DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
For AS 229 (Environmental Technology). 1. A competent environmental technologist with strong understanding of fundamental scientific and technological.
Advertisements

Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas.
ABET-ASAC Accreditation Workshop ABET Criteria and Outcomes Assessment
Keys to Success in Engineering Study
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
1 UCSC Computer Engineering Objectives, Outcomes, & Feedback Tracy Larrabee Joel Ferguson Richard Hughey.
Computer Science Department Program Improvement Plan December 3, 2004.
Outcomes-Based Accreditation: An Agent for Change and Quality Improvement in Higher Education Programs A. Erbil PAYZIN Founding Member and Past Chairman.
ABET Engineering Criteria 2000 To maintain ABET accreditation, Engineering Departments must demonstrate that all of their graduates have the following.
Program Improvement Committee Report Larry Caretto College Faculty Meeting December 3, 2004.
Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was established in 1868 and the first undergraduate degrees were awarded in The Department.
ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
Capstone Design Project (CDP) Civil Engineering Department First Semester 1431/1432 H 10/14/20091 King Saud University, Civil Engineering Department.
Assessment College of Engineering A Key for Accreditation February 11, 2009.
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology - is a non governmental organization that accredits post secondary educational organizations in : 1)
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingJanuary 24, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
ABET Accreditation (Based on the presentations by Dr. Raman Unnikrishnan and W. J. Wilson) Assoc. Prof. Zeki BAYRAM EMU Computer Engineering Dept. 14 January.
CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting June 3 rd, 2012.
King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals
A Decade of Experience On Outcome Based Accreditation: Still a Long Way To Go A. Erbil PAYZIN Bülent E. PLATIN Chair, MÜDEK Executive Board Member, MÜDEK.
OUTCOME BASED LEARNING- CONTINUES IMPROVEMENT. Motivation  PEC??  Continues Improvement.
OBE Briefing.
A Sample Poster — Landscape Layout Name of Team Members Mechanical Engineering Department Introduction The Mechanical Engineering Department at WPI was.
ABET’s coming to Rose! Your involvement Monday, Nov 5, 2012.
CHEMICAL ENGINEERING PROGRAM CHEN Program Assessment Advisory Board Meeting May 21, 2013.
AL-QADISIYIA UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT Submitted by SAR committee.
Overview of the Department’s ABET Criterion 3 Assessment Process.
GLOBAL ACCREDITATION TRENDS Russel C. Jones. Ph.D., P.E. World Expertise LLC USA and UAE.
1 Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR (18 th -27 th November 2013) -MDR Deliverables clearly defined? -Individual team member MDR deliverables.
EE Program Student Advising Prof. Michael Green These slides can be found at:
ABET 2000 Preparation: the Final Stretch Carnegie Institute of Technology Department Heads Retreat July 29, 1999.
EENG 4910/4990 Engineering Design Murali Varanasi September 02, 2009.
1 A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Incorporating Engineering Standards in the Major Design Experience William E. Kelly Department of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America.
Supporting ABET Assessment and Continuous Improvement for Engineering Programs William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University.
Cross Cutting Initiatives - Education William E. Kelly Professor of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America.
CEN ABET Mini- Retreat March 4, CEN ABET Mini-Retreat Agenda: –State of the Assessments –Discussion on loop closings. –CSE Program Objectives/Outcomes.
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering MDR Report.
Copyright © 2011 by ABET, Inc. and TMS 1 December 2, 2008 ABET Update UMC Meeting April 6, 2015 San Francisco, CA Chester J. Van Tyne
Copyright © 2014 by ABET Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5 Charles Hickman Managing Director, Society, Volunteer and Industry Relations AIAA Conference.
ABET Accreditation Status CISE IAB MeeertingOctober 6, CEN program fully ABET-accredited (in 2006) until 2012: no concerns, no weaknesses, no deficiencies.
HU113_Assignment31 HU113: Technical Report Writing Prof. Abdelsamie Moet Teaching Assistant: Mrs. Rana El-Gohary Fall 2012/13 Pharos University in Alexandria.
CEN Faculty MeetingMarch 31, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Engineering Standards in Capstone Design William E. Kelly Department of Civil Engineering The Catholic University of America Washington, DC ASEE.
Gateway Engineering Education Coalition Background on ABET Overview of ABET EC 2000 Structure Engineering Accreditation and ABET EC2000 – Part I.
UGSC: Undergraduate Studies Committee Haiyun Bian, Jay Dejongh, Travis Doom, Natsuhiko Futamura, Prabhaker Mateti *, Eric Matson, Karen Meyer, Michael.
CISE IAB MeetingOctober 15, ABET Accreditation Brief history. –1980’s: faculty qualifications sufficed. –1990s: quality of courses, materials, and.
Preparing for ABET visit Prof. Dr. Lerzan Özkale Management Engineering Head of Department November 2010.
ENGINEERING ANALYSIS. WHAT IS ENGINEERING ANALYSIS? ABET Required Program Outcomes: (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering.
1 Assessment of Undergraduate Programs Neeraj Mittal Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas (UTD) January 22, 2016.
UGSC: Undergraduate Studies Committee Haiyun Bian, Jay Dejongh, Travis Doom, Natsuhiko Futamura, Prabhaker Mateti *, Eric Matson, Karen Meyer, Michael.
COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING POLICIES THE WHAT, HOW AND WHY.
University of Utah Program Goals and Objectives Program Goals and Objectives Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Constituents U of U, COE, ASCE, IAB Strategic.
Assessment of Industrial Internships Karyn Biasca.
Engineering programs must demonstrate that their graduates have the following: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology (ABET) ETP 2005.
ABET ACREDITATION By: Elizabeth Rivera Oficina de Acreditación.
Funded by a grant from the National Science Foundation. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed are those of the authors and do.
 Engineering in the modern society  Professional profile of a modern engineer  Engineer as a key personality in the technological and social progress.
 (noun) a specification of an object, manifested by an agent, intended to accomplish goals, in a particular environment, using a set of primitive components,
ABET Accreditation College of IT and Computer Engineering
Continuous Program Improvement
OUTCOME BASED EDUCATION
Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology
2012 Capstone Design Conference Amin Karim, DeVry University
Proposed Revisions to Criteria 3 and 5
Inculcating “Parallel Programming” in UG curriculum
Department of Computer Science The University of Texas at Dallas
Development of ABET Syllabus
Assessment and Accreditation
CE 220 Professionalism A pupil from whom nothing is ever demanded which he cannot do, never does all he can. John Stuart Mill.
Presentation transcript:

DIPOL Quality Practice in Training at İstanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty Dr.Banu Tansel

Istanbul Technical University Maritime Faculty (ITUMF) offers training in accordance with STCW convention (IMO) and ABET model= DIPOL Quality Practice

DIPOL Quality Practice Thus, a student-centered system was established in accordance with STCW requirements and professional quality outputs for technical training (ABET).

ITUMF Department of Marine Engineering Program (MEP) DIPOL Quality Practice Two of the most important objectives of the established DIPOL quality system are as follows; To increase the quality of education/training within a systematic and continuously developing structure, To assure that the quality in education and training is maintained based on international standards.

ABET Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology The systems comprises a total of eight criteria, namely; students, program educational objectives, program outcomes and assessment, professional component, faculty, facilities, institutional support, financial resources and program efficiency.

All of ABET criteria are defined by procedures and the assessment criteria are drawn up for performance results Of these criteria, the one regarding student outcomes defines the skills to be acquired by a student graduating from an education program, as stated below. These skills are standard program outcomes with which the objectives of every engineering program comply. (a) an ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering (b) an ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data (c) an ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability (d) an ability to function on multidisciplinary teams (e) an ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems (f) an understanding of professional and ethical responsibility (g) an ability to communicate effectively (h) the broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context (i) a recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning (j) a knowledge of contemporary issues (k) an ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice.

In addition to these outcomes, ME Department has created its own program outcomes by adding a specific outcome, namely. (l) an ability to operate and maintain any marine main and auxiliary machinery, as well as to ensure ship safety through diagnosing and remedying engine troubles to the outcomes a to k.

In the Department of Marine Engineering Program DIPOL quality system, the process of undergraduate program is systematized in a quality cycle consisting strategic planning, practice, measurement and evaluation, and feedback stages.

Education Process Correlation Algorithm

The most important stage here is considered to be the measurement criteria and evaluation. Learning Outcomes for the Program/Lecture Evaluation/Measurement Method High level of competency in marine engineering Transcripts Evaluation made by students and academic staff to reach the target outcomes for a lecture Verbal and written communication skills Transcripts (Design Dissertation, Maritime English, Turkish etc.) Evaluation of laboratory reports and individual studies Meeting the requirement for a presentation for assignments and projects Creative thinking skills in individual works or team work, solution oriented approach to engineering problems and critical judgments Transcripts (operation, diesel, naval auxiliary, simulation courses etc.) Evaluation of individual works or team works Design dissertations Alumni questionnaire

1-Undergraduate Program of the Department of Marine Engineering (ME) is renewed, so first step is taken to enable students to acquire skills conforming to the outcomes a to l. While creating a new curriculum in accordance with the DIPOL quality system at the MEP, courses or topics such as Engineering ethics, Leadership, Environmental awareness, Development of written and verbal communication and Design,are taken into consideration. In addition, in order to provide a multidirectional perspective of engineering education, human and social science courses such as psychology, sociology and environment and society as well as art courses such as cinema arts, photography and theater are offered as elective courses to the students.

2-Course introduction forms are developed for each course and academic staff arranged relevant data for courses given by them such as course objective, skills acquired by students, weekly course planning, course sources and evaluation system. 3-All courses included in the undergraduate program are separately correlated with the outcomes a to l and a matrix is produced. Each academic member completes and carries out evaluations with that sense of responsibility throughout a semester.

Correlation Matrix for Lecture and Program Outcomes Program Outcomes Level of Contribution 123 aAn ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science, and engineering b An ability to design and conduct experiments, as well as to analyze and interpret data x c An ability to design a system, component, or process to meet desired needs within realistic constraints such as economic, environmental, social, political, ethical, health and safety, manufacturability, and sustainability dAn ability to function on multidisciplinary teams x eAn ability to identify, formulate, and solve engineering problems x fAn understanding of professional and ethical responsibility x gAn ability to communicate effectively x h The broad education necessary to understand the impact of engineering solutions in a global, economic, environmental, and societal context x iA recognition of the need for, and an ability to engage in life-long learning x jA knowledge of contemporary issues x k An ability to use the techniques, skills, and modern engineering tools necessary for engineering practice x l An ability to operate and maintain any marine main and auxiliary machinery, as well as to ensure ship safety through diagnosing and remedying engine troubles x

Evaluations are carried out based on what the student learns rather than what is taught to the student. In the MEP DIPOL quality system, the process of undergraduate program is systematized in a quality cycle consisting strategic planning, practice, measurement and evaluation, and feedback stages.

Thank you for your attention.