Justin DeStories Aircraft Design. Objective/Requirements  The UAV team at Arizona State University is designing, optimizing, and building an autonomous.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ODU UAV TEAM 2013 John Plank, Ethan Pratt, Michael Midkiff Kenneth Jermstad and Ignacio Santos Proudly Present: Advisor: Dr. Drew Landman.
Advertisements

College of Engineering and Computer Science Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering Wright State University Regular Class Aircraft SAE Aero.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
SAE Aero Design Presentation Oct. 30 th Wind Tunnel Testing and Modification Why use wind tunnels? They’re cheaper than most computational fluid.
What is engineering? Engineering - The branch of science and technology concerned with the design, building, and use of engines, machines, and structures.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR II Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review II “The 20 Hour Marathon” October 19, 2000 Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis.
Vertical Launch UAV Project Plan. ∞ Construct an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) with a camera payload ∞ UAV must autonomously navigate with real-time video.
GPS Vehicle Tracking/Payload Release System For Small UAV Project Team
The Black Pearl Design Team: Ryan Cobb Jacob Conger Christopher Cottingham Travis Douville Josh Johnson Adam Loverro Tony Maloney.
Guidelines Presentation. Aircraft Aim & Judging The aircraft needs to transport the mirror segments of the ESO European Extremely Large Telescope, being.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Brian Martinez.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane William Gerboth, Jonathan Landis, Scott Munro, Harold Pahlck February 18, 2010.
SAE Aero Design Guidelines Rev A, 2013 Aero Design Oral Presentation Guidelines How to Deliver a Presentation The Judges will Notice.
Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) SAE AERO Chase Beatty.
Daniel Graves (ME). Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems  Primary Customer: RIT College of Imaging Science ○ Currently.
1 Design Group 2 Kat Donovan - Team Leader Andrew DeBerry Mike Kinder John Mack Jeff Newcamp Andrew Prisbell Nick Schumacher Conceptual Design for AME.
AME 441: Conceptual Design Presentation
Critical Design Review AAE490 Project 1 March 2003 Nicholas Baker Brian Chernish Andrew Faust Doug Holden Mara Prentkowski Nicholas Setar.
Project Status Update II R09230: Open Architecture, Open Source Unmanned Aerial Vehicle for Imaging Systems A. Benjamin Wager (ME) B. Michael Skube (ME)
Vehicle Sizing PDR Presented by: Mark Blanton Chris Curtis Loren Garrison September 21, 2000 Chris Peters Jeff Rodrian DR2.
The Barn Owls Chris “Mo” Baughman Kate Brennan Christine Izuo Dan Masse Joe “Sal” Salerno Paul Slaboch Michelle Smith.
ME403 Chapter 3 Wing Aerodynamics
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Group #1 Matthew Chin, Aaron Dickerson Brett J. Ulrich, Tzvee Wood Advisor: Professor Siva Thangam December 9 th, 2004.
Group 3 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane William Gerboth, Jonathan Landis, Scott Munro, Harold Pahlck October 8, 2009.
Parts of an Aircraft. 8/7/2015Aerodynamics Day 12.
Wright Flyer Competition Commemorating 100 years of powered flight.
[SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane] Joe Lojek : James Koryan : Justin Sommer : Ramy Ghaly [Ducks on a Plane] : Advisor Professor Thangam : Thursday, February.
 Model airplanes are sized down models of an aircraft  The calculations are easy and the importance is given to building of the plane.
SAE AERO Chase Beatty (Team Leader) Brian Martinez (Organizer) Mohammed Ramadan (Financial Officer) Noe Caro (Historian) Chase Beatty.
Team 6: “Soldier Portable UAV” David Neira TJ Worden Matthew Martin Joshua Mellen Ona Okonkwo Josiah Shearon A IR HERCULES 1.
Team “Canard” September 19th, 2006
Student Unmanned Aerial System FAMU/FSU College of Engineering Mechanical Engineering Department (1) Electrical and Computer Engineering Department (2)
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Preliminary Sizing PDR 26 September, 2000.
The Lumberjacks Team /16/12 Brian Martinez.
Group 10 Dimitrios Arnaoutis Alessandro Cuomo Gustavo Krupa Jordan Taligoski David Williams 1.
BASICS OF RC PLANE. Overview  What is RC Plane?  RC Planes’ Parts and their Role  How planes fly?  Concepts and Terminologies of RC Plane  Stability.
Group 13 Heavy Lift Cargo Plane Richard-Marc Hernandez Yoosuk Kee Stephen McNulty Jessica Pisano Chi Yan Project Advisor: Siva Thangam.
DESIGN OF THE 1903 WRIGHT FLYER REPLICA MADRAS INSTITUE OF TECHNOLOGY CHENNAI - 44.
1 Lecture 4: Aerodynamics Eric Loth For AE 440 A/C Lecture Sept 2009.
 PROFESSOR: CHARLES KUNG  GROUP MEMBERS: AKRAM GERIES, JEEVEN HUGH, MICHAEL LADAS, BRAD LONG.
ES 100 Micro Aerial Vehicle Group 1 Michelle Helsel, Austin Dickey, Alsia Plybeah, Dylan Carlson, Peter, Lucilla Calderon.
AAE 451 Aircraft Design First Flight Boiler Xpress November 21, 2000
Subsystem Level Design Review.  Project Review  System Level Changes ◦ Tail Dragger ◦ Airfoil Change and Discussion  Subsystem Selection ◦ Fuselage.
ES 100 Micro Air Vehicle Project Montgomery College Professor: Dr. Charles Kung Summer I 2012 Team Members: Andrew Joe Laura Mohammed Nathelie Noella Stephanie.
DR2 Aerodynamic PDR Aerodynamic Preliminary Design Review October 3, 2000 German National Holiday Presented By: Loren Garrison Team DR2 Chris Curtis Chris.
Airfoils. Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Moving air Airfoil Aerodynamic force (lift)
Patrick Dempsey Bridget Fitzpatrick Heather Garber Keith Hout Jong Soo Mok Aerodynamics Preliminary Design Review #1 October 3, 2000.
Mini Autonomous Flying Vehicle CASDE is part of the National effort to develop a Micro Air Vehicle. CASDE has chosen a Mini Vehicle, in the short term,
SAE Aerospace Regular Class High Lift Competition Educational Aircraft Design Objective: To develop a stable, controllable, high lift aircraft to serve.
Beard & McLain, “Small Unmanned Aircraft,” Princeton University Press, 2012, Chapter 4: Slide 1 Chapter 4 Forces and Moments.
Keenan Valentine Introduction & Stress Analysis. Introduction I  The ASCEND team at Arizona State University is designing, optimizing, and building an.
Yaqoub Almounes John Cowan Josh Gomez Michael Medulla Mohammad Qasem
6.01 Aircraft Design and Construction References: FTGU pages 9-14, 27
Conceptual Design Report
Airfoil Any surface that provides aerodynamic force through interaction with moving air Aerodynamic force (lift) Moving air Airfoil.
Design/Build/Fly SU DBF
Structures and Weights
SAE Heavy Lift Cargo Plane
Airfoils and Simulation
Congratulations…Welcome to UTHM PARIT RAJA….A Place To Be..
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 27, 2006
Arizona State University Autonomous UAV Project
Congratulations…Welcome to UTHM PARIT RAJA….A Place To Be..
UAV Wing Design For Efficiency At Low Reynolds Numbers
Aerodynamics PDR # 2 AAE451 – Team 3 November 18, 2003
Airfoils and Simulation
Unit 2 Unmanned Aircraft
Airfoils.
Aether Aerospace AAE 451 September 19, 2006
Presentation transcript:

Justin DeStories Aircraft Design

Objective/Requirements  The UAV team at Arizona State University is designing, optimizing, and building an autonomous Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) to compete in a 2010 UAV aerial imaging contest.  The objectives of the contest are: (1) to fly an UAV via autopilot non-stop for minutes in a square search area of 1 square miles, and (2) use onboard/remote human detectors to locate and identify targets marked by colored alphabets  Additional contest rules: (1) fly between 100 and 750 feet above ground, (2) fly over way points (GPS), (3) some targets are along route/some are not, and (4) better performance = higher score Website: mp2010/default.html

Wing Design Flow Chart Brainstorm/ Research Filter using Requirements Chose Conventional Wing Design Research Various Airfoil Profiles Chose Clark-Y Airfoil Calculated a Preliminary Weight Budget Calculated Wing Size Using Wing Loading Chose Wing Sweep, Wing Taper Ratio and Dihedral Angle Completed Simplified Structural Analysis to Determine Materials and Rib Spacing Acknowledged and Took Into Consideration Self- Imposed Design Constraints Completed CAD Model of Wing Completed Wing Construction Phase

Wing Design Analysis (cont)  Relatively good at floating.  But not as fast due to the thicker airfoil (11.7%).  Is flat on the lower surface from 30% of the chord back.  It gives reasonable overall performance in respect of its lift to drag ratio.  Has gentle stall characteristics.

Preliminary Weight Budget  Researched Weights of components that were going to be used for building operating the aircraft. ItemTotal Oz. 1"x55" "x55" /8"x84" /4"x104" /8"x144"23.28 Wing Bolts /8x4x36" /4"x1/4"x25" /8"x1/2"x27.375"1.27 3/32"x4"x15" /8"x1/4"x36" "x1/2"x28.5"1.235 ElectronicsReceiver1.34 Servos5.08 Paparrazi w/ IRH,IRV1.31 Aircraft Flight Pack6.5 Power PlantHacker A80-10 Motor51.2 Masterspin Spin-Control9.5 Batteries (Lipo) AccessoriesStructure16.8 Monokote15 Video Camera6.5 Gimbal Setup5 Battery for Electronics6.5 Landing Gear20 Tail Wheel Assembly6.5 Main Wheel14 Wing Struts12 Propeller9 Misc Fasteners/Glue5 Total Weight (lbs)24.5

Wing Design Analysis  From research, choose Wing Loading and used it to determine the initial size of the aircraft.  For ease of construction and stability considerations the Wing Loading for our aircraft is

Wing Design Analysis (cont)  From Wing Loading and Chord length, all other wing parameters were calculated  Wing Planform Area (S)  Wing Span (b)  Aspect Ratio

Wing Design Considerations  Ease of Construction  Ease of Maintenance  Transportability 3 Separate Wing Sections 1 2 3

Wing Construction

Fuselage Design and Fabrication  Designed for ample room of equipment.  Batteries  Autopilot System  Flight Pack/Reciever  Antennas  Mini Computer (future)

Next Up  Ground/flight testing  Testing of the Autopilot  Camera Gimbal Setup Any Question?