An Analysis of LSU’s Transportation System Brian Marks GEOG 4077 This report has several facets, all concerning how LSU’s transportation system functions.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
York Viva Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) Concept image along Davis Drive.
Advertisements

Jordan School District Board of Education Boundary Recommendation for New Middle School in Herriman November 27, 2012 Teri Timpson, Administrator of Schools,
West Michigan Transit Linkages Study Wednesday, June 4 th, :00 a.m. Grand Valley State University Kirkhof Center Conference Room 2266.
1 Avoiding car ownership: a key element in progress towards carfree cities Richard Gilbert Consultant in Transport and Energy, Toronto Research Director,
Writing your final conclusion to your analysis.
Cellular Mass Transit (CMT) CMT4Austin.org. SOLUTION: Cellular Mass Transit Circulator Routes would converge on each Transit Center.
Towards More Sustainable Transportation at UMD David Allen Director, Department of Transportation Services (DOTS) 1.
NEW YORK CITY TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION COMMISSION NYSDOT Comments on New York City Traffic Congestion Mitigation Plan Bob Zerrillo, Director, Office.
Markham Centre TDM and Land Development Case Study ACT Canada – TDM Summit October 21, 2008.
 City of Mesa Council Presentation October 23, 2014.
Going Grey in Mississauga Evaluating the Older Adult Plan using Quality of Life as a Measure of Success.
New Shuttle Routes. Current Health Sciences Shuttles – Four (4) different primary routes with excessive stops – A few single purpose routes – “Concierge”
Urban Land Use (chapter 21)
Three Phases of Commuting Trip 1.Collection Phase – the trip from home to the main travel vehicle Cost: a.basically zero for automobile b.time costs and.
TRANSPORTATION POLICY COMMITTEE FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL STAFF COUNCIL ALUMNI CENTER APRIL 2, 2003.
Estimating Commute Trips The Evergreen State College Office of Institutional Research and Assessment.
Five-Year Mass Transit Fund Financial Forecast April 6,
UTA Utah Transit Authority Kia Matthews. Introduction Utah Transit Authority is a provider of public transportation throughout the Wasatch Front of Utah,
Once upon a time …. Pyrmont as new urbanism “The new urbanist approach can be applied at many scales, from individual subdivisions to entire regions.
Walking Works Promoting Walking to and on your campus Richard Smith Head of Business and Consultancy Services.
Presented to the Board of Trustees Davis Demographics & Planning, Inc. Riverside, California February 10 th, 2009 Upland Unified School District.
Calgary Regional Partnership Workshop BC Transit Governance and Funding Experience Bill Lambert, Manager, Transportation Solutions, April 16, 2013.
SEATTLE LIGHT RAIL STATION AREA PLANNING City of Seattle Station Area Planning in Seattle SEATTLE LIGHT RAIL STATION AREA PLANNING.
Kenia Garcia Monica Molina UC MERCED CAT TRACKS. SURVEY QUESTION 1.
{ Increasing Campus Safety in Parking Lots Prepared By: Hilary Palmer, Audrey Richards, Jordan Korte and Cecilia Carrillo.
Bus Rapid Transit: Chicago’s New Route to Opportunity Josh Ellis, BRT Project Manager Metropolitan Planning Council.
Illinois State University Parking & Transportation Services Master Planning and Parking Julie E. North, Director February 11, 2010.
Traffic Management Plan National Institutes of Health Division of Travel and Transportation Services, ORS And Division of Facilities Planning, ORF Presented.
Effective Transportation Planning City of Seattle, WA.
TAG 2012 Survey Data. Survey sent to 16, responded.
GIS FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. WHAT DOES GIS STAND FOR? Hardware and Software Data Mapping Standards GIS Savvy Users GIS G eographic I nformation S ystems.
NEW STRATEGY FOR TRANSPORT GOVERNANCE IN MONTREAL March EMTA Meeting, Madrid.
People commuting to UW suffer delays, congestion using both public and private transportation. We propose a park & ride system with express shuttle service.
Rural-Urban Interaction in NL: Understanding & Managing Functional Regions Functional Regions Element Update Funding support provided by the Canada- Newfoundland.
Welcome to Off-Campus Life and Living Who are we? What do we do? Off-Campus Student Services.
Steve Beverley SUSTAINABLE TRAVEL MANAGER METROCENTRE, GATESHEAD.
UTA UTAH TRANSIT AUTHORITY ENGLISH 2010 ALEXIS BRASIER.
Compact Housing Sustaining Communities and the Environment.
AUGUST 2, 2011 ADMINISTRATOR’S ACADEMY. TRANSPORTATION $1,500,000 REDUCTION Transportation is not provided to students that live within two miles of their.
On the Right Track Meeting Greater Boston’s Transit and Land Use Challenges May 17, 2006.
1 Presented to the Transportation Planning Board October 15, 2008 Item 9 Metrobus Priority Corridor Network.
Session Two Perspectives on Smart Growth. American Planning Association Core Principles of Smart Growth A.Recognition that all levels of government, and.
People are pedestrians by design join the movement at
January 2009 Transportation 2009 Support for transportation choices and alternatives Jon Boyd
1 FY2006 TDA Triennial Performance Audits Metropolitan Transportation Commission Programming & Allocations Committee October 4, 2006 GGBHTD (Golden Gate)
MULTIMODAL ACCESSBILITY PHYSICS OF CITIES – SCIENCE OF ACCESSIBILITY 2 2 A NEW ACCESSIBILITY FRAMEWORK 3 PRESENTATION OVERVIEW ACCESSIBILITY.
1 Regional Activity Centers and Clusters Presentation to National Capital Region Transportation Planning Board Paul DesJardin Department of Human Services,
Smart Growth Supporters Envision New Urban West By: Heather Clark, Associated Press The Herald, Sierra Vista, AZ
Presentation to President’s Cabinet February 16, 2016.
Urban Land Use Chapter Major Land Uses 1. Residential (40%) 2. Transportation (33%) 3. Commercial (5%) 4. Industrial (6%) 5. Institutional and Public.
GIS and the Built Environment: An Overview Phil Hurvitz UW-CAUP-Urban Form Lab GIS and the Geography of Obesity Workshop August 3, 2005.
There is a growing concern that current development patterns do not pay enough attention to the city Communities are questioning the economic costs.
Compact Housing Sustaining Communities and the Environment.
City Council – Project Update September 14, 2015.
Indianapolis Public Public Hearing – Proposed 2014 Budget Thursday, August 15, 2013 Transportation Corporation.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 2 – TRANSPORTATION ELEMENT 12/12/2013.
City of Portland Bureau of Development Services Staff Presentation to the Portland Design Commission Design Recommendation LU MS Conway’s NW.
Metropolitan Council Transit Capital Improvement Program October 10, 2007.
2016 Community Engagement Survey Results Office of Councilmember Chris Seelbach June 2016 Community Budget Survey.
Planning Commission Ian Macek May 26, 2016 Freight Master Plan.
Snoqualmie Retail Market Analysis Presented July 2, 2007 City of Snoqualmie.
Social Planning and Research Council of Hamilton
Parking and Transportation Master Plan Executive Summary
About Texas A&M College Station, Texas
Auckland Largest city
Staten Island Bus Study Public Workshop
Comprehensive Operational Analysis (COA)
Urban Land Use (chapter 21)
A&M Association of Commuter Transportation July 31, 2007
Urban Land Use (chapter 21)
Presentation transcript:

An Analysis of LSU’s Transportation System Brian Marks GEOG 4077 This report has several facets, all concerning how LSU’s transportation system functions. Density of Students’ Residences Efficiency of LSU’s Bus System Possible Ways to Improve Public Transit to/from LSU Student Accessibility to Groceries and Retailers by Public Transit Grocery Proximity to Student Neighborhoods

Methodology I used a copy of the LSU Student Directory to geocode 500 student mailing addresses. I excluded on-campus addresses and non-Baton Rouge addresses to get only students who commute a moderate distance to campus, the ideal population to use public transportation. This data should skew my results slightly away from campus, as many mailing addresses are parents’ homes, not students’ current residences.

I used this data to create a contour surface that indicates neighborhoods where many students live. I overlaid this data with the LSU bus system routes to determine if bus ridership reflected the system’s service population and if any large concentrations of students were not near bus service. I also digitized the major retailers near LSU, their area in square feet, and through a series of maps showed how student access to large retail stores has changed in the past few years. My conclusions were: LSU’s bus system seems to be running at more or less equal efficiency throughout its service area. Ridership for any given route correlated well with student residence density. With small exceptions, the LSU bus system reaches most of the large concentrations of nearby off-campus students.

Over the past few years, student access to large retailers near campus has decreased. Retailers are moving eastward away from campus. In addition there is poor public transit access to the new concentration of retailers on College Drive and poor pedestrian access to remaining nearby stores. While many off-campus students live near campus in dense concentration, the remainder live more dispersed and farther away than LSU’s bus system could feasibly accommodate. For this reason, to improve public transit I have two recommendations: 1.Reduce the wait times for busses in the largest, closest student neighborhoods, such as State Street, Tigerland, Nicholson Drive, and Burbank / E Boyd.

2. Incorporate LSU’s bus system into the larger city-wide system and increase funding so that students living outside student neighborhoods can use the system efficiently.

Context of Research in Current Baton Rouge Transportation Policy I believe my research shows that LSU’s bus system is running efficiently and should if anything be expanded and further integrated into the city’s overall public transit system. Currently LSU is in the process of implementing its Campus Master Plan, which among other things seeks to eliminate the Capital Transportation Corporation (CTC)’s contract with LSU to run off- and on-campus bus services. LSU’s contract with the CTC is $1.85 million/year, more than the City/Parish invests in the system, at just over $1 million annually.

LSU’s Plan, other than being financially unworkable and inflexible in its emphasis on cars as a means of transportation (LSU has the highest number of parking spaces per capita of any American university, at.65 spaces per student), will financially cripple the CTC. Thus, it is at odds with the conclusions of my research, which show that greater regional integration of transit systems would allow for more efficient public transit in Baton Rouge. This integration is the opposite of LSU’s current policy, which is to further detach itself from the rest of Baton Rouge.

From the Baton Rouge Advocate, 3/19/03 CTC (Capital Transportation Corporation) to seek funds, growth in services …The agency may need the money soon. The reason is that LSU Director of Facility Development Bill Eskew said the university isn't in favor of continuing the contracted bus service that has become one of CTC's main financial pillars. CTC General Manager Debbie Moore said she believes LSU would be happy to have big-bus service that runs to eight planned parking garages on the fringe of the campus. She said the garages could be transfer points for CTC-operated shuttles to ferry students around campus. That plan would require lots of smaller shuttles, she said. "What they don't realize is how many students ride those big buses," Moore said. "At times, we've got standing room only." Graphics at Right and on Following Page from LSU Campus Master Plan show Elimination of Off- Campus Bus Routes

From Campus Master Plan Visit #8 Presentation, available online at:

Read about the Master Plan online at: Read my critique of it online at: