THE URBAN INSTITUTE How do we evaluate place-based programs? Five questions to consider. Brett Theodos American Evaluation Association October 17, 2013.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Prof. Avis C. Vidal Humanities Center Seminar October 1, 2013.
Advertisements

SECTION 3 OVERVIEW City of Memphis Department of Housing and Community Development SCIF Workshop – 25 October 2013.
HUD Community Challenge Planning Grant Tarrant County Consortium September 17, 2010.
CBANA School of Urban Affairs and Public Policy The University of Memphis Center for Community Building and Neighborhood Action Phyllis Betts, PhD Director.
Project Monitoring Evaluation and Assessment
United Way THRIVE and Wells Fargo. Agenda United Way THRIVE Overview Wells Fargo Financial Capability Network Goals Wells Fargo Financial Capability Network.
Linking Research with Action to Support Neighborhood Level Capacity Building and Drive Social Change Phyllis Betts, Director Center for Community Building.
Housing Policy Chapter 15 McGraw-Hill/Irwin Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved.
1 Patterns of Residential Mobility Using Cluster Analysis to Identify Different Types of Movers, Stayers, and Newcomers in the Making Connections Sites.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 8 Neighborhood Choice.
Kansas City Community Development Initiative (KCCDI) l Partners –LISC –KCNA –Many Others l Researchers –UMKC - Center for Economic Information.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin ©2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, All Rights Reserved Chapter 14 Housing Policy.
Chapter 8 Neighborhood Choice McGraw-Hill/Irwin
1 Fannie Mae REO and Neighborhood Stabilization: Overview for Homebuyer Assistance Program Administrators.
URBAN INSTITUTE Urban Institute’s Role in the DC Promise Neighborhood Initiative April 2011.
Session Goals: To redefine assessment as it relates to our University mission. To visit assessment plan/report templates and ensure understanding for.
CONNECTING PEOPLE TO PLACE: IMPROVING COMMUNITIES THROUGH INTEGRATED DATA SYSTEMS Leah Hendey Urban Institute June 21, 2013.
Summary Document July 2011 P ROMISE N EIGHBORHOODS 2011 Competition Note: These slides are intended as guidance only. Please refer to the official Notice.
0 Civic Sites and Community Change OCTOBER 16, 2014.
Presentation Outline  Introductions  Why are “price sensitivity” and “value” important?  Strategic pricing & value enhancement framework  From research.
NALCAB Conference September 2009 Robert A. Rapoza Rapoza Associates Phone (202)
Indicators of Success -- Applying the TOC What will change? You must be able to test your theory!
Using Mental Maps to study Neighborhood Movement in the Inner-City: Formal vs. Informal Definitions Ned English Presented at Association of American Geographers.
Year Seven Self-Evaluation Workshop OR Getting from Here to There Northwest Commission on Colleges and Universities.
THE URBAN INSTITUTE Neighborhood Stability and Neighborhood Change: A Study of Housing Unit Turnover in Low-Income Neighborhoods Brett Theodos, Claudia.
Mission and Mission Fulfillment Tom Miller University of Alaska Anchorage.
Weaving a story of poverty in Multnomah County. Per capita income, Portland MSA, US Metro, Multnomah County, Source: Regional Economic Information.
University of Maryland Law School April 12, 2013 Affirmatively Furthering Fair Housing in HUD Housing Programs A First Term “Report Card” Philip Tegeler,
Education and Poverty Social World I Observations Strong consensus, education as important determinant of individual earnings; economic growth Exists.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice Monica Y. Minor, NCATE Jeri A. Carroll, BOE Chair Professor, Wichita State University.
Asset Building Strategies Mayors and Working Families: City Human Service Officials May 2, 2005.
Managing Neighborhood Change: An Overview Alan Mallach, Non-Resident Senior Fellow The Brookings Institution.
Planning the Plan May 28, 2010 grantify Hartford’s Promise.
Leah Hendey Deputy Director of the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership and Research Associate at the Urban Institute.
An innovative, high-impact collaboration of multiple services housed under one roof A bold new vision for helping families build lasting economic security.
Working Together for Stronger Communities Community Stabilization: Building Healthy Communities National Association for State Community Service Programs.
Transforming Michigan’s Adult Learning Infrastructure.
We worry about what a child will be tomorrow, yet we forget that he is someone today. --Stacia Tauscher.
East Bay Asian Local Development Corporation 35 Years of Building Healthy & Vibrant Neighborhoods for East Bay Communities East Bay Asian Local Development.
Georgia Affordable Housing Conference DCA  10/09/15.
Evaluating Ongoing Programs: A Chronological Perspective to Include Performance Measurement Summarized from Berk & Rossi’s Thinking About Program Evaluation,
Kansas City Community Development Initiative (KCCDI) l Partners –LISC –KCNA –Many Others l Researchers –UMKC - Center for Economic Information.
WASHINGTON, DC NOVEMBER 14, 2011 NASCCA Annual Business Meeting.
Defining a Community Change Agenda for the Future: Applying Lessons from Recent History Tom Dewar and Anne Kubisch Roundtable on Community Change The Aspen.
Single Family Housing Development Program A Briefing to the Housing Committee Housing/Community Services Department November 2, 2015.
Michigan Minority Contractors Association October 2, 2015.
Our mission: to build vibrant and diverse neighborhoods with homes that are affordable to families with a mix of incomes, where people choose to invest.
1 Strategic Plan Review. 2 Process Planning and Evaluation Committee will be discussing 2 directions per meeting. October meeting- Finance and Governance.
Evaluation of equal opportunity measures in the Hungarian Operational Programmes Monitoring and evaluation of Roma projects and policies 30 November 2010,
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
OneMECK Affordable Housing Overview January 5, 2016.
WORKSHOP SESSION: PLANNING COMPREHENSIVELY TO PREVENT VIOLENCE San Francisco November 18, 2011 Junious Williams, CEO Urban Strategies Council
Impact Evaluation of Urban Upgrading Programs Judy Baker, FEU November 19, 2007.
Constructing indicators of progress/well-being with citizens/communities Dr Jonathan POTTER OECD Local Economic and Employment Development Programme.
TND Community Engagement & Chelsea Shurtleff Bellingham Initiative May 2014 Melissa Walsh Director of Community Engagement The Neighborhood Developers.
President’s FY2017 Budget Request February 12, 2016.
Impact of an Aging Population Breakout Session. Phil Eckhert, Hennepin County Director of Housing, Community Works and Transit Ross Macmillan, University.
COMMUNITY ASSESSMENTS FOR QUALITY IMPROVEMENT & COLLECTIVE ACTION February 25, th Annual Regional Care CollaborativeGulfport, MS.
How United Way Works to Advance the Common Good. How United Way Works 2 To improve lives by mobilizing the caring power of communities Mission of the.
15 October 2013 Briefing on draft s 56G report on the effectiveness of information disclosure regulation at Christchurch Airport.
HEALTH WEALTH CAREER April 28, 2016 STRICTLY PRIVATE & CONFIDENTIAL The information included in this report is strictly confidential and is proprietary.
Presentation on Outcomes Assessment Presentation on Outcomes Assessment toCCED Mohawk Valley Community College October 11, 2004.
Governor's Commission on Senior Services HUD Senior Housing Overview August 13, 2015.
Section 811 Webinar During the webinar, we will be holding a Q and A session through the GoToWebinar phone system. If you would like to ask questions.
An Introduction to the National Neighborhood Indicators Partnership (NNIP) DALLAS, TX OCTOBER 21, 2015.
Opportunities and Challenges in Development Siting June 2016.
Agenda for Change Creating Stable Families Basic Needs Strategies and Guidelines.
NCATE Standard 3: Field Experiences & Clinical Practice
MESAS: Evaluation of minimum unit pricing (MUP) for alcohol
RMAPI Town Hall Meeting
Presentation transcript:

THE URBAN INSTITUTE How do we evaluate place-based programs? Five questions to consider. Brett Theodos American Evaluation Association October 17, 2013

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Motivation Place-based initiatives have dual aims to benefit people and neighborhoods Considerable policy/funder energy: Choice Neighborhoods, Promise Neighborhoods, Strong Cities Strong Communities, multiple foundation- led comprehensive community change initiatives Elements of theory (e.g. exposure, engagement and social processes) may falter, or at a minimum, make measurement difficult 2

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Question 1 What is the right outcome? 3

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Outcomes Communities are extremely complex systems consisting of many interrelated structures and activities that, along with external factors, influence the very conditions a program seeks to affect Individual program investments are often small in size relative to the neighborhoods or areas in which they take place 4

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Outcomes Programs frequently have broad mandates with respect to project activity types Project location/initiation/purpose decisions frequently delegated to intermediaries Program performance measurement must take into account this diversity so that projects can be evaluated against their intended purposes and desired outcomes 5

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Outcomes Picking the right outcome measures –The “poverty” fallacy –The double edge sword of jobs –Test scores –Is everything capitalized in home prices? 6

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Question 2 What is the right unit of analysis? –People, housing units, neighborhoods or multiple? –If place, how do you define the target area/neighborhood 7

THE URBAN INSTITUTE What is a neighborhood? 8 Providence

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 280 Wave 1 Children Providence Making Connections Site— Wave 1

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 671 Wave 2 Children Providence Making Connections Site— Wave 2

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 666 Wave 3 Children Providence Making Connections Site— Wave 3

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Question 3 How “stable” or mobile is the unit of analysis? 12

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 13 High Mobility Rates Over ~3 Years in Making Connections Neighborhoods

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Components of Neighborhood Change: Conceptual Approach Changing Circumstances for Stayers Changes as Out-movers replaced by Newcomers Wave Wave Wave Wave Non-poorPoor

THE URBAN INSTITUTE 15 Components of Neighborhood Change in Making Connections Neighborhoods

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Question 4 What is the right time period? How much exposure is necessary? 16

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Time period & Exposure Time period –Outcomes development can take time Theory of change assumes duration of exposure –Example: HUD’s Moving To Opportunity demonstration 17

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Question 5 What data and methods are available? –What standard of evidence is appropriate or sufficient? 18

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Data Case studies and qualitative data collection (e.g. New Markets Tax Credit, HUD’s Section 108) Neighborhood surveys (cross sectional or panel, following out-movers or not) (e.g. Making Connections) Local data, including Integrated data systems (IDSs) (e.g. data collected by National N’hood Indicators Partners Publically available secondary data (e.g. American Community Survey, American Housing Survey, Home Mortgage Disclosure Act data) Proprietary data (e.g. CoreLogic, credit bureaus) 19

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Methods Case studies and/or qualitative data analysis Pre-post cross sectional Adjusted interrupted time series (e.g. Community Development Block Grant, HOME program) Regression discontinuity (e.g. Low Income Housing Tax Credit, Community Development Block Grant, New Markets Tax Credit) Spatial hedonic (e.g. downpayment assistance) Propensity score matching Not likely: RCTs 20

THE URBAN INSTITUTE Resources Evaluating Economic and Community Development Programs (2010) Residential Mobility and Neighborhood Change: Real Neighborhoods Under the Microscope (2012) Platforms for Place-based Development in the U.S. (2012) New Markets Tax Credit Program Evaluation (2013) Getting to Better Performing Schools: The Role of Residential Mobility in School Attainment in Low-income Neighborhoods (2014) Neighborhood Stability and Neighborhood Change: A Study of Housing Unit Turnover in Making Connections Neighborhoods (2012) 21