US CMS Data Preservation Discussion, 16 February 2012 CMS Data Preservation Policy On behalf of Data preservation working group Active Members:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 of 13 Organization and Management Information Management in Your Organization IMARK Investing in Information for Development Organization and Management.
Advertisements

Citizens Task Force Study of Financial, Legal & Legislative Issues Associated with Improving Roadway Service Delivery Board of Supervisors Transportation.
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT, 15 June 2006 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
PRESENTATION TO THE JOINT RULES COMMITTEE 15 MARCH 2012 ON THE PROGRESS ON IMPLEMENTATION OF THE INDEPENDENT ASSESSMENT PANEL ADOPTED RECOMMENDATIONS ADOPTED.
Roadmap for Sourcing Decision Review Board (DRB)
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
E-OCVM (Version 2) Explained Episode 3 - CAATS II Final Dissemination Event Alistair Jackson EUROCONTROL Episode 3 Brussels, 13 & 14 Oct 2009.
Campus Improvement Plans
IPCC Products, Procedures and Processes Amsterdam, 14 May 2010 Dr. Renate Christ, Secretary of the IPCC.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Chesapeake Bay Program Goal Development, Governance, and Alignment Carin Bisland, GIT6 Vice Chair.
Summary and Closing Remarks Farrokh Najmabadi University of California San Diego Presentation to: ARIES Program Peer Review August 18, 2000 UC San Diego.
introduction to MSc projects
Recall The Team Skills 1. Analyzing the Problem 2. Understanding User and Stakeholder Needs 3. Defining the System 4. Managing Scope 5. Refining the System.
Fundamentals of Information Systems, Second Edition
Proposal for a Constitution for MICE A Plan for Discussion P Dornan G Gregoire Y Nagashima A Sessler.
Community Capacity Building Program Strategic Planning
National Public Health Performance Standards Local Assessment Instrument Essential Service:5 Develop Policies and Plans that Support Individual and Community.
DATA PRESERVATION IN ALICE FEDERICO CARMINATI. MOTIVATION ALICE is a 150 M CHF investment by a large scientific community The ALICE data is unique and.
WORLD BANK Publications The reference of choice on development The Promise, and Challenge, of Implementing Open Access at the World Bank Carlos Rossel.
Westminster City Council and Westminster Primary Care Trust Voluntary Sector Funding 2009/10 Voluntary Sector Funding Eligibility, Application Form Funding,
Research Data Management Philip Tarrant Global Institute of Sustainability.
1-2 Training of Process FacilitatorsTraining of Coordinators 5-1.
Hall D Online Data Acquisition CEBAF provides us with a tremendous scientific opportunity for understanding one of the fundamental forces of nature. 75.
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
CEOS-CGMS Working Group on Climate John Bates, NOAA SIT-30 Agenda Item #11 Climate Monitoring, Research, and Services 30 th CEOS SIT Meeting CNES Headquarters,
ISO/IEC JTC 1 Special Working Group on Accessibility (SWG-A) JTC 1 SWG-A N Document Type: SWG-A Meeting Document Title: Task Group 2/Break.
European GDE Meeting – Oxford, October 25th /13 European GDE Communication: Future Plans European GDE Communication: Future Plans Perrine Royole-Degieux.
The Department of Energy’s Public Access Solution Giving Voice to Energy and Science R&D Results Jeffrey Salmon Deputy Director for Resource Management.
8-May-08 For Computer Society Internal Use Only Walz1 IEEE-CS Constitution Standards Activity Board request to amend John Walz Prepared for IEEE CS C&B,
HECSE Quality Indicators for Leadership Preparation.
Larry Wolf, chair Marc Probst, co-chair Certification / Adoption Workgroup March 19, 2014.
HL-LHC FP7 DS Status of the proposal Lucio Rossi - CERN 3rd General Meeting for application preparation – CERN 20 October.
Scientific Merit Review René St-Arnaud, Ph.D. Shriners Hospital and McGill University CCAC National Workshop May 13, 2010, Ottawa (Ontario)
1 of 27 How to invest in Information for Development An Introduction Introduction This question is the focus of our examination of the information management.
The HiLumi LHC Design Study is included in the High Luminosity LHC project and is partly funded by the European Commission within the Framework Programme.
The Functional Genomics Experiment Object Model (FuGE) Andrew Jones, School of Computer Science, University of Manchester MGED Society.
The European Strategy Group (ESG) The remit of the ESG is to establish a proposal for an Update of the medium and long- term European Strategy for Particle.
Report on TTonT By: Jan Rozema. Contents Historical overview Status (at PFAC-02) Terms of Reference How to go onward.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey CDI Webinar Series 2013 Data Management at the National Climate Change and Wildlife Science Center.
UNITAR SEMINAR – February 22, 2012 Paul Balogun- Consultant
EN Regional Policy EUROPEAN COMMISSION Information and Publicity SFIT meeting, 12 December 2005 Barbara Piotrowska, DG REGIO
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
Ian Bird GDB CERN, 9 th September Sept 2015
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
DOE Data Management Plan Requirements
The Data Sharing Working Group 24 th meeting of the GEO Executive Committee Geneva, Switzerland March 2012 Report of the Data Sharing Working Group.
12 March, 2002 LCG Applications Area - Introduction slide 1 LCG Applications Session LCG Launch Workshop March 12, 2002 John Harvey, CERN LHCb Computing.
Harvard supports edX’s efforts in the following areas: As a non-profit platform and services provider that is a vehicle for member institutions to offer.
Predrag Buncic CERN Future of the Offline. Data Preparation Group.
Summary of HEP SW workshop Ian Bird MB 15 th April 2014.
LHCbComputing Personnel status Preparation of discussion at next CB.
DHHS COE Meeting Agenda February 16, 2011 Welcome Introductions Contract Compliance Reporting Questions and Answers DHHS Open Windows Update Group Exercise.
Open Public Meeting February 28, pm – 5 pm 1 Ashburton Place, Boston MassHealth Demonstration to Integrate Care for Dual Eligibles.
International Collaboration for Data Preservation and Long Term Analysis in High Energy Physics RECODE - Final Workshop - January.
1 st EGI CMMST VT meeting 19 February 2013 A. Laganà (UNIPG, Italy)
Aalto Research Data Management Policy Ella Bingham 8 April 2016 This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Strategic Planning. Agenda Icebreaker Welcome and Introductions Agenda Review What is Strategic Planning Types of Strategic Planning Planning to Plan.
Making the future happen Some remarks from the perspective of the Reykjavik-Group Chair full report:
Ian Bird, CERN WLCG Project Leader Amsterdam, 24 th January 2012.
Requirements Determination
Object oriented system development life cycle
Agency Requirements: NOAA Administrative Order Management of environmental and geospatial data and information This training module is part of.
Standards and Certification Training
Overview of working draft v. 29 January 2018
What does DPHEP do? DPHEP has become a Collaboration with signatures from the main HEP laboratories and some funding agencies worldwide. It has established.
Coordinate Operations Standard
MODULE B - PROCESS SUBMODULES B1. Organizational Structure
FY18 Water Use Data and Research Program Q & A Session
Strategy
Presentation transcript:

US CMS Data Preservation Discussion, 16 February 2012 CMS Data Preservation Policy On behalf of Data preservation working group Active Members: Paoti Chang, David Colling, Andreas Heiss, Kati Lasilla-Perini (chair), Sudhir Malik, Patty McBride, Jesus Marco, Liz Sexton-Kennedy, Lucas Taylor, Roberto Tenchini, (CMS) Su ̈ nje Dallmeier-Tiessen, Salvatore Mele (CERN INSPIRE/Open Access)

US CMS Data Preservation Discussion, 16 February Why are we here today? The CMS Collaboration Board in February 2011 set the following mandate: “To produce the CMS data preservation and access policy and a implementation plan, in coordination with CERN and other LHC experiments, to be approved by the Collaboration” Subsequently a task force was created for this purpose There have been 10 meetings of this task force to prepare the above policy and plan, made 2 presentations to the CMS Many of you have provided excellent input to it and also had genuine concerns After several iterations and inputs/concerns, we have a latest draft of the policy that is planned to be presented at the CMS CB meeting March 2, 2012 Today we are here to discuss this policy as a USCMS community and seek agreement

US CMS Data Preservation Discussion, 16 February Why is this important to (US)CMS? Requests for open access to publicly funded data becoming frequent from our funding agencies We are not “special” - our very hard earned funding is in competition with other fields which already offer open access to their data Climate, Astrophysics, Molecular biology ….. Funding agencies may want more value for their money and ask for more than we may be ready to give We now have a unique opportunity to define a policy before it is imposed on review our Modus operandi and adapt our practices to still make it in time Enable us in a position to provide a unique response to the present and future requests

US CMS Data Preservation Discussion, 16 February Who benefits the most? The main beneficiary of data preservation effort is the CMS collaboration itself (though not the domain of the policy) Use the opportunity of providing open access as the driving force to preserve data for our own possible future needs, preserve know-how Data preservation activities would be a natural long-term extension to the current CMS way of operation In other sciences, where open access has been provided, additional resources have been attracted

US CMS Data Preservation Discussion, 16 February What is being proposed? We are proposing a policy for an approval This policy is a commitment from the CMS collaboration to preserve the data and access to a part of it as defined in the policy Only after the policy is approved can we have an appropriate structure in place to address the technical issues

US CMS Data Preservation Discussion, 16 February Current CMS practices In general, CMS way of operation is already aligned with the long- term data preservation and re-use CMS is already doing a lot - AOD reprocessing, raw data compatibility for new software versions, public, open access results, software and documentation publically available, outreach... These practices need to be extended from the current short time-scale to ensure the long-term usability of the data There are many details which need to taken care of with appropriate resources and some new habits need to be adopted already now to ensure the preservation of the low-energy and low-occupancy data.

US CMS Data Preservation Discussion, 16 February Level 1 - publications in open access journals, supporting documents and numerical additional data made available at the time of publication Level 2 - simplified data formats for theory interpretations, limited analysis, education, outreach samples released promptly as determined by the CB Level 3 - reconstructed data and simulations, together with the software, analysis workflows and documentation samples released yearly during the long LHC machine shutdown periods, and at best effort during LHC running after an embargo period of 3 years limited to max 50% of the amount of data (in integrated luminosity) which is available to the collaboration a first stress-test exercise with a public release of a part of 2010 data in 2013 after which the experience is reviewed. In absence of unexpected overhead the public data release can be accepted as a standard procedure Level 4 - raw data and the software and documentation needed to access, reconstruct and analyze them CMS will decide whether to extend the public access to Level-4 data after the experience of the first public release of the Level-3 data has been reviewed and evaluated. Salient features of the policy

US CMS Data Preservation Discussion, 16 February CMS Data use outside the CMS collab. By Whom CMS Associates - As defined in the CMS Constitution Experimental physicists, Theorists, Other scientists, Education, Outreach, Citizen scientists How Cite public CMS data Re-use the CMS data (responsibility of the final user) Data released under Creative Commons CC0 waiver

US CMS Data Preservation Discussion, 16 February Links to past meetings and presentations Links to the preparatory meetings from here: Links to presentations to the CMS At the CMS week (Brussels, Sep 2011) (see under “Data preservation - Progress report ”) At the CMS CB ( Open to all CMS )(30 Nov, 2011) The latest draft of the policy is attached to the agenda of this meeting Answers to some pertinent questions are also attached to the agenda of this meeting Useful Links

US CMS Data Preservation Discussion, 16 February Over to the discussion