Modern and efficient public transport system www.transportlearning.net MODERN AND EFFICIENT PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM Mohamed Mezghani Lisbon, October 18.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Innovation: User Support Terminals. Built around existing integration terminals Combine social services, shopping, banking, etc. Provide service access.
Advertisements

Tackling the Environmental Impact of Transport Presentation by David Jamieson MP to the Institute for Public Policy Research Wednesday 15th October 2003.
GREEN PAPER "TOWARDS A NEW CULTURE FOR URBAN MOBILITY" EUROPEAN COMMISSION.
Mobility in Cities Database
Transport for Canberra 07 November2013. Transport for NSW: Regional Transport Plan ACT, whilst not part of the region, is an important destination Transport.
SCATTER workshop, Milan, 24 October 2003 Testing selected solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Integration of Public Transport in an Overall Transport System The Example of the Greater Zurich Area Christian Vogt, Zurich Transport Authority (ZVV)
Public Transport’s Contribution to Sustainable Development.
Welcome to CIVITAS. What is CIVITAS ? 3 72% of Europe’s citizens live in cities.
Mobility in Munich Tasks & Challenges Third AENEAS Training Workshop March 4th 2010 Florian Paul Munich Transit Ltd. (MVG) Strategy and Planning.
Organising Intermodality - a focus on passengers in the West Midlands Rafael Cuesta Head of Strategic Development Centro - Birmingham.
Introduction to CIVITAS‘ Definition of “Collective Passenger Transport“ and a Snapshot of its Results 13 September 2011 Brussels, Belgium Siegfried Rupprecht,
Improving the Urban Public Transport in Developing Countries: The Design of a New Integrated System in Santiago de Chile Antonio Gschwender
SPUTNIC – Strategies for Public Transport in Cities Strategies for Public Transport in Cities Funded by the EU Project introduction.
INNER CITY INVESTMENT SUMMIT TRANSPORT, INTEGRATED PUBLIC TRANSPORT NETWORK AND TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT Presenter: L N Mangcu SED: Transport and Roads Department.
The City of Gdynia City rights in 1926 With Sopot and Gdańsk forms the Tri-City agglomeration It has inhabitants Port city, employment structure:
TRANSPORT RESEARCH CENTRE ETSI CAMINOS, CANALES Y PUERTOS UNIVERSIDAD POLITÉCNICA DE MADRID Thredbo 9 9 th International Conference on Competition and.
1 Integration as a competitiveness instrument for Public Transport in rural areas Helder Cristóvão, José M Viegas Integration as a Competitiveness Instrument.
Increasing the Quality of Public Transport in Prague Prague Integrated Transport.
Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Paris and the Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative Isabelle Bachmann- RATP- Paris.
Modelling Service Quality for Public Transport Contracts: Assessing Users’ Perceptions Gabriela Beirão José Sarsfield Cabral 9th Conference on Competition.
Public transport framework plan for Buffalo City July, BUFFALO CITY MUNICIPALITY PUBLIC TRANSPORT FRAMEWORK PLAN PRESENTATION August 2008.
Sustainable Transport Management at Local Level: The ARCHIMEDES Project Mette Skamris Holm, City of Aalborg Coordinator ARCHIMEDES The Single Market Act.
What jobs in a low carbon European economy ? ETUC/CES Brussels, February 2007 Transport policies and measures in EU to mitigate climate change François.
SCATTER-SELMA joint workshop, Brussels, 8 June 2004 Testing potential solutions to control urban sprawl The Brussels case city.
Umeå:s positive experiences with CIVITAS and how we would like to continue the work!
Mobility plan for Geneva Airport employees. Constraints and needs for the mobility of Geneva airport staff Airport staff: all employees working in the.
GUIDELINES FOR PASSENGER TRANSPORT IN SOUTH AFRICA A MULTI MODAL ANALYSIS CHAPTER 1 BACKGROUND TO THIS STUDY GUIDE.
A Brief Comparison on Traffic System Between London and Shanghai Allen Liu, Shanghai Feb. 16 th 2012.
Reinventing Transit A European Perspective David Bayliss.
Civitas Workshop –Effective solutions for green urban transport 24 April 2012 Athens Alan Lewis, TTR on behalf of: Lars Elgaard Thomsen, Public Transport.
Workshop on Infrastructures Sustainable Infrastructure for Efficient Mobility: the Key Challenges Luc Bourdeau ECTP Secretary General Industrial Technologies.
Sustainable travel for Limerick and Area By Professor Lewis Lesley.
Ref : STIF rev PDU – Prepa comité des partenaires V1.1 DOCUMENT DE TRAVAIL Urban Mobility Plan in Ile de France EMTA General meeting 27th april.
Jeff’s slides. Transportation Kitchener Transportation Master Plan Define and prioritize a transportation network that is supportive of all modes of.
Athens, 24 April 2012 Bernd Decker, Rupprecht Consult Introduction to CIVITAS‘ definition of “Transport Demand Management Strategies“ and a Snapshot of.
Presentation to the Sustainable Prosperity Conference
| The Planning and roll-out of accessible and human-centred public transport services in Europe The cities’ perspective Karen Vancluysen, Polis.
PUBLIC TRANSPORT IN SKOPJE: NEW APROACH FOR BETTER QUALITY OF SERVICE
Innovative ITS services thanks to Future Internet technologies ITS World Congress Orlando, SS42, 18 October 2011.
Green Transport Dr Lina Shbeeb Minister of Transport. Jordan.
INTEGRATED TRANSPORT CHAINS Transparencies 2003 EU-funded Urban Transport Research Project Results TRANSPORT TEACHING MATERIAL.
THE CIVITAS INITIATIVE IS CO-FINANCED BY THE EUROPEAN UNION Promoting Sustainable Urban Mobility with CIVITAS.
Central London Congestion Charging David Hutchinson GREATER LONDON AUTHORITY International Union of Air Pollution Prevention and Environmental Protection.
Sustainable urban transport Fred Lee Department of Geography The University of Hong Kong March 15, 2012.
1 Examples of Italian Best Practices on Urban Traffic Management, Traffic Information and Ticketing.
GNTP Business Forum – The Big Idea – Gary Smerdon-White 18 th September 2012.
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
Project Information Brief project description Cairo, Egypt Bus Rapid Transit System with potential capacity of 45,000 people per person per direction Phase.
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
REDUCING THE NEED TO TRAVEL David Banister The Bartlett School of Planning University College London Mobile Network Seminar – 16 th May 2003.
1 DOC title location 01/09/07 THE URBAN MOBILITY PLAN IN THE ILE-DE-FRANCE REGION EMTA GENERAL MEETING MADRID 31 MARCH 2011.
Key problems and priorities in urban transport sector in SEE Regional Meeting on Sustainable Transport Policies in South Eastern Europe Budapest,
Putting Luas Cross City in context - Public Transport and Sustainable Measures in Dublin Dublin City Council 21 st March 2013 Gerry Murphy.
1. Variety of modes (types) of transport (public and private) 2. Density of transport networks more nodes and.
3rd Forum for Sustainable Mobility and Metropolitan Development
The Regional Transport Strategy Transport for Regional Growth Conference Edinburgh 5 November 2015 John Saunders SEStran.
Public Transportation Planning: Rapid transit solutions for adequate mass movement Mobility.
Fostering Mobility in a Compact City – Hong Kong’s Experience Professor Anthony B.L. Cheung Secretary for Transport and Housing Hong Kong, China.
Submission Document went to cabinet … Planning for the Future Core Strategy and Urban Core Plan (the Plan) is a key planning document and sets out the.
Road user charge, City of Zagreb Marko Slavulj Effective solutions for green urban transport – Learning from CIVITAS cities, Athens, 24 April 2012.
Key factors in the transport policy to encourage better integration Sixty-Third Session of UNECE, Geneva, 30th March 2009 "Economic Integration in the.
Organizzato da: Global Mobility Integration for Global Transit Schemes Bertrand Moritz Head of Product Management – VIX Technology.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
The Gauteng Economic Indaba Transport and Logistics Mr Piet Sebola Group Executive Strategic Asset Development Date: 09 th June 2016.
Delivering transport and growth
Transantiago July 2005.
Long term strategy and structure
Integration of the public transport system
Innovation in Railways NTA Ireland
Presentation transcript:

Modern and efficient public transport system MODERN AND EFFICIENT PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM Mohamed Mezghani Lisbon, October 18 th, 2006

Modern and efficient public transport system THE CONTEXT OF URBAN MOBILITY Urban sprawl Growing car ownership Increasing traffic congestion Improved energy/environmental technologies but lower energy/environmental performances Increasing energy prices

Modern and efficient public transport system CHANGING CITIZENS‘ EXPECTATIONS Demographic changes Changing urban rythms Changing citizens‘ behaviour and habits Growing concern for environmental issues Insecurity feeling

Modern and efficient public transport system THE VICIOUS CIRCLE OF URBAN DECLINE - Urban sprawl - More people dependent on car use - More roads - More cars - More congestion - Slower PT - Decrease in PT supply - Inner cities are less attractive - Transfer of activities to the outskirts - Lower PT quality - Less PT customers - Lower PT revenue

Modern and efficient public transport system - Car traffic appropriately charged - Controlled parking - Less car traffic - Less congestion - Possibly more fund for PT - Commercial speed of PT increases - More cost-efficient PT operation - Better quality for passengers - More efficient use of road infrastructure - Higher individual transport costs - More PT customers - More PT revenue - Less subsidies needed - PT more market oriented - Urban sprawl under control - More attractive cities and city centres HIGHER QUALITY OF URBAN LIFE PUBLIC TRANSPORT MORE COMMERCIALLY VIABLE WE MUST BREAK THE VICIOUS CIRCLE

Modern and efficient public transport system PUBLIC TRANSPORT costs less to the community... needs less urban space... is less energy-intensive... pollutes less... is the safest mode... improves accessibility to jobs... offers mobility for all

Modern and efficient public transport system IMPACT OF MODAL SPLIT ON MOBILITY COST

Modern and efficient public transport system IMPACT OF MODAL SPLIT ON MOBILITY COST AND ENERGY DEMAND

Modern and efficient public transport system IMPACT OF MODAL SPLIT ON ACCESS TO JOBS

Modern and efficient public transport system IMPACT OF MODAL SPLIT ON MOBILITY COST The cost of transport for the community in cities with a high share of public transport is up to half the cost in cities where the private car is dominant. This difference represents a saving of EUR per inhabitant per year. Cities characterized by the lowest cost of transport to the community are often those where expenditure in public transport is the highest. Modal share of public transport (%mechanized and motorized trips) Cost of transport to the Community (% of GDP) Geneva18,821,710,29,4 London23,926,88,57,5 Madrid23,429,112,210,4 Paris27,127,56,86,7 Vienna43,246,66,96,6

Modern and efficient public transport system IMPACT OF MODAL SPLIT ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Modern and efficient public transport system IMPACT OF MODAL SPLIT ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION Energy savings between cities with a high modal share of public transport and cities relying mainly on the private car represent around 500 to 600 litres of petrol per inhabitant per year. Cities which managed to increase the modal share of walking, cycling and PT saw a decrease in the consumption of energy per person. Modal share of walking, cycling and public transport (%) Average consumption of energy per person for transport (MJ) Athens34,140, Geneva44,848, Rome43,243, Vienna

Modern and efficient public transport system CARS TAKE UP PRECIOUS URBAN SPACE

Modern and efficient public transport system INTEGRATED URBAN MOBILITY THE THREE PILLARS OF AN INTEGRATED URBAN MOBILITY SYSTEM

Modern and efficient public transport system PUBLIC TRANSPORT ORIENTED URBAN PLANNING Urban density is more cost-effective than urban sprawl Put and end to urban sprawl (Compact city) Promote density around PT stations and routes Encourage integration of activities Limit construction on vacant land Control parking standards for residential, office and commercial buildings Encourage car-free residential zones Ensure coherency of housing policies

Modern and efficient public transport system IMPACT OF URBAN DENSITY ON MOBILITY COSTS

Modern and efficient public transport system IMPACT OF URBAN DENSITY ON ENERGY CONSUMPTION

Modern and efficient public transport system CURITIBA, BRAZIL Linear city with structural corridors Opposite to the conception of radial/monocentric city Public transport Cars

Modern and efficient public transport system COPENHAGEN, DENMARK Fingers plan: Development of the metropolitan area around rail corridors Density around rail stations A public company was set up to develop the area and finance the rail system

Modern and efficient public transport system CONTROL OF CAR TRAFFIC Congestion costs represent 2% of the EU GDP, i.e. 4 times what is spent for public transport Implement traffic schemes limiting car use in city centres Set a price on car use to reflect nuisance cost (ex. Congestion charging) Control parking (at working places, residential, park & ride) Develop pedestrian zones

Modern and efficient public transport system STRASBOURG, FRANCE In-transit car traffic is forbidden (Loop traffic scheme) 3 light rail lines Complementary bus network Control of parking Provision of Park & Ride Exclusive bicycle lanes  -30% in car traffic +101% In PT use ( )

Modern and efficient public transport system LONDON, UK Traffic delays reduced by 30% Number of cars reduced by 30% 50 to 60% of avoided car trips have been transferred to PT £100 million net revenues per year

Modern and efficient public transport system IMPACT OF PARKING PROVISION AutomobilePublic Transport Other ModeTotal Besançon Guaranteed parking No guaranteed parking 90% 46% 6% 29% 4% 25% 100% Grenoble Guaranteed parking No guaranteed parking 94% 53% 3% 29% 3% 18% 100% Toulouse Guaranteed parking No guaranteed parking 99% 41% 1% 24% 0% 35% 100% Bern Guaranteed parking No guaranteed parking 95% 13% 3% 55% 2% 32% 100% Geneva Guaranteed parking No guaranteed parking 93% 36% 3% 25% 4% 39% 100%

Modern and efficient public transport system PEDESTRIAN AREAS

Modern and efficient public transport system QUALITY PUBLIC TRANSPORT SYSTEM Integration, at all levels, is a prerequisite of a modern and efficient public transport system

Modern and efficient public transport system THE NEED FOR INTEGRATION Passengers use... different routes and interchanges different PT modes PT across administrative borders PT produced by different companies  The integration of all these aspects is the main challenge in order to offer passengers an easy-to-use door-to-door PT system.

Modern and efficient public transport system PUBLIC TRANSPORT ORGANISATION STRATEGIC What do we want to achieve? TACTICAL Which products can help achieving these goals? OPERATIONAL How to produce that service? Politics Management

Modern and efficient public transport system BUILDING SOLID AND FAIR PARTNERSHIP A strong institutional framework: The organising authority plays a decisive role in integrating public transport. Strong agreements: Contracts constitute an efficient tool for integration. Investment and operation: Integration costs money, but will be profitable in the long term. An Integrating body directing the policy and funding of integration and coordinating between authorities, operators, infrastructure managers, etc.

Modern and efficient public transport system INTERCONNECTING NETWORKS AND MODES Adopting a network approach Reducing the number of unnecessary transfers Integrating timetables Filling in any missing links in the infrastructure Providing public transport on demand where needed Tacking account of public and private transport services Interoperability planning PT users expect a continuity of the system beyond administrative borders and even if it includes several modes, or operated by several companies

Modern and efficient public transport system ENHANCING INTERCHANGE POINTS Location: Interchanges between two public transport trips; Interchanges at the beginning or end of the public transport journey. Functionality: Transfers should be as smooth as possible: reliable information; distances; single platform; avoid stairs; specific requirements of elderly, children, disabled, tourists; etc. Quality: Designed to be pleasant; comfortable and attractive waiting areas; safety and security; shops and public facilities. Time spent in an interchange is perceived twice as long as time on board a vehicle

Modern and efficient public transport system MAKING TICKETING USER-FRIENDLY Harmonizing and integrating fares and ticketing facilitates the use of public transport. Fare integration provides an incentive to travel, because PT is much easier to use and more accessible for travellers. New technologies can be a great help in fare integration. Multi-ticketing makes travel complicated and gives the feeling that public transport is expensive

Modern and efficient public transport system PROVIDING INTEGRATED INFORMATION Journey planner (www) Announcement of stops Information on transfers City information Real-time information

Modern and efficient public transport system TURNING TRAVEL TIME INTO AN ASSET Travellers should feel at ease in PT systems: heating, air-conditioning, quiet environment, news, music,.. The transport service itself should be personalised to people’s special needs: quality, type of transport solution bus or train; PT solution adapted to special needs. The advantages of public transport must be promoted to provide services that are not accessible for users of private transport modes. Time spent in public transport is perceived as time lost compared to car time

Modern and efficient public transport system PROVIDING COMPREHENSIVE MOBILITY SOLUTION Public transport should be complemented by flexible solutions in order to offer a comprehensive mobility package Integrated Park & Ride scheme is an incentive to the use of public transport by motorists Car-sharing offers the use of a car to (loyal) public transport customers when needed Shared taxis and on-demand transport are appropriate solutions for low density areas Conventional public transport modes are not able to offer door-to-door solutions in all situations

Modern and efficient public transport system MODERNISE PUBLIC TRANSPORT VEHICLES Driverless metros and automation of conventional metro lines Alternative fuels for buses Catenary-less power supply for tramways Information technologies for improved operation and security Low-floor buses Innovative design

Modern and efficient public transport system IMPLEMENTING MODERN MANAGEMENT Public transport companies should adopt a more commercial approach to business without sacrificing the social dimension of public transport Public transport staff should adopt a customer-oriented behaviour and should be motivated for that New information technology offers important possibilities for more efficient and improved fleet management and maintenance Public transport is moving from a production-focused industry to a customer-oriented service in a competitive market

Modern and efficient public transport system MADRID, SPAIN Set-up of an organising authority Extension of the metro network (+10 km/year) Reorganisation of the bus network and implementation of bus corridors Improvement of interchange stations Fare integration  +60% of public transport use ( )

Modern and efficient public transport system BOGOTA, COLOMBIA Implementation of Bus Rapid Transit network (41 km in 2002, 388 km in 2015) Reorganisation of bus network (trunk lines, feeder lines) Car traffic restriction  -32% in travel time  -40% in air pollutants  -93% in number of accidents

Modern and efficient public transport system DUBLIN, IRELAND Implementation of 100 km of bus corridors Provision of Park & Ride parking with fares integrated with public transport  Bus speed 30 to 50% higher than car speed  +29.7% in bus use (+38% in peak hours)  65% of new customers from the car

Modern and efficient public transport system BRUSSELS, BELGIUM Increase of public transport supply Improved quality (new buses, frequency, night services) New tariff policy  +50% in public transport use between 1999 and 2004

Modern and efficient public transport system SEOUL, SOUTH KOREA Implementation of Bus Rapid Transit system (84 km in 2005) Reorganisation of bus network (trunk lines, feeder lines, local lines) Integrated smartcard system (distance-based fare) Real time location of buses and travel information  +11% in public transport users in one year  Improved customer satisfaction

Modern and efficient public transport system HONG KONG Easy use of PT and increased attractiveness Speeding up access to train platforms (100 ms/pax) Better information on customers Saving in operational and maintenance costs in comparison with magnetic tickets Fight against fraud  7.5 million Octopus cards issued  6 million transactions every day  90% of all trips are paid by the Octopus card

Modern and efficient public transport system MARKETING AND BRANDING Retaining and attracting customers

Modern and efficient public transport system =  +10% OF NEW CUSTOMERS ( new PT users)  + 13% for the PT Market share in only 3 Years  + 5% of intensive users HOLDERS FINANCES /net margin: 9 to 23 €/year /pass PARIS, France

Modern and efficient public transport system “Transport is not a technical, but a political issue. Technically and economically it is possible and simple to structure high quality bus based transit systems, as long as other vehicles be removed from a few lanes in main arteries” Enrique Peñalosa Former Mayor of Bogotà

Modern and efficient public transport system Thank you for your attention and contribution!