best practice ◦ as a planning tool ◦ for research

 the program  target groups and needs  realistic achievable objectives  is the program ready for evaluation?

 Identify needs  State goals and measurable objectives  Assess progress towards objectives

Efficacy Intervention tested under ideal conditions with optimal study design Effectivenes Field based intervention testing whether the intervention works as intended for a defined population in the real world Efficiency Results in comparison to the efforts required to obtain them – often cost or cost effectiveness

IMPACT OUTCOME Measures activities, program quality, reach Measures long term effects (goals) PROCESS Formative Measures short term objectives Develop program & resources

 What is likely to work  Best practices in health promotion  Idea or concept development  Developing and pilot testing materials  Focus groups

 Focus groups and interviews with partners about their needs  Reviewing best practices from other programs such as Agita Sao Paulo  Pilot testing in one company

Process evaluation ◦ Program implemented as intended ? ◦ Quality of program components ◦ Attendance rates ◦ Audience awareness of message ◦ Appropriate message learned ◦ Participant satisfaction

 Companies enrolled  Workshops held  Promoters trained  Companies participating in community events

Impact & Outcome Evaluation ◦ Short and long term effects of program ◦ Hierarchy of effects : what level of effects indicates program success ◦ Assessing the impact upon those who attend or participate ◦ Community effects

 Physical activity level of employees  PA level in community  Disease rates or costs

Program Evaluation Framework Physical Activity Evaluation Handbook

Program Evaluation Framework Physical Activity Evaluation Handbook 1.Engage Stakeholders Include people with a vested interest in the program: implementers, partners, participants, possible opponents and decision makers. 2.Clearly Describe the Program The problem being addressed, descriptions of the planning, implementation and maintenance phases of the program, and finally, defining and communicating how all phases work together (eg. the "logic model").

Program Evaluation Framework Physical Activity Evaluation Handbook 3.Clearly Focus Asking a clear, straightforward question and ensuring linkage to the problem being addressed. Includes clarifying process and/or outcome evaluations of interest 4. Develop and Implement Data Collection Design of data collection efforts, selection of appropriate control groups, designation of appropriate baseline values and decisions about how much time should be built in to adequately measure "change”

Program Evaluation Framework Physical Activity Evaluation Handbook 5.Develop Conclusions Data analyses and interpretation. 6. Communicate Promotes the importance of tangible products from the evaluation, dissemination of those products, and follow-up (as appropriate).

20

 All physical activity interventions should be evaluated. Evaluation begins with program planning  There are many good programs, but very few are well evaluated  Involve stakeholders  Community – University partnerships can be very useful

 Process as well as outcome evaluation  Quantitative and qualitative  Tailor evaluation to stakeholders and situation  Evaluation is often undervalued compared with “hard science”  Adequate resources should be devoted to evaluation. 10% is recommended

 Evaluation results should be used to adjust programs and inform policy  Share results with stakeholders  Academic and practical training are needed  The CDC Physical Activity Evaluation Handbook provides a good framework

 Gracias/Thank you