Grants Business Process Re-Engineering (BPR) Overview

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
External Quality Assessments Frequently Occurring Findings Observed by The IIA QA Teams.
Advertisements

2007 – 2008 Academic/Business Plan …a strategic initiative School District of Palm Beach County New Horizons for Student Success.
Project THRIVE Goals and Objectives Achieving HR Excellence and Transforming APS The district views this Human Capital project as the primary vehicle to.
The HR Paradigm Shift Discover Stakeholder Value for the Human Resources Function.
1 Professionalising Programme & Project Management Developing programme & project management capacities for UNDP and national counterparts External Briefing.
An Intro to Professionalizing Procurement & Strategic Sourcing
Presentation for the Management Study of the Code Enforcement Process City of Little Rock, Arkansas August 3, 2006.
©2014 MFMER | slide-1 Unlocking a Quality Management System’s Potential – Key Components and Self- Monitoring Tools.
SEM Planning Model.
NOAA’s Vision and Future Scott Rayder NOAA Chief of Staff National Association of Marine Laboratories March 9, 2006.
Program Management Overview (An Introduction)
Institutional Effectiveness Operational Update Presentation made to the Indiana State University Board of Trustees October 5, 2001.
1 Program Performance and Evaluation: Policymaker Expectations 2009 International Education Programs Service Technical Assistance Workshop Eleanor Briscoe.
Orientation to Performance and Quality Improvement Plan
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Center for Health Care Quality Licensing & Certification Program Evaluation 1 August 2014 rev.
Implementing Business Process Reengineering (extract) U.S. Department of Transportation Office of Commercial Services Management.
UWM CIO Office A Collaborative Process for IT Training and Development Copyright UW-Milwaukee, This work is the intellectual property of the author.
Certified Business Process Professional (CBPP®)
Procurement Transformation State of North Carolina
MARKETING STRATEGY O.C. FERRELL • MICHAEL D. HARTLINE
Core Performance Measures FY 2005
AEP Implementation Focus Group
Strategic Planning for EEO & HR Offices Dinah Cohen CAP Director Derek Shields CAP Program Manager EEOC Executive Leadership Conference – May 3-5, 2011.
Mia Alexander-Snow, PhD Director, Office for Planning and Institutional Effectiveness Program Review Orientation 1.
The Evergreen, Background, Methodology and IT Service Management Model
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
Building Tribal programs that invest in children, youth, and families, while preserving tribal cultural values and traditions. Hankie P. Ortiz,Deputy Bureau.
FY2010 PEMP Notable Outcomes October 15, FRA, LLC Board of Directors 10/15-16/2009 Office of Quality and Best Practices Performance Evaluation Management.
1. Continue to distinguish and clarify between Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) and Service Area Outcomes (SAOs) 2. Develop broad SLOs/SAOs in order to.
1 Improving Administration in Your Financial Aid Office SFA’s Tools for Success.
Certificate IV in Project Management Introduction to Project Management Course Number Qualification Code BSB41507.
CSI - Introduction General Understanding. What is ITSM and what is its Value? ITSM is a set of specialized organizational capabilities for providing value.
BPR PHASE IV IMPLEMENTATION NOAA Business Process Re-Engineering Current Status: June 21, 2006 NESDIS Cooperative Institute Directors and Administrators.
Technology Use Plan Bighorn County School District #4 Basin / Manderson, Wyoming “Life-long learning through attitude, academics, and accountability.”
Applying Business Process Re-engineering
Award Monitoring Update National Science Foundation Advisory Committee for Business and Operations October 22, 2003 Mary Santonastasso, Director, Division.
Family Service System Reform Grant Application Training Video FY Donna Bostick-Knox, Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare, Office of Children.
Technology planning* … is the process of identifying the ideal role of technology in an organization and mapping the evolution of that role into the future.
Office of the Chief Financial Officer Gwendolyn Sykes Chief Financial Officer November, 2007 © Yale University 2007.
Webinar for FY 2011 i3 Grantees February 9, 2012 Fiscal Oversight of i3 Grants Erin McHughJames Evans, CPA, CGFM, CGMA Office of Innovation and Improvement.
NCURA 54 th Annual Conference USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture Office of Grants and Financial Management November 7, 2012.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
Department of Defense Knowledge Fair Tim Young Office of Management and Budget September 27, 2007.
University of Minnesota Internal/External Sales “Annual Requirements and Certification” How to Annually Account for Internal Sales Activity.
The Value Driven Approach
The University of Kentucky Program Review Process for Administrative Units April 18 & 20, 2006 JoLynn Noe, Assistant Director Office of Assessment
NOAA Cooperative Institutes John Cortinas, Ph.D. OAR Cooperative Institute Program, Program Manager NOAA Cooperative Institute Committee, Chairperson.
15 th NOAA Science Advisory Board Meeting NOAA Program Review Team Recommendations for Grants Administration Rimas T. Liogys NOAA Finance and Administration.
New Frameworks for Strategic Enrollment Management Planning
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Catholic Charities Performance and Quality Improvement (PQI)
RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE GOVERNOR ’ S TASK FORCE ON CONTRACTING AND PROCUREMENT REVIEW Report Overview PD Customer Forum September 2002.
Internal Auditing Effectiveness
Indian Health Service Grants Management Grants 101- Fundamentals.
Health Management Dr. Sireen Alkhaldi, DrPH Community Medicine Faculty of Medicine, The University of Jordan First Semester 2015 / 2016.
Lincoln Trail District Health Department Strategic Plan Our Foundation Strategic Goals & Objectives Measures of Success Mission: The Lincoln Trail District.
Washoe County School District Mike Paul- Director of Professional Growth Systems and TIF3 & TIF4 Grants Yvette Deighton- TIF4 Program Coordinator Jim Grace.
Module 4 Presented by Strumpf Associates on Behalf of the WDB February 19, 2016.
Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management Leadership Guide for Strategic Information Management for State DOTs NCHRP Project Information.
IMPLEMENTING THE APPROPRIATE PMO FOR MY ORGANIZATION Karen Walkup, PMP September 26, 2007.
Effective Practices for a Successful Standards Review.
I P M 1 City of Fort Worth City Council Presented by Doug Rademaker, Deputy Director, PMO Ken Hall, IPM Program Manager, CH2M HILL October 6, 2009 I n.
Establish and Identify Processes  Identify and establish current state:  Roles and responsibilities  Processes and procedures  Operational performance.
January 23,  Balance state’s higher education long range plan and agency operations in the required strategic plan;  Involve agency staff in.
Operational Reviews at the National Cemetery Administration (NCA)
Applying Business Process Re-engineering
Monitoring and Evaluation using the
Monitoring & Managing Your WIF Grant
WORK STREAM TEAM DELIVERABLES
Presentation transcript:

Grants Business Process Re-Engineering (BPR) Overview Rimas T. Liogys Director Policy, Planning, and Systems

Topics Vision for Strengthening Financial and Administrative Services Grants Vision and Strategic Goals BPR Recommendations Overview BPR Implementation Approach Grants Operating Model FY06 Performance Metrics Expected BPR Implementation Results Menu Slide This is the context we are working in, and some opportunities and challenges that we face. The 2004 election has brought the need to create new relationships on the Hill.

Vision for Strengthening Financial and Administrative Services “[W]e are working to improve the management and delivery of financial and administrative services. Numerous studies… documented opportunities for improvements in financial and administrative service areas and recommended changes to both our organizational structure and business processes.” - Memorandum from Conrad C. Lautenbacher, Jr., Vice Admiral, U.S. Navy (Ret.), September 9, 2004 Vision Clear, consistent policies and procedures Properly resourced workforce with appropriate competencies and skills Value-added business processes with maximum use of automation for improved timeliness and quality of service delivery Performance metrics that enable program assessments, diagnostics, and customer satisfaction Assurance that processes are aligned with NOAA goals, properly governed, and effectively managed Increased organizational capabilities in new processes and improved performance in current processes

Grants Vision and Strategic Goals Grants Vision Statement: Enable achievement of NOAA's mission through effective and efficient grant program partnerships Grants Strategic Goals: Increase [internal and external] customer outreach, service and understanding of grant programs Strengthen Grants Management coordination, planning, execution and monitoring Measure Grant results against NOAA's mission

BPR Approach Business Process Reengineering Training Phases I II III IV Business Process Reengineering Training Assessment of “As-Is” Environment Design of “To-Be” Processes Implementation of BPR Transformation Activities: Participate in tailored training in BPR tools and techniques – to include approximately 60 NOAA and 40 other Department of Commerce staff Complete an Action Learning Module that prepares participants for next phase Perform a 90-day end-to-end assessment of 8 administrative business areas across NOAA with trained NOAA staff Identify areas of duplication and redundancy as well as opportunities and recommendations for improvement Participate in “To-Be” design effort with trained NOAA and Department staff Focus areas: Budget Formulation and Execution Grants Administration Workforce Management Analyze current business processes, develop new business processes, and develop implementation plan Execute the plan to implement new organization and business processes changes Evaluate, measure, and adjust the new business processes Executive Leadership committed to strengthening NOAA’s Financial and Administrative Services NOAA’s vision for the BPR effort: Consistent policies and procedures across NOAA – eliminate the need to “shop for the best answer” Properly resourced staff – “right people in the right jobs”; and the right number of employees Value-added processes….leverage and enhance the IT systems we currently have to ease the manual work staff does and free time up for them to do more value-added work and analysis Assurance processes are aligned……… Increased organization (LO and corporate offices) capabilities BPR effort initiated in September 2004 “As-Is” Phase II assessments for 8 functional areas completed and final report released April 11, 2005 “To-Be” Phase III activities started in March, 2005 TMT has conducted the majority of Phase III activities for Grants: including best practices research, deep analysis of Phase II data, interviewed SME’s and conducted liaison meetings and focus groups; identifying major issues and developing improvement recommendations. Org/Change management activities including the impacts of the new process on roles and organization structure; culture gap analysis, capability and skill analysis. Final Report released end of November; January 06 for Budget Phase IV implementation (January ’06 for Grants)

Grants Operating Model Customers Grant Services OAR* GMD Reps LO Reps Outreach & Advisory Services • Stakeholder Relationship Management Grants - Budget Planning and Review Proactive Site Visits Progress Reviews Education and Outreach Performance Measurement against Mission Goals Customer Service Teams FALD Attorneys Operational Services Federal Funding Opportunities Merit Reviews Minimum Requirements Reviews NEPA Reviews Award, Post Award, and Close out Processing Grants Online Grants.gov – Grants Website NEPA Coordinators NOS* NMFS/MSI/NESDIS* NMFS/Corp/NWS* *GMD Reps = Grants Officers, Policy Advisors, Audit Specialist, Team Leads, Specialists, and Technicians LO Reps = Grants Coordinator, Program Managers, Federal Program Officers, and Program Assistants Clear Roles Accountability GMS/FPO Certification End to Performance Metrics Efficient and Effective Processes Knowledge Management Operating Enablers Collaborative, “ One NOAA ” Grants Management Operating Model NMFS* OAR/MSI* OAR/NESDIS/Corp/NWS* Grants Administration Operating Model

BPR Recommendations Overview Summary of Grants BPR recommendations Increase emphasis on grants planning Reduce transaction processing; Redistribute workload throughout the fiscal year Realign roles and responsibilities to improve efficiency; Enhance NOAA-wide communication, collaboration, and outreach Develop standard operating procedures, policies, and consistent processes across NOAA Increase skill levels of Grants personnel

BPR Implementation Approach

Initial BPR Recommendation Results Updated FY06 Grants Performance Metrics Increased focus on measuring Grant results in helping achieve NOAA’s mission goals Balanced focus on critical metrics in addition to timeliness in processing grants, including: Customer satisfaction Employee skill proficiency NMFS Grants Planning Pilot Developing Broad Area Announcement “Benefits from process reengineering to be identified by end of FY 06”

FY06 Performance Metrics FY06 Metrics Baseline Targets Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Long Term % of GMS and FPO certified 24% 35% 50% 100% % of grants awarded 30 days prior to the start/effective date TBD 55% 70% 85% % of multi-year grant awards 36% 40% 45% % of non-competitive grants 19% 15% 10% 5% % of grantee satisfaction (unsuccessful grant applicants and grant recipients) ~70% 75% 95% % of internal grant community satisfaction % of grants awarded enhancing NOAA’s Mission Goals For each proposed metric, the Grants BPR Team identified targets for the upcoming 3 fiscal years and a long-term target. These metrics expand upon the As-Is performance metrics and enable NOAA’s Grants Community to measure additional elements beyond timeliness. In addition, the Grants BPR Team developed a detailed process and approach to measure each proposed performance metric , detailing the frequency, approach/process, and considerations/assumptions. Examples – Hip Pocket

Expected BPR Benefits Reduce cost to process a grant Increase grant processing capacity Decrease cycle time to process a grant Shift focus of grants personnel from low value added to high-value added activities Improve grant workload distribution Increase ability to award grants 30-days prior to their start date, leading to increased customer satisfaction

Backup Slides

BPR Recommendations Overview 19 Grants BPR recommendations help achieve several desired outcomes: Increase emphasis on grants planning Award existing multi-year grants/non-competitive continuations in first quarter Formalize process for identifying Grant-related earmark recipients in a timely manner Provide grants mission-related data to LO’s to assist with future funding decisions Reduce transaction processing; Redistribute workload throughout the fiscal year Create an exception to the requirement to publish solicitations in the Federal Register Increase the number of new multi-year Grant awards Reduce the number of non-competitive Grants

BPR Recommendations Overview Realign roles and responsibilities to improve efficiency; Enhance NOAA-wide communication, collaboration, and outreach Establish GMD prioritization criteria for processing awards Build collaboration between GMD and LO staff into the end-to-end Grants process Conduct proactive site visits Design and implement a comprehensive knowledge management website Realign GMD and FALD responsibilities

BPR Recommendations Overview Develop standard operating procedures, policies, and consistent processes across NOAA Standardize electronic Grant package submissions Develop consistent approach to the pre-application process Develop consistent approach to conducting merit reviews Implement enhanced NEPA grant requirements Develop Construction Grants policies and SOP’s Formalize/Publicize process for Grantee compliance Increase skill levels of Grants personnel Develop a NOAA-wide Federal Program Officer certification program Develop a GMD Grants Specialist certification program QW -

BPR Implementation Approach